The normalisation of femicide in South Africa
Bonolo Mahlatsi 6 June 2025 | 12:09 Femicide
Gender-based violence (GBV)
Women's Month
A memorial service was held for Olorato Mongale in Bloemfontein on 29 May 2025. Picture: Katlego Jiyane/EWN
Femicide, gender-based violence (GBV), and violence in general have become an integral part of life for South African women. This horrendous crime is a national crisis, plaguing society as a whole. Despite South Africa's robust legal framework, policies and strategic plans aimed at tackling GBV and femicide, such scourges are still escalating and appear to be deeply rooted in societal norms.
The epidemic of femicide that South Africa is and has been facing is misogyny amplified, normalised, and reproduced. It has become normal for women to be violated and ostracised while already being vulnerable.
The violence against women, and its normalisation, has once again come under the spotlight with the murder of Olorato Mongale, who was killed by a man she went on a first date with. The unfortunate and untimely passing of Olorato, a reminder of what South Africa has become for women, hit home for many individuals, including her friends, who tried to find her after her phone location indicated she was in a dangerous place.
Upon realising she was missing, social media posts were circulated seeking assistance from the public about her whereabouts. Olorato was a postgraduate student. Her body was found in Lombardy West in Johannesburg on Sunday, less than two hours after she was picked up.
THE SOCIAL MEDIA NARRATIVE
However, as if the murder of yet another young woman was not bad enough, it was unfortunate to read the comments posted on social media, such as: "Why did she go out with a stranger?" "Why did she not drive herself to the date?" The posts blamed her for not taking extra measures to avoid putting herself in danger. The comments continued despite people learning about the safety measures Olorato had put in place, including sharing her location with friends.
The comments suggest she did not know any better.
Another grim and unfortunate instance of femicide was that of Sbusiso Lawrence, a KwaZulu-Natal man who took a disturbing video of himself 'unaliving' (killing) his partner in December 2024.
Lawrence's video sparked outrage after he shared the traumatic incident on social media, where he attempted to justify his actions, saying he was triggered by being mistreated in their relationship and was seen with blood on his face. After confessing, he was later found hanging from a tree near the murder scene.
The normalisation there was in people asking, "Why did she leave him? He was a good man." And even when it was later revealed that he had previously attempted to unalive her, negative remarks were still made about the victim. The narrative of victim-blaming became apparent following that incident. Again, we observed social media comments that her actions provoked his behaviour, which led to her death.
The social media commentary is an invisible finger-pointing exercise that serves to blame women. And there are many other cases. It is such behaviour that normalises and perpetuates violence against women.
There is advice cautioning women to avoid becoming victims, such as 'don't walk alone at night, don't wear provocative clothing or short skirts'. However, the same cautions aren't used against men to say they shouldn't violate women.
The unfortunate incidents show that social media has unfortunately become a breeding ground for victim-blaming. Victim-blaming has become a normative part of our thinking that goes unchallenged. Social media commentary that pushes the victim-blaming narrative fosters a culture of negativity on social media and only adds salt to the wound, which is another form of deviant behaviour illustrating gendered stereotypes.
These narratives pushed through social media commentary obstruct sympathy and support for those who have suffered and those afflicted.
Start confronting femicide and GBV to alleviate the dangers
Generally, we observe the normalisation through social codes and social media posts that place the blame on women. What is unfortunate is that despite having such social codes that essentially spell out the terms in which women should conduct themselves, all in the name of being 'safe,' women still become victims of femicide and GBV.
The normalisation of femicide and GBV is disheartening and inhumane; we need to start confronting it to alleviate the dangers they pose. How many mass movements will it take for women's voices to be heard that we live in constant fear day and night? Why should we suffer at the misogynistic hands of men?
Such deviant behaviour cannot in any way be normalised. The danger of continuously normalising such behaviour will get to a point where it will no longer feel wrong.
We will soon be celebrating Women's Month, with our faces bowed with despondency from heartbreaking news we would have learned about since the year started and from previous years. Shortly after that, we will be celebrating 16 Days of Activism for No Violence Against Women and Children, aware of the constant fear women live in.
The Department of Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities and the Portfolio Committee on Women should start stepping up intentionally and practically advocating for women (young and old) and uproot the persisting issue with the help of all women to mobilise our cry for help, safety, and not having to live in constant fear.
Until that happens, as South African women, we will live in fear and be failed, which is appalling. Do we deserve to be treated like we are sub-human?
Bonolo Mahlatsi is a Senior Student Experience Officer in the Centre for Teaching and Learning, and a Sociology master's graduate, UFS. She writes in her personal capacity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
10 more SANDF officials arrested over murder and kidnapping of Hawks officer Frans Mathipa
Ten more South African National Defence Force (SANDF) members were arrested on Monday in connection with the murder of Lt-Col Frans Mathipa. Hawks spokesperson Lt-Col Christopher Singo said the 10 suspects handed themselves over to the Hawks serious organised crime investigation unit in Johannesburg. 'They are all SANDF members and face similar charges,' he said. The 10 suspects are expected to join the two soldiers who were arrested on Sunday at the Randburg magistrate's court on Monday. All the suspects face charges of murder and kidnapping. Mathipa was fatally shot while driving on the N1 near Hammanskraal in August 2023 when the assassins pulled up next to him and opened fire. The Sunday Times reported he had been investigating the abduction of alleged Isis leader Abdella Abadiga from the Mall of Africa in Johannesburg and was looking into suspicions that South African military special forces were involved.
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Judge to deliver final blow? Diddy's fate looms in New York trial
Judge Arun Subramanian presided over the criminal trial United States v. Combs, which started on 5 May 2025, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Sean 'Diddy' Combs is facing five federal charges: one for conspiracy to commit racketeering, two for sex trafficking by force, and two for transporting individuals for prostitution. He pleaded not guilty, and authorities are holding him at MDC Brooklyn under the inmate number 37452 054. Additionally, all twelve jurors (eight men and four women) are New York State residents. Over six weeks, prosecutors called 34 witnesses, including Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura and an unknown woman, known only as 'Jane'. Ventura, 38, said Combs forced her to participate in drug-fuelled group sexual activities involving urine and subjected her to constant physical and mental abuse. She also said that Combs threatened to send out sex videos to control her. Brendan Paul, Sean Combs' assistant from late 2022 to March 2024, testified on 20 June 2025 after prosecutors granted him immunity. Paul also said that he planned 'freak-offs', which he described as parties full of drugs and sex. He said the terms 'Gucci bag active' and 'Wild King nights' were code words for drug and sex parties, respectively. After six weeks and thirty-four witnesses, the prosecution will wrap up its case on 23 June 2025. Combs Global employees and an expert witness will testify during Sean 'Diddy' Combs' defence, which is expected to last one to two days. However, Combs is not going to testify. The judge has hinted that closing arguments could begin as early as 26 June 2025; it is anticipated that they will begin shortly after the defence is finished. According to federal sentencing guidelines in the United States, Combs faces a mandatory minimum sentence of 15 years. If convicted of crimes such as sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, Combs could face a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Court allows #UniteBehind to join Prasa Zondo corruption review proceedings
Prasa's former chief executive Lucky Montana is one of five former Prasa board members who will ask the court to review and set aside State capture findings against the entity. Image: File The organisation #UniteBehind has been granted permission by the court to join the proceedings in which five former board members of the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) are challenging findings of corruption against them by the Zondo Commission of Inquiry into State Capture. In ruling in favour of #UniteBehind, the Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg said the commuter activist organisation had demonstrated a direct and substantial interest in the review application of the five former board members. Acting Judge Xenophon Stylianou added that given the importance of the subject matter of the review application, it would be in the public interest and the interests of justice that #UniteBehind be granted leave to intervene as a respondent. The ex-board members want the court to review and set aside the findings and recommendations concerning Prasa as detailed in Part 5 Volume II of the Final Report of the State Capture Commission. They are former Prasa chairperson Sfiso Buthelezi, Dr Bridgete Gasa-Toboti, the former chairperson of the board's Finance, Capital Investment and Procurement (FCIP) Committee, Mmatebogo Nkoenyane, who served on the FCIP Committee, Nkosinathi Khena, who served on the audit and risk management committee (ARM), and Lucky Montana, former Prasa group chief executive. The group will at a later stage argue that the report is reviewable on numerous grounds, including what they deem the selective application of the commission's rules and regulations, "factual inaccuracies and disregard of the evidence". In its intervention application to be joined as a respondent, #UniteBehind, through Zackie Achmat, a well-known South African political activist, explained that their input in the matter is in the public interest. The five ex-board members meanwhile denied that the organisation has a direct and substantial interest in the review application. #UniteBehind said its intention to join the main proceedings is to demonstrate to the review court that the relief sought in the review application is neither just nor equitable, that certain factual allegations made by the ex-board members in the review application are incorrect, and that the findings of the Commission's report are correct and should withstand review. It explained that its members use trains as a form of transport and that it has a direct interest in the effective and efficient management of Prasa and commuter rail. #UniteBehind cited a long-running track record in campaigns against Prasa in support of its case. This includes a campaign to end corruption, maladministration, and malfeasance at Prasa under the name of #FixOurTrains, and it also assisted the Commission at the time by providing it with evidence. In ruling in favour of #UniteBehind, the judge found that the objective of the organisation is to hold Prasa accountable to its constitutional and legislative mandates. Its interest in accountability and fighting corruption is specifically focused on rail commuters and Prasa through campaigns such as #FixOurTrains. #UniteBehind published 'PRASALeaks,' which sought to highlight findings from two reports (one by Treasury and another by Werksmans) which #UniteBehind said showed widespread corruption at Prasa.
