British Airways flights to Doha and Dubai cancelled after US strikes Iran
British Airways has cancelled flights to Dubai and Doha after Donald Trump ordered a US attack on Iran's nuclear sites.
It comes after a British Airways (BA) flight from London Heathrow to Dubai was diverted to Zurich on Saturday night (June 21).
The BA109 flight departed from the UK at 9.53pm on Saturday and reached Saudi Arabia before the Boeing 787 Dreamliner changed its course, landing in Switzerland, according to flight-tracking website Flightradar24.
All of the airline's flights to Dubai and Doha that were scheduled to depart from Heathrow on Sunday have been cancelled, including return flights, the company said.
Dubai: 1,000-plus British Airways passengers waiting in the UAE to be flown home after BA cancelled 4 flights from Heathrow to DXB. 1 BA plane on Saturday reached Saudi Arabia before turning around, but had to divert to Zurich. Emirates operating normally.https://t.co/oyhZE6OZVp
— Simon Calder (@SimonCalder) June 22, 2025
Israel announced on Sunday (June 22) that it had closed its airspace to both inbound and outbound flights in the wake of the US attacks.
The US struck three nuclear test sites in Iran overnight, prompting Tehran to launch a retaliatory ballistic missile barrage against Israel.
Recommended reading:
How does parking work at Heathrow Airport - All to know
Can you still use a red passport for travelling in 2025?
Furious Ryanair customer abandons holiday over 'ridiculous' £55 charge
In a statement, British Airways said: 'As a result of recent events, we have adjusted our flight schedule to ensure the safety of our customers and crew, which is always our top priority.
'We are contacting our customers to advise them of their options while we work through this developing situation.'
BA is offering a flexible booking policy for customers already booked onto flights to Dubai and Doha between Sunday and Tuesday who wish to change their dates of travel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Looking to Gamble on Hard-Hit Solar Stocks? This Is the Top-Rated Ticker Now.
If President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' passes, it would not be so beautiful for companies in the solar industry. This reality was evident in the meltdown that solar stocks witnessed on news that the Senate version of the bill looks to fully phase out both solar and wind power tax incentives by 2028. So, where does that leave First Solar (FSLR), whose shares have corrected by nearly 18% already this year? In a pretty good place, if analysts are to be believed. Looking to Gamble on Hard-Hit Solar Stocks? This Is the Top-Rated Ticker Now. Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! First Solar specializes in large-scale utility solar projects and integrated photovoltaic (PV) systems. The company designs, manufactures, and sells CdTe thin-film photovoltaic modules and is the only major solar manufacturer headquartered and producing in the U.S. Its market cap currently stands at $15.4 billion, making it one of the largest companies in the industry. Now, there are some valid reasons for FSLR stock's decline with the 'Big Beautiful Bill' chief among them. With such legislation pending, investors fear that developers may cancel or delay new solar installations, shrinking First Solar's total addressable market. Consequently, this may hurt project bookings and revenue visibility for First Solar. However, I reckon First Solar's correction has been overdone, and projections about its downturn extending further are misplaced. Why? Let's have a closer look. First Solar has had a tough time in recent quarters as its earnings have missed estimates, with the latest quarter even seeing the company's earnings witness a yearly decline. However, its net sales did surpass the Street estimates and rose on an annual basis, accompanied by a decrease in short-term debt. In Q1 2025, First Solar reported net revenues of $844.6 million, up 6.4% from the previous year. However, earnings of $1.95 per share reflected a yearly fall of 11.4%, missing the consensus estimate of $2.50 by a considerable margin. A yearly jump of 18.5% in total operating expenses to $123.2 million resulted in the sharp drop in profits. First Solar also cut its revenue guidance for 2025 to be between $4.5 billion and $5.5 billion from prior estimates of $5.3 billion and $5.8 billion. Net cash from operating activities was at a negative $607.9 million compared to the positive figure of $267.7 million in the year-ago period. However, First Solar closed the quarter with a cash balance of $837.6 million, which exceeded the company's short-term and long-term debt levels of $197.2 million and $327.9 million. Lastly, management remains confident about the company's long-term prospects based on its 'Made in USA' strategy with CEO Mark Widmar commenting, "Despite the near-term challenges presented by the new tariff regime, we believe that the long-term outlook for solar demand, particularly in our core U.S. market, remains strong, and that First Solar remains well-positioned to serve this demand. This belief is based on the unique profile of First Solar compared to its peers, as America's largest, and most established solar module manufacturer, and the country's only fully vertically integrated producer, our significant network of domestic supply chain vendors, and our proprietary CadTel-based semiconductor.' First Solar appears poised to win the battle for solar industry dominance for a few reasons. First is its unique CdTe thin-film solar technology, which gives the company a distinct advantage by insulating its supply chain from the risks associated with China-dependent crystalline silicon. With roughly 95% of solar modules globally based on crystalline silicon, First Solar stands out as the only large-scale solar manufacturer with international reach using cadmium telluride technology. This allows for a level of energy independence that isn't achievable through cost savings alone. Another key strength is its strong domestic manufacturing base. First Solar currently holds the largest solar production footprint within the U.S., and by 2026, it is expected to operate 14 GW of vertically integrated production capacity across the country. This includes the 3.5 GW facility in Alabama, which began operations last year, and a new Louisiana-based 3.5 GW plant that is on track to become commercially operational by year-end. These capacity expansions reflect the company's ongoing commitment to scaling operations in anticipation of rising electricity demand. The surge in artificial intelligence-driven infrastructure further plays to First Solar's strengths. AI data centers are projected to account for nearly half of all new power demand this decade, with solar energy likely to become the primary source fueling the next phase of digital development. First Solar's product line, especially its utility-scale thin-film modules, is particularly suited to meet the reliability and performance requirements of this growing segment. In fact, the company has secured supply deals with project developers who build facilities for hyperscale customers, effectively placing First Solar at the core of the AI-powered energy transition. Overall, its domestically manufactured modules are now playing a critical role in supporting data centers, chip manufacturing plants, and automated production hubs across the U.S. Analysts remain bullish on First Solar stock, assigning it a rating of 'Strong Buy' with a mean target price of $211.81. This denotes upside potential of about 45.5% from current levels. Out of 31 analysts covering the stock, 25 have a 'Strong Buy' rating, two have a 'Moderate Buy' rating, three have a 'Hold' rating, and one has a 'Strong Sell' rating. On the date of publication, Pathikrit Bose did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Toyota makes a tariff move customers are going to hate
While President Donald Trump's social media posts make it seem as though his tariff moves are executed at his whim, it is clear that at least some industries have a seat at the negotiating table. The auto industry's top executiveshave said they are in close contact with the White House and have even praised the president and his White House team for hearing their concerns. However, it is also clear that Trump's interest in protecting the auto industry's bottom line is minimal. Related: General Motors makes $4 billion tariff move Ford, Stellantis, and General Motors - America's Big 3 automakers - have all said that Trump's tariffs will cost them billions, and they've pulled their guidance due to a lack of visibility. Trump has made it clear to every industry that he doesn't want prices to increase, even going as far as telling companies like Walmart to just "EAT THE TARIFFS." So, every time the auto industry has been observed raising prices in recent months, it has denied that it has anything to do with tariffs. Others, like Mazda, have indeed eaten the tariffs, with the Japanese automaker sending a letter to its U.S. dealers informing them that it would not raise its sticker prices or tack on import fees for any vehicles already on dealership lots or that will come into the country before May 1. Toyota is the latest Japanese automaker to make a pricing move, but it isn't blaming the move on tariffs. Toyota sold over 2.3 million vehicles in the U.S. last year, a 3.7% year-over-year increase. Between April 2024 and March 2025, the company built 1.96 million units in the U.S., according to Statista. So, despite a U.S. production capacity that can handle nearly 2 million vehicles a year, Toyota still ships in nearly half a million vehicles from overseas to sell in the U.S. On June 21, Toyota said that prices for several Toyota and Lexus brand vehicles will rise by an average of $270 and $208, respectively, starting in July, according to an email seen by Bloomberg. While the price increase could be seen as a response to the 25% duties Trump has placed on auto imports, Toyota insists that the move is just part of its regular price review process. Related: Jeep parent Stellantis ponders drastic action on struggling brand In April, fellow Japanese automaker Mitsubishi said it would hold its vehicles in port for the foreseeable future instead of offloading them and being forced to pay duties. "We have sufficient stock on the ground at dealers for the moment to not impact customer choice," the company said at the time. While it was unclear how much cargo was in the ports, Mitsubishi's 330 U.S. dealers sold 109,843 vehicles in the U.S. in 2024, a 25.8% year-over-year increase and the brand's best performance since 2019. Earlier this month, the company announced that it is raising prices on three models, also saying that the move was just a regular adjustment and not a reaction to tariffs. Japanese car companies aren't the only ones afraid to pin their price increases on tariffs. In May, Ford sent a notice to dealers saying it planned to raise prices on the Mustang Mach-E electric SUV, Maverick pickup truck, and Bronco Sport SUV by as much as $2,000 on some models. Those vehicles are made in Mexico. More Automotive news Detroit Big 3 benefit from auto tariffs now, but time is running outPopular Ford newcomer overtakes Jeep in a key areaToyota makes surprising move to beat Tesla in key market A Ford spokesperson confirmed that the price increases will be seen on vehicles built after May 2. Those vehicles will start arriving on dealer lots in late June. The company emphasized that its employee pricing promotion remains for all of its vehicles through the July 4 weekend. Just like Mazda and Toyota before it, the company says the increase was due to its usual midyear pricing actions, but it was also "combined with some tariffs we are facing. We have not passed on the full cost of tariffs to our customers." Related: Car buyers, dealers are both shocked by latest price trends The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Treasurys may be losing their safe-haven status — and these bonds could take their place
U.S. Treasury bonds are seen as a safe haven at times of geopolitical upheaval and uncertainty — a refuge for global assets in the wake of a crisis. At such times, panicked investors flee to the perceived safety of the U.S. Treasury market, pushing up bond prices while yields fall. Except that didn't happen after Israel's attack on Iran last week. This was a geopolitical crisis of major proportions, risking a wider war that quite conceivably could draw in the United States. Yet, instead of falling in the immediate wake of the Israel-Iran hostilities, which would indicate buying demand, the 10-year U.S. Treasury BX:TMUBMUSD10Y yield spiked. My sister and her husband died within days of each other. Their banks won't let me access their safe-deposit boxes. What now? Investors brace for 'unpredictable spillovers' in markets after Trump announces Iran strikes 'I'm at my wit's end': My niece paid off her husband's credit card but fell behind on her taxes. How can I help her? Israel-Iran clash delivers a fresh shock to investors. History suggests this is the move to make. How can I buy my niece a home in her name only — without alienating or upsetting her husband? As of noon on June 13, the 10-year yield was 6 basis points higher than before Israel's attack began. Countries whose 10-year government yields fell that day, indicating demand, were primarily from Asia — led by an 8-basis-point one-day decline in Australia's 10-year bonds through midday on June 13. Taken by itself, last Friday's action is insufficient to conclude that the U.S. Treasury market has lost its safe-haven status. But many recent indicators are pointing in that direction. Perhaps the most significant occurred on April 2, when President Donald Trump announced huge tariffs on virtually all of the United States' trading partners. As the U.S. stock market plunged, some Wall Street heavyweights predicted that those tariffs would result in an 'economic nuclear winter.' In the past that panic would have been accompanied by a clear flight to safety in U.S. Treasurys, with their yields correspondingly falling. Yet after Trump's April 2 tariff announcement, the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield rose while the composite yield on government bonds of developed non-U.S. countries fell. Two large exchange-traded funds that invest in the government bonds of developed countries other than the U.S. are SPDR Bloomberg International Treasury Bond ETF BWX and iShares International Treasury Bond ETF IGOV. The BWX ETF has gained 9.3% and IGOV is up 10.0% so far this year, versus a gain of 3.6% for iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF IEF. The ETFs have an effective duration of between seven and eight years, comparable to that of the U.S. 10-year Treasury. The takeaway here is the need to diversify fixed-income investments that you hold as a hedge against geopolitical crises. You can no longer assume that U.S. Treasurys will be the prime beneficiary of a flight to safety. Mark Hulbert is a regular contributor to MarketWatch. His Hulbert Ratings tracks investment newsletters that pay a flat fee to be audited. He can be reached at More: Why bonds aren't acting like a safe haven for investors amid the Israel-Iran conflict Also read: How to select bond funds based on your investing needs and time horizon Israel-Iran conflict poses three challenges for stocks that could slam market by up to 20%, warns RBC I'm 75 and have a reverse mortgage. Should I pay it off with my $200K savings — and live off Social Security instead? I'm 51, earn $129K and have $165K in my 401(k). Can I afford to retire when my husband, 59, draws Social Security at 62? 'I'm 68 and my 401(k) has dwindled to $82,000': My husband committed financial infidelity and has $50,000 in credit-card debt. What now? 'It might be another Apple or Microsoft': My wife invested $100K in one stock and it exploded 1,500%. Do we sell? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
