Nurses and midwives allowed to prescribe abortion drugs under a bill set to pass parliament
The Catholic Archdiocese says amendments to contentious abortion reform legislation are a 'helpful development', with a watered-down bill set to pass parliament this week.
Experienced nurses and midwives will be allowed to prescribe abortion drugs to women in the first nine weeks of their pregnancy under the legislation, which is expected to go to a vote on Wednesday.
The legislation will expand women's access to medical abortions, but will not force medical professionals to facilitate terminations if they object to the practice.
Upper House Greens MP Amanda Cohn sparked a series of protests outside parliament when she introduced her bill to expand access to abortions, with speakers including former prime minister Tony Abbott labelling the legislation as an attack on religion.
Protesters attend an anti-abortion rally outside NSW parliament last week. Picture: Supplied
Mr Abbott and others were campaigning against changes which would have forced doctors who object to providing abortions to refer patients elsewhere.
However, the aspects of the bill which created the most controversy were removed before the legislation passed the upper house.
'While it is a helpful development that the intended attacks on conscience have been removed from the bill, we still hope the bill will be rejected in its entirety,' a Catholic Archdiocese spokeswoman said.
Former prime minister Tony Abbott speaks at an anti-abortion rally outside NSW parliament last week. Picture: Facebook
Protesters attend anti-abortion rally outside NSW parliament on Wednesday May 7, 2025. Picture: Supplied
The legislation which is expected to pass into law will allow endorsed midwives and nurse practitioners to prescribe the abortion drug MS-2 Step to medically terminate a pregnancy in the first nine weeks of gestation.
Nurse practitioners and midwives will only be allowed to prescribe the drug if it is within their scope of practice.
Allowing nurse practitioners and midwives to administer abortion drugs was recommended by a NSW Health inquiry into abortion laws, which found there were difficulty accessing the service in some areas of the state.
Mr Minns originally opposed the legislation, but on Monday confirmed he would vote for the amended bill, now the provisions on conscientious objection have been removed.
Liberal and Labor politicians will vote according to their conscience, and not be bound to party lines.
Opposition health spokeswoman Kellie Sloane will also vote in favour of the legislation.
'I could not have supported the original version of this bill – it went beyond what I considered reasonable or workable, but I support the amended version,' she said.
NSW Greens MLC Amanda Cohn. Picture: Facebook
'(The amended bill) aligns with TGA guidelines, reflects the number one recommendation from the NSW Health statutory review, and brings NSW into line with every other state except Tasmania.
'It's a sensible, tightly scoped reform that improves access while preserving safeguards and respecting professional conscience.'
Dr Cohn confirmed the Greens would support the bill 'as it currently stands'.
The legislation will also make no changes to a requirement for two doctors to approve abortion after 22 weeks gestation.
It will also make no change to the 'duty owed' by healthcare workers to provide medical care to a baby born due to a failed termination.
She blamed anti-abortion campaigners for spreading 'disinformation' over her bill, which had 'caused unnecessary distress in the community'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
27 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Should not be punished': Queensland decries GST carve up
Cash-strapped state governments are looking west with envy as Western Australia pulls in its large slice of the GST carve up despite the healthiest books in the country. Resource-rich WA posted a $2.5bn operating surplus on Thursday – it's seventh budget surplus in a row. From Friday it is set to receive its share of the GST pool of 75 cents in the dollar, despite its strong revenue stream from its resources sector. State premiers and treasurers have been agitating for changes to the GST distribution, since the final figures were announced in March, and ahead of the funds formally being dished out on Friday. WA is still enjoying the windfalls of a 2018 GST deal struck under previous Coalition government by then-treasurer Scott Morrison and backed in by the Albanese government, where WA is guaranteed 75 cents of every dollar paid in GST. Without this benchmark, WA would have received as little as 18 cents back. The WA Premier and Treasurer credited their economic management for this week's operating surplus and healthy debt forecasts. Iron ore prices are hovering at $US95 while the state government has done its forecasting with an expectation of $US72 a tonne. But every state and territory except WA has been posting deficits since the 75 cent distribution reforms in 2018. The Queensland Treasurer feels short-changed, as strong coal royalties pad the state coffers. Victoria and NSW's slices of the GST pie are set to expand while Queensland's portion gets a trim. 'This money belongs to Queenslanders and we should not be punished because of our support for industries that underpin our national wealth,' state Treasurer David Janetzki said. The impending Queensland state budget, to be delivered on Tuesday, will show the effects of a dip in coal prices after an $8.8bn royalties windfall during the past four years. Despite the Sunshine State's royalty take coming down, Queensland's GST payout this year falls by $1.1bn to $16.5bn. In a speech to the National Press Club on Wednesday, federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who has historically opposed raising the GST rate, left the door slightly open to raising it from 10 per cent – the amount the excise has remained for the past 25 years. 'I've, for a decade or more, had a view about the GST,' he told The Conversation. 'I repeated that view at the Press Club because I thought that was the honest thing to do, but what I'm going to genuinely try and do, whether it's in this policy area or in other policy areas, is to not limit what people might bring to the table.' This year, Queensland is the only state or territory getting less than previous years, while every other jurisdiction is getting more. Victoria is set to become a net-recipient of the GST pool for the first time as well. 'It used to be the case that our friends in Victoria would help us shoulder the burden in supporting all the other states,' NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said last month. 'Victoria is now a recipient state, to quite a large degree, $1.07 (per dollar taxed) is what they're getting. 'I'm going to continue to speak out, particularly about the fact that NSW is now carrying the federation when it comes to GST distribution.' The Northern Territory receives $5.15 for every dollar it contributes, far and away the largest return. Despite having the second largest population, Victoria receives the largest portion of the total pool, getting 27.5 per cent; with a $3.6bn year-on-year increase this time around.
SBS Australia
34 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Australia's social media ban is approaching, but questions remain over whether it will work
April Willis says young people need a seat at the table for figuring out how to implement the teen social media ban. Source: SBS News / Ash Minchin Like many, April Willis has been using social media since her early teens. As she grew up on the platforms, she says she didn't immediately understand the impact it was having on her. She says that in hindsight, though, she can see that a lot of her "behaviours" and "the content and interactions" she had on social media platforms were "definitely not great" for her mental health. But the now 22-year-old ReachOut youth advocate says she doesn't think a ban would have stopped her. "I think the hard truth is that a lot of us are thinking, 'I would've found a way around it', as I'm sure many young people will." Whether she actually would have is one of the many questions experts are wondering six months out from the implementation of Australia's social media ban for those under the age of 16. And as of 11 December this year, social media companies will be required to take "reasonable steps" to prevent Australian children and teenagers under 16 from using their platforms. A government-commissioned trial into the potential technologies used to assess the ages of users presented their preliminary findings on Friday. Their key finding was that "age assurance can be done in Australia and can be private, robust and effective". "The preliminary findings indicate that there are no significant technological barriers preventing the deployment of effective age assurance systems in Australia," project director Tony Allen said in a statement. "These solutions are technically feasible, can be integrated flexibly into existing services, and can support the safety and rights of children online." With details about the accuracy of the technologies tested left for later release, experts are wary of the trial's initial claim. Daniel Angus is a professor of digital communication at the Queensland University of Technology and the director of its Digital Media Research Centre. "One of the key concerns that we have is how the industry often will inflate their accuracy and the utility of these approaches when we know that there are still significant issues when it comes to both gender and also racial biases, but also the general lack of efficacy of these approaches," he said. According to the Department of Communications, a government-commissioned report from the Social Research Centre found nearly nine in 10 adults were supportive of age assurance measures. Only two of those 10 had heard of at least one potential method to check a person's age online. 'This research shows Australians widely support our world-leading age restrictions on social media for under 16s and have strong expectations of platforms when it comes to data protection and security," Communications Minister Anika Wells said in a statement. Angus says the general public has not been adequately informed about the likely impacts of these technologies. "I think Australians are in for a very rude shock when this actually perhaps, gets implemented, and they all of a sudden are being forced to hand over [their] data to access services that they've freely been able to access up to this point," he said. "It's absolutely everything you would expect to find in the midst of a moral panic where people have been sucked along with this idea that, 'Yeah, this thing is really, really bad and we need to prevent it,' but have not stopped to think critically about this, and then not been properly informed about the fullness of that risk." John Pane, chair of digital rights organisation Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA), is a member of the stakeholder advisory board for the trial. He says the EFA has "concerns about the rollout of this technology because it's not simply about restricting access to social media platforms for children 15 and under". "It requires all adults who participate in the online environment, who wish to access social media platforms to either have their age authenticated or establish their identity as a means of, or part of that age authentication. "So from our perspective, it's the Trojan horse for getting people to get used to providing more and more credentials online." Amid these concerns, some remain supportive of the ban, including Kirra Pendergast, another member of the stakeholder advisory board. "Initially, I was only against the ban purely because of the technical workarounds that are possible for some kids who are more technical than others," she said. "But after having lots of conversations with parents in particular, it became abundantly clear that the ban was making parents have a conversation that we've needed to have for a very, very long time." Pendergast is the founder of Safe on Social, an online safety advisory group for schools and businesses, and chief digital safety strategist at the global Ctrl+Shft Coalition. "I get contacted almost every single day by parents that are struggling with this," the cybersecurity expert said. "They don't know how to say no." Pendergast said parents and educators would have "a lot more time to get it right". "It's like all aspects of technical security, cybersecurity, and cyber safety. It's never ever going to be 100 per cent. This is never going to be the silver bullet. "It's a really, really good start because, again, it sparked all of the conversations that we needed to have at every level of society." Professor Tama Leaver, an internet studies academic at Curtin University and the chief investigator in the ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child, says the ban responds to a "very real fear that parents have that social media is an unknown space". "If this is world-leading, we need to be quite clear on what the legislation is actually doing." He warned that the implementation of the policy may not address all the issues that have been discussed. "Some harms, for example, such as cyberbullying, were very much touted as one of the big problems to be solved," he said. "There is nothing in this legislation that addresses cyberbullying meaningfully at all. "This at best addresses algorithmic amplification … of young people's experiences of social media, but … we expect from what's been said already that most messaging apps are exempt from this legislation. "So, the spaces where we imagine cyberbullying is most likely to happen are not being touched by this legislation at all." Leaver was a signatory on an open letter from more than 140 academics and civil society organisations against the ban. "If the rest of the world is watching Australia and hoping that this might be a blueprint, we're going to have an awful lot of work to do in the next few months to actually have a blueprint to practically do this rather than simply aspire to giving parents some reassurance," he said.
SBS Australia
34 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Suicide prevention workshops in language try to help refugees, asylum seekers find mental wellness
Listen to Australian and world news, and follow trending topics with SBS News Podcasts. Nuha Abdul Razaq arrived in Australia from Iraq as a refugee in 2005. She says the topic of suicide is something many from the Arabic-speaking community find especially difficult to talk about. "It's a topic which they never talk about it in our country. When I was in Iraq or many people, I have clients from Syria, from different countries, from Lebanon or from Jordan, maybe we didn't talk it, we didn't talk about suicide in our countries. It's like, some people they feel it's shameful." She now delivers suicide prevention workshops in Arabic for refugees and asylum seekers. The workshops are part of a program launched by Wesley LifeForce which provides training in suicide prevention in six languages: Arabic, Dari, Farsi, Karen, Khmer and Tamil. It's co-designed with survivors of torture, trauma and forced displacement, paired up with the program by an organisation called Service for the Treatment and Rehabilitation of Torture and Trauma Survivors - STARTTS. Ms Abdul Razaq says the success of the training is in large part because it's delivered by people like herself who understand the challenges and stresses of displacement and resettlement. "To move to another country, it's not easy. Some people, they stay in camps for 10 years, 12 years, moving to other country, which is different languages, financial, most of them, they don't have any money to spend, even if they move to other country, if they want to find a job, it's struggling to get a job. And when you get settlement to Australia, another one, you have all (the) stress comes with you." Recent research shows refugees and asylum seekers in Australia experience disproportionately high rates of suicide. Data from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare shows between 2007–2020, humanitarian entrants to Australia were 1.7 times more likely to die by suicide compared to other permanent migrants. Bethany Farley, the National Training Manager at Wesley Lifeforce, says the broader figures around mental wellbeing for refugees and asylum seekers are also deeply concerning. "There's reports that show that over 50% do actually report that they have poor mental health with more than 25% experiencing PTSD. There are some other reports around thoughts of suicide, which for men can be as high as 10% and for women can be as high as 17%." Deputy CEO of STARTTS Lachlan Murdoch says the trauma of war and displacement presents complex psychological challenges for refugees and asylum seekers. "So being pushed out of your country in traumatic circumstances, exposure to conflict and war, being subjected to things like shelling and bombardment, in some cases being imprisoned and being held in circumstances of great deprivation. Experiences of torture. So all those things impact people in ways that affect their psyche. So refugees experience much higher levels of anxiety and depression and post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidal ideation." He says for asylums seekers, these experiences of trauma can be further complicated by fear of being returned to the country they have fled. "Asylum seekers are in a situation where they're living in protracted uncertainty. And so there's not clarity for them about whether the person will remain in a situation of relative safety or could be returned to circumstances of danger. So that experience of uncertainty also compounds the traumatic effects of exposure to violence and to conflict." Ms Farley says these challenges are exacerbated by a lack of access to culturally appropriate care for refugees and asylum seekers arriving in Australia. "Then you add the other challenges of a language barrier, not understanding how the processes work. And finding services that have translators or people that can actually understand the nuances of how their community and culture responds to different situations, to different processes. The mental health models themselves can be alienating in that they do not meet the needs of a multicultural community." The suicide prevention training delivered by community members like Ms Abdul Razaq aims to address some of these issues by facilitating workshops where participants can share experiences in their own language and learn from each other about the supports available. Ms Abdul Razaq says the stigma attached to speaking about suicide was initially a barrier for her. "And at the beginning I was stressed when I was trained for the first time and I hearing something, some information, but later I accepted that if that's happening in the community, we need all the community to know about it." After delivering the first training session, she says she was inspired by the openness of the participants, and their ability to move past any shame they might associate with talking about suicide. "Nine women attended and it was very good and I liked the way they talk about it. They open their mouth and talk about their stories as well. And it's to build comfortable space between us and to build the trust between us. When they want to talk, they will talk in a normal way." If you or someone you know needs crisis support, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14, the Suicide Call Back Service on 1300 659 467 and Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800. More information and support with mental health is available at and on 1300 22 4636. Embrace Multicultural Mental Health supports people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.
