Queensland government to spend more than $33 billion on public health next year
The Queensland government will invest more than $33 billion in the public health system next financial year, the ABC can reveal.
Treasurer David Janetzki will make the record funding announcement on Tuesday afternoon when he hands down the first state budget since the LNP's election win in October.
The budget will also include an investment of more than $18 billion in health infrastructure over the next five financial years.
More than $5 billion of that will fund the construction of new and expanded facilities, including the New Coomera Hospital on the Gold Coast, as well as expansions of Redcliffe and Townsville Hospitals.
The timeline for the delivery of those projects and which exact financial years the funds will be spent in remains unknown.
The government has said the record investment is a more than 10 per cent increase on this financial year, when its Labor predecessors spent almost $29 billion.
Mr Janetzki said the government was following through on its pre-election pledges.
"We made a commitment to Queenslanders that we'd deliver world-class health services where and when they need them, and this budget delivers on that promise," he said.
The LNP has promised to deliver more than 2,600 new hospital beds across the state through its 'Hospital Rescue Plan', although there's no timeline for when those will be operational yet.
While in opposition, it had committed to Labor's goal of 2,200 new beds by 2028.
A review of the former government's hospital expansion program found it had increased in cost to $17 billion, up from $9.8 billion.
Health Minister Tim Nicholls said the record investment would ensure vital services were kept running.
"The budget will fund measures Labor didn't fund or left underfunded, like the women and girls' strategy, staff entitlements including reproductive leave [and] legislated but unfunded midwife-to-patient ratios," he said.
Mr Nicholls said the funding would also allow Mater Hospital Springfield to open 186 public beds.
Queensland Health's operational budget over the next four financial years will be increased by more than $6.5 billion.
The former Labor government's last budget was headlined by big-ticket cost-of-living relief measures, including $1,000 energy rebates and 20 per cent vehicle registration discounts.
With those now due to end, Mr Janetzki flagged more targeted measures for those who "need it most", in an interview with the ABC on Sunday.
The government has otherwise been tight-lipped on what to expect from Tuesday's budget.
It has announced it will continue to fund a program launched by the previous government where parents with children playing sport can access $200 vouchers.
Concessions of $30,000 for first home buyers purchasing a new build will also be continued.
On Monday, the government detailed a raft of crime prevention measures, including almost $150 million for police equipment like tasers and body-worn cameras as well as $50 million for crime prevention schools for at-risk youths.
While in opposition, the LNP promised debt would be lower under its governance than Labor's.
It has also ruled out any cuts to the public service.
A budget review in January showed Queensland's debt was forecast to surge to $218 billion by 2027-28, up from the $172 billion Labor forecast in its final budget.
The opposition, though, accused the government of juicing the books to make the outlook look as bad as possible.
The full budget will be delivered on Tuesday afternoon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
33 minutes ago
- ABC News
A harmful algal bloom is having a devastating impact on marine life
For the past three months, a harmful algal bloom — 70 times the size of Sydney Harbour — has been lingering off South Australia's coastline.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Did Australia provide support for the US strikes on Iran?
The Prime Minister today confirmed Australia supports Donald Trump's decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites. But he wasn't weighing in on the debate over whether this US action is in breach of international law. Nor would he confirm whether Australia provided any support for this mission - only saying it w a unilateral action by the United States. Mike Pezzullo is the former Secretary of Home Affairs and a former Deputy Secretary of the Defence Department, and author of the 2009 defence white paper. He spoke to David Speers.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Editorial: Wishy-washy Anthony Albanese puts Australia on the outer
Close to 24 hours after the United States bombed key Iranian nuclear facilities, Anthony Albanese finally stood to address the nation. This was a pivotal point in history: Australia's closest military and strategic ally had made a bold strike against one of the world's most tyrannical and dangerous regimes. Australians want to know what it all means, and what was likely to come next. They got a Prime Minister who looked like he'd rather be anywhere else. It was clear from Mr Albanese's curt manner at his Monday morning press conference that he didn't want any part of US President Donald Trump's surprise attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. He said what he had to: that Iran could not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons and that Australia was in support of actions to prevent that nightmare scenario. But Mr Albanese also stressed that Australia was not involved in this conflict. Five times, the Prime Minister said that this had been a 'unilateral action' by the US. And when asked directly, repeatedly, whether Australia was given any heads-up an action would occur prior to the bombs falling, Mr Albanese skirted the question. What he did say was that he had not spoken to Mr Trump since before last week's G7 summit, which the President left a day early, causing the planned sit-down between the two leaders to be abandoned. Australia-US relations have never been at a lower ebb. Mr Trump is a challenging character. And Mr Albanese isn't alone in his distaste for him. Successive polls have found Australians are among the world's biggest critics of him, finding him dangerous and untrustworthy. But this isn't about Donald Trump the man. This is about the fact that the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran is an intolerable one. Iran's regime is the antithesis to liberal democracy, obsessed with the destruction of Israel and of Western values. The decision by the US to join Israel in doing what needed to be done — despite Mr Trump's clear personal preference not to get involved in matters beyond his borders — was the right one. Contrast Mr Albanese's non-existent relationship with Mr Trump's administration with that of British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who did get a heads-up about the US' intentions in Iran. Mr Albanese and Mr Starmer are ideological kin, sharing a leftist world view. Yet where Mr Albanese wears his repugnance towards Mr Trump on his sleeve, Mr Starmer makes it work. The result is a UK which is firmly within the Western alliance, and an Australia increasingly on its outer. Mr Albanese must make it his priority to repair Australia's deteriorating relationship with the US. That means we need an effective ambassador in Washington. While this is not intended as a Kevin Rudd-bashing exercise, it is apparent he is not that person. Shifting him out and finding the right person to serve Australia's interests in the Trump era is one step along the road to restoring our alliance. Responsibility for the editorial comment is taken by Editor-in-Chief Christopher Dore.
