Inside the legal fight over the telehealth clinics that help women defy abortion bans
Every month, thousands of women thwart abortion bans in their home states by turning to telehealth clinics willing to prescribe pregnancy-ending drugs online and ship them anywhere in the country.
Whether this is legal, though, is a matter of debate. Two legal cases involving a New York doctor could wind up testing the shield laws some states have passed to protect telehealth providers who ship abortion pills nationwide.
Dr. Margaret Carpenter faces a felony charge in Louisiana for supplying abortion medication through the mail to a pregnant teen in that state. The patient's mother also faces criminal charges. A Texas judge fined the same physician $100,000 after the state accused her of prescribing abortion medication for a woman near Dallas.
So far, the prosecution hasn't progressed thanks to New York's shield law, which has protected Carpenter from extradition to Louisiana. But other telehealth centers operating in states with similar legal protections for abortion providers are watching closely.
"We have great legal counsel who have advised us that what we are doing is legal,' said Dr. Angel Foster, co-founder of The Massachusetts Medication Abortion Access Project, which is among a handful of telehealth providers that facilitate abortions from afar in states with bans.
As more states consider enacting shield laws or expanding existing ones, whether one state can shield providers from liability for breaking another state's laws around abortion is still an unsettled area of law.
Erik Baptist, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which opposes abortion, said shield laws violate a constitutional requirement that states respect the laws and legal judgments of other states.
"What these shield law states are doing are undermining the prerogative of these pro-life states to implement and enforce pro-life laws,' said Baptist, director of the group's Center for Life. 'And so I think the Supreme Court ultimately will want to take this.'
'That is inherently a challenge with shield laws and telehealth,' said Carmel Shachar, faculty director of the Health Law and Policy Clinic at Harvard Law School. 'At a certain point, for the purposes of abortion bans, the courts will need to decide: Do we treat a telehealth abortion as happening within the state of the provider or within the state of the patient?'
Abortion pills sent to your home
Decades ago, the FDA approved the use of two prescription medicines — mifepristone and misoprostol — to terminate pregnancies.
But it wasn't until 2023 that telehealth abortions across states became more popular, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The Society of Family Planning, which supports abortion rights, said that between April and June 2024 there were an average of 7,700 telehealth abortions performed each month in states that either ban abortion totally or after six weeks of pregnancy.
The prescribing process at telehealth clinics varies by provider, but usually takes place entirely online, with the patient answering a series of health-related questions and consent forms.
At some telehealth clinics, medical providers don't come face-to-face with patients, even via videoconferencing, and patients don't necessarily know the prescriber's name unless requested.
For instance, when Foster's clinic, also known as The MAP, puts pills in the mail, only the name of the practice appears on the label, as allowed under the Massachusetts shield law. If patients have follow-up questions, they can talk or text the doctor working that day, but may not know that doctor's name either.
Pills can arrive in a less than a week.
'This has been the safety net, post-Dobbs, of allowing people who don't have the ability to travel out of state to get abortion care,' said Greer Donley, a University of Pittsburgh law professor and abortion law expert.
When dealing with medications not related to abortion, doctors are often able to write prescriptions for patients in other states. However, in most states, if the patient is located within its borders, the doctor must have a license issued by that state, according to Mei Wa Kwong, executive director of the The Center for Connected Health Policy.
States with shield laws
Twenty three states and Washington, D.C., currently have shield laws protecting abortion providers.
Of those, eight have specific provisions protecting them from criminal prosecution or civil lawsuits even if the patient is in another state, according to the nonprofit research organization KFF. They include California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
Louisiana's request to extradite Carpenter hit a roadblock when New York Gov. Kathy Hochul rejected it, citing the state's shield law. (A county clerk also cited the shield law as he refused to file the civil judgment from Texas.)
'These are not doctors providing health care. They are drug dealers,' Republican Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told state lawmakers as she promoted a bill that would expand who can sue and be sued in abortion medication cases. 'They are violating our laws. They are sending illegal medications for purposes of procuring abortions that are illegal in our state.'
Clinics say they will keep prescribing
Julie Kay, the executive director of the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, the nationwide organization co-founded by Carpenter, said providers won't be 'bullied and intimidated' into ceasing operations.
Other telehealth abortion providers said they also won't be deterred by legal threats.
'I have been working in this field for 25 years and this is part of the work," said Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, founder and director of Aid Access, an abortion pill supplier. 'It's something that we all anticipated would happen," she said of the legal challenges.
A doctor who is part of A Safe Choice, a network of California-based physicians that prescribes abortion pills to women in all 50 states, told The Associated Press he believes he is protected by the state's shield law, but is also taking precautions.
'I'm not going to be traveling outside of California for a very long time,' said the doctor, who spoke with The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he wanted to protect his identity for safety reasons.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Real Housewives star Dolores Catania reveals frightening health crisis that led her to have surgery
The Real Housewives of New Jersey star Dolores Catania revealed she was forced to have heart surgery after suffering from atrial fibrillation (AFib). Her condition is a form of arrhythmia, meaning her heartbeat had become irregular, causing her to have chest pains that began six months ago. Last month she underwent a cardiac ablation, a procedure that destroys the small bit of heart tissue that was causing the problem. Dolores, 54, went public with the news this weekend, posting an Instagram video that began with her boyfriend Paulie Connell driving her to the hospital. 'We are going to get my procedure done. It's a cardiac ablation for my AFib. I know, I'm too young to have this,' she quipped to the camera. As they emerged from the car and walked into the building, he asked if she had a 'last word' to say, to which she beamed at him and said: 'Love you.' She also posted photos and video of herself in her bed and gown, including one apparently post-op snap of herself grinning beside her electrophysiologist, whom she jokingly referred to as her 'other electrician.' 'About six months ago, I was driving when I suddenly felt a sharp pain in my chest that radiated down my arm,' she explained in her caption. 'As women, we tend to ignore aches and pains, brushing them off as part of everyday life- but this felt different,' remembered Dolores. 'After that, I started experiencing frequent flutters in my chest, sometimes waking me up at night. Eventually, I got scared enough to call my cardiologist,' she wrote. 'He gave me a heart monitor to wear, and within hours, he called to tell me I had AFib (atrial fibrillation). He referred me to an electrophysiologist, who confirmed the diagnosis,' added the New Jersey-born reality star. 'He told me, 'You're not the same girl I met two years ago when you came here with Paul.' Some of you may remember that my boyfriend, Paul Connell, was diagnosed with WPW (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) and also needed an ablation.' Dolores offered a word to the wise to her fans: 'I'm sharing this because I want you to listen to your body. That racing or fluttering in your chest you feel doing simple tasks during the day- that's your body trying to tell you something. DON'T IGNORE THIS. AFib increases your risk of stroke or heart attack.' She crowed: 'I'm not 6 weeks out and back to myself! I'll be off all medication soon, and I haven't had any episodes since the procedure.' Dolores urged readers not to 'wait' as their 'heart health is not something to take lightly,' adding that she 'was truly in the best of hands' with her doctors and encouraging her public: 'Take care of yourself you deserve it!!' She began dating Paulie four years ago after they met in line at an Apple Store, and the pair have been living together for the bulk of that time. Her surname comes from her ex-husband Frank Catania, whom she was married to from 1994 to 1998, during which time they welcomed two children. Dolores has publicly claimed the marriage crumbled after she discovered that Frank cheated on her during her pregnancy with their son Frankie, 27.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The baldness cure that can cause permanent erectile dysfunction and suicidal thoughts. It cost PE teacher Sam his life... now doctors say patients MUST be warned
A powerful hair-loss treatment being touted by influencers on TikTok may trigger erectile dysfunction and even suicidal thoughts, experts have warned. Videos of young men proudly showing off their regrowth after taking the daily tablet dutasteride have racked up millions of views on the social media site.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Parents receive $2.2 million after doctor posted horrific video of their child's autopsy online
Georgia parents who sued a doctor after he posted autopsy photos of their decapitated baby on social media have been awarded a whopping $2.2 million in damages. Jessica Ross and Treveon Isaiah Taylor Sr. alleged their baby boy, Treveon Isaiah Taylor Jr., was decapitated during childbirth at Southern Regional Medical Center on July 9, 2023. The couple said they had no idea of their son's condition until they were notified by the funeral home and hired pathologist Dr. Jackson Gates to conduct an autopsy on the newborn. However, they filed a lawsuit against the pathologist after they paid him $2,500 for the autopsy and discovered he posted identifying videos and photos on Instagram, where he often shares his work for public health purposes. 'This video showed in graphic and grisly detail a postmortem examination of the decapitated, severed head of Baby Isaiah,' court documents said. The lawsuit stated that after the clip was removed, Gates posted two more videos of the baby's autopsy exactly a week later - ones that graphically depicted the baby's head, body, brain, and even organs. A judge ruled that Gates was liable for sharing the images on social media in March 2024. On Wednesday, a jury awarded Ross and Taylor $2.25 million in damages, as reported by Atlanta News First. 'While we are pleased that a jury punished Dr. Jackson Gates for his reprehensible behavior, nothing can ease the pain that the parents, Jessica Ross and Treveon Isaiah Taylor Sr., have experienced in losing their baby boy in such a horrific way,' the couple's attorneys said. 'After the decapitation of their baby, Gates poured salt into the couple's already deep wounds when he betrayed them. 'This young couple trusted him with the remains of their precious baby. Gates, in turn, repaid this trust by posting horrific images of their child for the world to see.' Gates's attorney, Ira Livnat, told WSBTV that his client regularly posted autopsy results on social media and had no intention of hurting Ross and Taylor. 'I believe that Dr. Gates believed he was helping. He believed he was helping the plaintiffs uncover what the hospital actually had done,' Livnat said 'He's absolutely heartbroken for what happened to this family. And what he said at trial was, is that if he had known that it would have harmed them, he would have never done it.' The parents' nightmare began on July 9, 2023, when Ross arrived at the hospital to give birth. They claim Dr. Tracey St. Julian applied 'ridiculously excessive force' on the baby's head and neck to try to deliver it while Ross was still awake. Ross began experiencing complications when her baby boy's shoulders got stuck during a vaginal delivery which started at 8.40pm, according to the suit. Dr. St. Julian is accused of delaying a C-section procedure and failing to seek help quickly. Instead, she applied 'ridiculously excessive force' on the baby's head and neck to try to deliver it while Ross was still awake, claims attorney and physician Roderick Edmond. The baby's body and legs were delivered by C-section three-and-a-half hours later at 12.11am, and his head was delivered vaginally. When Ross and Taylor demanded to see and hold their child, they claim the baby was tightly wrapped in a blanket with his head 'propped on top of his body' to make it appear like it was still attached. They ultimately found out about the decapitation from the funeral home, they claim. The grieving couple has filed a lawsuit against Ross and the hospital, accusing them trying to cover up what happened by discouraging them from getting an autopsy and encouraging them to have their son cremated. In February 2024, the Clayton County Medical Examiner's Office baby Isaiah's death was ruled a homicide. The baby suffered 'fracture dislocation with complete transection (to the) upper cervical spine and spinal cord,' according to an autopsy report. His death was caused by shoulder dystocia, arrest of labor and fetal entrapment in the birth canal. Pregnancy-induced diabetes and premature rupture of membranes also contributed, per the report.
