What if a budget isn't the answer?

For many, budgeting has never felt like more of a challenge, which might explain why it seems to be trendier than ever — with all the fads and judgment that attention implies. TikTok influencers offer financial trendbait like 'loud budgeting' and the '100 envelope challenge,' which suggest that people can solve their financial problems by following strict rules that can be summed up in a single viral hashtag.
Dana Miranda is a personal finance journalist and educator based in central Wisconsin who runs the Healthy Rich newsletter and is the author of You Don't Need a Budget. Jen Smith and Jill Sirianni are based in St. Petersburg, Florida, where they co-host the Frugal Friends Podcast and co-authored Buy What You Love Without Going Broke . These three financial educators believe that budgeting culture has gone to the kinds of extremes that make it difficult to think holistically about financial values — and that the best way to manage money might involve letting go of some of the so-called rules.
The following conversation has been lightly condensed and edited.
Jen Smith: I think that we've learned a lot of our budgeting, and our financial habits and consumption, from the way we consume food. We've taken something we're already familiar with, extreme diets, and transitioned it to money. For women, it's been this constant source of shame and struggle — and so we really want to get away from the language that causes this shame and struggle and create a new way to think about financial concepts that are a little more freeing and empowering.
Dana Miranda: I specifically thought it was important to name budget culture and to show the direct parallel to diet culture. The ways we talk about money are focused on that same restrictive mindset. It's also a very individualistic mindset, when both our approach to food and our approach to money have so many systemic causes and implications that we often don't talk about when we're giving financial advice.
Once we understand the ways we teach and talk about money in our culture, we can understand that even if we're not specifically engaging in restrictive budgeting, that kind of culture underlies all of the ways we think about money.
Jill Sirianni: I think a lot of us are not taught how to manage our resources well. We're not taught how to spend, we're not taught how to save, much less how to invest. It's not usually overtly taught by our parents or caregivers, and it's not taught in school — so we graduate and take on student loan debt, not really understanding what that means for us in the long term.
We also learn that spending is a personality trait. You're either a spender or a saver. We should be learning that we all spend, and we all should be saving, and there shouldn't be this guilt or shame attached to any of it. We can align our spending with the things that actually matter; our values, the things that are important and life-giving to us. This gives us a sense of confidence and freedom about the ways we spend our money — or ways we don't spend our money, if we choose to consume less.
Jen: Spending was a hobby when I was growing up. It's what we did on the weekend! We went to the mall. We went to Walmart. That was how I learned what to do with money. I didn't learn how to spend it on investments. I didn't learn how to spend it on vacations after saving up for them. I wasn't taught any of that.
Now shopping isn't just a hobby. It's what you do when you're stressed! It's what you do when you're bored! It's the go-to thing to do with any free given second of time.
Dana: That's interesting, because I was raised just the opposite. I grew up in a culture that was anti-debt, anti-spending, pro-saving. Hold on to money as much as you can and work hard to earn it. That's what I see in people as adults, too — sometimes they're afraid to spend money, because they've been told their whole life that spending money leads to chaos.
We're never taught to question what's going on outside of us, and we're never taught to look inside of ourselves and ask ourselves what we want to do with our money.
Jill: For our book, we really wanted to teach the skill of spending. It's not a personality trait, it's not a moral failing or a moral superiority, it's a skill. That means it's something you can learn and something you can get better at doing.
Stopping all spending and doing something like a no-buy year, we don't think that's the answer. A short no-spend challenge can show us something about our spending habits and speed up the timeline of learning — but if you want to learn how to function in the world that we live in, you're going to spend money. Let's hone that skill and do it well!
Dana: Your book is such a complement to mine that I'm starting to recommend them together. My book focuses on the cultural relationship with money and the personal relationship with money. What I really want people to take away from my book is to start to question the traditional advice that they're hearing, because I think that's the big skill we're not learning. We're looking for a specific set of rules or a specific method, and we end up bouncing from method to method to try to find the right one instead of asking questions about why this person is describing this particular method. Why is this person giving this particular advice? What about their life made that method work for them, and how might that be different from what's in my life — or how might it be the same? That's how people can start piecing together something that works for them, and how they can start questioning what's around them instead of asking someone else to tell them what to do next.
I use my book to shift people into that mindset, but I like to recommend your book because it gives people the practical tips that can help them take the next steps.
Jill: Our approach is similar to Dana's approach: understanding ourselves first. We need to understand some of the reasoning behind what we're doing so that we can have self-understanding, and a lot of that involves giving people tools that they can take with them throughout any season of life.
When that happens, when we understand what our current spending habits are and learn the ways in which we want to shift them, how we can get more of what really matters, our values, our higher needs; then we can identify what we want to do with our resources. That's all of our resources: our time, our physical space, our relationships, our mental and emotional energies, as well as our money.
So with something like investing — and of course that's a whole large topic, there are plenty of books just on that topic — we believe that it requires these first steps in order to build a really solid foundation so that people can determine what the best investment strategy might be for them going forward.
For many people who are middle or average earners, the best strategy is probably going to be some kind of automation utilizing your Roth IRA and your 401(k), but a lot of times people in this space are still looking at debt payoff and fully funding an emergency fund. These are the types of things they can set on autopilot so they can begin saving for retirement, but first we need to understand the skill of spending. What do I even value? How can I get more of what I want without throwing money at my problems?
Jen: There are already plenty of great investment books out there. Rich AF by Vivian Tu, Grow Your Money by Bola Sokunbi, but it is very hard to take action on them if you are spending every dollar you make. The lowest barrier to entry to get started with investing is to spend less. Our book can help people increase their margin so they can start investing faster. They don't have to wait to earn more.
Dana: In You Don't Need a Budget , I try to speak to people who might be experiencing financial insecurity or some instability, but the issue with that is that most of the time if someone is experiencing something like food insecurity, it is usually the result of a systemic cultural problem and not something that we can offer personal advice to help them change. It's something that needs to be addressed at a systemic level.
What I try to do for readers in that situation is to reiterate that message over and over, because often in the personal finance space they're getting messages written for people who are middle or average income. They're getting tweaks on how to spend their money, which is just not enough — so the message I want to send is that this information is not for you . People are not speaking to your situation, and you should not feel ashamed of the things that you have to do to survive in this system that is not allowing you that kind of security.
It's hard as a financial educator and personal finance writer to speak to that situation, because there's no answer for it. It's a systemic thing and a political thing, and it's important to say that.
Jen: We also believe that debt is neutral. Some people consider a mortgage 'good debt,' and for other people their mortgage can be 50 percent of their income — which doesn't make mortgages bad, but in this case it might not be the best decision for you.
Credit card debt and high interest debt can be a bad decision, but not always. Sometimes you need those tools to keep you afloat. I often like to say that there's a difference between being hungry and not knowing where your next meal is coming from. A person who is using credit cards to deal with food insecurity is different from a person who is maximizing every line of credit available to them and not dealing with their long-term financial goals.
That said, if you are in credit card debt, get rid of that debt first. That's something I'm willing to take a stand on. For everything else, you have to honor your season and your capacity for what you can do financially.
Dana: I really think that's the approach we need to take to debt. It's about your season. I take a radical approach in terms of allowing the use of debt, but I also want people to understand how debt products work.
I don't think that anybody has a moral obligation to pay off debt as quickly as possible, the way that it is sometimes represented. I think that debt products are a resource to help you live a life that's comfortable and have the experiences that you want and deserve. As long as you understand how debt works and how to deal with any debt you accrue, you can go ahead and use debt products in your life.
It's important to avoid actions such as maxing out your credit card or damaging your credit score — the kind of things that might reduce your access to debt as a resource — but you should also avoid thinking of debt in terms of rules, such as 'it's a rule that we should avoid debt' or 'it's a rule that we should pay off debt as quickly as possible.'
Jill: One of the reframes we've used on debt is the idea of 'beneficial' versus 'not beneficial.' Rather than talking about moral and immoral or good and bad, try to individualize these decisions. Is this good for me and my family, or is this not beneficial for me and my family? That's going to look different from person to person.
Dana: When I say that you don't need a budget, the most important thing I'm looking at is eliminating that reliance on restriction and the kinds of boundaries that require you to live a smaller life. You need to be aware of what's happening with your money, but it's not just an awareness of where your money's going because that kind of exercise can lead to self-judgment. You should also be aware of what money is coming in and what resources you have access to. What goals are you trying to achieve, and how can you use money as a part of all of that?
This doesn't mean making a spending plan, and it doesn't mean restricting your spending according to someone else's rules — but it does mean being aware of money because it's one of the things you're dealing with in life. It's one piece of your life that you're being mindful about, the same way that you are about anything else.
Jill: It's like asking whether you can have beneficial relationships and interactions in the future without looking at what your past relationships and interactions have been. You just can't. That's not to say that we're going to look back with shame, but we won't be able to make money decisions and choices if we don't know what we've already been doing with our money.
Jen: The anticipation of finding that out is typically a lot more overwhelming than what you actually find out. It's also a good idea to reframe some of the negative feelings that might come up. Instead of feeling guilty, for example, you can acknowledge that you regret some of your past decisions. That's healthy. Regret helps you understand that you can change, and it helps you decide what to do next.
Jill: Writing this book has helped me manage some of my own financial regrets and reframe them as learning opportunities.
Jen: For me, writing the book has given me accountability to practice what I preach. When I spend, it's on something that I truly value — and if it's to meet a need, I want to make sure what I buy is meeting that need 100 percent , instead of trying to put money towards something that money can't buy.
Dana: What I've learned from writing about personal finance is this empowerment of understanding how things work. How our financial systems work and how they interact with our culture and our political systems.
So much of financial education is about telling people the right and wrong things to do, and that isn't accurate for everyone. Once you understand how things work, you can find out what's actually right for you — and you can understand why certain things don't work for some people. Then you can take what works for you and do what's going to work best in your life, instead of doing whatever someone else told you is the right thing.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

4 hours ago

• Yahoo

‘I just want finality': GOP greets newest TikTok extension with resignation

President Donald Trump's latest move to keep TikTok alive is yet again frustrating congressional Republicans, many of whom object to China's continued involvement in the popular app but just want to be done with the whole drama. 'Not my favorite thing,' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), along-time proponent of the ban, deadpanned, when asked about the president's plan to issue another extension. He spoke a day before the White House confirmed Trump signed a 90-day suspension of enforcement of the law requiring TikTok to divest from ByteDance, its China-based parent company, throwing another lifeline to the short-form video app. By Friday, some House lawmakers registered a note of resigned irritation. The extension — Trump's third since the law went into effect on Jan. 19 — is a unilateral decision not envisioned in the bipartisan law passed by Congress and upheld last year by the Supreme Court. Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.), a member of the House Intelligence and China committees, told POLITICO. 'The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away. I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways." But Trump's extension of the TikTok law largely boxed out Republicans in both chambers who have shown little inclination — beyond stern words — to prevent him from making these postponements almost routine. Many GOP lawmakers saw themselves as granting the president space to cut a promised deal while the White House deals with urgent priorities, like trade negotiations and the Israel-Iran conflict. 'In light of everything going on, I think he did the right thing,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a China hawk who voted for the ban, told POLITICO of Trump. 'I have concerns about all kinds of things — that [the extension] is on the list — but it's not at the top of the list.' Though Trump has promised his TikTok negotiations areclosely tied to trade talks with China, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified last week to a Senate panel that TikTok's sale wasnot currently a part of the negotiations with China, raising a further potential obstacle to Trump inking a deal in the near future. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close ally of the president and longtime national-security hawk said earlier in the week: 'The sooner we get that issue solved, the better,' without offering any ideas for further enforcement. 'I just want finality,' Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told POLITICO. 'I want some certainty and just know that the Congress isn't being played when we make a decision [that the app] be sold.' Another member of the House China Committee, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), told POLITICO, 'No more extensions. It's time to follow through.' Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.), also a member of the China panel, noted in a post on X Thursday the law only allows one extension of the compliance deadline, adding, 'I was proud to support the ban of TikTok and believe the law should be implemented as written.' With their comments, the lawmakers echoed House China Chair John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who in early June called for the U.S. to 'let [TikTok] go dark' to bring China to the table to negotiate. He reiterated that stance on Friday. 'Delays only embolden the Chinese Communist Party,' Moolenaar said in a statement to POLITICO. 'I urge the administration to enforce the law as written and protect the American people from this growing national security threat." Still, observers say Republicans are not exercising their leverage to demand the White House enforce the law they helped write, for example by withholding funding or congressional oversight hearings. "I keep reading that Republicans are 'frustrated' and 'impatient' about their TikTok law being ignored, but they should stop complaining to reporters and take it up with Trump,' said Adam Kovacevich, founder and CEO of the pro-tech Chamber of Progress. Among the Republicans being undercut by the president is his own secretary of state. Marco Rubio — who as senator was one of the loudest critics of TikTok's ties to China, and a huge backer of the app's ban — has been conspicuously silent as Trump has repeatedly granted more time to strike a deal for its sale. 'You have to decide what's more important, our national security and the threat that it poses to our national security,' Rubio told POLITICO in March 2023, as Congress was considering a ban. 'You have to weigh that against what you might think the electoral consequences of it are. For me, it's an easy balancing act. I mean, there is no balance. I'm always going to be for our national security.' A spokesperson for Rubio at the State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Democrats — even those who support keeping TikTok online — say Trump's approach is the wrong one. 'These endless extensions are not only illegal, but they also put TikTok's fate in the hands of risk-averse corporate shareholders,' Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) told POLITICO in a statement. 'This is deeply unfair to TikTok's creators and users. I'm prepared to work towards a solution, but Trump isn't coming to the table.'

Atlantic

5 hours ago

• Atlantic

When SkinnyTok Came for Me

The bride had to do just one last thing before she walked down the aisle. 'I currently am in the bathroom in my wedding dress I asked everyone for just a few mins alone so that I could message you this.' Was she writing to an estranged friend? An old lover—the one that got away? At the beginning of her 'journey,' the bride weighed 134 pounds. 'My goal was to just lose 5lbs,' she wrote, but she had somehow dropped down to 110. 'I'm crying writing this because I have never felt so healthy and confident. THANK YOU!!!' The message was accompanied by two photos—a before and an after. The first shows a thin woman who looks to be a size 2 or 4. In the second, the woman's bones are visible beneath her skin, and her leggings sag. She owed all of this to Liv Schmidt, a 23-year-old influencer known for her harsh, no-bullshit approach to staying thin. 'You feel like a best friend and sister to me,' the bride wrote to Schmidt, who shared the message on Instagram. Schmidt is the queen of SkinnyTok—a corner of the internet where thin, mostly white women try to make America skinny again. Her 'what I eat in a day to stay skinny' videos thrust her into virality about a year ago. There she is with her mint tea—which she always drinks before eating anything, to check if she's really hungry or just bored—or a mile-high ice-cream sundae that she'll take three bites of before tossing. She's very clear: She stays skinny by not eating much. Many find this refreshingly honest. Others think she's promoting eating disorders. Influencers have condemned her; magazines have published scathing critiques. Last month, Meta removed her ability to sell subscriptions ($20 a month for access to private content and a group chat called the 'Skinni Société') on Instagram, and this month, TikTok banned the SkinnyTok hashtag worldwide, saying it was 'linked to unhealthy weight loss content.' And in response, the right has championed Schmidt. She has been canceled, and she may be more powerful than ever. I didn't mean to join the legions of young women on SkinnyTok. It happened fast. I liked an Instagram reel about an 'Easy High Protein, Low Calorie Breakfast.' What I got next, I didn't ask for. Within hours, my Instagram 'explore' page was flooded with videos of conventionally pretty, thin women preaching one message: Stop eating. Phrases such as 'You're not a dog, don't treat yourself with food' and the Kate Moss classic, 'Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels,' began to flood my feed—and my subconscious. At lunch with a friend one Saturday, I didn't finish my salad. 'Do you know Liv Schmidt?' I asked. 'The three-bite rule? Of course I do. She's kind of a genius.' I realized I wasn't down this rabbit hole alone. Conor Friedersdorf: The many ripple effects of the weight-loss industry 'I know the advice I'm getting from these women is not healthy,' another friend said, but 'everything I want is on the other side of being skinny, and these women are going to help me get there.' 'I like SkinnyTok. It helps me to not eat 'the extra thing' I don't need. Don't like it? Don't follow it.' 'It's internalized misogynistic brainwash!' 'I love that skinny bitch.' Where had Schmidt come from, and what had happened to the 'body positivity' movement that had been so loudly touted through the past decade? You can form a community around anything online. When I was a kid in the 2000s, teenage girls with eating disorders were gathering on 'thinspiration' websites, where they could exchange tips. Tabloids sold copies off body shaming—one day Britney Spears was too fat; the next, Lindsay Lohan was too skinny—and my friends and I were going around with 100-calorie Chips Ahoy! packs in our lunchboxes. By the time I was a teenager, the body-positivity movement had arrived, promising to change the culture. Plus-size models started appearing in ad campaigns. The problem wasn't women's bodies, activists argued, but women feeling bad about their bodies. Yet when people tried to force society to embrace new body norms, society lashed out, bringing to the surface a lot of underlying hatred. 'Body positivity didn't resonate with a lot of people, because it felt like lying,' Maalvika Bhat, a 25-year-old TikTok influencer who is getting a doctorate in computer science and communication at Northwestern University, told me. Many felt that the movement was in denial about both the practical health risks of being overweight and America's willingness to put its engrained fat phobia aside. Ozempic has accelerated that backlash against body positivity. Many of the plus-size leaders of the body-positivity movement shut up and shrunk down. Their followers noticed that they were using a weight-loss drug. Apparently you didn't have to love yourself as you were—and you didn't have to suffer to change, either. You just had to have a prescription and enough money to pay for it. But what about those pesky last 10 pounds, the difference between being a size 6 and a size 2? Although some healthy-weight women with no medical reason to take GLP-1 drugs have nonetheless found work-arounds to get their hands on the medication, most aren't going to those lengths. How would they keep up now that skinny was back? For some, the answer was SkinnyTok. You don't need a prescription to be ultrathin. You just need a bad relationship with food, fueled by a skinny stranger yelling mean-girl mantras at you. In the end, the body-positivity movement's lasting effect may have been to prove the validity of the very message it was trying to combat—that thinner people are treated better. At least, many women feel, SkinnyTok is telling them the truth. As one SkinnyTok influencer put it, 'Don't sugarcoat that or you'll eat that too.' I started listening more closely to the SkinnyTok videos. They weren't just about self-deprivation. They were about being classy. They were about being a lady—the right kind of woman, one that men drool over. They were, most importantly, about being small. In one of Schmidt's videos, she's approached by a man in a black car during a photo shoot. The caption reads: 'This is the treatment Skinni gets you. Was just taking pics … Then a Rolls-Royce rolled up begging for my number like I'm on the menu mid photo. He saw clavicle he swerved. He saw cheekbones lost composure.' From the July 2025 Issue: Inside the exclusive, obsessive, surprisingly litigious world of luxury fitness SkinnyTok influencers basically never talk in their videos about politics. They aren't preaching about Donald Trump—let alone about issues such as abortion or immigration. And yet everything they talk about—the emphasis on girls and how girls need to behave and how small they need to be—is, of course, political. A few days after my Instagram feed surrendered to the SkinnyTok takeover, the tradwife content began to sneak in. Beautiful women baking bread in linen dresses spoke to me about embracing my divine femininity. I should consider 'softer living' and 'embracing my natural role.' All of a sudden, I wondered whether I, a single woman in her late 20s living in Manhattan, should trade it all in to become a mother of 10 on a farm in Montana. Watch a few more of these videos, and soon you'll be directed to the anti-vax moms, or the Turning Point USA sweetheart Alex Clark's wellness podcast, Cultural Apothecary, or the full-on conspiratorial alt-right universe. This is just how the internet works. Eviane Leidig, the author of The Women of the Far Right: Social Media Influencers and Online Radicalization, sees a connection between SkinnyTok and tradwives in their 'very strong visual representation of femininity.' Whether they mean to be or not, they have become part of the same pipeline. Algorithms grab your attention with lighter, relatable content while exposing you to more extremist viewpoints. The alt-right, she said, is great at making aspirational and seemingly apolitical content that viewers relate to. 'This is a deliberate strategy that the conservative space has been employing over the last several years to capitalize on cultural issues as a gateway to radicalize audiences into more extreme viewpoints.' Two months ago, Evie Magazine, a right-wing publication that promotes traditional femininity, ran a profile of Schmidt: 'Banned for Being Honest? Meet Liv Schmidt, the Girl Who Made 'Skinny' Go Viral.' The magazine had one of the biggest tradwife influencers, Hannah Neeleman of Ballerina Farm, on its cover back in November. The article about Schmidt focused on her being canceled and banned on a number of platforms for promoting thinness. 'I don't owe the internet a version of me that's palatable,' Schmidt told the magazine. 'If a girl bigger than me posted what I eat in a day, no one would care. But when I do, it becomes controversial. Why? Because I'm blonde, thin, young, and unapologetic.' Last year, Evie profiled Amanda Dobler, another SkinnyTok figurehead, whom it described as 'TikTok's skinny queen'—'both brutally honest and surprisingly sweet.' The more the left has attacked Schmidt, the more the right has celebrated her. Bhat, who describes herself as progressive, said, 'I think the left is deeply, deeply exclusive.' On the right, 'you're allowed to make dozens of mistakes and not be shunned. They say, 'If the left doesn't welcome you, we will.' And they always do.' You can't deduce a political manifesto from someone's Instagram followers, but it seems worth noting that Schmidt follows conservative figureheads including RFK Jr., Candace Owens, and Brett Cooper. When she posted about losing the paid-subscription feature on her Instagram, through which she had been making nearly $130,000 a month, according to AirMail, she tagged Joe Rogan. 'She's clearly trying to get her foot in the door with the alternatives,' Ali Ambrose, an influencer who critiques SkinnyTok, told me. (Ambrose struggled with an eating disorder for years, and says Schmidt's content pushed her back into unhealthy habits.) Schmidt's appeal does cross party lines, though. When I polled a politically diverse group of my own friends, my most conservative friends loved SkinnyTok. A number of my progressive friends did too; they just felt like they shouldn't say so out loud. Schmidt has written that the Skinni Société is not 'a starvation or extreme diet community.' She didn't respond to multiple requests for an interview, but I spoke with Amanda Dobler, another SkinnyTok influencer. She remains on TikTok, though she has twice been temporarily barred from its Creator Rewards Program, through which she made some money for her videos, for not abiding by 'community guidelines.' Dobler is almost 10 years older than Schmidt, so she attracts a slightly different demographic. I asked her if she considered herself a political person, or her content politically charged. She responded with a decisive no. 'I'm up at 4 a.m. working my ass off, so I would say I'm the opposite of a tradwife,' she told me. 'If people relate it to right wing, to left wing,' she said, 'there's only so much of the narrative that I can control.' Sophie Gilbert: What porn taught a generation of women Dobler is known for her directness. If anything, she's even harsher online than Schmidt is. Right before our call, I scrolled through her TikTok profile: 'You are killing yourself with the shit you eat. It's disgusting. And you should feel shameful.' I briefly wondered if she'd be able to detect my own insecurities through the phone. But the Dobler I spoke with was approachable and friendly. I instantly liked her. I even opened up to her about the things I wish I could change about my body. 'There's nothing wrong with wanting to look a little better,' she said. Unlike a number of SkinnyTok influencers who only just entered the field, Dobler has been a fat-loss and mindset coach for six years. She talks about the importance of getting your nutrients instead of exclusively practicing restraint. She also pushes for a consistent workout routine, while others focus exclusively on their step count to burn calories and avoid bulking at the gym (SkinnyTok is a spectrum). I brought up the criticism that SkinnyTok content encourages young people to adopt disordered-eating habits. Dobler said that she doesn't coach children, and that the majority of her clients are in their 30s through 50s. 'I get it. It's hard if you're a parent seeing stuff online,' she told me. 'But at the same time, there's porn online; there's a bunch of weird crap. I think that there is a lot of other censorship that should be going on.' When I asked why she was so harsh in her videos, she told me, 'That's the type of talk that I need. I wouldn't say that I'm mean. I'm just blunt.' She added, 'I've been in all of the situations that I'm talking through. So it's not like I'm just up here scolding people.' This echoed something Bhat had said to me: SkinnyTok's ruthless tone rings true to many women because they're already being so ruthless toward themselves. I'd be kidding myself if I said a woman's body size doesn't affect her prospects for dating, and even jobs. I would be lying if I said I did not desperately want to be slightly thinner—that I hadn't wanted that from the moment I first watched my mother critique her own body in her bedroom mirror. I hesitate to admit that I've lost four pounds since I saw my first SkinnyTok video. I have not walked 40,000 steps a day, nor have I stopped eating after three bites. I've just stopped eating when I'm full, which, as silly as it sounds, I did learn from SkinnyTok. Still, I think it's time to unsubscribe. The body of my dreams isn't worth risking my health for. I have two nieces, ages 3 and 6. I hate the idea that somebody might one day tell them to shrink themselves. To them, a swimsuit is nothing but a promise that they'll spend the afternoon running through the sprinkler. They're perfect, and they dream of being bigger, faster, stronger—not smaller.

Business Insider

7 hours ago

• Business Insider

How I quit my daily Starbucks habit that cost me $5,000 a year

For years, the single most important thing I could never do without in the mornings was a Starbucks macchiato espresso and a blueberry muffin. Every morning at 7:30 a.m., including weekends, I'd rush out the door with a half-done tie and a productivity podcast playing through my earbuds. I'd speed walk to make it to Starbucks before the line was too long. I became popular in the joint, and sometimes the servers would start my coffee order as soon as I walked through the door. No matter the chaos in my life, I always looked forward to Starbucks. My coffee delight didn't come cheap At $5 per cup and $3.95 for the muffin, I was spending about $63 the entire week on these Starbucks delicacies, give or take one rare Sunday when I'd sleep in. Every month, I was down $241 on coffee and muffins, and that was on the lower end. Throw in an iced latte or two every other evening, the occasional banana bread upsell, other friendly yet costly coffee meet-ups with friends, and we were talking close to $5,000 annually. The worst part is that I owned several functional coffee makers, including a French Press and a drip. They were gathering dust and judgment on my kitchen counter. Eventually, a combination of guilt and self-reflection changed my perspective, and I thought I would have been better off if I had saved the money. I've always had an annual personal saving goal of $6,000 to $7,000 that I hardly ever met, and I realized that if I could cut down my Starbucks expenses, I would come very close to attaining the goal. Plus, after much reflection, I found that it wasn't even Starbucks that had me hooked. It was the 10-minute walk that made me feel awake, excited, indulgent, and maybe a little bit seen. I figured if I could recreate these feelings, maybe I would bring my coffee makers out of retirement and keep my money in my wallet. As 2024 rolled in, I resolved to make my coffee at home to cut costs, and I've stuck to my guns. Here's how I did it. Step 1: I did the math and felt the pain I created a spreadsheet to tally all of Starbucks' receipts over a few months. I had figures like $240 in August, $300 in September, and so forth. In one brutal month, I spent $410. When I saw the totals adding up, my stomach churned. It was enough to put into a Roth IRA or spend on a vacation ticket to destinations I wanted to visit. There was something sobering about how much I was paying for a 15-minute delight. So I started thinking about what else the money would do for me. Step 2: I turned my kitchen corner into a coffee shrine I wanted a dedicated coffee shrine that would mimic the Starbucks ambiance. I cleaned my coffee makers, purchased nice mugs, takeout cups, and bought bougie beans. I went a step further to look up my favorite Starbucks coffee recipes on TikTok to ensure I had everything I needed. I didn't just want to make coffee, I wanted to stage it, and the kitchen corner felt like an upgrade. Step 3: I made it emotional I still battled with the Starbucks urges time and again. However, when I faced the urges, I jotted on my phone exactly what I was craving: was it a reward, comfort, or just the need to escape from morning meetings? I always wrote what mattered: "This $5 coffee will buy me 15 minutes of delight, and that will be $5 less toward my savings goal." It automatically made me rethink the transaction. Step 4: I strived for better mornings, not just cheaper ones I didn't want to give up my blueberry muffins. My wife looked up a couple of recipes, not only with blueberries but also banana oat bars and cinnamon. She made delicious choices most mornings and breakfast sandwiches on others. I had great food options, top-notch coffee beans, and extra time to spend with the family as I wasn't rushing to beat the line. It felt peaceful. The final step: I found accountability and have some fun To make it stick, I invite some of my friends to do weekly "coffee reset challenges", where they share their latest coffee finds and we even take pictures of our home brews to crown a winner. What I spend today I buy my favorite coffee beans at $12 a bag, which lasts two weeks. We also opt for homemade blueberry muffins, which makes my coffee ritual very affordable. And after throwing in other spontaneous trips I would make to the coffee shop and everything else I would buy, I significantly cut costs. I didn't quit Starbucks to be virtuous. I stopped because I could save the money and put it towards the future. I no longer miss it as much because I realized it was not really about the caffeine. I was looking for comfort and moments of peace, things that I now find at home with my family.