The Trump administration is trolling all of us

Taking their cues from the right-wing culture warriors and edgelords who make up the MAGA media sphere, the Trump administration has made performative cruelty its media strategy blueprint.
With a staff largely comprised of former Fox News hosts, pro-Trump influencers, made-for-TV politicians, and Trump's 'first buddy' Elon Musk, who just so happens to own one of the largest social media platforms in the world, each day has seemingly brought about a new rage baiting stunt in the conservative media complex.
The goal for online behavior and mainstream media engagement remains the same: titillate Trump supporters while angering the left. In a word, trolling.
So far, it's working, whether it's Trump's infomercial for Musk's electric vehicles, DHS chief Kristi Noem's cosplay theatrics or FBI Director Kash Patel posting a perp walk photo of a judge he had arrested.
Is this White House's press strategy nothing more than an offshoot of the conservative media entertainment complex? Are they just trying to 'own the libs' and provoke 'liberal tears'? Or is there a greater mission in place here with the propagandist-style stunts and toxic social media posts?
'I think it's all of the above,' author Eoin Higgins, whose new book Owned examines how right-wing tech-billionaires have reshaped the media landscape, told The Independent. 'They're trying to appeal to the ultra-online far right, of course, but they're also doing the 'flood the zone' thing that Stephen Bannon wants them to do. I'd hesitate to call it a strategy; it seems to me more that it's a number of competing efforts.'
Amid the fallout from ICE illegally deporting a Maryland man to El Salvador, which has seen the administration essentially ignore a Supreme Court order to facilitate his return, the White House has doubled down and accused the man of being an MS-13 gang member involved in human trafficking.
In one instance, they even employed the well-known Counternarratives style created by artist Alexandra Bell, who began reworking New York Times headlines and articles to challenge racial and gender biases she saw in legacy media. Some of her most famous examples centered around the shooting of Michael Brown and the Ferguson protests.
Following another social media trend, the White House has also posted deportation cartoons modeled after the animated films produced by the Japanese film studio Ghibli, after ChatGPT made this option available last month. The most notorious example of this meme came on March 27 when the White House's official X (formerly Twitter) account posted a Ghibilifed image of a Dominican woman weeping after she was arrested by ICE agents.
The White House and Trump's acolytes in the MAGA media world believe the president has been given a mandate to take down the 'woke' liberal agenda while installing the blueprint laid out by Project 2025, and they're pushing that message with their whole chest.
'When times get tough, you don't take a step back; you double down. And if that doesn't work, you triple down,' the White House communications director Steven Cheung told The Atlantic when asked if Trump ever goes too far with his aggressive rhetoric and self-created reality in his interviews and Truth Social posts.
This quote from Cheung – the combative former UFC flack who now steers the Trump administration's press and social media strategy – encapsulates how this latest iteration of a Trump White House is reshaping the way a presidential administration communicates with the press and public.
Michael Edison Hayden, an author and expert on far-right extremism, noted that MAGA has grown so big as a cultural phenomenon 'that they no longer need to integrate with what we would consider mainstream culture in order to thrive.' According to Hayden, the White House has 'bet big on MAGA as a completely separate cultural bubble' in hopes that it can completely replace the legacy media altogether.
'It's a bold play and we will find out whether or not it was completely hubristic in time,' he added. 'But that's why they feel like they can mock immigrants so sadistically and openly try to humiliate the press. They think MAGA will supplant the non-MAGA world and this is how they try to assert dominance.'
Still, is this approach working? As we turn the corner on Trump's first 100 days in office, the president's approval rating is already at historic lows – and Trump's chaotic strategy of overwhelming the public isn't calming fears about his ability to competently run the country.
On the contrary, picking fights with the legacy media and dehumanizing immigrants while suggesting that U.S. citizens may soon be next in line to be sent to a foreign gulag has made independent voters – the ones who helped put Trump back in the White House – turn their backs on him.
According to the latest ABC News poll, only 39 percent of Americans approve of Trump's job in office – the lowest ever for a president in his first 100 days. The president is underwater on pretty much every issue, including immigration – the central tenet of his campaign platform. Vast majorities believe that his tariff and economic policies will lead to a recession, that he is going too far in trying to expand presidential powers, and that he is crossing the line by targeting his political opponents. In fact, 62 percent of independent voters feel Trump is out of touch with most people's concerns.
Therefore, is the administration's combative and polarizing PR strategy effectively turning off most Americans?
'I think that's part of it, and the repellent agenda that they have,' Higgins, the Owned author, said. 'Trump's largely dispensed with even pretending to fix anything, it's all vengeance and cruelty.'
Far-right expert Hayden, meanwhile, urged a 'strong word of warning' on polls due to Trump regularly outperforming them throughout his decade in politics. At the same time, he noted that 'the White House has decided to reach out only to the MAGA base with their propaganda, and the risks of doing that are fairly obvious,' meaning it could potentially spell doom for the movement down the road.
'People have to find the MAGA movement — or cult, as many have called it — attractive enough to join it,' he stated. 'If independent-minded people aren't turned on by what they see, it's a potential recipe for movement collapse. They can't risk losing any supporters.'
And it isn't just independent centrists or left-leaning Democrats who have expressed disapproval with some of the stunts pulled off by this administration in an effort to pander to the right-wing fever swamp crowd.
Even the president's most fervent supporters lashed out at Attorney General Pam Bondi in late February for failing to deliver on the promised bombshell release of FBI documents related to the deceased sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein, a subject much of the right has been obsessed with for years. Bondi made a huge show of handing over binders of already public information to pro-Trump influencers, sparking intense backlash among the MAGA faithful.
'I hate to say it, but the American people can't trust the validity of the Epstein files released today,' far-right extremist Laura Loomer tweeted about the 'Epstein Files' fiasco. 'It was released in an unprofessional manner with paid, partisan social media influencers to curate their binders for us. I can't trust anything in the binder. Neither should you.'
Additionally, conservatives have grown increasingly exasperated with Noem, who has play-acted as an ICE agent, firefighter, pilot and Customs and Border Protection officer for social media clips. Having already faced heat for her El Salvador trip to the infamous CECOT prison, where she filmed an Instagram video in front of shirtless prisoners while wearing a $60,000 Rolex, the Homeland Security director was roundly criticized for posting about an ICE raid in Arizona.
Not only was Noem mocked for failing gun safety standards during her latest cosplay performance, she was also blasted for taking Libs of TikTok creator Chaya Raichik, a far-right influencer who has been criticized for her Twitter pile-ons, for the 'ride-along.' Afterwards, Raichik promoted 'exclusive footage' of migrant arrests for her online fans.
'Can we talk about Kristi Noem and these ridiculous photo ops? Why does she have to keep doing this?' former Fox News host turned independent MAGA influencer Megyn Kelly grumbled this month. 'Stop with the glam! I mean, she looks like I look right now, but she's out in the field with her gun, being like we're gonna go kick some a**! No one wants you there.'
Should we expect criticism from the right to continue over these performative tactics? And are these critiques about the PR strategy itself or the feeling that the administration isn't following through on some of Trump's campaign promises?
'If Trump's polls continue to tick down, the sociopaths and narcissists that populate the MAGA influencer realm will start planning for an exit and a rebrand,' Hayden observed. 'I don't think campaign promises will factor much into it, unless the influencer's branding has a lane of criticism built into it, like a Nick Fuentes. If Trumpism starts to collapse, and it's palpable, see how they run.'
Even with the White House facing some blowback from the right, the administration hasn't slowed down when it comes to its 4chan-level trolling tactics.
Patel, meanwhile, may have even violated the Department of Justice's policies when he posted a photo of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan – who was arrested last week for allegedly obstructing immigration agents – being escorted by federal law enforcement officers in a perp walk.
This also raises another question – who among the MAGA media sphere is the administration taking its cues from and who are they looking to emulate most?
'The White House X account sometimes plays like some of the content you would find on 4chan, 8chan or Gab during the first Trump administration,' Hayden explained. 'These were the places where pseudonymous fascists would go to post their sadistic fantasies about non-white people. And what I think we can take away from that is that Trump supporters have been isolated in their own bubble and cooking in propaganda for so long that they don't understand how extreme they've actually become.'
He continued: 'Either that or they know and don't care because they've become so resentful. I mention that because those websites were always regarded as fringe, even if many Trump supporters saw content from them during their online MAGA voyage.'
In the end, one has to wonder if the White House's trolling tactics are 'too online' for even the average Trump supporter.
'By choosing 4chan as their voice, the Trump White House has put themselves in a position where they can't pivot into something softer or more compassionate,' Hayden pointed out. 'And that is a problem if Trump's poll numbers continue to fade. If they try to pivot to a softer tone, they will look weak.'
Referencing the administration's social media posts of migrants being deported alongside pop music soundtracks, he said that the White House 'has boxed themselves into a position where they must perpetually double down' because they're 'on a sort of death drive where they either supplant liberal culture and destroy it or fail and suffer MAGA movement collapse.'
Higgins, for his part, asserted that the average American is likely not paying attention to this stuff. 'They want to know why things are getting more expensive and why the big positive changes haven't come yet,' he added.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New York Post

24 minutes ago

• New York Post

Miranda Devine: Trump's ‘spectacular' Iran strike could carve his place in history as most courageous leader since Ronald Reagan

What an impressive sight it was Sunday, when the futuristic B-2 stealth bombers sliced through the powder-blue Missouri sky on their triumphant return to home base in the American heartland after dropping their Massive Ordnance Penetrator bombs on Iran's underground nuclear sites. The strikes were 'a spectacular military success,' President Trump told the world Saturday night, after emerging from the Situation Room. 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' he said. Advertisement While Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan 'Razing' Caine said Sunday it was 'way too early' to know the full extent of damage at Iran's Fordow uranium-enrichment complex, satellite images show several large holes and a layer of gray-blue ash where all 14 massive 'bunker buster' bombs, each weighing 30,000 pounds, hit their target Saturday night in Operation Midnight Hammer. The strikes were also a spectacular political calculation by the president who ran on no new wars, and managed to keep a poker face all week as he was given advice by all and sundry. 'Unconventional' He made the right decision, and it appears to have been executed flawlessly. A limited strike, in and out. Iran's nuclear capability has been eliminated or at least severely degraded. No regime change. If the nuclear threat from Iran is indeed neutralized, leading to the extension of the Abraham Accords and peace in the Middle East, Trump will have achieved what countless predecessors failed to do. Advertisement If he pulls it off, without embroiling us in a larger war, he will have carved his role in history as the most courageous and consequential leader since Ronald Reagan. The man who rose from the stage in Butler, blood pouring down his face, raised his fist in the air and said, 'Fight, Fight Fight,' is exactly who you want as commander in chief at a time like this, especially as it's not his first rodeo. Photographs released by the White House show a serious-faced Trump inside the Situation Room Saturday night, wearing his trademark suit and red tie, not cosplaying a flyboy as his more casually-attired predecessors liked to do. His only bow to informality was a red MAGA hat with '45-47' on the side, representing his bifurcated presidential terms and the relentless grit it took to come back from the political dead. Advertisement So much for 'TACO Don.' He outfoxed everyone. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, just after emerging from the Situation Room last week where he watched the president deal with the complexities of the Iran-Israel war, likened Trump to Winston Churchill. 'He has a strategy and it's not a conventional strategy, but what conventional person has ever done great things?' said Bessent, in an interview for my new podcast Pod Force One. 'Does anybody think that Winston Churchill was conventional? '[Trump is] also so flexible in terms of the way he looks at things,' Bessent said. 'We've just spent basically the past 24 hours in the Situation Room over the Iran-Israel conflict, and I can tell you that the American people should know, and the American troops should know, that Donald Trump is doing an incredible job looking after their interests in what could turn, without someone like him, could turn into a widespread conflict that US soldiers and interests could get sucked into.' New team Advertisement In one fell swoop, Trump also restored the prestige of the US military, which had plummeted under Joe Biden. Most welcome was the upgrade from Gen. Mark 'Thoroughly Modern' Milley of 'white rage' fame, whom Biden had to give a preemptive pardon on his way out the door, presumably for his Trump-deranged outbursts to the Chinese. In Milley's place we now have 'Razing Caine,' once a daring F-16 pilot, and as cool and contained a general as you could find. 'This mission demonstrates the unmatched reach, coordination, and capability of the United States military,' he told reporters in a Sunday news conference alongside Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, another veteran whose rapport with 'war fighters' has helped revive recruitment to record levels. 'In just a matter of weeks, this went from strategic planning to global execution,' said Caine. 'As the president clearly said last night, no other military in the world could have done this.' Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! What a contrast to the previous administration. Under Biden, our military was humiliated. Preposterous wokery and weak leadership led to a breakdown in discipline embodied in online displays of perverts in uniform dolled up in kinky dog masks and bondage gear. Advertisement Under Biden, incompetence was the order of the day, from the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan, leaving behind $7 billion of equipment, to the failure to bring our astronauts home from the International Space Station, to the $230 million Gaza pier debacle which resulted in the death of one young soldier and dozens of troops injured while delivering minimal aid. The morale and reputation of our armed forces was severely depleted, making a mockery of Biden's frequent refrain' God bless our troops.' Under Biden, Obama's benighted Iran deal that Trump axed in his first term was reanimated. Trump 1.0 left Iran on its knees, unable to fund its proxies to attack Israel. Biden, in his wisdom, empowered and enriched Iran, reappointing Robert Malley, Antony Blinken's childhood friend from their prestigious Parisienne école, as Iran envoy. Malley was then suspended without pay pending an FBI investigation into an Iranian influence ring and his 'mishandling' of classified information. Naturally, the Ivy League came to his rescue, giving him gigs at Yale and Princeton. That is Biden's legacy. Advertisement But instead of thanking Trump for saving the world from a nuclear Iran, Democrats are pretending that he did something unconstitutional, and are whining because he didn't inform Democrat leaders in Congress before the top-secret operation. They only have themselves to blame for proving to be so unreliable with secrets in the past. Hello, Schifty Schiff. Dems were fine with Obama bombing Libya, Syria and Pakistan an estimated 13,000 times, killing thousands of people, without asking Congress for permission. Remember then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton cackling over Libyan leader Moammar Khadafy's gruesome end when he was sodomized and brutalized to death on camera as she watched lasciviously from afar: 'We came, we saw, he died,' she said. Strong stance Advertisement Democrats should sit this one out. Despite their threats to impeach him, Trump has seized the moral authority and no doubt his already buoyant approval ratings will soar. That's the political dividend of strong leadership. What GOP senator could refuse to pass Trump's beloved Big Beautiful Bill now? And as with everything Trump does, the visuals were impeccable. The icing on the cake was his brand new 100-foot flagpole out the front of the White House, with Old Glory waving languidly in the night breeze as the B-2s worked their magic half a world away. Advertisement You're paying for radical Zoh New York, we have a problem. How could a candidate as toxic and radical as Zohran Mamdani be so close to victory in Tuesday's Democratic mayoral primary? An antisemitic socialist who is running to defund the police and raise more taxes for illegal migrants should be a political impossibility, yet he has surged to second place behind Andrew Cuomo in the polls. Attorney Denise Cohen, who writes a substack as 'Rational New Yorker,' has figured out this dangerous man 'could attain the highest office in NYC using public money that most of us didn't approve through a slush fund that we unwittingly paid for.' Mamdani has the highest social media engagement of all mayoral candidates with almost 6 million likes on TikTok, and has created the false appearance of a vibrant grassroots campaign with tens of thousands of small dollar donors, she writes. But he didn't amass a $8.4 million war chest from grassroots donations. Eighty percent of it came from taxpayers thanks to a New York campaign finance law in which the New York City Campaign Finance Board matches small donations by $8 for every $1 raised. If Mamdani wins, you and I probably paid for his campaign.

Los Angeles Times

24 minutes ago

• Los Angeles Times

Trump says he's open to ‘regime change' in Iran, even as his aides insist otherwise

WASHINGTON — President Trump on Sunday called into question the future of Iran's ruling theocracy after a surprise attack on three of the country's nuclear sites, seemingly contradicting his administration's calls to resume negotiations and avoid an escalation in fighting. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' The post on his social media platform marked a stark reversal from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing of Iran early Sunday. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Hegseth said. The administration has made clear it wants Iran to stop any development of nuclear weapons, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that any retaliation against the U.S. or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the regime at risk.' But beyond that, the world is awash in uncertainty at a fragile moment that could decide whether parts of the globe tip into war or find a way to salvage a relative peace. Trump's message to Iran's leadership comes as the U.S. has warned Iran against retaliating for the bombardment targeting the heart of a nuclear program that it spent decades developing. The Trump administration has made a series of intimidating statements even as it has called for a restart of negotiations, making it hard to get a read on whether the U.S. president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran that began with Israeli attacks on June 13. Until Trump's post Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging by his vice president, Pentagon chief, top military advisor and secretary of State suggested a confidence that any fallout would be manageable and that Iran's lack of military capabilities would ultimately force it back to the bargaining table. Hegseth had said that America 'does not seek war' with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes had given Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington. But the unfolding situation is not entirely under Washington's control, as Tehran has a series of levers to respond to the aerial bombings that could intensify the conflict in the Middle East with possible global repercussions. Iran can block oil being shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, attack U.S. bases in the region, engage in cyberattacks or accelerate its nuclear program — which might seem more of a necessity after the U.S. strikes. All of that raises the question of whether the U.S. bombing will open up a more brutal phase of fighting or revive negotiations out of an abundance of caution. In the U.S., the attack quickly spilled over into domestic politics, with Trump spending part of his Sunday going after his critics in Congress. He used a social media post to lambaste Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), a stalwart Trump supporter who had objected to the president taking military action without specific congressional approval. 'We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)' Trump wrote. Boak and Pesoli write for the Associated Press.

Yahoo

30 minutes ago

• Yahoo

It sounds sick, but Iran hostilities may be good for stocks

It sounds sick, but Iran hostilities may be good for stocks originally appeared on TheStreet. So, President Trump ordered B-2 bombers to drop bunker-busting bombs on three Iranian nuclear facilities late Saturday. He pronounced the result "a spectacular success," with Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities "completely and totally obliterated." There will be lots of media coverage Sunday and beyond on whether the operation worked and whether the United States will be dragged into a third war in the Middle East since 1991. 💵💰💰💵 A question for investors, however, is this: How will stocks react?There are some unknowns. There's been no verification that Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities are, in fact, totally obliterated. It's not clear if Iran will try to cut a deal to stop the Israeli and U.S. bombing or opt somehow to play a long game of defending itself with missile shots at Israel and U.S. military bases in the Middle East. Nonetheless, there's a good chance Wall Street will seize on the attacks as a prime stock-buying opportunity. That's what happened in 2003's Second Gulf War when U.S.-led forces invaded Iraq and toppled the dictatorial regime of Saddam started to tumble in late January 2003 as another war against Iraq became inevitable. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index was down as much as 9% for the year on March 11. But then investors started to believe the invasion would go well, and the S&P 500 started to recover. Indeed, when Baghdad fell on April 9, 2003, the index had recovered all the early losses and was up 8.2% from the March low. And stocks never looked back. The S&P 500 finished up 26.4% in 2023. The gain from the March 2003 low to year-end: 38%. One will be able to see how investors and markets are looking at the conflict starting at 6 p.m. ET Sunday. That's when futures trading in the S&P 500, the Dow Jones industrials and the Nasdaq-100 starts. Gains like 2003 might not happen. Iran was lobbing missiles at the Israeli cities of Tel Aviv and Haifa into Sunday. And, so far, there's no hint that Iran's leadership wants a cease fire. A prolonged fight might be bad for stocks. Iran has missiles and drones to deploy. It could block off Strait of Hormuz, through which 25% of the world's crude oil is shipped. Blocking the strait would send global oil prices sharply higher and cause havoc for the global economy. in fact, oil prices already have reacted. As tensions have grown between Israel and Iran (and now the United States), crude oil has climbed 29.3% to $73.84 per 42-gallon barrel from a May 5 closing low. U.S. gasoline prices have risen, too, about 4% or so, to about $3.20 a gallon, according to companies would profit. In fact, stocks in the S&P 500's Energy Sector are up 9.2% so far in June, the best performance by any of the 11 S&P 500 sectors. Oil-and-gas producer APA Corp. () , the sector leader is up 15.8% over the last month, according to data. Exxon Mobil () has jumped 9.3%; Chevron () is has risen almost 9%. More Experts Analyst makes bold call on stocks, bonds, and gold TheStreet Stocks & Markets Podcast #8: Common Sense Investing With David Miller Veteran fund manager sends dire message on stocks Theoretically, the first-quarter earnings seasons is done, but some of the late stragglers due this week are important. These include: FedEx () , after Tuesday's close. FedEx shares have struggled, but there is hope. The delivery giant is doing business again with () , and its business overall is growing again. But shares are off nearly 20% this year because of tariff worries. Earnings are estimated to rise 8.9% from a year ago to $5.89 a share. Revenue will be off slightly at $21.8 billion. Cruise-line giant Carnival Corp. () , before Tuesday's open. Between August 2024 and Jan. 30, the shares doubled to $28.49 because bookings were beyond terrific. Then, the shares fell 49%, thanks to the Trump tariff plan and the mini-stock panic. Carnival is back to $23.77. The quarterly revenue estimate of $6.2 billion is up 7.3% from a year ago. Earnings of 24 cents a share would be up 118%. Chip maker Micron Technology () shares are up 47% this year, and Wall Street likes — no, loves — the stock, whose chips have carved out a lucrative spot in artificial intelligence. In fact, the shares are already ahead of one analyst's one-year price target. The revenue estimate is $8.8 billion, up nearly 30% from a year ago. Earnings of $1.59 a share would be up 156%. Nike () is having a challenging year. The shares are down 21% this year, third-worst among the Dow Jones industrial stocks. True, it's selling athletic wear and shoes again on but it is extremely vulnerable to the Trump tariff hikes. Barrons says Nike's factories in Vietnam, Indonesia and China manufacture 50%, 27% and 18% of all its footwear. (Yes, that adds up to 95% of production.) The Nike revenue estimate: $10.7 billion, down 15.1% from a year ago. Earnings of 12 cents would be down 88%.It sounds sick, but Iran hostilities may be good for stocks first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 22, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 22, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data