Russia warns of 'unpredictable consequences' if Iran-Israel conflict escalates
Russia 's ambassador to the UN said on Tuesday he sees no willingness from Israel to engage in mediation efforts to end its conflict with Iran, warning of 'unpredictable consequences' as hostilities intensify.
'This thing should be stopped, because it has absolutely unpredictable consequences, given that we're talking about nuclear sites that are under threat and given that the ballistic exchange continues with heavy casualties on both sides,' Vasily Nebenzya told reporters in New York.
The remarks come as retaliatory attacks between Israel and Iran continue, and as international calls grow for de-escalation. It also comes as President Donald Trump has indicated the US could enter the conflict.
Moscow is seeking to be a mediator, but its overtures have yet to translate into concrete talks.
'There was a conversation between President [Vladimir] Putin and President Trump the other day, and President Putin said that we are ready to do what we can to facilitate … so in that sense, yes, we are co-ordinating, but we don't have any mediation efforts on the ground,' he said.
Iran provided critical drone support to Russia during the first year of Moscow's war in Ukraine, helped it establish a domestic drone factory, and signed a 20-year strategic partnership in January, deepening defence and political ties between the two allies.
Yet months after that agreement, as Iran faces unprecedented Israeli strikes threatening its stability, Russia has offered little beyond diplomatic statements and phone calls, leaving Tehran increasingly isolated.
Moscow is walking a tightrope, Iulia-Sabina Joja, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, told The National, as it weighs support for Tehran against protecting its broader regional interests amid Iran's declining influence.
Any prolonged instability in the Middle East, especially involving Iran, could undermine Russia's delicate balancing act in the region, Ms Joja said.
'Russia has to play now a very difficult balancing game,' she said. 'On the one hand, they want to support Iran but have to be on the winning side in the Middle East to pursue their interests, and Iran is looking weak, with its interests on the losing side across the region, particularly in Syria with the Assad regime and other elements.'
At the same time, Moscow's immediate priority remains its war in Ukraine, where it aims to prolong the conflict while stringing along the US with illusory negotiations.
'For them to be able to do that for as long as possible, which is their aim, they have to play nice, or at least pretend to play nice, with the United States,' Ms Joja said. 'That's why we're seeing them take a step back or adopt a more reluctant position than some expected in their partnership with Iran.'
If the US joins Israel in striking Iran, Ms Joja said direct Russian intervention is unlikely. 'The US and Israel have the upper hand,' she said of their air superiority.
Still, any escalation of the conflict would necessarily make Moscow uncomfortable, as it would jeopardise Russia's goals in Ukraine and its broader Middle East ambitions, including access to warm-water trade routes, she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
29 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
Trump hosts Pakistan's army chief, praises him for stopping war with India
US President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House on Wednesday in an unprecedented meeting that risked worsening a disagreement with India over the president's claim that he stopped last month's conflict between the nuclear-armed South Asian foes. The lunch meeting was the first time a US president had hosted the head of Pakistan's army, widely regarded as the most powerful figure in the country, at the White House unaccompanied by senior Pakistani civilian officials. Trump said he was honoured to meet Munir and that they had discussed Iran, which he said Pakistan knew better than most. Trump told reporters he had thanked Munir for ending the war with India, for which he also praised Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who he spoke to on Tuesday night. "Two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war; that could have been a nuclear war," Trump told reporters. Pakistan's military said in a statement that the two discussed trade, economic development, and cryptocurrency during the two-hour meeting and also exchanged views on tensions between Israel and Iran. "President Trump expressed keen interest in forging a mutually beneficial trade partnership with Pakistan based on long-term strategic convergence and shared interests," the army said. Munir had been expected to press Trump not to enter Israel's war with Iran and seek a ceasefire, Pakistani officials and experts said. A section of Pakistan's embassy in Washington represents Iran's interests in the United States, as Tehran does not have diplomatic relations with the US. Pakistan has condemned Israel's airstrikes against Iran, saying they violate international law and threaten regional stability. The meeting represented a major boost in US-Pakistan ties, which had largely languished under Trump and his predecessor Joe Biden, as both courted India as part of efforts to push back against China. Asked earlier what he wanted to achieve from meeting Munir, Trump told reporters: "Well, I stopped a war ... I love Pakistan. I think Modi is a fantastic man. I spoke to him last night. We're going to make a trade deal with Modi of India. "But I stopped the war between Pakistan and India. This man was extremely influential in stopping it from the Pakistan side, Modi from the India side and others," he said. "They were going at it - and they're both nuclear countries. I got it stopped." White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said Trump hosted Munir after he called for the president to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for preventing a nuclear war between India and Pakistan. NO MEDIATION Trump had said last month that the neighbours agreed to a ceasefire after talks mediated by the US, and that the hostilities ended when he urged the countries to focus on trade instead of war. However, Modi told Trump in their call on Tuesday that the ceasefire was achieved through talks between the Indian and Pakistani militaries and not US mediation, India's most senior diplomat, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, said in a statement. Pakistan has thanked Washington for playing a mediating role, however, while India has repeatedly denied any third-party mediation. Tuesday's phone call between Modi and Trump was the two leaders' first direct exchange since the May 7-10 conflict. "PM Modi told President Trump clearly that during this period, there was no talk at any stage on subjects like India-US trade deal or U.S. mediation between India and Pakistan," Misri said. "Talks for ceasing military action happened directly between India and Pakistan through existing military channels, and on the insistence of Pakistan. Prime Minister Modi emphasised that India has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do." Misri said Modi and Trump had been due to meet on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada but Trump left a day early due to the Middle East situation. Trump asked Modi if he could stop by the US on his return from Canada, Misri said, but the Indian leader expressed his inability to do so due to a pre-decided schedule. The heaviest fighting in decades between India and Pakistan was sparked by an April 22 attack in Indian Kashmir that killed 26 people. New Delhi blamed "terrorists" backed by Pakistan, a charge Islamabad denies. Pakistan has previously said the ceasefire happened after its military returned a call the Indian military initiated. On May 7, Indian jets bombed what New Delhi called "terrorist infrastructure" sites across the border, triggering tit-for-tat strikes spread over four days in which both sides used fighter jets, missiles, drones and artillery. Michael Kugelman, of the Asia Pacific Foundation think tank, said India-US ties, which have thrived in recent years, could suffer if Trump continued to make remarks about a US role in the ceasefire and offered U.S. mediation on Kashmir, a Himalayan territory India and Pakistan both claim. "For Delhi, it all boils down to an age-old question: How much can it tolerate U.S.-Pakistan cooperation without having it spoil US-India relations - a partnership that's thrived in recent years despite continued U.S.-Pakistan links," he said. Reuters
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel's attack on Iran could spark a region-wide explosion
Israel's decision to strike Iran marks a profound escalation in regional tensions, launching a new and volatile phase of the geopolitics of the Middle East. The Israeli military operation, codenamed Rising Lion, signals a shift to a direct confrontation between Israel and Iran. The Iranian retaliation, involving a barrage of drones and ballistic missiles, was not just expected, but politically necessary for Tehran to preserve its deterrence and national pride. The situation now threatens to entrench both countries in an unpredictable cycle of violent escalation. Although Israel has justified its strikes as a preventive measure aimed at dismantling Iran's nuclear capabilities, many analysts question its ability to achieve this without US support. A deeply buried facility like Fordow cannot be hit without advanced American bunker-busting munitions. Rather than halting Iran's nuclear ambitions, these strikes may provoke its full withdrawal from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, pushing Tehran to pursue nuclear weapons openly in a scenario reminiscent of North Korea's defiance. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Iran has already enriched uranium to 60 percent purity and announced new enrichment facilities, heightening fears of an irreversible nuclear trajectory. The Israeli attacks have also placed fragile US-Iran nuclear negotiations in jeopardy. Talks were due to resume just days after the strikes. While Washington officially denies involvement, widespread belief in American complicity could push Tehran to treat the US as a co-belligerent, complicating diplomatic efforts and risking the involvement of American forces if Iran targets US assets in the region. New alliances Gulf states, many of which seek economic diversification and regional stability, have expressed alarm over Israel's actions. These governments fear being dragged into a wider war and are advocating for de-escalation and diplomacy. But the perception of Israel as the dominant regional power is growing. This shift could lead to new, albeit fragile, alliances centred around Israel's deterrence power - complicating Arab foreign policy strategies, as public opinion remains vehemently opposed to Israeli aggression. By allowing Israel to bomb Iran, Trump is pushing Tehran to go nuclear Read More » Israel's military strategy apparently aims to decapitate Iran's military and nuclear leadership. While Tehran has proven resilient, ongoing economic sanctions and domestic unrest could fuel greater internal instability. On the other hand, Israel faces its own crises: more than 600 days of war in Gaza, soaring military expenditures, deep political divisions, and a government accused of prolonging conflicts for personal political gain. The result is growing disillusionment among Israelis, including over stalled hostage negotiations and the state's deteriorating international standing. Rather than short-lived skirmishes, Israel's broader strategic ambition is to reshape the Middle East, dismantle the 'axis of resistance', and entrench its hegemony. Although Hamas and Hezbollah have been weakened, they remain active. The likelihood of a broader war is high, especially if the US decided to join forces with Israel. The economic ramifications are also severe: soaring oil prices and potential disruptions to critical shipping lanes like the Strait of Hormuz. Israel's strikes on Iran, and its genocide in Gaza have ignited widespread public outrage across the Arab world. Support for normalisation with Israel has sharply declined, even in countries that signed the Abraham Accords, while public trust in western powers has plummeted since October 2023. While the protests that have erupted across Arab countries in recent months may not topple authoritarian regimes, they constrain political decision-making and force governments to recalibrate their foreign policies to appease public sentiments. Prolonged instability Iranians may escalate their responses to restore credibility; this could include cyberattacks, targeting western military bases, or disrupting maritime trade. Such a chain reaction could draw in major global powers, including Russia and China. The re-militarisation of the region, collapsing trust in diplomacy, and increasing polarisation now raise the spectre of prolonged instability Efforts to isolate or collapse Tehran may also backfire. If Iran were to fragment along ethnic lines (Kurdish, Arab, Baloch, Azerbaijani, etc), the result could resemble post-Gaddafi Libya or post-Saleh Yemen: ungoverned spaces prone to terrorist entrenchment. Such a scenario would invite transnational groups like al-Qaeda to expand. The region is already boiling over Israel's genocide in Gaza. Israeli military actions have weakened already vulnerable states, eroding central authority and opening power vacuums ripe for exploitation by non-state actors. The war on Iran might be framed as a targeted mission to neutralise nuclear threats, but its broader goal appears to be reshaping the Middle Eastern power structure in favour of Israeli dominance. This comes at the cost of rising public outrage, weakened Arab regimes, and emboldened extremist actors. The re-militarisation of the region, collapsing trust in diplomacy, and increasing polarisation now raise the spectre of prolonged instability. This undermines development agendas, shattering alliances and risking a larger war that could quickly spiral out of control. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Oil tumbles, stocks rebound after Trump Middle East pause
Stock markets ticked higher on Friday while oil skirted close to its biggest daily drop since April after President Donald Trump pushed back a decision on U.S. military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. Rising risks from the Middle East have loomed large on the world's top indexes again this week. Europe's main bourses all rose between 0.5%-1% after similar gains across Asia, although it was touch and go whether it would be enough to prevent a second straight weekly loss for MSCI's main world index. Israel bombed targets in Iran, and Iran fired missiles at Israel overnight as the week-old war continued although Friday's markets moves, which also included a modest drop in the dollar, showed an element of relief. That was largely pinned on Thursday's statement from the White House that Trump will decide in the next two weeks - rather than right away - whether the U.S. will get involved in the war. European foreign ministers were to meet their Iranian counterpart in Geneva on Friday, seeking a path back to diplomacy over its contested nuclear programme. The relief the U.S. wasn't charging into the conflict sent oil prices down as low as $76.10 per barrel, although they were last at just over $77 and still up 4% for the week and 20% for the month. "Brent crude is down 2.5% today in the clearest sign that fears over an imminent escalation in the Israel/Iran conflict have eased," MUFG strategist Derek Halpenny said. Gold, another traditional safe-haven play for traders, was also lower on the day although Nasdaq, S&P 500 , and Dow futures were all in the red after U.S. markets had been closed on Thursday. Asian shares had gained 0.5% overnight thanks to a 1.2% jump in Hong Kong's Hang Seng and as newly elected President Lee Jae Myung's stimulus plans saw South Korea's Kospi top 3,000 points for the first time since early 2022. China's central bank held its benchmark lending rates steady as widely expected in Beijing, while data from Japan showed core inflation there hit a two-year high in May, keeping pressure on the Bank of Japan to resume interest rate hikes. That in turn lifted the yen and pushed down the export-heavy Nikkei in Tokyo. OIL RETREATS The dollar was ending an otherwise positive week lower on the day, with the euro up 0.3% against the U.S. currency at $1.1527 and the pound 0.2% higher at $1.3494. The U.S. bond market, which was also closed on Thursday, resumed trading with the key 10-year Treasury bond yield flat at 4.39%, while German 10-year yields , which serve as Europe's borrowing benchmark rate, fell 2.5 basis points to 2.49%. Gold prices eased 0.5% to $3,354 an ounce, but were set for a weekly loss of 2.3%. But the main commodity market focus remained oil. Brent crude futures were last down $1.60, or around 2.2%, at $77.28 a barrel in London although they were still on track to end the week 4% higher. PVM analyst John Evans said the big market risk of the Middle East troubles was "unintended action that escalates the conflict and touches upon oil infrastructure". "The world has more than adequate supply for 2025, but not if the nightmare scenario of 20 million (barrels per day) being blocked in the seas of Arabia, however briefly that might be," he said. (Additional reporting by Stella Qiu in Sydney Editing by Frances Kerry)
