How Trump's ‘big, beautiful' bill targets transgender medical procedures nationally

The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld Tennessee's ban on transgender medical procedures for minors — a controversial practice that could be outlawed nationally if President Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill clears the Senate intact.
The House-passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes a provision barring the use of taxpayer money to fund so-called 'gender-affirming care,' for both children and adults.
The provision, championed by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-Texas), would ban Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIPs) and Affordable Care Act (ACA) funds from being spent on puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and irreversible surgeries, such as double masectomies and genital reconstruction.
The so-called 'Crenshaw Amendment' — a last-minute addition to the massive piece of legislation — specifically amends the Social Security Act, halting federal payments for what the provision deems as medically unnecessary procedures.
3 Crenshaw's provision will save taxpayers $2.5 billions over the next 10 years, according to his office.
REUTERS
The provision will have to survive the Senate's strict rules governing the reconciliation process, specifically the Byrd Rule, to make it into the upper chamber's version of the legislation.
The Byrd Rule prevents the inclusion of measures deemed 'extraneous' to the budget process. For instance, provisions that don't directly affect spending or revenue.
The Byrd Rule is interpreted and enforced by the Senate parliamentarian.
Crenshaw's office notes that taxpayers will save 'about $2.5 billion over 10 years' if the provision becomes law.
'That's the estimated savings from blocking federal funding — via Medicaid, CHIP, and ACA — for gender transition procedures,' the congressman's office states. 'With transition costs running up to $75,000 per patient, the numbers add up fast. This amendment cuts it off—saving money and saving lives.'
Last month, Crenshaw vowed that his provision 'will become law,' arguing that it is 'long overdue.'
'Gender transition procedures are the lobotomy of our generation,' he said in a statement. 'So-called 'gender-affirming care' isn't healthcare — it's fringe science with no proven benefit and massive risks.'
3 The transgender surgery ban would codify and expand on President Trump's executive actions preventing federal agencies from using tax dollars to promote or fund gender transitions.
AP
3 The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's transgender surgery ban on Wednesday in a 6-3 ruling.
REUTERS
In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court found that Tennessee's ban on transgender puberty blockers and hormone therapy treatments for minors does not violate the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
More than half of US states have similar laws on the books.
'Today was not just a win for basic biology and common sense, but for human decency, sound medicine, and the dignity and safety of children everywhere,' Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) said of the high court's ruling.
'As a doctor for over 25 years, I understand the gravity of these harmful so-called treatments radical activists have been pushing on children. They leave permanent scarring, sterilization, and other horrible side effects,' he added.
'Make no mistake, there's more work to do, and I remain committed to eliminating taxpayer-funded transgender procedures on both minors and adults.'
Marshall's No Subsidies for Gender Transition Procedures Act is the Senate's companion legislation to Crenshaw's measure in the House.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

25 minutes ago

• Yahoo

U.S. Soccer Star Dishes On 'Weird' Oval Office Moment With Donald Trump

U.S. Men's National Soccer Team star Timothy Weah has opened up about what he described as the 'weird' experience of standing behind Donald Trump in the Oval Office while the president fielded questions on the Iran-Israel war and attacked the idea of transgender women competing in women's sports. Weah was at the White House with his Juventus teammates on Wednesday as part of a promotional event for the FIFA Club World Cup, ahead of the Italian side's 5-0 victory over the United Arab Emirates' Al-Ain FC. Advertisement Trump invited questions from reporters about the game and the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which the U.S. will host alongside Mexico and Canada. But the Juventus players stood uncomfortably behind POTUS as he instead answered queries about the more pressing political questions of the day. Weah, the son of former Liberian soccer star-turned-former president George Weah, later told reporters that the players had been made to attend the event. 'They told us that we have to go and I had no choice but to go,' he explained, reported The Athletic. 'I was caught by surprise, honestly. It was a bit weird,' he added. 'When he started talking about the politics with Iran and everything, it's kind of like, I just want to play football, man.' Related...

Bloomberg

33 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

Bassiri Tabrizi: Promising To See Diplomacy Back on Table

President Trump says he is putting off US action on Iran, for now. The White House says he'll decide within two weeks whether to attack, adding that his goal remains halting uranium enrichment, and he remains open to diplomacy if possible. Gulf leaders are assessing the possibility of the Islamic Republic's clerical regime falling as an impact of the war between Israel and Iran. Aniseh Bassiri Tabrizi, Senior Analyst at Control Risks told Bloomberg's Horizons Middle East and Africa anchor Joumanna Bercetche on the next steps ahead. (Source: Bloomberg)

Newsweek

42 minutes ago

• Newsweek

Russia Reacts to Trump Tactical Nuclear Bomb Report: 'Catastrophic'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russia said the use of a tactical nuclear weapon by the U.S. in Iran would be "catastrophic" after a report that it had not been ruled out as an option for President Donald Trump, who is considering joining Israel's strikes. "There is a lot of speculation now," said Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin, state news agency TASS reported. "Such a development of events would be catastrophic, but there is so much speculation that it is actually impossible to comment on it." The question is whether a bunker-buster bomb would be sufficient to destroy Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment facility, which is built deep into a mountain, or if it would take a tactical nuclear bomb to finish the job. The Guardian had reported that tactical nuclear weapons were considered more capable of destroying Fordow, citing unnamed defense officials, but that Trump was not presented with or considering them as an option. Later, Fox News reported that all military options were still on the table for the U.S., citing an unnamed top official, but that the military is very confident bunker-buster bombs could destroy Fordow. There has been no official comment from the U.S. about whether the use of a tactical nuclear weapon is being considered. Trump is giving himself two weeks to decide if he should strike Iran, a window of time for Tehran to avert such a fate by abandoning its nuclear program. It denies seeking to build a nuclear bomb, saying the program is for energy purposes. But Iran has enriched uranium to a level very close to that required for a bomb, and well beyond what is needed for civilian energy. Trump says Iran cannot be allowed to build a nuclear bomb. This is a developing article. Updates to follow.