Ministry should practise transparency first
Published on: Sunday, May 04, 2025
Published on: Sun, May 04, 2025 Text Size: In a recent report by Free Malaysia Today, the private healthcare sector was again chided and reminded to 'embrace transparency' or risk losing public trust. Fomca, CAP and the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (KPDN) appear determined to single out private General Practitioners (GPs) for not displaying medicine prices, framing us as barriers to transparency and affordability in healthcare. Let's be clear. General Practitioners are not afraid of price display. We are for transparency, completely, unreservedly and unequivocally. What we reject is selective enforcement, bureaucratic overreach and the moral hypocrisy of institutions that preach transparency to others but operate in shadows. If Malaysia truly wants a transparent healthcare system, then transparency must start at the top, not be forced upon the smallest players in the ecosystem while the larger institutions remain veiled in opacity. 1. The Ministry of Health Must Lead by Example The Ministry cannot demand compliance from the private sector while it fails to walk the talk on its own operations. How many closed tenders has MOH issued in the past five years? What was the selection criteria for contractors building hospitals, maintaining government facilities, supplying pharmaceuticals, or providing IT solutions? Who are the recipients of multi-million ringgit hospital maintenance contracts? Are they awarded based on capability or connection? Why are these contracts not publicly listed, with line-by-line breakdowns of awarded sums and timelines? And what about outsourced cleaning and support services in public hospitals, often riddled with complaints, delays, and inefficiencies? How are these vendors selected? How many of these tenders were awarded through opaque processes? If MOH demands full price display from small, single-doctor clinics, then Malaysians deserve to see the cost of every MOH project, down to the last screw and toilet brush. Let's begin with full disclosure of the cost for every hospital built or upgraded in the last 10 years. Let's also make public the names of the individuals and companies involved in selecting, bidding, and approving these deals. Until then, any sermon on transparency rings hollow. 2. KPDN: Please Stick to Chicken and Eggs The Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (KPDN) has suddenly developed an interest in regulating healthcare, flexing powers under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011 (Act 723). A Ministry that struggles to keep the prices of chicken and eggs stable now claims authority to barge into GP clinics and regulate drug pricing, a domain outside its technical expertise. Why isn't KPDN focusing on its core mandate? Has the price of cooking oil, rice, and petrol been resolved? Is the ministry prepared to regulate costs in private hospitals, insurance premiums and TPA charges? Or is it simply easier to pick on the low-hanging fruit, small GP clinics, who have no lobbyists or monopolies to shield them? The reality is this – GPs are not profiteers. We are the first line of defence in Malaysia's medical system. We see patients others turn away. We absorb price hikes, staff shortages and compliance costs without increasing consultation fees, which have remained unchanged for over 30 years. Yet we are portrayed as greedy villains by those who refuse to scrutinise their own systems. 3. Fomca and CAP: Side Characters in a Larger Story Fomca and CAP continue to play the role of 'concerned watchdogs' every time the issue of healthcare pricing arises. But where were they when public hospital wait times soared? Where were they when insurance companies slashed benefits and increased premiums? Where are their statements when TPAs delay payments to clinics or dictate which medications a patient can afford? Who funds these NGOs? Are their funding sources transparent? Are they truly neutral or politically motivated mouthpieces that conveniently target private GPs while remaining silent on corporate profiteering? If they are serious about healthcare transparency, let them investigate how much profit Medical Insurance companies make on an annual basis. Many of which dictate treatment protocols without ever meeting a single patient. 4. A Call for System-Wide Transparency If transparency is truly the goal, then let's have a national medical cost transparency initiative, a portal where every MOH tender, hospital construction cost, insurance claim rejection, drug markup percentage, and TPA administrative fee is logged and searchable. Only then can we begin to have an honest conversation about cost and care. Let us also not forget that the real cost inflation in healthcare is being driven by government inefficiencies, monopolistic procurement practices, and artificial barriers to competition. The recent examples involving Pharmaniaga's monopoly on drug supply and Fomema's exclusive rights to foreign worker health screenings are clear indicators that cartel-like structures exist,but not in GP clinics. 5. We Will Display Our Prices—Will You? We, the private GPs, are ready to display our prices, item by item, if necessary. But first, we want the same transparency from those who sit in ivory towers and draft policies detached from the realities of everyday medical practice. We invite MOH to publish every contract they sign. We invite KPDN to explain how it suddenly gained authority in medical regulation. And we invite Fomca and CAP to stop barking at shadows and start chasing the real beasts. Until then, we advise KPDN to focus on their chicken and egg list, and let MOH do its own housekeeping before sweeping into our clinics with more forms and fines. Leadership in transparency must begin at the top. Until then, don't lecture us GPs on trust. Datuk Dr James Jeremiah Past President & Founding President Association of Private Practitioners Sabah (APPS) [email protected] The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Plan needed to raise retirement age
PETALING JAYA: Malaysia could miss out on the untapped economic potential of its ageing population if it fails to act now by investing in skills training and creating age-friendly workplaces for those aged 45 and above. The warning comes from Universiti Putra Malaysia's Malaysian Research Institute on Ageing (MyAgeing) director, Assoc Prof Dr Rahimah Ibrahim, following a recent call by former Swedish prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt for countries like Malaysia to consider raising the retirement age to 75 to ease pension pressures. Closer to home, last month Law and Institutional Reform Minister Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said suggested the government consider extending Malaysia's retirement age to 65, noting that many Malaysians remain active, capable and energetic well into their 60s. Malaysia last raised the retirement age in 2014 — to 60, from 58 in the public sector and 55 in the private sector. However, Rahimah warned that Malaysia is not yet prepared to support adults working into their 70s. She stressed that any changes to the retirement framework must be gradual and flexible, not abrupt. 'Working longer must be a choice backed by robust systems, not a necessity born out of financial desperation. 'Rather than fixating on a single retirement age, we should link pensionable age to gains in healthy life expectancy, and ensure early-exit options remain available, especially for physically demanding jobs.' She said senior workers need adaptable, meaningful roles and the right support to stay healthy and productive. While Sweden has successfully kept senior adults in the workforce, Rahimah said that achievement came after decades of investment in near-universal pension coverage, retraining programmes, and inclusive labour policies – elements that Malaysia currently lacks. 'In Sweden, over 80% of those aged 55 to 64 are still working. In Malaysia, it's just under 50%. 'More than half of senior Malaysian workers are in informal employment, with no social protection, limited upskilling and little ergonomic support.' She added that health is another limiting factor. 'According to the World Health Organisation, Malaysians aged 60 have an average of 18.5 healthy years remaining, compared with the 21 years in Sweden. 'We can't expect people to work longer if their bodies are already exhausted. Health must be part of the retirement equation.' Rahimah also flagged concerns about financial preparedness. 'Only 36% of active Employees Provident Fund (EPF) contributors reach the basic savings threshold of RM240,000 by age 55. 'The updated benchmark, based on the Belanjawanku model, is RM650,000 – roughly RM2,690 a month for 20 years. But most low-income workers fall short. 'A B40 household earning RM3,401 a month may retire with just RM180,000 – enough for only RM750 a month,' she said. Rahimah argued that EPF savings alone are not enough, and called for a three-pillar model: personal savings, a universal pension floor and long-term care insurance. Her colleague, senior research officer Chai Sen Tyng agreed and called for a unified retirement policy that ensures portability of savings across job sectors. 'Our system wasn't built for longer lifespans. 'We need a national health financing model that supports people across the life course, from early screening to rehabilitation and community care. 'Our healthcare remains too hospital-centric, too expensive and often out of reach for older Malaysians.' Chai added that healthy ageing should be viewed as an intergenerational investment, not just a senior citizen issue. 'We continue to work in silos. What we need is integrated thinking and coordinated reform.' Former MyAgeing director and gerontology expert Datuk Dr Tengku Aizan Tengku Abdul Hamid echoed this, urging a fundamental rethink of how Malaysia perceives ageing. 'Let's stop asking what older people cost and start asking what value we can unlock from healthy longevity. 'Malaysia has the capacity to lead in this space. What we lack is political will and imagination.' Rather than raising the retirement age, she said Malaysia should prioritise reemployment opportunities and flexible work arrangements. 'Our institutions haven't kept up with how people live and work today. It's time we stop viewing senior adults as dependents and start seeing them as contributors,' she said.
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
#HEALTH: Improving outlook on cancer
WHEN it comes to cancer, most of us feel a mix of fear,confusion and uncertainty. But understanding cancer better could save lives. Cancer today is not what it was 20 or even 10 years ago, but the key message of early detection remains relevant. The good news is that survival rates have improved tremendously with more advanced treatments, earlier detection methods, and a better understanding of disease pathology. The Malaysia National Cancer Registry Report 2017 to 2021 indicates that breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed, followed by colorectal, lung, lymphoma, and liver cancers. We are also seeing more prostate cancer cases, likely due to increased awareness, screening and earlier detection of the disease. Cervical cancer rates are dropping with the implementationof the national HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccination programme. Although cancer is more common than ever, with 1 in 8 Malaysians at risk, early detection and interventions are making a difference. OncoCare Cancer Centre Malaysia senior consultant clinical oncologist Dr John Low says cancer is no longer a disease of just the elderly. "We are seeing more breast and colon cancers among Malaysians under 50. This may be due to rising obesity, sedentary lifestyles, and a shift from traditional high-fibre-low fat diets to those with more processed, modern-day foods." Increased awareness and screening are also picking up cancers earlier. Being young doesn't mean you are immune, adds Dr Low. Your lifestyletoday shapes your health good news is that many cancers are now treatable, even curable, especially when detected early. With more effective treatments available, survival rates have improved significantly. One of the common myths is that sugar "feeds" cancer. Dr Low explains that while cancer cells use glucose, so do all our healthy cells. "Cutting sugar alone won't cure cancer. What matters is maintaining a balanced and nutritious diet to support your overall health when undergoing treatment." Neither can traditional medicine alone cure cancer. While some traditional remedies may support wellbeing or alleviate side effects during treatment, they should never replace evidence-based cancer therapies like surgery, chemotherapy or radiation.
Malaysiakini
a day ago
- Malaysiakini
DAP senator warns of risky EPF-insurance plan, potential exploitation
DAP Senator RA Lingeshwaran raised serious concerns over the proposal to allow withdrawals from Account 2 of the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) to pay for health insurance premiums. While acknowledging that the government may seek to ease financial hardship, he said it risks compromising the EPF's mandate to safeguard Malaysians' retirement security. 'The government's intention...
