NAB issue major blow for millions of Aussies with cash in a bank account

Aussie savers are seeing lower returns after the Reserve Bank of Australia cut interest rates in May.
Major banks, including NAB and BOQ have responded by further reducing savings rates.
While lower rates benefit borrowers, they're a blow to savers - particularly those building a home mortgage deposit or relying on interest payments for retirement.
NAB reduced its Reward Saver rate by 0.05 percentage points, bringing it down to 4.35 per cent.
Meanwhile BOQ cut the maximum rate on its account for young adults from 5.25 per cent to 5.10 per cent.
Some banks have gone even further than the RBA's 25 basis point rate cut.
ING slashed its Savings Maximiser rate from 5.40 per cent to 5.00 per cent on 2 June, a 40 basis point drop.
Across the February and May RBA cuts, ING has reduced its rate by a half a percentage point or 50 basis points.
Canstar.com.au research shows the average ongoing savings rate today is 3.07 per cent , while at the start of the year the average rate was 3.40 per cent - a drop of just 0.33 percentage points.
Rabobank also made significant reductions, though specific figures were not disclosed.
Term deposit rates are falling even faster.
The average one-year term deposit rate has dropped from 4.14 per cent on 1 January to 3.52 per cent - a 0.62 percentage point fall in just six months.
Sally Tindall, Canstar's data insights director, warned that savers should brace for more reductions:
'While the average savings rate on our database is an uninspiring 3.07 per cent, there are six banks still offering an ongoing savings rate of 5 per cent or more. That said, if the RBA wields its knife again in July or August, savings rates starting with a 5 won't last beyond winter.
'Term deposit rates are, unsurprisingly, falling faster than at-call savings rates, as banks continue to bake in further cash rate cuts into the fixed rate term.
'If you're someone who likes the certainty and security a term deposit can bring, time is of the essence as these rates are likely to keep on falling in the weeks ahead.'
Her comments follow an updated forecast from Luci Ellis, Westpac's chief economist and former Reserve Bank official, who has now included two additional interest rate cuts in her 2026 outlook.
On top of two 25 basis point cuts to the key lending rate in August and July in 2025, Ms Ellis predicts additional reductions by the central bank in February and May.
That would leave the cash rate at a terminal figure of 2.85 per cent, from the current rate of 3.85 per cent, meaning mortgage holders would save $350 a month.
The additional cuts could come even earlier, potentially in December and February, if inflation and the labour market unfold even weaker than expected in late 2025, Ms Ellis said earlier this month.
Changes to the inflation outlook mean arguments in favour of more cuts in 2026 are building.
A faster-than-anticipated fall in immigration will ease rental costs, dragging down inflation, which Westpac now believes will drop below the midpoint of the RBA's 2-3 per cent target by the end of the year.
'We believe that would tip the RBA in favour of cutting the cash rate further,' Ms Ellis said.
'Indeed, if we are right, the RBA might be in for a bit of an 'oh crikey!' moment late this year.'
Australia's economy is at risk of a slower-than-expected recovery, as disappointing GDP growth figures in last week's national accounts revealed, amid a 'shaky handover' from public to private spending.
'Consumer spending is tracking weakly, as we expected. We are now starting to see this weigh on business activity. The result is likely to be soggy growth and surprisingly weak wages growth despite apparently low unemployment,' Ms Ellis said.
CBA and ANZ predict just two more rate cuts, beginning in August, while NAB is the only big four bank betting on the RBA to cut rates at its next meeting in July. All up, NAB expects three more cuts to the cash rate that would see it fall to 3.1 per cent, down from 3.85 per cent now.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

30 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS Australia Post price increase: What you need to know

The cost of sending a letter is set to rise as the consumer watchdog waves through a price bump to reflect the decline in snail mail. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission approves of the 13.3 per cent price increase, allowing Australia Post to nudge stamps for ordinary small letters up to $1.70 from $1.50. The final hurdle for the fee change is Communications Minister Anika Wells, who still has an opportunity to reject the change. If finalised, the new stamp fees will kick in on July 17. ACCC commissioner Anna Brakey said the call was based on evidence Australia Post's letter operations were bringing in less revenue than the money it was costing to run it. 'Our final decision recommends Australia Post examine ways to alleviate affordability issues for businesses, including those subject to requirements to send physical mail,' Ms Brakey said. Under the fee changes, ordinary large letters between 125 and 250 grams will jump from $4.50 to $5.10. Stamps for large letters lighter than 125g will tick higher from $3.00 to $3.40. Charities will still be offered discount rates. Australia Post says letter volumes have declined to levels not seen since the 1950s. 'The average household purchases five to six full-rate stamps each year and the proposed increase would cost them about $1.20 extra per year,' a spokesperson said on Monday. Even with the price increase, Australians will still be paying less than the current median price of $1.93 for a small letter across OECD postal service operators. The self-funded government enterprise may be losing money delivering letters, but has benefited from growing appetites for online shopping and parcel delivery.

The Guardian

2 hours ago

• The Guardian

Cost of sending a letter in Australia to rise to $1.70 as snail mail continues to decline

The cost of sending a letter is set to rise as the consumer watchdog waves through a price bump to reflect the decline in snail mail. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has approved the 13.3% price increase, allowing Australia Post to nudge stamps for ordinary small letters up to $1.70 from $1.50. The final hurdle for the fee change is communications minister Anika Wells, who still has an opportunity to reject the change. If finalised, the new stamp fees will kick in on 17 July. ACCC commissioner Anna Brakey said the call was based on evidence Australia Post's letter operations were bringing in less revenue than the money it was costing to run it. 'Our final decision recommends Australia Post examine ways to alleviate affordability issues for businesses, including those subject to requirements to send physical mail,' Brakey said. Under the fee changes, ordinary large letters between 125 and 250 grams will jump from $4.50 to $5.10. Stamps for large letters lighter than 125g will tick higher from $3.00 to $3.40. Charities will still be offered discount rates. Australia Post says letter volumes have declined to levels not seen since the 1950s. 'The average household purchases five to six full-rate stamps each year and the proposed increase would cost them about $1.20 extra per year,' a spokesperson said on Monday. Even with the price increase, Australians will still be paying less than the current median price of $1.93 for a small letter across OECD postal service operators. The self-funded government enterprise may be losing money delivering letters, but has benefited from growing appetites for online shopping and parcel delivery.

Daily Mail​

2 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

Bunnings is slammed for 'dehumanising' move: 'You are treated like a number'

Bunnings has come under fire as it becomes one of several large Australian retailers to use artificial intelligence in its recruitment process. The application process involves a chat and video interview powered by Sapia AI, a tool designed to screen candidates. According to Sapia's website, the technology was 'built on the foundation of making hiring inclusive, efficient and effective'. Bunnings describes the AI interview as comparable to a traditional phone interview with a recruiter, but highlights several benefits. 'You can take all the time you need and edit your answers until you're happy with them,' the company explains in its FAQ for job applicants. 'There are usually five questions, and most people finish in about 30 minutes.' For those who don't have access to the required technology, Bunnings reassures candidates they 'can arrange an alternative format for you to complete the same interview questions'. The retailer emphasises that the AI interview is designed to be fair and impartial, focusing solely on responses to a standardised set of questions. Sapia is used by a number of businesses across Australia, including Woolworths, Qantas, David Jones, Suncorp and Starbucks. It was founded by Barb Hyman, a former HR executive who is based in Melbourne. Sapia claims that companies using its software are saving up to 20 hours a week in recruitment time, while also cutting the time-to-hire in half. They report a 90 per cent satisfaction rate among job applicants. Recruiter Tammie Ballis, who owns Realistic Careers, expressed scepticism about the approach, calling it 'dehumanising'. 'It's a cost-cutting feature, it's also a screening tool,' she told Daily Mail Australia. 'You are treated like a number now more than ever, especially if you are applying to jobs for the big retailers.' She did acknowledge that businesses were trying to save money, saying the HR process is often 'expensive'. A screenshot of a job advertisement promoting the use of Sapia AI was shared to Reddit where social media users were divided 'My suggestion to you as a recruiter is don't touch the big retailers, you are more likely to get a personal and human experience when applying to a small or medium sized business,' Ms Ballis said. A screenshot of a job advertisement promoting the use of Sapia AI was shared to Reddit, where social media users slammed the change. 'Pro-tip: If they were actually interested in hiring you, they'd speak to you in person. Don't put up with this dehumanising c***,' one wrote. 'We're cooked,' another wrote. 'It won't be long before people are selling optimal answers for AI interviews, it'll be like SEO for Google,' a third added. 'As long as someone knows the key words/phrases they'll nail the interview.'