Why are the British becoming so French?
THE air in the corner of Battersea where I live is suffused with the smell of butter thanks to a new bakery-cum-café. August Bakery produces bread and croissants in such delicious profusion that the place is permanently packed. At weekends (which these days appear to start on Friday), people queue around the block from eight in the morning for their little piece of baked paradise.
Is this one of many signs that Britain is turning into France? The British and French have had a turbulent relationship since at least the Norman Conquest in 1066 (I have on my shelves a fat book entitled A Thousand Years of Annoying the French by Stephen Clarke). Charles de Gaulle vetoed British membership of the then European Economic Community in 1963 and 1967 on the grounds that, as a maritime nation, the British looked to the world rather than to the continent. Many Britons voted for Brexit in 2016 for the same reason. One leading Brexiteer, Peter (now Lord) Lilley, kept a portrait of De Gaulle on his office wall during his various ministerial appointments.
Yet rather than turning toward the world, the British seem to be doing everything in their power to turn into their old rival. England now has 450 wineries producing 3.15 million bottles annually. The sparkling wines are even good. The shelves of supermarkets such as Waitrose and Marks & Spencer testify to how Britons over 40 now prefer wine to beer. Britain can now boast many first-rate restaurants and farmers' markets (though the average British provincial town is still not a patch of its French equivalent). There is even a popular category of pubs — gastro pubs — that specialise in things like duck confit or steak frites rather than fish and chips or shepherd's pie.
The queue outside the August Bakery on a Friday morning is also testimony to Britain's enthusiasm for another aspect of French culture: a work-life balance tilted more toward life. A decade or so ago, the British scoffed at France's taste for taking a month-long vacation in the summer and reading books such as Bonjour Paresse ('Hello Laziness') by Corinne Maier, which describes how she got away with doing nothing at work, and Absolument dé-bor-dée! ('Absolutely Snowed Under'), which describes how French public-sector workers competed to do as little as possible. Now scoffing has turned into imitation. Nine million working-age Britons are 'economically inactive'; 43 per cent of Britons tell pollsters it would be a good thing if less importance was placed on work compared with 40 per cent of French; 93 per cent say that leisure is important to their lives compared with 86 per cent of French.
If popular culture is pushing Britain in a French direction, Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government is also pushing it. Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, is masterminding a Labour Employment Rights Bill that aims to reinforce employment rights, entrench statutory sick pay and family leave and outlaw zero-hour contracts; it will, in other words, make the British labour market as rigid as the French. Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, is in the process of creating a national energy champion, Great British Energy, which is intended to boost the production of clean energy.
The British political system is well advanced in its transition from a parliamentary system into a French-style presidential system. Successive British prime ministers have gathered more and more power into their own hands. The British Foreign Office is now all but irrelevant from a strategic point of view, as the big decisions are taken in Downing Street.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle
Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The electorate is also fracturing along French lines. France has seen the two main postwar parties, the conservatives and the socialists, first lose their monopoly of power and then enter sharp decline. For the first time since the Second World War, it's possible to imagine this happening in Britain, particularly to the Tories. France has also seen a radical right party, previously called the National Front and now the National Rally, move from the periphery to the centre of politics, with the largest number of opposition delegates in the French parliament and deep roots in provincial France. Nigel Farage's Reform Party is currently 10 points ahead of Labour in the polls and is building a professional political machine in left-behind Britain. Moreover, Farage is abandoning his residual Thatcherite politics in favour of Marine le Pen-style state activism. Starmer's embrace of hardline immigration policies this week shows just how frightened he is of Reform.
The provision of fresh-baked croissants to the citizens of Battersea and beyond is a cause for celebration. So is the profusion of first-class restaurants and wineries. But other aspects of Britain's ongoing Frenchification are more worrying. The French may work relatively short hours, but they are also among the most productive workers in the world. The British, by contrast, are likely to combine short hours with low productivity. The French have a long tradition of staffing state companies with the brightest products of their educational system. The British tend to staff them with either local bureaucrats or failed businesspeople.
There is a big difference between Britain's accidental and gerrymandered presidential system and France's carefully crafted one. The British prime minister works in a rickety town house rather than the Élysée Palace and is sorely lacking in support staff. He must also perform residual but time-consuming parliamentary duties such as appearing at prime minister's question time, a ritual that no less a public performer than Tony Blair described as 'nerve-racking, discombobulating, nail-biting, bowel-moving, terror-inspiring, courage-draining'.
Hence a troubling dynamic in Britain's national transformation: Our embrace of both presidential politics and national champions will almost certainly speed up the advance of Nigel Farage and his band of gilets jaunes. But at least we'll have a better supply of croissants and coffee to comfort us as we watch Vichy rise. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
5 hours ago
- Straits Times
Iran threatens ‘more devastating' response to Israel's attacks
Rocket trails are seen in the sky above the Israeli coastal city of Netanya, amid a fresh barrage of Iranian missile attacks on June 21. PHOTO: AFP TEHRAN - Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian warned on June 21 of a 'more devastating' retaliation should Israel's nine-day bombing campaign continue, saying the Islamic republic would not halt its nuclear programme 'under any circumstances'. Israel said on June 21 it had killed three more Iranian commanders in its unprecedented offensive, and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar claimed Tehran's alleged progress towards a nuclear weapon had been set back by two years. 'We will do everything that we can do there in order to remove this threat,' Mr Saar told the German newspaper Bild, adding that Israel would keep up its onslaught. Israel and Iran have traded wave after wave of devastating strikes since Israel launched its aerial campaign on June 13, saying Tehran was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon. On June 21, Israel said it had attacked Iran's Isfahan nuclear site for a second time, with the UN nuclear watchdog reporting that a centrifuge manufacturing workshop had been hit. Later on June 21, Iran's Mehr news agency said Israel had launched strikes on the southern city of Shiraz, which hosts military bases. And early on June 22, Iran's Revolutionary Guard announced that a 'vast' wave of 'suicide drones' had been launched against 'strategic targets' across Israel. Iran denies seeking an atomic bomb, and on June 21 President Pezeshkian said its right to pursue a civilian nuclear programme 'cannot be taken away... by threats or war'. 'Not prepared to negotiate' In a phone call with French President Emmanuel Macron, Mr Pezeshkian said Iran was 'ready to discuss and cooperate to build confidence in the field of peaceful nuclear activities'. 'However, we do not agree to reduce nuclear activities to zero under any circumstances,' he added, according to Iran's official IRNA news agency. Referring to the Israeli attacks, he said: 'Our response to the continued aggression of the Zionist regime will be more devastating.' Iran's armed forces threatened to strike shipments of military aid to Israel 'from any country'. Israel's main arms supplier is the United States, whose President Donald Trump warned on June 20 that Tehran had a 'maximum' of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes as Washington weighed whether to join Israel's campaign. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was in Istanbul on June 21 for a meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation to discuss the conflict. Top diplomats from Britain, France and Germany met Mr Araghchi in Geneva on June 20 and urged him to resume nuclear talks with the United States that had been derailed by the war. But Mr Araghchi said on June 21: 'Iran is ready to consider diplomacy once again, and once aggression is stopped and the aggressor is held accountable for the crimes committed.' 'We're not prepared to negotiate with them (the Americans) anymore, as long as the aggression continues'. People waiting in an underground parking lot amid an attack by Iran, in Tel Aviv, Israel, on June 21. PHOTO: REUTERS Hundreds killed Mr Trump, dismissive of European diplomatic efforts, said he was unlikely to ask Israel to stop its attacks to get Iran back to the table. 'If somebody's winning, it's a little bit harder to do,' he said, of Israel's campaign. Any US involvement would likely feature powerful bunker-busting bombs that no other country possesses to destroy an underground uranium enrichment facility in Fordow. US B-2 stealth bombers capable of carrying bunker busters were flying across the Pacific Ocean, according to tracking data and media reports, fuelling speculation over their intended mission. Iran's Houthi allies in Yemen on June 21 threatened to resume their attacks on US vessels in the Red Sea if Washington joined the war, despite a recent ceasefire agreement. The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency said on June 20 that, based on its sources and media reports, at least 657 people had been killed in Iran, including 263 civilians. Iran's health ministry on June 21 gave a toll of more than 400 people killed and 3,056 in the Israeli strikes. Iran's retaliatory strikes have killed at least 25 people in Israel, according to official figures. The Israeli military said it had launched a fresh wave of strikes on June 21 in the area of southern Iran's Bandar Abbas, targeting drone storage sites and a weapons facility. Iran's Tasnim news agency said air defences were activated in the area. Overnight, Iran said it had targeted central Israel with drones and missiles. Israeli rescuers said there were no casualties after an Iranian drone struck a residential building. On the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, Israel said June 21 that an Iranian terror plot targeting Israeli citizens had been 'thwarted'. 'Tired' Israel's National Public Diplomacy Directorate said more than 450 missiles had been fired at the country so far, along with about 400 drones. In Tel Aviv, where residents have faced regular Iranian strikes for nine days, some expressed growing fatigue under the constant threat from Iran. The streets of Tehran, meanwhile, were still largely quiet on June 21, though a few cafes and restaurants were open. In the afternoon, supporters of the government gathered briefly in front of the headquarters of state television to wave Iranian, Palestinian and Hezbollah flags to a soundtrack of electronic music whose lyrics called for the 'death of Israel'. Western powers have repeatedly expressed concerns about the expansion of Iran's nuclear programme, questioning in particular the country's accelerated uranium enrichment. International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi has said Iran is the only country without nuclear weapons to enrich uranium to 60 per cent. However, his agency had 'no indication' of the existence of a 'systematic programme' in Iran to produce a bomb. Mr Grossi told CNN it would be 'pure speculation' to guess at how long it would take Iran to develop one. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
10 hours ago
- Straits Times
Tens of thousands join pro-Palestinian marches in London and Berlin
Tens of thousands join pro-Palestinian marches in London and Berlin LONDON - Tens of thousands of pro-Palestinian protesters marched in London and Berlin on June 21, calling for an end to the war in Gaza, amid concerns that the Iran-Israel conflict could spark wider regional devastation. Protesters in the British capital waved Palestinian flags, donned keffiyeh scarves and carried signs including 'Stop arming Israel' and 'No war on Iran' as they marched in the sweltering heat. 'It's important to remember that people are suffering in Gaza. I fear all the focus will be on Iran now,' said 34-year-old Harry Baker, attending his third pro-Palestinian protest. 'I don't have great love for the Iranian regime, but we are now in a dangerous situation,' he added. There have been monthly protests in the British capital since the start of the 20-month-long war between Israel and Hamas, which has ravaged Gaza. The June 21 march comes amid heightened global tensions as the United States mulls joining Israel's strikes against Iran. Cries of 'Palestine will be free' rang out as protesters carried signs saying 'Hands off Gaza' or 'Stop starving Gaza'. Gaza is suffering from famine-like conditions according to UN agencies in the region following an Israeli aid blockade. Gaza's civil defence agency has reported that hundreds have been killed by Israeli forces while trying to reach the US- and Israeli-backed aid distribution sites. 'People need to keep their eyes on Gaza. That's where the genocide is happening,' said 60-year-old protester Nicky Marcus. 'I feel frustrated, angry because of what's happening in Gaza,' said 31-year-old data analyst Jose Diaz. 'It's in everyone's eyes. It's still on after so many months,' Diaz added. 'Scared' The overall death toll in Gaza since the war broke out has reached at least 55,637 people, according to the health ministry. Israel has denied it is carrying out a genocide and says it aims to wipe out Hamas after 1,219 people were killed in Israel by the Islamist group's Oct 7, 2023, attack. Protesters holding Palestinian flags take part in a 'United 4 Gaza!' rally in Berlin on June 21. PHOTO: AFP A 31-year-old Iranian student who did not want to share her name, told AFP she had family in Iran and was 'scared'. 'I'm worried about my country. I know the regime is not good but it's still my country. I'm scared,' she said. Tehran said over 400 people have been killed in Iran since Israel launched strikes last week claiming its arch-foe was close to acquiring a nuclear weapon, which Iran denies. Some 25 people have been killed in Israel, according to official figures. In Berlin, more than 10,000 people gathered in the centre of the city in support of Gaza, according to police figures. 'You can't sit on the sofa and be silent. Now is the time when we all need to speak up,' said protestor Gundula, who did not want to give her second name. 'Germany finances, Israel bombs' was among the chants from the crowd, which gathered mid-afternoon close to the German parliament. For Mr Marwan Radwan, the point of the protest was to bring attention to the 'genocide currently taking place' and the 'dirty work' being done by the German government. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
12 hours ago
- Straits Times
European proposals in Geneva unrealistic: Senior Iranian official
FILE PHOTO: The InterContinental hotel is pictured on a day of nuclear talks in Geneva, Switzerland, June 20, 2025. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse/File Photo ISTANBUL - A senior Iranian official said on Saturday that proposals put forward by European powers at talks in Geneva about his country's nuclear programme were "unrealistic", suggesting that if they stuck to them it would be difficult to reach an accord. There were few signs of progress on Friday after the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany, known as the E3, plus the EU met their Iranian counterpart in a bid to prevent the conflict between Israel and Iran from escalating. "The discussions and proposals made by the Europeans in Geneva were unrealistic. Insisting on these positions will not bring Iran and Europe closer to an agreement," the senior official told Reuters, while speaking on condition of anonymity. "In any case, Iran will review the European proposals in Tehran and present its responses in the next meeting,' the official said. Both sides signalled on Friday their readiness to keep talking, although no new date was set. European diplomats said Friday's talks had been aimed at testing Tehran's willingness to negotiate a new nuclear deal despite there being no obvious prospect of Israel halting its attacks soon. While neither side disclosed details of what was put forward, two European diplomats said the E3 did not believe that Israel would accept a ceasefire in the near term and that it would be difficult for Iran and the U.S. to resume negotiations. They said the idea was to begin a parallel negotiating track, initially without the U.S., on a new deal that would involve tougher inspections, including potentially of Iran's ballistic missile programme, while allowing Tehran some notional uranium enrichment capacity. French President Emmanuel Macron on Saturday spoke with his Iranian counterpart and said the two sides had agreed to accelerate negotiations, although he insisted it was up to Iran "to provide every assurance that its intentions are peaceful." Despite some European ministers suggesting on Friday that Iran was more ready to talk about issues beyond the nuclear programme, the senior official dismissed the possibility of negotiating its defensive capabilities, including its missile programme, and repeated that the idea of zero enrichment of uranium was a dead end. "Iran welcomes diplomacy but not under the shadow of war," the official said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.