Let me tell you why Pride matters, 40 years after the first parade in Wales

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Sharon James-Evans, is principal of Cardiff and Vale College and a gay woman
Every year I look forward to Pride Month. It's not just to celebrate the progress we've made but to remind myself that, even in moments of joy, we have to stay vigilant. Pride has always been both a celebration and a prompt —a moment to rejoice, but also a call to action and a time to speak out.
This year marks the 26th anniversary of the largest not-for-profit LGBTQ+ organisation in Wales, which will host over 50,000 people in a weekend of celebration and solidarity. It promises to be a wonderful event, but beyond the parades and festivities, it's also a reminder of the work still to be done. Everything you need to know about Pride Cymru's weekend in Cardiff is here.
As a gay woman, Pride means so much more than just a celebration of who we are. It's a direct response to the ever-present danger of regression affecting many in our society, especially at a time when there is a rising tide of anti LGBTQ+ legislation is particularly affecting transgender people in the United States. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here
And it's not just about trans people. The fight for trans rights is fundamentally a fight for all human rights. It echoes the same ideals that have driven other liberation movements—whether it's for racial justice, women's rights, or disability rights. At its core, the trans rights movement is about autonomy, self-determination, freedom from violence, and the ability to live without societal limitations.
Indeed, I find myself increasingly concerned by what's unfolding in the United States. The attack on transgender rights and the larger LGBTQ+ community there is rippling outward, affecting not just Americans, but people all over the world. It has the potential to become a dangerous export.
(Image: Matthew Horwood)
Meanwhile, here in the UK, the latest Home Office data shows that transphobic hate crimes increased by 186% between 2018 and 2023. It's not right, and it's not fair.
In Cardiff, where I'll be marching with my colleagues at Pride, the realities of these issues feel particularly pressing. Diversity, inclusion, and community are core values at the very heart of our Cardiff and Vale College, and I'm proud that we represent one of the most vibrant and diverse communities in Wales.
As Wales' largest college, we prioritise diversity and inclusivity for our staff and our learners, and we are proud of our thriving and caring community. Our LGBTQ+ Staff Network is a safe space for staff to connect, share experiences, and support one another, enabling cross departmental collaboration and friendships to grow thus promoting an inclusive culture. There is no place for any anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric.
In fact, we hold the prestigious Leaders in Diversity status, and we are previous winners of the Association of Colleges (AoC) UK-wide Beacon Award. That's testament to our innovative work to embrace equality and inclusion. We also hold a WorldSkills UK Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Ambassador Award and we are second on the NCFD's Top 100 Most Inclusive Workplaces.
This is important because research from Stonewall has shown that LGBTQ+ workers are increasingly prioritising diversity in their workplace. Three-quarters of LGBTQ+ workers want to work for companies that actively support inclusion. Yet despite this demand, bullying and harassment are still rampant in many sectors, with 49% of LGBTQ+ workers reporting unwanted sexual comments or being undermined due to their identity. Even more concerning, one in five LGBTQ+ workers contemplate leaving their job due to lack of LGBTQ+ inclusion efforts.
That's why we celebrate Pride not only as a symbol of who we are but as a rallying cry for action. This is a time for solidarity, not just in marches but in real, everyday actions. As a country, we should be proud to be a safe space where people can live openly, with acceptance and without fear of judgment.
We're reminded of the words of German pastor Martin Niemöller, who warned of the dangers of staying silent in the face of injustice. In his famous poem 'First They Came…', he reflects on how failing to speak out when others are targeted ultimately leaves no one to defend us when we become the target. It's a powerful message for us all. When trans rights are attacked, it is not only a trans issue—it is a human issue. Silence in the face of discrimination allows oppression to grow unchecked.
We must remember that the LGBTQ+ community, including trans people, are like all people - multifaceted, with complex lives, rich relationships, careers, and communities. The struggles they face are a direct result of the prejudice, violence, and barriers that society continues to put in their way. Our collective responsibility is to remove those barriers—whether that's standing up against discrimination, advocating for better healthcare access, or simply being an ally in our workplaces and communities.
Pride is our collective voice—loud, visible, and resolute in saying: we will not be silent. It's about wanting to be part of a multi-cultural and fully inclusive society and creating a world where trans people, and all LGBTQ+ people, can live freely, fully, and safely together.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

South Wales Argus

27 minutes ago

• South Wales Argus

Historic vote brings assisted dying closer to becoming law in England and Wales

More than 300 MPs backed a Bill that would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to end their lives. Yes campaigners wept, jumped and hugged each other outside parliament as the vote result was announced, while some MPs appeared visibly emotional as they left the chamber. Others lined up to shake hands with Kim Leadbeater, the Bill's sponsor through the Commons, with some, including Home Office minister Jess Phillips, stopping to hug the Spen Valley MP. Despite warnings from opponents around the safety of a Bill they argued has been rushed through, the proposed legislation has taken another step in the parliamentary process. MPs voted 314 to 291, majority 23, to approve Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill at third reading. Kim Leadbeater has been the MP behind the assisted dying bill (Jonathan Brady/PA) This means the Bill has completed its first stages in the Commons and will move to the House of Lords for further debate and scrutiny. Both Houses must agree the final text of the Bill before it can be signed into law. Due to the four-year implementation period, it could be 2029 – potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's Parliament – before assisted dying is offered. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. Supporters of assisted dying have described the current law as not being fit for purpose, with desperate terminally ill people feeling the need to end their lives in secret or go abroad to Dignitas alone, for fear loved ones will be prosecuted for helping them. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a poll (James Manning/PA) Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer remained supportive of the Bill, voting yes on Friday as he had done last year. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, who had urged MPs to vote against the legislation, describing it as 'a bad Bill' despite being 'previously supportive of assisted suicide', voted no. Friday was the first time the Bill was debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 at second reading. Labour MP Ms Leadbeater has argued her Bill will 'correct the profound injustices of the status quo and to offer a compassionate and safe choice to terminally ill people who want to make it'. During an hours-long date on Friday, MPs on both sides of the issue recalled personal stories of loved ones who had died. Conservative former minister Sir James Cleverly, who led the opposition to the Bill in the Commons, spoke of a close friend who died 'painfully' from cancer. He said he comes at the divisive issue 'not from a position of faith nor from a position of ignorance', and was driven in his opposition by 'concerns about the practicalities' of the Bill. MPs had a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decided according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Campaigners in Parliament Square, central London, ahead of the vote (PA) The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Public support for a change in the law remains high, according to a YouGov poll published on the eve of the vote. The survey of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, suggested 73% of those asked last month were supportive of the Bill, while the proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle stood at 75%.

BBC News

31 minutes ago

• BBC News

Pride flag moved in Matlock after Christian bookshop complaint

A council in Derbyshire has removed a Pride flag following a complaint from a Christian Town Council said it had received "communication" that the rainbow flag could be "forcibly removed" from outside Cornerstone Christian Bookshop in Dale Road so action was taken to relocate the the flag to another central location to avoid confrontation or council said the decision was "purely from a health and safety standpoint" and it stood in "full support of the LGBTQIA+ community".In a statement, the trustees of the bookshop said they were happy to fly flags but declined to fly the Pride flag as a "matter of conscience and in keeping with our faith and scriptures". Last year, the council needed to replace a number of flags and approved a budget to add Derbyshire and Pride flags to complement the existing Union Jacks flown in the town's mayor, Marilyn Franks, told the BBC the idea was to make the town centre more colourful and welcoming to visitors. The various flags were put up randomly above shop fronts but the Christian bookshop, which has been open since 1994, complained. The council's decision to move the flag prompted criticism on social deputy mayor Ashley Orwin, who is gay, said the complaint and the flag's removal had supercharged support for the town's first Pride event which is taking place in June next year."This has actually sparked a really positive response because it has shown how inclusive and accepting the community is," Orwin said. "There's been a moment of complaint and it spiralled into a bit of a social media thing. But the resounding thing from it is people support and love our community."As a gay man in public office, this has only been a positive thing... this has sparked our first Pride [event] in the Peaks in Matlock that's going to happen next year."In a statement, town council leaders said they "deeply regret" any upset the removal may have caused. "The move was made without malice or prejudice, and we sincerely apologise to any individuals or groups who were hurt by this decision," the statement said."We recognise how symbolic the flag is, especially during Pride Month, and we acknowledge the impact this action had, regardless of intent." In a joint statement, the store's trustees said: "The bookshop is an inclusive organisation that wants to share the Christian faith with everyone and we do not want to advocate or condemn anyone on the basis of their belief or sexual orientation."As a Christian bookshop we would have been delighted to have flown the Derbyshire flag, the flag of St George or the Union Flag. "Unfortunately, due to lack of initial consultation on the matter, we had to decline to fly the flag allocated to our shop, as a matter of conscience and in keeping with our faith and scriptures."Many of the other faith communities in Britain would also have declined to fly this flag. Fortunately, we are blessed in this country with freedom of conscience and freedom of religion legislation, enshrined in the Equality Act of 2010 which allows religion or belief as a protected characteristic. "We are therefore very grateful for the speedy removal of this flag when we raised our concern to the council."

Daily Mirror

2 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

Trump administration scrap suicide helpline for LGBTQ+ youths

LGBTQ+ organisations have described the defunding of the suicide prevention service as "devastating" as Trump's administration plans to close helpline within 30 days The Trump administration is set to shut down a US national suicide prevention hotline for LGBTQ young people in funding cuts. American non-profit suicide prevention organisation, The Trevor Project has described scrapping the the helpline as "devastating", but the administration has cited the service as "radical gender ideology". The suicide prevention service in place for LGBTQ young people says it will soon close, but a 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline will remain active with an option for LGBTQ youths available. The service has reassured that anyone calling will be treated with "compassion' and helped, but the hotline cuts to specific LGBTQ people has raised concerns for many. ‌ The Trevor Project has helped to run the LGBTQ+ helpline option, and the organisation has said the recent decision will be harmful, impacting vulnerable young people the most. ‌ Chief executive of The Trevor Project, Jaymes Black said 'suicide prevention is about people, not politics' and expressed concern at the announcement that the LGBTQ suicide prevention hotline will close down in 30 days time. Mr Black said: "The administration's decision to remove a bipartisan, evidence-based service that has effectively supported a high-risk group of young people through their darkest moments is incomprehensible." The funding cuts to the service in place for this 'high risk' group coincides with international Pride Month, where LGBTQ lifestyle and history is celebrated across the world. Cities across the globe feature Pride processions and events honouring LGBTQ culture in society. The news of axing the service also came in ahead of a US Supreme Court decision on June 17 concerning minors who identify as transgender. The state of Tennessee upheld a ban on healthcare help when transitioning. The general 988 Lifeline will still offer a helpline for anyone who is struggling with mental health. It provides free mental health support via call, texts, or a chat service. The 988 Lifeline is funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration in America. ‌ Any LGBTQ young people calling through currently can select option 3 from the menu to connect with specialised counsellors. Once the changes occur (in 30 days time) the general 988 Lifeline service will instead "focus on serving all help seekers", including LGBTQ young people. However, when the changes are in place, the hotline will no longer have a separate helpline for LGBTQ youth services. Officials from the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposed the cuts to the 988 Lifeline's LGBTQ youth services in June 2025. Speaking to NBC News at the time, a HHS spokesperson said the specialised LGBTQ+ option was a "chat service where children are encouraged to embrace radical gender ideology by 'counsellors' without consent or knowledge of their parents". ‌ LGBTQ youth are "more than four times more likely to contemplate suicide than their peers, with 1 in 5 LGBTQ youth and more than 1 in 3 transgender youth reporting attempting suicide" reports suggest. But the helpline cuts come amid Trump's push to curtail other services specifically for transgender people across the government. Trump recently ordered the removal of transgender service people from the US military - and issued an executive order. The order being that the American government would only recognise males and females as 'two sexes' in society.