‘Yellow shirts' return to Bangkok streets, demand Thai PM quit
The protest, held in scorching tropical heat, drew mostly elderly demonstrators wearing yellow shirts. PHOTO: REUTERS
BANGKOK - Hundreds of anti-government protesters gathered outside Thailand's Government House on June 19, demanding Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra resign over a leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen that triggered public outrage.
The scandal rocked Ms Paetongtarn's coalition after the Bhumjaithai party, a key partner, pulled out on the evening of June 18, accusing her of undermining the country and insulting the dignity of the military.
The leaked call, in which Ms Paetongtarn referred to the Thai army's north-eastern commander as her opponent and addressed Mr Hun Sen as 'uncle', has drawn strong public backlash.
The protest, held in scorching tropical heat, drew mostly elderly demonstrators wearing yellow shirts – the colour strongly associated with Thailand's monarchy – who accused the 38-year-old leader of 'lacking diplomatic skills' and 'endangering national interests'.
'I was very disappointed when I heard the (leaked) audio,' Ms Kanya Hanotee, 68, a temple worker told AFP.
'She lacks negotiation skills. Who does she think she is? This country is not hers.'
Protesters waved Thai flags and placards labelling Ms Paetongtarn a 'traitor', and chanted 'Get out!' and 'Go to hell!' while dozens of riot police stood nearby.
Many in the crowd were long-time supporters of the conservative, pro-royalist 'Yellow Shirt' movement, which has fiercely opposed the Shinawatra political dynasty since the 2000s.
Ms Kaewta, 62, a housewife from Bangkok said she joined Yellow Shirt protests near Bangkok's Democracy Monument two decades ago.
'I didn't support any political party. All I knew was that I hated Thaksin and his family,' she told AFP. 'Our politicians are all corrupt.'
The battle between the conservative pro-royal establishment and Mr Thaksin's political movement backed by its own 'Red Shirt' supporters has dominated Thai politics for more than 20 years.
Yellow Shirts, backed by Royalists and business elites, led 2008 protests that shut Bangkok's airports, stranded tourists, and helped topple a Thaksin-linked government.
In 2010, pro-Thaksin 'Red Shirt' protesters rallied in Bangkok in opposition to the military-backed government, ending in a bloody crackdown that left more than 90 people dead.
'The power has been passed from her father to her aunt, and now to her,' said Mr Mek Sumet, 59, an electrical equipment seller who took part in the 2008 Don Mueang airport occupation.
'She doesn't think of the country but only of herself,' he told AFP.
The kingdom has had a dozen coups since the end of absolute monarchy in 1932, and the current crisis has inevitably triggered rumours that another may be in the offing.
Despite Thailand's long history of coups, some protestors openly welcomed the idea of another military intervention.
'I want the military to take control,' Ms Kanya told AFP. 'We are thinking long-term. It will be positive for the country.' AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
International Business Times
an hour ago
- International Business Times
Thailand's Gas Gamble: How Policy Missteps and Private Gains Drive Up Power Bills
In a nation where more than two-thirds of electricity is generated by gas-fired plants, Thailand's deepening reliance on expensive liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports is not just an energy strategy—it's a growing burden on its people. As global LNG prices spike and domestic gas output dwindles, questions are mounting over whether energy policy mismanagement and elite profiteering have come at the expense of the average Thai household. At the center of this complex web lies Gulf Energy Development Public Company Ltd., a powerful conglomerate helmed by Thailand's richest man, Sarath Ratanavadi. Together with the state-owned PTT Group, Gulf has secured long-term rights to import, store, and distribute LNG under lucrative government contracts. And while energy prices for consumers rise, so too do the profits of these well-connected corporate giants. The Cost of Policy Paralysis The roots of the crisis trace back to delays and dysfunction in the management of Thailand's domestic gas fields. The Erawan and Bongkot concessions in the Gulf of Thailand—once key pillars of the country's energy independence—saw production plummet following administrative upheavals. Chevron, which had operated Erawan since 1981, was ousted in 2021 in favor of a state-backed bidder, PTTEP. The handover was anything but smooth. By 2022, output from Erawan had dropped by over 50%. Despite promises from successive energy ministers to fast-track exploration and development, a combination of bureaucratic gridlock and deliberate policy choices has led Thailand to import nearly a third of its gas as LNG, compared to under 5% in 2011. These LNG imports are often priced at two to seven times more than domestically produced gas. In 2022, LNG hit a jaw-dropping $38.66 per million BTU, while Thai-sourced gas was only $5.51. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) reports that LNG imports surged 34% in 2023 alone. The financial toll on Thailand's state utility, EGAT, has been staggering—losses of 150 billion baht ($4.3 billion) between late 2021 and the end of 2022. A Tale of Two Winners: Gulf and PTT Gulf Development, once a challenger to PTT's monopoly, now appears to be its most strategic partner. The two firms jointly operate the Gulf MTP LNG Terminal, one of the country's main LNG import facilities. The terminal's capacity is set to double from 5 to 10.8 million tons annually. Gulf was granted its import license in 2020, becoming only the second private player after EGAT. Since then, the firm has expanded its influence across the LNG supply chain—from procurement to regasification to pipeline distribution. Critics argue that the system has been gamed to benefit a handful of actors. Two senior officials within the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC), which oversees procurement policy, previously held advisory or executive roles at Gulf and PTT. The appearance of conflict of interest has eroded public trust in regulatory oversight. "This is a classic case of regulatory capture," said an IEEFA analyst who requested anonymity. "You have regulators with corporate ties making decisions that steer the country toward imported gas, which just happens to benefit their former—or future—employers." The Public Pays the Price The fallout is increasingly visible in Thai households and businesses. Electricity prices have remained elevated despite a fall in global LNG prices in 2024. EGAT, which purchases over 85% of Gulf's power output, absorbs the higher input costs, eventually passing them down to consumers. Small businesses, already recovering from the pandemic, have seen utility bills cut into margins. Rural provinces have protested rolling blackouts and unaffordable tariffs. Meanwhile, Gulf's profits have soared, bolstered by long-term contracts and a guaranteed buyer in EGAT. The government's response has been muted. While officials acknowledge rising costs, they continue to cite energy "security" and global volatility as justification for their reliance on LNG. Yet, a growing chorus of energy economists and civil society groups argue that the crisis is self-inflicted. "Thailand had the resources," said Dr. Nakornthap, a respected energy expert. "What it lacked was the political will and administrative competence to develop them." What Lies Ahead With elections on the horizon and household discontent simmering, energy policy is emerging as a political flashpoint. Some opposition leaders are calling for a full audit of LNG contracts and regulatory appointments. Others propose reforms that would prioritize domestic exploration and overhaul procurement transparency. As the Thai people pay for these missteps at the meter, the broader lesson may echo beyond Bangkok: in energy policy, inaction and insider influence can be just as costly as imported gas.
International Business Times
2 hours ago
- International Business Times
Pro-Palestinian Activists Go Berserk, Vandalize RAF Aircraft in England
Pro-Palestinian activists in the UK broke into a Royal Air Force base in central England on Friday, vandalizing two military aircraft used for transport and refueling operations. The incident took place at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire. The group, Palestine Action, claimed responsibility, saying two activists infiltrated the high-security base and sprayed red paint into the engines of the RAF Voyager aircraft. They also reportedly used crowbars to inflict structural damage. A video of the incident was posted by the group on X, formerly Twitter. It showed the activists moving around the base and targeting the aircraft with red paint. "Though Britain criticizes the Israeli government, it still helps fly spy planes over Gaza, sends military cargo, and refuels U.S./Israeli jets," the group said in a statement. "Britain isn't merely complicit—it's actively involved in Gaza genocide and Middle East war crimes." The UK's Ministry of Defence strongly condemned what it described as an act of "vandalism" and confirmed it is collaborating with police in the investigation. "Our Armed Forces represent the best of our nation. They risk their lives for our safety. Their courage, commitment, and selfless service are an example to everyone," the ministry said. "We must stand by those who protect us." Local police said they received reports of unauthorized access and criminal damage at the base. An investigation is underway. (With inputs from agencies)
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Israel tells UN Security Council ‘we will not stop' Iran attacks
Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon speaking at a meeting of the UN Security Council on June 20. PHOTO: AFP WASHINGTON - Iran said it would continue to defend itself against Israel during a UN Security Council session on June 20, while Israel's UN ambassador vowed that his country would not stop its attacks until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled. 'We will not stop,' Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon said. 'Not until Iran's nuclear threat is dismantled, not until its war machine is disarmed, not until our people and yours are safe.' Iran's UN Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani urged the Security Council to take action. 'Israel apparently declared that it will continue this strike for as many days as it takes. We are alarmed by credible report that the United States... may be joining this war,' he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
