Why workers at an Adani power plant who gave up land for jobs went on a hunger strike

An Adani power project that exports electricity to Bangladesh has faced heat from the new regime in Dhaka over the price of power. While the standoff between the company and Dhaka has made news, a recent protest in Godda, Jharkhand, where the company has built its thermal plant, has largely gone unnoticed. Scroll travelled to Godda to report this two-part series.
On March 30, several workers at Adani Power's thermal power plant in Godda, Jharkhand, received an email that left them enraged. The email contained a contract that stated that the workers were being hired by a company named Riddhi Corporate Services, for their client Adani Power. Though the contract bore the date on which they received the message, it stated that their 'date of joining' was almost two years earlier, May 5, 2023.
Four days later, around 180 employees who had been shifted to the second company decided to protest this move. The workers constructed a small tent next to the main gate of the power plant and sat there on a hunger strike.
The workers were angry because many had given up their land to the company for the construction of the power plant. While they had received compensation for their land, under the terms of the acquisition, they had further entitlements that, they argued, were being denied. Specifically, they had been promised that they could choose between receiving Rs 5.5 lakh or being given a job at the plant.
'We did not get these jobs for free, we had the option of either receiving Rs 5.5 lakh in compensation or getting a job at the plant,' said Mukesh Paswan, one of the landowners, who is from the village of Motia. 'We chose the latter, thinking we would get long-term job security.'
Many had given up the money under the assumption that they would be employed by Adani Power directly. Instead, workers told Scroll, they had been hired by another outsourcing firm between two and three years ago and were now being switched to Riddhi through the backdated contract.
Nityanand Jha, one of the affected workers who said he had given up land for the project, explained to Scroll on April 9 that when they first joined the outsourcing company, they were told that the company 'and Adani are the same'.
But now, he said, 'we have been switched to another company. Tomorrow like cattle they might put us in a third company.' He added, 'All we want is to be put under Adani's payroll and have some job security.'
Gautam Mody, the general secretary of the New Trade Union Initiative, criticised the temporary contracts for the workers. 'In my understanding, land is an asset,' he said. 'To take that away and replace it with an insecure contract job would amount to a complete violation of the very spirit of the LARR', referring to the 2013 land acquisition law under which villagers gave up their land for the project.
Mody observed that such temporary contract jobs were being used across the country in the process of land acquisition. 'After a certain period of time, these jobs also disappear – they're precarious jobs,' he said.
This precarity is evident in the experience of Robin Hembrom, a resident of the village of Gangta, who said he had worked at the plant in 2024 in a housekeeping role. 'But the contract got over, and the contractor left, now I'm sitting unemployed at home,' he said.
Hembrom noted, 'They get people from all over the place to work at the plant, but they don't give jobs to locals.'
In response to queries emailed by Scroll, an Adani Power spokesperson stated, 'Job opportunities and one time settlement has been offered as per Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act 2013 and Jharkhand government's Rehabilitation & Resettlement Committee's guidelines and regulations.' He added, 'For any open position, first preference is given to locals with matching skills.'
The spokesperson added, 'The decision to change the outsourcing partner was formally communicated well in advance and all employees have seamlessly been accommodated in the new company.'
The workers' protest was broken up by the police on April 6, following which a state minister intervened and brokered an agreement between the workers and the company. On April 24, the protesting workers accepted the jobs they had been offered with Ridhi – after local leaders promised them future employment with Adani Power.
Criticism from the start
Groundwork for the coal-fired thermal power plant began in 2015, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi travelled to Bangladesh and made a pitch for Indian power companies. The same day, the Bangladesh power board announced that it would buy power from the Adani Group.
A power purchase agreement followed two years later, making the Godda project the first power plant in India that would export electricity to another country. The plant, which had a reported total budget of more than $2 billion, would have two units, each with a capacity of 800 megawatts.
From its inception, the project has been criticised by energy and business experts, as well as by human rights activists.
Among the aspects that have been criticised is the move by the Indian government in 2018 to amend rules to grant the power plant the status of a Special Economic Zone, and so exempt it from paying many taxes and duties.
Financial aspects of the project have also been called into question. In 2018, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, based in Ohio in the United States, released a report that analysed the project, describing it as 'too expensive, too late, and too risky for Bangladesh'.
The report claimed that the plant's high tariffs were 'clearly designed to benefit Adani' and it was 'at least in part' also an endeavour 'to prop up Adani Enterprises' troubled Carmichael coal project in Australia'.
It noted, 'It appears that the Godda project will use Australian coal to export power to Bangladesh, locking Bangladesh into an expensive, long-term, and emissions-intensive source of electricity for decades to come.'
In December 2024, the interim government of Bangladesh said it wanted to renegotiate the deal with Adani. It accused Adani Power of withholding tax benefits it had received from the Indian government to set up the power plant. Bangladesh's top court also set up a high-level committee to review electricity agreements signed by the ousted government, including that with Adani Power.
In its response, Adani's spokesperson said that the company supplied 'reliable, high quality, and amongst the most competitively priced power to Bangladesh in comparison to the other imported coal fired plants like Pyara, Matarbari, and Rampur'.
He added, 'Adani has been supplying uninterrupted power to Bangladesh in spite of $900 million worth of outstandings from the nation. We are hopeful of early liquidation for continued plant operations.' He noted that the company had not received any communication about the government's committee, and that it would 'fully cooperate with the government whenever asked to'.
Human rights activists have from the start alleged that the company has violated the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act by forcefully acquiring land from villagers for the project. In 2018, Scroll reported that several villagers were kept out of social impact assessment hearings and that their land was forcibly fenced off by the company.
In its response, the company stated, 'Land has been acquired by the Government under the LAAR Act 2013 and R&R policies and transferred to Company.' Further, it said, the company had 'honored its commitments in good faith and continues to ensure transparency, fairness, and opportunity for all affected stakeholders'.
The acquisition of land
Land acquisition for the power plant began in 2017. According to the social impact assessment report, prepared in 2016, a total of 841 families were impacted by the construction of the plant – but activists noted that the number was more than 1,000. In its response to Scroll, the company stated that the number of affected people was 'determined by the government' and that it had 'fully met' its commitments under the relief and rehabilitation policy for the project.
The social impact assessment report stated that 2,120.59 acres of land would be taken over from locals and 264.69 acres from the government. Later, as the updated environmental impact assessment report noted, the total area under the project was reduced to around 558 acres of land.
According to a letter written in July 2017 by the divisional commissioner of Dumka, who has administrative responsibility over Godda district, the total number of families whose land was acquired for the project was 192.
The letter also lists the name of one affected individual in each case, and under a column titled 'employment or one-time lump sum', lists the additional compensation they are due for the land acquired, along with a separate smaller amount as a rehabilitation allowance.
More details on this plan were recorded in a 2017 meeting report of the project's Rehabilitation and Resettlement Committee, accessed by Scroll – the meeting was chaired by the additional district collector and attended by members of the state's legislative assembly, and a member of parliament.
The report states that the committee passed a resolution on May 6 that every family that gave up two or more acres of land to the project would be guaranteed one job or Rs 5 lakh, in addition to the financial compensation they had received for their land. Further, it states that families that gave up less than two acres of land would also be considered for jobs.
The provision of employment is in line with the 2013 land acquisition law, which states that the 'appropriate government' shall 'where jobs are created through the project, after providing suitable training and skill development in the required field, make provision for employment at a rate not lower than the minimum wages provided for in any other law for the time being in force, to at least one member per affected family in the project or arrange for a job in such other project as may be required'.
Further, Saraj Mishra, one of the leaders of the protestors group, claimed that though the company did appear to provide jobs to those whose land was acquired, the process was haphazard and unfair. For instance, he noted, many landowners were circulated from one training programme to another for years and were finally given a job in an unrelated field.
'We were first told that you all don't have any skills, so you'll need to be trained,' he said. 'After two years, we were told that the training was of no use and then we were sent to the ITI [Industrial Training Institute] for two years, after that an internship for a year.'
One affected landowner shared documents with Scroll that showed that he had been trained as a fitter for a year, then as a welder, and finally as an automotive technician for two years – but his employment contract dated 2023 showed that he had been hired as an operator.
'How does this make sense?' he said, asking not to be named. 'Their entire plan was to keep us busy from one thing to another so we couldn't organise and protest.'
In its response, the company said, 'As per their education, interest and skills, local project affected people were provided training and accordingly job has been offered.'
Apart from assuring employment for those whose land was used for the project, the environmental impact assessment report also contains clauses more broadly pertaining to the employment of locals. It states, 'As part of CSR prior identification of local employable youth and eventual employment in the project after imparting relevant training shall be also undertaken. Company shall provide separate budget for community development activities and income generating programmes.'
But residents of the three villages said that apart from a few tailoring programmes for women, the company had not provided any other support of this nature.
In its response, the company claimed that more than 2,0000 women had been 'trained in Stitching/Tailoring from more than 20 villages of around Power Plant'.
How the protest ended
On April 6, at 2 pm, local police broke up the protest, and forcibly transported several of the workers to the Godda city police station where, according to local reports, they were made to undergo medical checkups – protestors said police claimed that this was for their own health and safety.
But on returning to the protest site, they found that the tent had been broken down. The workers then shifted their protest a few kilometres further away from the plant, seeking shelter from the scorching heat under a banyan tree.
'It was very hot without the tent and people were already fasting,' said Paswan. 'Five people fainted and had to be rushed to the hospital.'
The local administration did not respond to queries emailed by Scroll about the protests being forcibly broken up, and adverse health consequences that protestors faced.
On the evening of April 10, Sanjay Yadav, the member of the legislative assembly of the Godda constituency and Jharkhand's minister for labour and employment, arrived at the protest site. After speaking with the workers, he offered them juice boxes to break their hunger strike.
'The workers will be granted their genuine demands according to existing rules and laws,' he told Scroll. He added that negotiations would continue after more high-level meetings with Adani officials and the local administration.
After the protesting workers accepted the jobs with Riddhi on April 24, one of them, Ragnee Jha, told Scroll that local leaders had assured them that they would be provided permanent jobs directly under Adani Power. But she added that they told the workers, 'It will take some time.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Time of India

14 minutes ago

• Time of India

All can see transformation under PM Modi, Rahul Gandhi busy undermining India's progress: BJP

The BJP on Saturday hit out at Rahul Gandhi, saying the Congress leader cannot see the transformation happening in the country under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership because he is too busy "undermining India's progress". This came after Gandhi launched a fresh salvo at Prime Minister Modi, and said he has mastered the "art of slogans" but offered no solutions, claiming that India's manufacturing was at a record low despite the 'Make in India' initiative. Hitting back, BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari wrote in a post on X, "Rahul ji, everyone in India can see the transformation, except you. Maybe because you're too busy undermining India's progress to notice it." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: 1 simple trick to get all TV channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo Operation Sindoor is the latest and "landmark example" of India's manufacturing prowess where India's indigenous developed drones destroyed Chinese drones, he added. Citing various data indicating progress made under the 'Make in India' initiative of the Modi government, BJP IT department head Amit Malviya said Rahul Gandhi's narratives are "outdated, misinformed, and disconnected from reality". Live Events "India is building. India is growing. India is leading," he said in a post on X. Under PM Modi, India has transformed from an importer to a global manufacturing powerhouse, Malviya added. Bhandari said since 2014 under PM Modi's leadership, engineering exports have surged by 60 per cent while defence exports "skyrocketed from just Rs 686 crore to over Rs 23,000 crore". "From importing 70 per cent of our defence equipment, India now manufactures 65 per cent of its needs domestically. PMI is at a 10-month high, signalling industrial strength," he said. Bhandari said India under Modi's leadership supplied 60 per cent of the world's COVID-19 vaccines, becoming the "pharmacy of the world". India is now the second largest mobile phone manufacturer globally, he added. "While Indian startups and entrepreneurs were burning the midnight oil to build a world-class drone industry, you (Rahul Gandhi) were busy endorsing Chinese drones and promoting Chinese brands on Indian soil," the BJP spokesperson charged. Bhandari said Gandhi never believed in 'Make in India' because 'Atmanirbhar Bharat' doesn't align with his "imported ideology." "What was there in that secret MoU which you signed with the Communist Party of China," Bhandari asked. Malviya, in his post on X, said "Let's bust the myths - with facts". He said the PLI scheme, which Gandhi claimed had failed, has led to cumulative investments of Rs 10,905 crore, total production worth Rs 7.15 lakh crore and exports of Rs 3.9 lakh crore. "Electronics production value rose from Rs 18,900 crore (FY14) to Rs 4,22,000 crore (FY24). Mobile phone exports surged 77-fold from Rs 1,566 crore (2014-15) to Rs 1.2 lakh crore (2023-24)," he said. He added that 99.2 per cent of mobile phones sold in India are now made in India, up from just 26 per cent in 2014-15. Malviya further said that under the PLI scheme for electronics alone, 1,39,670 direct jobs have already been created. As many as 1.8 lakh new companies were registered in 2023-24, marking a 16 per cent increase over the previous year, he said. "Electronics exports hit USD 38+ billion in FY24-25, a 32 per cent year-on-year increase," Malviya said. "PLI allocations for electronics rose from Rs 5,747 crore (FY24-25) to Rs 8,885 crore (FY25-26) - a clear signal of continued commitment," he added. Malviya said the government has approved landmark semiconductor projects worth Rs 1.52 lakh crore, "a critical leap into deep-tech manufacturing". Overall, electronics production is projected to reach USD 300 billion by 2026, he said.

Business Standard

23 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Sebi plans overhaul of mutual fund rules to aid investors and industry

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is undertaking a comprehensive review of mutual fund regulations to make them more investor-centric and industry-friendly, a senior official said on Saturday. "We are reviewing the entire mutual fund regulatory framework to enhance ease of doing business for all stakeholders, including the regulator," SEBI executive director Manoj Kumar said at the 17th Mutual Fund Summit organised by the Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC) here. Existing regulations governing the sector are among the lengthiest and require simplification to keep pace with evolving investor needs and industry innovations, stakeholders said. "The process has started and soon we will come out with draft regulations for feedback and consultation process before it is finalised," Kumar said without giving any timeline for the rollout of the new rules. Kumar outlined the regulator's strategic roadmap to strengthen India's securities market, with mutual funds positioned as a critical pillar in fostering inclusive financial growth and investor protection. A consultation paper on regulations which governs advisory functions in mutual funds is also in the pipeline. Addressing the event, Kumar said India has undergone major market transformations under SEBI's stewardship. These include the shift to an electronic trading ecosystem in 1998, followed by achieving 100 per cent dematerialisation of shares, making India the only jurisdiction globally to do so. "The third transformation is unfolding now through the mutual fund revolution," he said, calling it a cornerstone of SEBI's "optimum regulation" approach, one that seeks balance among the interests of the regulator, the industry, and investors. While India's mutual fund industry has crossed Rs 72 lakh-crore in AUM and monthly SIP contributions have touched Rs 28,000 crore, the investor base remains limited to just five crore in a population of 140 crore, Kumar pointed out. SEBI is also actively reviewing scheme categorisation norms to make them more intuitive for investors, while ensuring all offerings remain "true to label" to prevent mis-selling. To offer wider choice to investors, SEBI has approved a new product category, referred to as SIF, aimed at investors with ticket sizes between Rs 10 lakh and Rs 50 lakh. Mutual funds were selected to manage these products given their established governance and handling of retail flows. Parallelly, SEBI has opened faster registration windows for Portfolio Management Services (PMS) and Alternative Investment Funds (AIF) with similar offerings. Addressing industry concerns over stress test disclosures for mid- and small-cap funds, Kumar reaffirmed SEBI's disclosure-based regulatory model, stressing that informed investors are central to market resilience. While he acknowledged that some disclosure requirements may seem burdensome, he assured stakeholders that SEBI remains open to feedback and streamlining processes. He urged the industry to avoid situations that warrant regulatory intervention, saying, "Our goal is not to disrupt but to allow business to thrive." Highlighting the untapped potential in eastern India, Kumar said SEBI views West Bengal and the Northeast as strategic regions for mutual fund expansion, underscoring the need for targeted penetration efforts. Echoing this vision, AMFI chief executive V N Chalasani said India is transitioning from financial inclusion to financial well-being, where saving smartly and investing wisely will enable sustainable wealth creation. He cited the exponential growth of mutual funds post-2017, following SEBI's investor education mandate, which helped expand the investor base and improve financial awareness. However, Chalasani pointed out that India's mutual fund AUM still forms only about 20 per cent of GDP, compared to a global average of 65 per cent. He stressed the need for deeper financial literacy, especially in Tier 3 and 4 cities, where AMFI is focusing through school and university programmes, distributor expansion via India Post, and new product innovations aimed at mid-income investors. "Every Indian can evolve from a saver to an investor and ultimately a wealth creator," he said, calling for sustained collaboration between regulators, industry, educators and investors to build an empowered, financially resilient India.

Business Standard

24 minutes ago

• Business Standard

NTPC board approves plan to raise ₹18,000 crore via bonds, NCDs

The company also fixed the cut-off date of Friday for the purpose of reckoning the names of members Press Trust of India New Delhi State-run power giant NTPC board on Saturday approved the proposal to raise up to Rs 18,000 crore through the issuance of NCDs or bonds on private placement in the domestic market. The board of directors of the company in its meeting on Saturday also considered and approved the draft notice of postal ballot in respect of seeking approval of shareholders of the company for issue of these non-convertible debentures (NCDs), as per a regulatory filing. The company also fixed the cut-off date of Friday for the purpose of reckoning the names of members, who are entitled for receiving postal ballot notice and voting rights, it said. According to the filing, the board approved the issue of non-convertible debentures up to Rs 18,000 crore in one or more tranches/series not exceeding 12, through private placement in the domestic market during the period commencing from the date of passing of special resolution till completion of one year. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)