ComEd customers warned of higher summer power bills

The Brief
ComEd electricity supply prices will rise sharply on June 1, adding about $10.60 per month to customer bills.
The Citizens Utility Board (CUB) says the price hike will last at least a year, driven by high capacity costs and policy issues.
Consumer advocates point to a state law that will offer partial relief and urge customers to explore assistance options.
CHICAGO - Starting next month, ComEd customers can expect to see a noticeable increase in their monthly electric bills, according to the Citizens Utility Board, a nonprofit consumer watchdog.
What we know
Beginning June 1, ComEd's electricity supply rate will rise to roughly 10 cents per kilowatt-hour—up about 45 percent from last June's rate of 6.9 cents, based on a CUB review of recently filed tariffs.
This increase could translate to an extra $10.60 per month for the average customer, and those higher rates are expected to remain in place for the next 12 months.
The rate hike covers the supply and transmission portion of the bill, which typically makes up more than half of a customer's total charges. ComEd, by law, cannot profit from this portion of the bill—it passes these costs directly to consumers.
What they're saying
ComEd, in a statement, acknowledged the potential financial burden and encouraged customers to explore bill-assistance options listed on its website.
"Beginning this summer, the average monthly residential customer bill in the ComEd service territory is expected to rise by about $10.60 due to the annual PJM Interconnection capacity auction held last year. These costs go into effect in June and will be reflected in the "supply" portion of customer bills, which ComEd passes on directly to customers with no markup. ComEd does not profit from this increase, was not part of the auction, does not supply capacity, and does not retain any proceeds of the capacity charge payments. ComEd is responsible for the "delivery" portion of bills, which pays for the work ComEd does to maintain and upgrade the system to ensure safe and reliable electric service for all customers.
"We fully understand that rising supply costs pose a challenge for customers, which is why we continue to offer our full range of bill-assistance options that, so far this year, have connected nearly 110,000 customers to more than $31 million in financial assistance and other support options. We also offer a comprehensive and award-winning energy-efficiency program that helps families and businesses manage their energy use and save money on monthly bills. Customers can visit ComEd.com/BillSupport to find the programs they may qualify for."
What we don't know
It's unclear how much relief ComEd customers will see from a credit tied to a state energy law, the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA), which is expected to vary month to month.
"We're glad CEJA gives customers some relief in the short term, and in the long term we will continue to work at fixing the root causes of this price spike, mainly poor policy from PJM Interconnection, the power grid operator for northern Illinois," CUB Executive Director Sarah Moskowitz said in a statement. "As we advocate for pro-consumer reforms at PJM and the State Capitol, we also urge ComEd to work with customers to keep them connected this summer."
CUB has launched CUBHelpCenter.com to provide energy-saving tips, links to assistance programs, and advice on avoiding costly alternative electricity deals.
The Source
The information in this article was provided by Citizens Utility Board (CUB) and a statement from ComEd.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

a day ago

• Yahoo

Exelon (NasdaqGS:EXC) Announces Melissa Washington's Appointment As SVP Of Governmental Affairs

Melissa Y. Washington's appointment as Senior Vice President at ComEd, a subsidiary of Exelon, is a significant leadership change, expected to steer strategic initiatives but had little direct impact on the share price last week. Exelon's 1% decline is aligned with broader market trends, where the market remained flat over the week. While the executive transition might have added weight to Exelon's performance, it did not deviate significantly from the market's overall behavior. Exelon's price move reflects these broader market dynamics rather than being directly influenced by the executive changes, adding context to its flat performance. You should learn about the 2 possible red flags we've spotted with Exelon (including 1 which can't be ignored). Outshine the giants: these 27 early-stage AI stocks could fund your retirement. The recent appointment of Melissa Y. Washington as Senior Vice President at ComEd, a subsidiary of Exelon (NasdaqGS:EXC), may have implications for the company's strategic direction, potentially affecting revenue and earnings forecasts. Despite the appointment, the share price experienced a 1% decline, aligning with broader market trends. This indicates that the executive change did not significantly influence immediate market perceptions but could impact longer-term strategic initiatives. Over a longer-term period of five years, Exelon's total shareholder return, including both share price and dividends, amounted to 105.72%. This demonstrates a substantial return for shareholders, particularly in comparison to the past year's performance where Exelon exceeded the US Market's return of 10.4% and the US Electric Utilities industry's return of 14.7%. Such a performance suggests resilience and growth in shareholder value over the longer period. The legislative advancements in Maryland and Exelon's US$38 billion investment plan are key drivers of potential future revenue and earnings growth. Analysts project that these initiatives will boost Exelon's revenue and earnings, with estimated earnings growth of 6.19% per year. The current share price of US$46.29 is slightly below the consensus analyst price target of US$47.53, suggesting limited upside potential in the near term, but reflecting a fair valuation by the market relative to anticipated growth projections. Investors should consider how these factors might play into future revenue streams and market perceptions. Learn about Exelon's historical performance here. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NasdaqGS:EXC. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Chicago Tribune

3 days ago

• Chicago Tribune

Guest column/Josh McBroom: Naperville council shouldn't be gambling with city's energy future

Naperville is standing at a critical energy crossroads. In the coming weeks, the Naperville City Council must make decisions that will shape our electricity supply, costs and reliability for decades. The stakes couldn't be higher — and the cost of delay will be felt by every household and business in our city. Thanks to decades of foresight, Naperville owns its own electric utility and is part of the Illinois Municipal Electric Agency (IMEA), a nonprofit energy consortium of 32 communities. IMEA has delivered stable, affordable, and reliable electricity. Most cities would envy our position. But now our future with IMEA is at risk. Due to Illinois' new energy law — the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act, which mandates the full retirement of fossil fuel power generation — IMEA is asking member cities to recommit to a new long-term contract beginning when the current one expires in 2035. Nearly every member community has signed on. Naperville, despite holding the vice chair position on IMEA's board, has not. Some council members, and the public, have raised seemingly reasonable questions: Why sign a contract so far in advance? Why not ask for guarantees on future pricing or renewable energy options? Why not shop around? Here's the reality: no utility provider can guarantee rates or energy sources for 2035 and beyond. What IMEA is offering isn't certainty, it's influence. Signing now secures Naperville a seat at the table during a crucial planning period. Waiting too long could mean losing that seat — and our voice. And let's be clear: IMEA is not a bad actor in this story. It is a nonprofit governed by its member communities. IMEA employees work for us. Naperville doesn't have leverage because IMEA needs us — we have leverage because we're a partner. But IMEA must know now whether to plan for our future energy needs. For example, solar and wind farms can take up to a decade to develop and require 20-year contract commitments. Delays and indecision have already cost us valuable time. IMEA presented the new contract back in February 2024 with a deadline of April 2025. City staff recommended hiring an outside consultant — a prudent step — but the council initially declined. By the time we hired one, we were already racing the clock. But despite the costly and unnecessary delays, we have the information we need. That consultant, hired with taxpayer dollars, has recommended renewing our contract with IMEA. Our Public Utility Advisory Board, after more than 15 hours of review, did the same with a 4-3 vote. The facts are in. Expert advice has been delivered. The question now is whether the council will act. We've already missed the April deadline. IMEA is considering a final extension, possibly until Aug. 21, as a gesture of good faith to allow us to complete our due diligence. But at the May 20 council meeting, my request for a public workshop where council members could question the expert consultants directly was met with considerable resistance. The council did ultimately concede to a public discussion, but with the conditions that it be an undefined number of 'several' workshops abd a suggestion that begin in September. Pardon my skepticism, but this appears to be an intentional delay meant to blow well past the possible August deadline. But make no mistake — no decision is a decision. If Naperville tries to rejoin IMEA later, it will surely come at a steep cost. When we joined late in 2011, our 'late entry' fee was estimated at $50 million. That wasn't a penalty but to protect other communities from the financial risks of our delay. So what's really behind the hesitation? The truth is it's Naperville's historic investment in two clean coal plants through IMEA. Coal plants are already scheduled to close under the state's Climate and Equitable Jobs Act. But for some on the council, the optics are politically inconvenient. Walking away from IMEA doesn't stop the energy transition. What it does do is remove us from the room where the future is being planned. And let's not forget, Naperville is on the verge of paying off bonds related to our current power infrastructure, which still makes up 20% of our electric costs. Walking away now would be like paying off your mortgage and then handing over your house keys. Outside of IMEA, communities are already facing the reality of Illinois' energy transition: higher rates, shrinking supply and blackout threats. If we fail to act, Naperville could face the same — or worse. This is not about fossil fuels vs. renewables. That decision has already been made in Springfield. This is about whether Naperville will have a voice in how that transition happens or whether we'll gamble our energy future on wishful thinking. The risks of inaction are real. The costs of delay are growing. It's time to act based on facts — not politics — and secure the best possible future for Naperville.

Yahoo

12-06-2025

• Yahoo

ComEd unveils $10 million fund to help Illinois residents with energy costs

FORD HEIGHTS, Ill. (WTVO) — ComEd has announced a one-time, $10 million Customer Relief Fund available to eligible Illinois residents and businesses to offset rising capacity charges. On June 1st, ComEd is raising the capacity charge, the cost paid for companies to store extra energy in case of a spike in demand. According to ComEd, 'Energy prices are driven by supply and demand. Large power generators sell this electricity supply to ComEd and we pass this cost directly to you. Because of factors like extreme weather, spikes from high energy users like data centers, and other factors, demand is outpacing supply, so costs are getting more expensive. Due to these factors, starting in June 2025, the will increase for all ComEd customers.' Capacity prices are extra payments consumers pay power plant operators to have enough reserve electricity available in the event of a sudden spike in demand. The Citizens Utility Board estimated each household's bill would go up approximately $10 a month. However, CUB explained that ComEd will not profit from the price increase, since the cost is passed along to the utility via PJM Interconnect. Utility companies are required to pass supply costs onto consumers. The Customer Relief Fund will become open to applications starting July 7th. To lessen the impact of the supply price increase, ComEd recommends practicing energy efficiency at home, considering a community solar deal to help ease costs, or installing solar panels. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.