《古墓奇兵》新作終於要來？爆料者聲稱隨時都可能會公開

（圖源：Shadow of the Tomb Raider）
2022 年時，Square Enix 以 3 億美金的價格，出售旗下《古墓奇兵》（Tomb Raider）和《駭客入侵》等多款遊戲 IP 與開發團隊給 Embracer 集團，雖然收購後《古墓奇兵》推出了兩部舊版強化盒輯，但新作已經有近 7 年時間沒有任何消息。而近日，根據爆料消息指出，《古墓奇兵》新作很快就會推出。
知名影視娛樂消息爆料者 V Scooper，去年曾爆料《古墓奇兵》新作背景設定在印度，並且有張能允許玩家自由探索的大地圖、可以駕駛載具等消息。而近日，V Scooper 引用去年的消息，發文表示《古墓奇兵》新作可能隨時都會公開。
I can see the announcement coming anytime soon... https://t.co/5Rs00Nh66M
— V Scooper (@thevscooper) April 11, 2025
距離上一次 Crystal Dynamics 的《古墓奇兵》新作，已經是 2018 年的《古墓奇兵：暗影》，屬於重啟系列的新三部曲。而 Crystal Dynamics 其實早在 2022 年時，就通過 Epic Games 的官方節目「 The State of Unreal 2022 」確認新作採用 Unreal Engine 5 開發，後來更確定是由 Amazon Games 負責發行，不過同樣至今 2 年過去仍沒有任何新消息。
緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠，追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台！
🎉📱 Tech Facebook：https://www.facebook.com/yahootechhk
🎉📱 Tech Instagram：https://www.instagram.com/yahootechhk/
🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群：https://chat.whatsapp.com/Dg3fiiyYf3yG2mgts4Mii8
🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道：https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va91dmR545urVCpQwq2D
🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道：https://t.me/yahootechhk

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Geek Girl Authority

2 hours ago

• Geek Girl Authority

How to Choose a 3D Game Studio in 2025

A truly cutting-edge 3D game studio in 2025 is defined by its adoption of advanced technology, a proven multidisciplinary team, and a forward-looking portfolio. Top studios embrace the latest game engines (such as Unreal Engine 5 with features like Nanite and Lumen for realism), AI-driven tools, and modern development practices. They showcase projects leveraging 3D game development services in VR/AR, realistic physics, and cross-platform deployment, demonstrating versatility. Moreover, a cutting-edge studio has a team of experienced 3D game developers (artists, programmers, designers) who continuously update their skills. These studios often integrate innovations like AI for QA or procedural generation, indicating they stay ahead of industry trends. In short, a 2025-era top studio is one that pairs seasoned talent with state-of-the-art tech to deliver standout gaming experiences. How crucial is a studio's portfolio and past projects in 2025? In a word, extremely crucial. A studio's portfolio is a window into its capabilities and consistency. Investors or clients should thoroughly examine the games and projects a studio has completed: Are there titles similar in genre or scope to your project? High-quality past projects prove the studio's technical skill and artistic vision. It's advisable to not only look at screenshots or descriptions, but actually play or experience those games if possible. Check for elements like visual fidelity, smooth performance, and innovative gameplay in their past work. A strong portfolio with successful 3D games (especially ones that achieved game development goals or market success) also reflects reliability. Studios like this will have honed pipelines and can cite concrete results. In 2025, a portfolio is the ultimate credibility marker – it shows whether a game development company can meet modern standards in graphics, design, and user experience. Always favor studios with a track record of projects that align with the quality and style you aim to achieve. What role does specialization play for 3D game developers? Specialization can be a major asset. Many game development studios carve out niches or areas of focus – for example, some specialize in photorealistic AAA action games, others in stylized mobile experiences. This specialization means the studio's developers build deep expertise in particular engines, genres, or art styles. For clients, choosing a studio specialized in your project's domain often translates to higher efficiency and quality. They will understand genre conventions and technical requirements better. For instance, a studio known as a 3D game development company for VR titles will be aware of performance tricks and interaction design for VR that a generalist might miss. However, specialization should be balanced with versatility. If your project spans multiple genres or platforms, ensure the studio isn't too narrowly focused. In 2025's competitive landscape, many top 3D game developers have multidisciplinary teams where each member might specialize (one expert in Unreal Engine, another in character art, etc.), collectively covering all bases. The key is to match the studio's strengths with your project's needs. A specialized studio with relevant experience will hit the ground running, whereas a mismatch could lead to a learning curve or subpar results. What cultural and communication aspects are essential for a successful partnership in 2025? Successful game projects rely not just on technical prowess but also on cultural fit and communication between the client and studio. Open, transparent communication ensures that the vision for the game is shared and understood by both parties. In 2025, with many projects happening remotely or across different countries, it's vital that a studio's team is proficient in your preferred language and uses modern collaboration tools (Slack, Jira, etc.) for regular updates. A positive collaborative culture – where the studio welcomes client input and provides honest feedback – is crucial. Look for signs of this in initial meetings: do they ask insightful questions about your 3D game concept? Do they set clear expectations about milestones and feedback cycles? Cultural alignment also matters: if you value a certain work ethic or creative philosophy, the studio's values should resonate with that. For instance, if iterative development and flexibility are important to you, avoid highly rigid studios. Effective communication entails scheduled progress reports, clear points of contact (e.g., a dedicated project manager), and a documented plan for handling changes or issues. Ultimately, a studio that is communicative and culturally in sync will be easier to work with, avoid misunderstandings, and be more likely to deliver a product that meets or exceeds expectations. What questions should you ask about a 3D game studio? To make an informed choice, prepare a list of pointed questions when evaluating a prospective 3D game studio: Can I see case studies or play demos of your past 3D games? – This probes their experience with projects similar to yours. Ask what the studio specifically contributed on those projects (game design, 3D art, programming, etc.). Who will be on the development team for this project? – Get an idea of team size and the roles (lead developer, artists, QA, etc.). Inquire about their experience levels. A strong team will have specialists where needed (e.g., a senior 3D game designer for level design). What is your development process and timeline? – A professional studio should be able to outline their process (pre-production, milestones, testing phases) clearly. If they provide only vague answers or skip important stages (like prototyping or QA), that's a red flag. How do you handle project management and communication? – Ensure they use project tracking (Agile boards, weekly status updates) and have a system for incorporating feedback. For example, ask if you will get to review builds at regular intervals. Can you discuss your approach to post-launch support? – A serious studio will mention maintenance, updates, or the ability to provide live-ops if the game requires it. This shows they don't consider the job done the moment the game is delivered – crucial for ongoing 3D game projects. These questions not only give you answers, but also let you gauge the studio's professionalism. A confident game dev studio will answer transparently and enthusiastically, while evasion or inconsistency in answers might indicate issues. What financial considerations and engagement models are most popular for choosing 3D game development services? In 2025, studios typically offer a few engagement models: Fixed-price contracts – A set price for a defined scope. This model is predictable in cost but requires a very clear initial specification. It's suited for smaller projects or when an investor has rigid budget limits. However, changes in scope later will require renegotiation. Time and Materials (T&M) – You pay for the actual hours and resources expended. This model is flexible when scope can evolve, common in agile development. It requires trust, as costs can grow if the project expands. Reputable studios will still give an estimate and update you frequently on burn rate. Dedicated team / Outsourcing model – Essentially hiring a ready-made development team for a period. The studio charges a monthly rate for a team dedicated to your project. This is useful for long-term projects where you want maximum control and integration with your processes. When evaluating pricing, get detailed quotes and break downs. Compare what's included: Does the price cover art, music, testing, post-launch support? For example, a quote might be higher but includes extensive QA and 6 months post-release support, which adds value. Be wary of game development services that are quoted far below industry norms – if it sounds too good to be true, it likely is. Extremely low bids could mean the studio is underestimating the work or will cut corners. Also discuss payment schedules (milestone-based payments are standard to ensure mutual commitment). In terms of budget impact: remember that 'fast, good, cheap – pick two' cliché often holds true. Quality 3D development isn't cheap, and rushing can raise costs. An investor should decide what is priority – is it meeting a strict launch date, or staying within a strict budget? Align the engagement model accordingly. Lastly, clarify upfront how extra features or changes will be billed to avoid disputes later. What are the key indicators of a 3D studio's commitment to post-launch support? Several signals show that a studio is serious about post-launch support: Mentioning updates and maintenance in the contract or proposal: If the studio includes a post-launch period for bug fixes, updates, or even live operations (like events, DLCs), it's a positive sign. For example, they might explicitly state a 3-month support window for addressing any issues after release. Existing live games in their portfolio: If the studio has titles that are ongoing (multiplayer games, MMOs, or mobile games with regular updates), ask how they manage those. Their ability to run patches and content updates indicates a workflow for support. Dedicated QA and patch process: A top studio will describe how they handle player feedback, issue tracking, and deploying patches even after launch. If during discussions the developers emphasize building a long-term relationship and mention tools for monitoring game performance (analytics, crash reporting), that's a good indicator of commitment. Client testimonials about long-term collaboration: Check references or reviews. If previous clients mention that the studio continued to assist after launch, or helped improve the game based on player feedback, it demonstrates reliability. In essence, a 3D game studio that sees itself as a partner in your game's entire lifecycle (not just development) will ensure the game remains successful and stable post-launch. Given that many games now treat launch as just the beginning (with updates, seasons, etc.), it's wise to pick a studio that understands and plans for this reality. Conclusions: Choosing the right 3D game development studio in 2025 involves careful evaluation on multiple fronts – technical expertise, relevant experience, communication, and reliability. Do your due diligence: scrutinize portfolios, ask tough questions, and even test the studio with a small pilot project if feasible. It's important to find a balance between a studio that is cutting-edge and one that aligns culturally with your vision and work style. A successful partnership feels like an extension of your own team, with shared goals and trust. Keep an eye out for red flags like unrealistic promises, poor communication practices, or unclear processes – these can save you from costly headaches. By taking the time to vet potential partners, you increase the chances that your 3D game project will be delivered on time, on budget, and to a quality level that meets your ambitions. Remember that Kevuru Games , as a veteran 3D game development studio, exemplifies many of these ideals – with a robust portfolio, specialized teams, and a strong commitment to client collaboration from concept through post-launch – making it a strong candidate for those seeking a reliable development partner. Coming Soon You Can 3D Print Your STAR TREK ONLINE Starships RELATED: Burnout Paradise Remastered is Taking Us Back to Paradise City in March

Yahoo

2 days ago

• Yahoo

Bravely Default Flying Fairy HD Remaster (Switch 2) Review

Thirteen years ago, Square Enix released one of the best Final Fantasy spin-offs they'd made to-date but called it by a different name: Bravely Default. Standing on its own merits, it proved to be a cult classic for the 3DS by the time it arrived in the west in 2014, and still stands as one of the Nintendo 3DS' must-play RPGs (alongside its direct sequel, Bravely Second: End Layer). And yet, it still seems to lack the recognition it deserves as an upstanding modern take on classic JRPGs. Now, with as a launch title for the Nintendo Switch 2, this can finally be set right. Bravely Default: Flying Fairy HD Remaster is a definitive take on the original game, which amalgamates its myriad re-releases and refreshes it for Nintendo's brand new console. Despite taking on the subtitle of the very first edition, Flying Fairy, it's based on the updated For The Sequel edition, which was the version we initially received in English—because what's a Square Enix JRPG franchise without some convoluted names? Naturally the game has been converted to suit the Switch 2's single screen, after originally utilizing the dual screen of the 3DS. This transition has been handled remarkably well, and will hopefully inspire more developers to bring their 3DS gems to Switch 2. Akitoshi Yoshida's character models and the game's beautiful storybook-like environments also translated nicely to both modern TVs and the Switch 2's screen. Though it was, admittedly, a little jarring to see the mouths moving on certain kookier character models, but that's testament to how much clearer the experience is now. While the 3DS' display was fine at the time, the HD, 16:9 presentation is vastly superior, breathing new life into Bravely Default's folksy world of Luxendarc. Most environments are enhanced by the clearer resolution, which shows off the paint-like texture of the landscapes. Even without the touch screen, this almost feels like the way it was meant to be seen. (Missing entirely is the original game's use of the 3DS' gyroscopic camera. This enabled a handful of AR cutscenes which sounded cool in theory, yet were gimmicky in practice, like the intro CG cutscene.) Beneath Bravely Default's fairy tale appearance (no pun intended) lies a well-crafted tale that combines the motifs of classic Final Fantasy, like crystals and warriors of light, with some plot elements from more modern FF, like the corrupt governments and natural resource wars of Final Fantasy VII. The party consists of Tiz, a young man who's the sole survivor of his simple village; Agnès, sheltered cleric of the Wind Crystal; Edea, a defector from Eternia, the enemy state that seeks to destroy the crystals' hold over society; and Ringabel, an amnesiac who hasn't forgotten his womanizing ways and carries a prophetic journal. Guided by the fairy Airy, they seek to restore the four crystals and thus, the balance of nature while thwarting the forces of Eternia along the way. Bravely Default's writing is still incredibly good by modern standards, even if the voice acting (and a late-game slog) will probably remain as divisive to audiences in 2025 as it did in the twenty-teens. The main characters are charming, as are the minor antagonists in their own way, and the world is easy to invest in. Allusions and homages to Final Fantasy are littered throughout, from the recurring names of spells (Fire-Fira-Firaga), to classes (White Mage, Black Mage), and items, to deeper thematic cuts (like the actions of the Water Crystal's Vestal). Squint just right and it could practically be a sequel to Final Fantasy III, but with profoundly more character and plot. Nowhere is that connection to classic 2D Final Fantasy more apparent than in battle. Players unlock up to 24 jobs (called Asterisks here) throughout Bravely Default, by defeating practitioners of that class. In this department, it harkens more to fellow underrated game Final Fantasy V: each job has distinct active and passive abilities, and as a character increases that job's level they unlock more permanent upgrades which can be equipped even after swapping to another class. Tiz might learn Black Magic, for example, then switch to the Time Mage class and keep the Black Magic command and the Pierce ability. This take on job classes is a tried and true system, and I'm glad to see Bravely Default still putting it to good use even if Final Fantasy isn't. It's kept fresh with some original inventions and unique interpretations of classic jobs, each well-earned in battle with the sort of villains you love to hate. If jobs were 'something old' or 'something borrowed,' Bravely Default's 'something new' was the battle system its name stems from. Actions in a fight cost 1 BP, and characters earn 1 BP per turn normally. Outside of the usual conventions of turn-based RPG combat, each participant can 'default' on their turn to guard and store up their BP, or 'brave' to take 2-4 actions at once. This deceptively simple paradigm can have big strategic ramifications. In weaker random battles, characters can go all out with braves and quickly dispatch their foes in one turn—instead of stooping to a 4-turn slugfest. In harder fights, will your opponent default and tank through your biggest assault? Or can you successfully brave when their guard is down and tear them to shreds instead? It's a simple tweak on the usual turn-based format which lends the game a very unique feel. All of the gameplay holds up just as well today as it did at Bravely Default's western debut. Thankfully, the 3DS original's connectivity features remain intact as well. Friends with the game can be added into your file, allowing you to 'link' your character with theirs—so if your friend has a maxed out Monk Edea, you can use the Abililink system to give your Edea some of those advanced, level 9 abilities. As well, the ability to call upon other players has been salvaged from the 3DS. In a similar fashion, players can 'record' their best moves in battle and save them to their profile, so that other players can summon them. (The game also provides fake, computerized 'ally' profiles periodically to avoid leaving behind those with smaller friend lists.) Even the town restoration minigame, where players idly repair Tiz's hometown over time, has made the jump. Once delegated to the bottom screen, the Norende Village Restoration is easily summoned with a press of the Switch 2 D-pad, as is the in-game reference book and the encounter rate setting, among other bells and whistles. New to Bravely Default: Flying Fairy HD Remaster are two minigames using the Joy-Con 2's mouse features. Much like the system's mouse function itself, I found these distractions to be better than expected, though still a little too cumbersome to be a main event. The first, Luxencheer Rhythm Catch, also invokes another Final Fantasy spin-off, Theatrhythm. Bravely Default's take injects a sliver of Beat Saber, turning the Joy-Con 2s into a pair of light-stick cursors on the screen. As notes pass by, players must position those cursors so that the notes are caught between them, or move the correct cursor over the notes and press a button in time. It's more elegant in practice than it sounds on paper, and was actually a pretty fun use of the mouse, though I'm in no rush for Theatrhythm to adopt this approach instead. The other, Ringabel's Panic Cruise, is an airship pilot simulator. Meant to show all the work Ringabel does when flying the party's airship, this minigame tasks players with not only steering the craft horizontally and vertically, but also manipulating various controls to fulfill other character's requests or defending the craft from attackers. Though a tonal shift from the rest of the game—the first level has you fending off ghost pirates, because Reasons—it's another fun little distraction. Neither minigame is worth the price of the remaster's admission alone, though there are a plethora of rewards to be earned from playing them periodically, like more background on the characters and unique costume or special move parts. Each minigame has three difficulty levels and more stages to unlock through main plot progression; higher difficulty means more medals, and faster rewards. Like the original game using the 3DS' camera for AR cutscenes, the new minigames in Bravely Default's remaster make a case for the potential of the Switch 2's mouse controls. Fortunately this makes a better case than the first, and I'm pleasantly surprised with the mouse's application, but I still need a little more in-depth proof of its worth. (Bring on Metroid Prime 4.) My only real nitpick with the experience here is the unreliability of the network connection. Bravely Default isn't exhaustive in its network features, only requiring a passive connection to send or receive friend data. In theory, it's 'set it and forget it.' Yet if the connection is disrupted—say, by taking the Switch 2 off the dock—it can be tedious to reconnect. A small quibble in the grand scheme of things, perhaps addressable through updates, though still a minor nuisance. All in all, I couldn't be happier to see Bravely Default get a second chance in the spotlight with a bigger audience. Over a decade ago it proved that classic JRPGs weren't dead or a taboo—a lesson that studios still need to be reminded of, evidently. The Switch 2 has revitalized that core experience, in some ways revealing a superior form, and any fan of original Nintendo-era Final Fantasy, or even classic PS1 RPGs, should give it a shot. With backward compatibility, fans of the genre can already feast well on Switch 2, and having a strong, classic launch title like Bravely Default helps show how Nintendo's partners like Square Enix can keep that feast going. (For a perfect dessert course, the sequel would be a great fit as well, just saying…)

Gizmodo

4 days ago

• Gizmodo

The ‘Magic: The Gathering' Team Had to Fight to Keep One of the ‘Final Fantasy' Set's Best References

Suplex's place in 'Final Fantasy' meme history lives on, even if Square Enix would prefer you call it Meteor Strike these days. Magic: The Gathering's new Final Fantasy set is an absolute love letter to the beloved RPG series, with hundreds of cards making a flavorful nod to their source material in one way or another. But one of the most fun references in a set filled with them almost didn't make it in—thanks to a quibble between Wizards of the Coast and Square Enix's translation teams. In a fascinating new article about translating the Final Fantasy set for its English and Japanese-language versions shared on the official Magic website today, Joseph Leis, the program manager for the Final Fantasy set, explained some of the challenges facing translating several cards in the set to ensure the standards of Magic's usual international translation process, while also working with Square Enix and its own translations for Final Fantasy as a franchise. But one of the most intriguing examples concerns one of the most fun nods to Final Fantasy fandom's western history that almost didn't make it in: the Final Fantasy VI card, Suplex. Or, at least in the form that Final Fantasy VI fans would've wanted it to. A red mana sorcery card, Suplex in the set can either be used to deal three damage to a target creature (with the added bonus of exiling them if it destroys it), or exiling a target artifact card from play. This second rule is a specific synergy so that Suplex can target another card in the game, the black mana artifact Phantom Train. It's a reference to the memetic legacy of FFVI players realizing that Sabin the monk, one of the game's expansive party members, can use one of his special abilities, Suplex, to physically hoist up the giant demon locomotive and slam it back down in an absurd image, dealing a ton of damage. In the years since its release, and especially in the advent of the online age, Sabin suplexing a literal train has become a part of Final Fantasy meme culture. But the thing is, Suplex wasn't called Suplex in the original Japanese game. It was called Meteor Strike (or specifically 'メテオストライク' in katakana) back when Final Fantasy VI was first brought over to North America as Final Fantasy III (several games in the series initially missed being translated), a name that Square Enix has kept ever since. While the original translation remained for many FFVI ports, it took until 2022 when the game was re-released as part of the Final Fantasy Pixel Remaster collection for the official translation to be updated to Meteor Strike. So Wizards and Square Enix found themselves at a bit of an impasse. Where possible, Wizards prefers that translation and localizations of card names diverge as little as possible from the English-language originals: Magic sets are typically designed in English first, and then translated into various languages, but the Final Fantasy set was the first in the game's history to be developed in English and Japanese simultaneously. Square Enix wanted to keep the Meteor Strike name as the official translation of Sabin's move as that's what was it always was in Japanese, but Wizards argued that English-language fans who played VI as kids would be disappointed if the card wasn't called Suplex as tribute to the nostalgic place the fight has taken in western fandom culture. 'This was something that principle narrative designer Dillon Deveney went back and forth through multiple rounds of negotiations with Square Enix,' Leis said, 'explaining how important that scene and the name 'Suplex' would be to English-speaking Final Fantasy VI fans, how kids growing up would yell 'suplex!' at the top of their lungs while playing at the playground, and how the nostalgia of the term was something that he wanted to keep as an Easter egg for English-speaking Final Fantasy VI fans.' Thankfully, Square Enix eventually relented, and a rare divergence between the English and Japanese sets allowed Suplex and Meteor Strike to co-exist. Now you can exile that one particular artifact to your heart's content, in the exact way you'd want to.