'They will die': Foreign aid cuts hit women and girls the hardest
Young girls are denied an education and forced into child labour or early marriage, pregnant women in refugee camps have to give birth without a midwife, female survivors of rape, sex workers and HIV patients are left without shelter or support.
These are not hypothetical scenarios or stark warnings, but the real and current impacts of massive foreign aid cuts on NGOs that support women and girls in war and conflict zones and crisis-stricken countries ranging from Gaza to Ukraine, several aid groups told Euronews.
Women-led and women's rights groups operating on the frontlines of humanitarian crises have been hit the hardest — with almost half of all such organisations expecting to shut down within six months due to a lack of funding, warned a recent report by UN Women.
A survey it conducted in March of 411 women-led and women's rights organisations across 44 countries also found that nearly three-quarters of the groups had already laid off staff while just over half had suspended programmes due to funding cuts.
'Simply put, women and girls will die from lack of access to these services,' said Sabine Freizer Gunes, UN Women's country representative in Ukraine. 'This situation will worsen as women's organisations providing vital services are forced to close.'
International aid fell in 2024 for the first time in six years, and over the last year or so, top donor governments have announced cuts to overseas development assistance (ODA), including Canada, France, Germany, the UK and the US — the world's largest donor.
The administration of US President Donald Trump has dismantled the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and slashed billions of dollars for aid projects globally.
Only 11.1% of the $46 billion (€40.6bn) required for global humanitarian needs in 2025 has been funded, forcing the entire aid system to reform and cut back, UN Women said.
Dorothy Sang, head of advocacy and policy at CARE International UK, described the responses to UN Women's survey as 'deeply concerning', and said it was not just a case of 'abstract losses or numbers on a spreadsheet'.
'It's about daily, human experience: a girl who no longer has a safe space to learn; a mother giving birth without medical support; a survivor of violence turned away from a shelter that's been closed,' she told Euronews.
'The international aid architecture is being turned on its head and while we of course want to see vital aid being restored — we need to make sure the decisions being made right now do not leave a legacy of destruction for women and girls,' Sang added.
Even before the recent cuts announced by leading government donors, humanitarian organisations worldwide were already struggling with an overall reduction in ODA.
Such aid amounted to $212 billion (€188bn) last year, a reduction of by 7.1% in real terms compared to 2023, the first drop after five years of consecutive growth, according to the latest data from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
NGOs say this funding squeeze has been compounded by the Trump administration's cuts to USAID, which the US president himself referred to last month as 'devastating' while saying he hoped they would spur other countries to 'chip in and spend money too'.
The US was responsible for 38% of all global aid funding recorded by the UN last year. US government data shows that it disbursed about $61 billion (€69bn) in foreign aid in 2024, more than half of which came from USAID.
Aside from the US, eight European countries and the EU itself have announced or already implemented cuts to their overseas development assistance totalling some €30 billion over the next four years, found a recent study by Countdown 2030 Europe.
Aid cuts disproportionately affect local women-led and women's rights groups compared with international NGOs and UN entities, according to UN Women's research and experts.
Nearly two-thirds (62%) of the women-led and women's rights organisations surveyed said they have had to reduce services to women and girls, and four in five predicted that the reductions in foreign aid would severely undermine access to life-saving services.
A separate report released in April by several UN agencies including the World Health Organization (WHO) warned that the funding cuts were putting more pregnant women at risk, and ultimately threatening fragile progress worldwide in ending maternal deaths.
In places such as the Democratic Republic Congo, Gaza, and Ukraine, women-led and women's rights groups "are often the backbone of their communities, acting as first responders and providing life-saving relief,' according to Niki Ignatiou, head of women, peace, and security at ActionAid UK.
'Global North governments and donors … need to stop overlooking the national, local and grassroots groups that are doing the heavy lifting in crisis zones,' she told Euronews.
'We know from previous cuts to ODA in the UK that in the immediate wake of cuts, women and girls lose most, including access to lifesaving services," Ignatiou added.
When vital services collapse during humanitarian crises, women and girls also tend to take on more care-related responsibilities, such as providing food and water and looking after the sick, UN Women said. They are also more likely to sacrifice their own health and nutrition to put their families first, and tend to have fewer opportunities to earn money.
One local women's rights organisation in Ukraine, which operates solely on money from donors, told UN Women that it was in a 'dire situation' due to a reduction in funding.
'Many of our beneficiaries, women who have survived violence, HIV-positive women, former prisoners, sex workers, urgently need adaptation support and social services, but due to funding cuts, we can only offer phone consultations,' said the NGO, which was not identified.
Faced with reduced funding, women-led and women's rights groups are selling assets and cutting operational costs — among other measures — UN Women said. Many are also looking for new donors or seeking additional support from their existing backers.
Several of the aid experts said that humanitarian programmes for women and girls must be protected and prioritised, with greater investments in local women's organisations and more flexibility over the funding provided in order to ensure long-term support.
Gunes of UN Women in Ukraine said the terms of funding for women-led and women's rights groups had routinely undermined their sustainability. She highlighted how money is typically tied to specific projects, which often only last for a few months up to a year.
'This has all kinds of implications for organisational sustainability and strategic growth,' she said, calling for donors to consider flexible funding that allows women's groups to respond in real time to needs on the ground, instead of being driven by donor priorities.
While the immediate focus is on protecting the lives of women and girls, there is also concern in the aid sector about the long-term impact of funding cuts on women's rights.
'The weakening of these organisations will roll back the gains and progress made on gender equality and women's empowerment and may further embolden the anti-gender movements,' said April Pham, chief of the gender unit at the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
Local women's organisations from countries including Colombia and Cameroon told UN Women that the dwindling funding available to them was a setback for women's rights.
'Without the presence of women's organisations, women will be increasingly neglected and their rights will be trampled on,' said one such NGO in DRC, which was not named.
At a time when gender equality is under sustained attack, all humanitarian actors must reinforce their commitments to women-led and women's rights groups, Pham said.
'We now have an opportunity to shape a humanitarian reset that truly puts women and girls at the centre — and it is time we do it,' she added.
The Russian army is developing its war capabilities by multiple times more than that of NATO despite having an economy 25 times smaller, NATO's secretary general has warned.
Mark Rutte also suggested Russia could attack NATO territory within three to five years, during a press conference ahead of a defence ministerial meeting taking place at NATO headquarters in Brussels.
Rutte's remarks come as the US is demanding its NATO allies show "credible" progress towards spending 5% of GDP on defence.
"The Russians, as we speak are reconstituting themselves at a rapid pace and producing four times more ammunition in three months than the whole of NATO in a year," said Rutte.
He said Russia is doing this despite having an economy 25 times smaller than the combined economy of NATO.
"So we really have to ramp up our defence spending, and that includes command and control, long range air defence systems to keep ourselves safe in case the Russians decide to attack us in three to five years," he told reporters.
Demands for NATO allies to increase defence spending from 2% of GDP to 5% is the key focus of this week's meeting, as well as a leaders' summit for the alliance taking place in the Hague on 24 and 25 June.
"Putin needs to know if he tries to attack the Baltics or NATO our response will be devastating," Rutte said.
The timeline for allies to meet the 5% target hasn't yet been agreed but US Ambassador to NATO Mathew Whitaker said Washington expects countries to start ramping up spending immediately.
US President Donald Trump expects allies to "show meaningful progress on defence budgets and credible growth year after year", Whitaker told journalists in a briefing ahead of the defence ministers' meetings on Wednesday.
"The core of our message is 5% - every ally must commit to spending 5% [of GDP]," Whitaker said.
He said the US is committed to NATO but the US wants to see Europeans "take a leadership role on European security".
He also said Trump wants the war in Ukraine to end, adding: "This war needs to come to an end – the cost is very high on both sides."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
US deploys B-2 bombers as Trump plans to meet national security team
Multiple US B-2 bombers appeared to be airborne and heading west from the US on Saturday as US President Donald Trump weighs military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. The US leader was set to meet with his national security team on Saturday evening. He previously said he would put off a decision on US involvement in the conflict for up to two weeks. B-2 bombers are the only aircraft that carry the larger "bunker buster" bombs. It was not clear whether the planes being escorted on Saturday were prepared for an operation or moving to airbases closer to Iran as a show of force. Aside from an on-the-ground raid or even a nuclear strike, Iran's underground Fordo uranium enrichment facility is considered out of reach to all but American bunker-buster bombs. According to the US Air Force, only the US has configured and programmed its B-2 aircraft to deliver the bomb. While these planes are normally stationed in Missouri, on Saturday multiple aerial refuelling tankers were spotted on commercial flight trackers flying patterns consistent with escorting aircraft from the central US to the Pacific. The White House did not respond to requests for comment, but Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said US military involvement 'would be very, very dangerous for everyone.' He said Iran was open to further dialogue, but not while Israel continues its attack. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said Israel's military operation will continue 'for as long as it takes' to eliminate what he called the existential threat of Iran's nuclear program and ballistic missile arsenal. Iran's Revolutionary Guard announced the launch of drones towards Israel on Saturday evening in the latest wave of attacks as fighting entered the 10th day. Iranian media said Israel launched strikes on the southern city of Shiraz, which hosts military bases.
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
Patrick Artus: 'In the US, attacks on the public research system and universities compromise growth prospects'
The United States, inevitably, is heading for very weak economic growth in 2025. The economic policies being pursued – higher tariffs and restrictions on immigration – have already had visible effects on inflation expectations. These expectations have jumped to as high as 7% over one year, according to a survey of American households by The Conference Board, and up to 6.5%, according to another survey by the University of Michigan. The prospect of high inflation is very unfavorable for US household consumption, since in the US, wages are only very partially indexed to prices. Therefore, under these circumstances, it is not surprising that US consumer confidence about the economic situation in six months has collapsed, according to The Conference Board survey, with the confidence index dropping to 73, compared to 85 at the end of 2024. Furthermore, inflation expectations are being reinforced by the fight against illegal immigration (even though, under Joe Biden's presidency, net migration reached 1.5 million people per year). This has led to a slowdown in household consumption: Its annual growth fell from 4% in the fourth quarter of 2024 to 1.8% in the first quarter of 2025. Over the same periods, the growth in goods production dropped from 6.2% to 0.5%. Backtracking It is likely that these growth-damaging policies will be loosened. Tariffs on US imports of electronics and automotive parts have already been removed. Donald Trump has reduced tariffs on US imports from China from 145% to 30%. The decline in the US president's popularity in polls, as well as his inability to implement economic policies favorable to the US economy, should lead to more backtracking. In the US, immigrants are, on average, more highly educated than native-born Americans. Proportionally, they create nearly twice as many businesses. Foreign-born residents make up 14.3% of the population, but 23.6% of entrepreneurs and 23.6% of employees in technology, engineering, and science. As with tariffs, Trump's anti-immigration policy does not appear sustainable.
France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
From attendances to NBA-style walkouts: Club World Cup talking points
AFP Sport looks at some of the main talking points at the tournament so far: Political shadow FIFA have faced criticism for their increasingly close links to US President Donald Trump and his administration. Ahead of the tournament, UEFA accused FIFA chief Gianni Infantino of prioritising "private political interests" after he turned up late for FIFA's own congress because he met with Trump in the Middle East. Infantino was in the Oval Office again on Wednesday with a delegation from Juventus, as they shared an awkward exchange with Trump as he questioned them on transgender athletes. "It was a bit weird," said Juventus and USA forward Timothy Weah. "When he started talking about the politics with Iran and everything, it's kind of, like... I just want to play football, man." Meanwhile some fans were worried by reports ICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement) officers were providing "security" at Club World Cup stadiums. Plainclothes ICE officers have been targeting what they say are "undocumented" migrants. To this point they do not appear to have apprehended any match-going supporters. European teams not getting it all their own way Europe's leading clubs are the richest in the world and it would be a surprise if the winner of the inaugural 32-team Club World Cup came from a different continent. However, the evidence so far is that Europe's representatives are not having it all their own way. Up to Friday, clubs from Europe had won only half of 16 games against opponents from other continents, with South America showing it can more than hold its own. Paris Saint-Germain lost to Botafogo, while Chelsea were blown away by Flamengo. Real Madrid could not get the better of Saudi side Al-Hilal, but Europe sent far more clubs (12) than any other continent and it still looks likely that over half of the teams in the last 16 will be European. Attendances hold up despite empty seats There has been a lot of talk about empty seats, with the low point being the attendance of 3,412 in Orlando for Mamelodi Sundowns against Ulsan HD. There were also barely 22,000 at Chelsea's win over Los Angeles FC in Atlanta, leaving around 50,000 empty seats in the stadium in Atlanta. Yet the average attendance over the first seven days at the tournament was 36,135. That is higher than the average in La Liga, Serie A or Ligue 1 over the last season. The games featuring South American teams have seen some incredible atmospheres, especially in Miami for Friday's clash between Bayern Munich and Boca Juniors. "Amazing, amazing," said Bayern coach Vincent Kompany when asked about the crowd, with passionate Boca fans making up the vast majority of the 63,587 attendance. "It is one of these things: if you are not here it is sometimes hard to understand, but being here is an experience, a privilege." Waiting for the weather Several matches have been held up because of inclement weather. Common public safety protocols in the US mandate that outdoor sports events are suspended for at least 30 minutes if lightning or thunder is seen or heard in the nearby area. Two matches in Orlando, a regular location for tropical storms, have been suspended, while games in East Rutherford and Cincinnati have also been interrupted. National team coaches preparing for the 2026 World Cup must consider the best way to prepare their players to cope with such delays. Climate change has been linked to an increase in frequency and intensity of storms and extreme weather conditions. 'Showbiz' NBA-style walkouts Organisers have jumped on the chance to make each game a show in the style of a traditional American sporting event, including having players come out onto the field one by one as their names are announced, like in the NBA. "Why not bring it to the Premier League," replied Chelsea's Romeo Lavia when asked if it could become a thing in England. "It's a bit of a showbiz thing, isn't it? I quite like it." Not everyone agrees with Lavia. "It's a bit slow. I find it a bit strange. It seems like putting on a show for the sake of it. It seems a bit pointless," said the Porto coach, Martin Anselmi.
