Two more suspects linked to Durban passport fraud syndicate arrested
The Hawks have said two more suspects have been arrested in connection with a passport fraud syndicate.
Image: Henk Kruger Independent Newspapers.
Two more suspects have been nabbed in an ongoing corruption probe linked to the fraudulent issuing of South African passports at the Department of Home Affairs (DHA).
The Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (Hawks) has confirmed the arrest of two additional suspects after five suspects were initially arrested at the weekend in the Home Affairs-led law enforcement operation.
According to a media statement issued by the Hawks, the arrests of the two suspects were made on Monday as part of a larger investigation that began in September 2022.
The Hawks said the investigation was linked to the issuance of fraudulent passports to undocumented foreign nationals. The crimes reportedly took place between February 2020 and July 2023, at the DHA's Durban Commercial Street and uMngeni Road branches.
Preliminary investigations found that South African citizens were allegedly paid between R300 and R1 000 to enable foreign nationals to fraudulently acquire passports. The bribes were paid at various DHA offices including Isipingo, Durban Central and Eshowe.
It is alleged that a group of South African citizens collaborated with DHA officials to facilitate the illegal transactions.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'These unlawful activities took place outside of regular business hours, including evenings, weekends and public holidays, when the DHA offices were officially closed,' the Hawks statement added.
Since 2022, a total of 38 individuals have been arrested in connection with the case, including seven DHA officials and 31 private citizens. Of those arrested, 'twenty-four individuals of whom four are DHA officials have been convicted and sentenced to a combined sentence of three hundred and ten years imprisonment.'
All seven suspects are expected to face charges of corruption, fraud, and violations of the Immigration and Identification Acts. They are scheduled to appear on Tuesday at the Durban Specialised Commercial Crimes Court.
THE MERCURY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
‘Reprehensible failure' — NSPCA files criminal charges against Daybreak Farms directors
The National Council of SPCAs has filed criminal charges against the board of directors of Daybreak Farms, following what it describes as one of the largest and most disturbing cases of animal cruelty in South African history. More than one million chickens died or suffered prolonged distress at Daybreak Farms amid what officials are calling a systemic collapse in basic animal care. The charges come after weeks of high-profile legal action, public outcry and disturbing revelations from multiple investigations into the company's broiler operations. The National Council of SPCAs (NSPCA) now seeks criminal accountability for what it describes as 'a grave and morally reprehensible failure'. The council's senior inspector Nazareth Appalsamy, who heads the Farm Animal Protection Unit, said the law compels the NSPCA to value every animal individually. 'To witness the suffering of one animal multiplied by a million is not just a disaster – it's a grave and morally reprehensible failure.' According to the NSPCA's formal statement released on Friday, on-site investigations revealed chickens suffering in scenes reminiscent of disaster zones: birds cannibalising one another, open wounds left untreated and animals too weak to move. The scale of neglect was matched only by the visible breakdown in operational control across Daybreak facilities. Photos taken during inspections – now widely circulated online – depict rows of emaciated birds crammed into overcrowded sheds, some lying motionless, others pecking desperately at carcasses. The NSPCA's evidence dossier reportedly contains documentation of mass starvation events, inadequate or absent veterinary oversight and intentional inhumane culling methods. 'This is not misfortune,' said one official. 'It's systemic abuse.' Court steps in On 23 May 2025, the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Johannesburg made an interim order compelling Daybreak to comply with urgent animal welfare directives. In a scathing ruling, the court stated: 'The urgency was necessitated by the collapse of Daybreak's responsibility to appropriately care for the chickens in their possession and under their control.' The court cited 'financial mismanagement of the available funds' by the company's leadership. As part of the judgment, Daybreak was ordered to cease inhumane culling immediately, provide adequate nutrition to all remaining birds, halt all new chick placements until the NSPCA deemed conditions appropriate and provide inspectors with full access and a comprehensive resolution plan. Despite the ruling, the NSPCA has warned that meaningful accountability remains elusive. Though the court awarded legal costs in their favour, the organisation now fears it may never recover those funds: shortly after the judgment, Daybreak announced it was entering voluntary business rescue proceedings. Business rescue In the eyes of many observers, Daybreak's move into business rescue – a legal process similar to bankruptcy protection – only deepened concerns over the company's transparency and financial conduct. As reported by Daily Maverick on 23 May, Daybreak's sudden shift into business rescue raised red flags about possible attempts to shield decision-makers from the full financial fallout of the crisis. The Public Investment Corporation (PIC), which owns a controlling stake in Daybreak, faced mounting pressure to explain how such a collapse was allowed to unfold on its watch. Daybreak's financial woes appear deeply intertwined with the animal welfare catastrophe. Feed shortages, for example, were not caused by logistical blockages but, according to the NSPCA, by a failure to allocate sufficient funds for procurement. As a result, birds were left to starve, and workers were forced to cull tens of thousands of chicks without the tools or training to do so humanely. Human costs Beyond the birds, human suffering has also come into focus. Daily Maverick's reporting from early May included interviews with Daybreak workers at its Delmas operation, who described despair, intimidation and, in some cases, retaliation for speaking out. Some workers at the farm told Daily Maverick they lack the necessary farming experience to help save the company. One employee told us: 'We didn't even know what to say anymore. You can't just keep quiet when you see animals suffering like this. But when we tried to raise it, it was like nobody at the top was listening.' Amid the scandal, board chairperson Bojane Segooa resigned and reportedly received a R625,000 payout. The timing of her departure – days after the high court's intervention – fuelled public anger. Though a new board has since been installed, many within the NSPCA and broader civil society remain sceptical that meaningful reform will occur. A crisis of governance Daybreak's collapse is more than an isolated corporate disaster – it is also a test of South Africa's welfare regulatory and enforcement systems. The NSPCA, which receives no government funding, has now spent more than R580,000 responding to the Daybreak emergency. These costs include transport, shelter setup, biosecurity measures and extensive staff hours. The organisation says it will continue to work with the South African Police Service and the National Prosecuting Authority to ensure criminal charges are pursued. However, without government support or clear political backing, the path to justice remains uncertain. 'This cannot be swept under the rug,' said one inspector involved in the case. 'We are talking about a million sentient beings who suffered because no one took responsibility. If there are no consequences for this, what does that say about the value we place on life?' Public response Civil society organisations have begun to mobilise around the case. An open letter signed by 16 conservation and food justice groups was delivered to the agriculture minister last week, demanding that the state undertake a full audit of Daybreak's practices and provide emergency support to the NSPCA. The letter warns that, if ignored, 'this crisis will repeat itself – not just at Daybreak, but across an industry where enforcement is weak, funding is scarce and animals are treated as numbers on a balance sheet'. For the NSPCA, the criminal charges represent a turning point. After weeks of being on the defensive – rushing from farm to farm, providing aid to surviving animals and navigating legal landmines – it now seeks to push the matter into the courts. 'We owe it to these animals,' said Appalsamy. 'We owe it to the public. And we owe it to the future of farming in this country.' DM
The Citizen
9 hours ago
- The Citizen
KZN premier summoned to appear before portfolio committee
KZN Premier Thami Ntuli has been summoned to appear before the Portfolio Committee on Office of the Premier, Community Safety and Liaison to give clarity on allegations that the youth manager in his office threatened to physically harm the former director general, Dr Nonhlanhla Mkhize. Portfolio Committee chair Mbali Frazer alleges that Mkhize's crime was to refuse to sign off an appointment letter related to the R100-million Youth Fund. ALSO READ: Embattled KZN director-general resigns 'We believe it will be an abdication of our responsibility not to allow the premier of the province to address these serious allegations in an appropriate platform,' said Frazer. 'We have written a letter to him requesting him to appear before the committee. As the committee responsible for playing an oversight role over the executive, we believe such allegations warrant our attention. 'The Office of the Premier has a critical role to play in terms of the co-ordination of the work of provincial government departments on service delivery. The destabilisation of the Office of the Premier in any form, including threats to physically harm a senior female civil servant, should be viewed in a serious light by all leaders of society across all political affiliations,' she said. The ANC Youth League strongly condemns the actions of Premier Thami Ntuli for allegedly shielding perpetrators of violence, particularly gender-based violence (GBV), within his administration. ANCYL KZN Provincial Secretary Lulama Mabude said they are appalled by these allegations. 'We fully support the Youth Fund initiative established by the former ANC premier, Numusa Dube-Ncube, to empower young people to thrive in business and contribute meaningfully to the economy. 'However, we categorically reject the misuse of these funds to benefit non-compliant applicants or those selected based on political affiliation. 'We demand an immediate halt to this process and call for a transparent, merit-based review to ensure funds serve their intended purpose of uplifting KZN's youth,' said Mabude. She added that the youth manager in question is alleged to have pressured Mkhize to approve these funds to benefit his political allies and associates, undermining the integrity of the Youth Fund. 'We will not tolerate government officials perpetuating GBV and escaping accountability. 'South African women and youth live in constant fear due to harassment and abuse, and the premier's office has failed to address these serious allegations,' said Mabude. Attempts to obtain comment from the Office of the Premier were unsuccessful at the time of going to print. Don't have the ZO app? Download it to your Android or Apple device here: HAVE YOUR SAY Like our Facebook page and follow us on Twitter. For news straight to your phone invite us: WhatsApp – 060 784 2695 Instagram – zululand_observer At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Daily Maverick
11 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
ATM hacking accused freed on bail after magistrate's blunder in multimillion-rand case
A man who allegedly made millions in cash by hacking ATMs in the Eastern and Western Cape was released on bail late last week after the Bhisho High Court ruled that the magistrate had made a mistake by not giving reasons for the decision to keep him behind bars. One of the men arrested by the Hawks in March 2025 and linked to a syndicate that has allegedly netted R7-million by hacking ATMs has been released on bail after the court ruled that the magistrate hearing his bail application had made a mistake. Mongameli Tom was arrested with another man near Peddie in the Eastern Cape after the pair allegedly hacked into two ATMs in Mdantsane, Buffalo City. At the time of Tom's arrest the Hawks said that he was also linked to a series of ATM fraud incidents in the Western Cape. Tom has denied any involvement. Tom and the other man were intercepted near Peddie on 17 March 2025 following a multidisciplinary, intelligence-driven operation led by the East London Serious Organised Crime Investigation team. The Hawks explained at the time that the suspects allegedly disguised themselves as cash-in-transit security guards, armed with a rifle, to create the illusion that they were legitimately servicing the ATM. But instead they were using 'jackpot' software to hack into the ATM and take all the money. Tom was arrested by the Hawks on 19 March 2025. On 9 April 2025 he applied for bail but this was refused. He is charged with 51 counts of fraud and 52 counts of theft which were allegedly committed between Cape Town and East London. Four of these offences were committed in the Eastern Cape and two in the magisterial district of Mdantsane, where he appeared in court. In February and March 2025 amounts of R143,500 and R236,900 were taken from two ATMs at two garages in Mdantsane. Tom, from Mitchells Plain in the Western Cape, is the director of two companies, Abakwazidenge Trading (Pty) Ltd and Khundulu Holdings (Pty) Ltd. According to Tom both companies made between R30,000 and R50,000 profit a month but had stopped operating after he was arrested. In an affidavit before court – detailing his personal circumstances – he stated that he had dependent children and had to provide for their needs. Acting Judge Aaron Zono said the magistrate hearing Tom's bail application had not dealt with an affidavit setting out his personal circumstances. Tom has no previous convictions nor pending cases. 'There is not a single reason in the magistrate's judgment why [Tom's] case or version has not been accepted or rejected. We may only assume that it was rejected for the fact that it is not referred to in the judgment,' Zono said. 'In fact, the magistrate's failure to accept or reject appellant's case is rooted in his failure to consider the same. One cannot accept or reject something he has not considered. No balancing act has been made by the magistrate. 'The magistrate did not account for the judgment he gave. He did not analyse the evidence before arriving at his conclusion. He did not explain why the evidence of the accused persons was not accepted and why that evidence did not meet the standard of being reasonably possibly true. He did not even explain on what basis he found that the state had discharged its onus of proof and why its evidence was accepted. 'A judgment without reasons is arbitrary. Equally a judgment that does not account for all the evidence is arbitrary. A judgment without balancing exercise between the two opposing versions or evidence lacks proper analysis and is consequently arbitrary. Zono also said the State had not rebutted evidence presented by Tom, who denies knowledge of any crimes, but only stated that the prosecution's case is strong and Tom's case is weak. He added that the magistrate should have given a reasoned ruling on why bail was refused.
