Human Rights Forum : «Migration is instinctive, it's part of human nature»
Historian Pascal Blanchard set the tone for the debate by grounding it in a fundamental anthropological truth: migration is a natural part of being human. Far from a banal observation, his statement situates migration within its long historical context, reminding us that «America was built by immigrants» and that while hostility toward newcomers may be «understandable», it is «entirely misguided», as opposition has always existed.
In his ten-minute address, Blanchard focused particularly on the paradoxes of our time. Despite globalization supposedly enabling greater connection, «it's precisely when the world becomes a village that moving freely becomes more difficult». He attributed this to a longstanding «fear of mixing», a phenomenon with deep historical roots that now finds new forms of expression, particularly through digital technologies.
Three Contemporary Shocks
Blanchard identified three major «shocks» shaping current migration debates. The first is demographic and economic: «Do you want to receive twice the pension?» A seemingly simple question that speaks to the challenges of aging Western societies.
The second is global inequality: «Most countries won't be able to remain wealthy» as wealth is redistributed on a global scale. The third, and perhaps most unpredictable, is the climate crisis: «Climate risk is equivalent to the risk of war», Blanchard warned, given its power to trigger massive and unforeseen population movements.
The Political Instrumentalization of Migration
The conversation then turned to the increasingly politicized nature of migration. Andrea Rea, a sociology professor in Belgium, spoke of a «toxic instrumentalization» that has come to permeate broader societal debates. Migration, he noted, is now wielded as diplomatic leverage between countries.
This dynamic cuts across traditional political lines. As Blanchard pointed out, «Donald Trump wasn't elected only by white men. White women voted for him too and so did many minorities». Opinions on migration, he argued, are far more nuanced, even among the communities most affected.
Blanchard called for a fundamental rethinking of how migration is approached, as a means of combating the global rise of the far right. That begins, he argued, with education by «deconstructing xenophobia». Xenophobia, he insisted, «is not abstract. It's a culture», rooted in colonial history and sustained by historical stereotypes.
Today's youth, he added, reject these outdated narratives. For them, the fear of the Other «can no longer hold». And as Blanchard powerfully concluded: «What we need to change is not human mobility, but the fixity of our fears». The new generation, he believes, may well drive that change.
Culture as a Universal Tool
«Culture opens doors when it listens rather than judges or rejects, it softens migration». These words from documentary filmmaker Kamal Redouani, who has worked extensively in conflict zones such as Syria, brought a deeply human perspective to the discussion. Sharing the story of Marwa, a young actress from Aleppo forced into exile, he emphasized how «culture gives people a voice of dignity».
His message resonated particularly within the Moroccan context, where cultural diversity is a strength. The very fact that this forum was held during the Gnaoua and World Music Festival is a testament to that.
Redouani also stressed the importance of «making room» for migrants and seeing the people behind the numbers. «We talk about statistics, but we forget where they've been», he said, recalling a poignant encounter with an elderly man on the road to exile: «I left my home behind, but I did not leave my memory». A sentence that, on its own, captures the strength, resilience, and dignity of those who continue to move forward despite having no guarantees for tomorrow.
Crossing Borders Through Screens
In an era where physical borders are increasingly blurred by digital networks, historian Yvan Gastaut posed a new question: how do we rethink migration in a hyper-connected world? He spoke of the «deterritorialization» brought about by constant digital access: «Will our longing for elsewhere be satisfied by this deterritorialization, which ultimately reduces the weight of physical space?»
Gastaut's reflection challenges us to reconsider the mobilities of tomorrow. While digital platforms symbolically erase borders and offer access to other cultures, they also risk creating a homogenized world. The world appears more open but at the cost of a growing uniformity that raises as many concerns as it does hopes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ya Biladi
12 hours ago
- Ya Biladi
Human Rights Forum : «Migration is instinctive, it's part of human nature»
Historian Pascal Blanchard set the tone for the debate by grounding it in a fundamental anthropological truth: migration is a natural part of being human. Far from a banal observation, his statement situates migration within its long historical context, reminding us that «America was built by immigrants» and that while hostility toward newcomers may be «understandable», it is «entirely misguided», as opposition has always existed. In his ten-minute address, Blanchard focused particularly on the paradoxes of our time. Despite globalization supposedly enabling greater connection, «it's precisely when the world becomes a village that moving freely becomes more difficult». He attributed this to a longstanding «fear of mixing», a phenomenon with deep historical roots that now finds new forms of expression, particularly through digital technologies. Three Contemporary Shocks Blanchard identified three major «shocks» shaping current migration debates. The first is demographic and economic: «Do you want to receive twice the pension?» A seemingly simple question that speaks to the challenges of aging Western societies. The second is global inequality: «Most countries won't be able to remain wealthy» as wealth is redistributed on a global scale. The third, and perhaps most unpredictable, is the climate crisis: «Climate risk is equivalent to the risk of war», Blanchard warned, given its power to trigger massive and unforeseen population movements. The Political Instrumentalization of Migration The conversation then turned to the increasingly politicized nature of migration. Andrea Rea, a sociology professor in Belgium, spoke of a «toxic instrumentalization» that has come to permeate broader societal debates. Migration, he noted, is now wielded as diplomatic leverage between countries. This dynamic cuts across traditional political lines. As Blanchard pointed out, «Donald Trump wasn't elected only by white men. White women voted for him too and so did many minorities». Opinions on migration, he argued, are far more nuanced, even among the communities most affected. Blanchard called for a fundamental rethinking of how migration is approached, as a means of combating the global rise of the far right. That begins, he argued, with education by «deconstructing xenophobia». Xenophobia, he insisted, «is not abstract. It's a culture», rooted in colonial history and sustained by historical stereotypes. Today's youth, he added, reject these outdated narratives. For them, the fear of the Other «can no longer hold». And as Blanchard powerfully concluded: «What we need to change is not human mobility, but the fixity of our fears». The new generation, he believes, may well drive that change. Culture as a Universal Tool «Culture opens doors when it listens rather than judges or rejects, it softens migration». These words from documentary filmmaker Kamal Redouani, who has worked extensively in conflict zones such as Syria, brought a deeply human perspective to the discussion. Sharing the story of Marwa, a young actress from Aleppo forced into exile, he emphasized how «culture gives people a voice of dignity». His message resonated particularly within the Moroccan context, where cultural diversity is a strength. The very fact that this forum was held during the Gnaoua and World Music Festival is a testament to that. Redouani also stressed the importance of «making room» for migrants and seeing the people behind the numbers. «We talk about statistics, but we forget where they've been», he said, recalling a poignant encounter with an elderly man on the road to exile: «I left my home behind, but I did not leave my memory». A sentence that, on its own, captures the strength, resilience, and dignity of those who continue to move forward despite having no guarantees for tomorrow. Crossing Borders Through Screens In an era where physical borders are increasingly blurred by digital networks, historian Yvan Gastaut posed a new question: how do we rethink migration in a hyper-connected world? He spoke of the «deterritorialization» brought about by constant digital access: «Will our longing for elsewhere be satisfied by this deterritorialization, which ultimately reduces the weight of physical space?» Gastaut's reflection challenges us to reconsider the mobilities of tomorrow. While digital platforms symbolically erase borders and offer access to other cultures, they also risk creating a homogenized world. The world appears more open but at the cost of a growing uniformity that raises as many concerns as it does hopes.
Morocco World
12-06-2025
- Morocco World
Global Nuclear Watchdog Finds Iran Failing to Meet Nuclear Operations
A resolution has been passed by the Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has, for the first time in 20 years, passed a formal resolution censuring Iran for failing to meet its nuclear obligations. Iran signed a nuclear deal with the United States and six other countries in 2015. However, the US withdrew from the deal and placed sanctions on Iran in 2018 during the first Trump administration. The Iran deal was established in response to international fears that Tehran was developing nuclear weapons, although it has consistently denied these allegations The Trump administration has had difficult relations since the assassination of General Qassem Soleimani in 2020. When he returned as President, he again overturned the Iran deal and started further negotiations with the country. Trump announced on June 11 that nationals in the region should be warned to leave the area. He also began to reduce the number of embassy staff in Iraq, Kuwait, and Bahrain, citing security concerns. However, last week, the IAEA raised concerns about a general lack of cooperation from Iran and raised questions concerning the secret activities and undeclared nuclear material, which was under investigation. Iran has also continuously breached the restrictions of the nuclear deal. On June 11, the global nuclear watchdog passed a resolution stating that Iran had failed to meet its obligations. This statement has the potential to go to the UN Security Council. The IAEA has reported that Iran has stockpiled in excess of 408 kg of uranium enriched to a purity of 60%, which far exceeds the nuclear deal at 3.67%. The IAEA has stated that this is enough uranium to build nine nuclear weapons. This announcement has put Western nations on high alert. Donald Trump has announced his concerns about these actions, placing sanctions on the state. He has also stated that Iran 'cannot have a nuclear weapon, it is that simple.' This comes as Iranian diplomat Abbas Araghchi is going to meet special envoy Steve Witkoff in Oman on Sunday. Iran has rejected the West's fears over its nuclear program, stating that the uranium is for peaceful purposes and that the state would never try to develop or acquire nuclear weapons. Observers characterize this as a historical development that could impact the security of the region. Tags: Iran Nuclear dealIran Nuclear ProgramIran nuclear weapons
Morocco World
12-06-2025
- Morocco World
Trump Moves US Staff from Middle East as Iran Talks Stall
Rabat – US President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that the United States is moving some of its personnel out of the Middle East due to growing tensions over Iran's nuclear program, with a stark warning that the country must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon. The announcement comes as nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran remain stalled. Iran has warned that if a conflict breaks out, it will target US military bases across the region. 'We've given notice to move out and we'll see what happens,' Trump told reporters in Washington. 'They can't have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. We're not going to allow that.' According to US officials, embassy staff in Iraq are being reduced due to security concerns, with reports suggesting personnel are also being moved from Kuwait and Bahrain. This move comes amid concerns that Israel may soon carry out airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Trump said he has urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on any action to give diplomacy more time, but he also said his patience is wearing thin. Iran responded strongly, threatening to strike US bases in the region if attacked. 'All its bases are within our reach … and without hesitation we will target all of them in the host countries,' said Iranian Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh. Iran's top diplomat, Abbas Araghchi, is expected to meet US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff in Oman on Sunday to discuss a response to Washington's latest proposal for a nuclear deal. Since returning to office in January, Trump has re-launched his 'maximum pressure' campaign on Iran, warning of military action if talks fail. This isn't the first time tensions between the two countries have led to threats of violence in recent years. In 2020, after a US strike killed top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani, Iran fired missiles at US bases in Iraq. The US still has many military bases in the Middle East, including its largest in Qatar. The UK's Maritime Trade Operations has advised ships to be careful when passing through the Gulf due to the risk of conflict. The main issue in the talks is Iran's uranium enrichment. Iran is currently enriching uranium at a rate 60% much higher than the 3.67% allowed under the 2015 nuclear deal. Although 60% is still below weapons-grade (90%), it has still put Iran on a high-alert watch for Western nations. Tehran insists its program is for peaceful use, but the US says this level of enrichment is unacceptable. The US initiated a proposal during multiple talks on the issue, but Iran has criticized it for not including relief from harsh economic sanctions, which have severely hurt its economy, and says it will soon present a counter-proposal.
