What to expect at the US Army's 250th anniversary parade

The tanks are staged and ready to roll. Fencing and barriers are up. Protective metal plating has been laid out on Washington's streets.
And more than 6000 troops are poised to march near the National Mall to honour the Army's 250th anniversary on Saturday (local time), which happens to be President Donald Trump's 79th birthday.
With preparations well in hand, one big unknown is the weather. Rain is in the forecast, so there is a chance the parade could be interrupted by thunderstorms.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said Thursday that rain or shine the parade will go on. But it could be delayed if there is lightning.
'No matter what, a historic celebration of our military service members will take place!' Kelly said in a statement.
ADVERTISEMENT
Daylong festivities celebrating the Army are planned on the National Mall — featuring NFL players, fitness competitions and displays — culminating in the parade, which is estimated to cost $25 million (NZ$41.6 million) to $45 million (NZ$74.9 million). The Army expects as many as 200,000 people to attend.
A special reviewing area is being set up for the president, where he will be watching as each formation passes the White House.
Here's what to expect at the parade tomorrow:
The troops
US Army soldiers work on Stryker combat vehicles staged in West Potomac Park ahead of an upcoming military parade commemorating the Army's 250th anniversary and coinciding with Donald Trump's 79th birthday, Wednesday, June 11, 2025, in Washington. (Source: Associated Press)
A total of 6,169 soldiers as well as 128 Army tanks, armored personnel carriers and artillery will parade before the president and viewers, while 62 aircraft will pass overhead.
The parade will tell the Army's story, starting with the Battle of Lexington — the first battle of the Revolutionary War — and move all the way to present day.
ADVERTISEMENT
Each conflict will have 150 troops in period costume, followed by a section of hundreds of troops in modern-day dress. For the past several weeks, Army planners have been working out how to get it timed to exactly 90 minutes, Army spokesman Steve Warren said.
Planners first tried marching troops five across and 12 deep — but the parade ran long. To get it down to the exact time, each section will have soldiers marching seven across and 10 deep, Warren said. That means, for example, the Civil War gets exactly three minutes and 39 seconds and World War II gets 6 minutes and 22 seconds.
The tanks and aircraft
A crew member walks past US Army UH-60M Black Hawk helicopters that will participate in an upcoming military parade commemorating the Army's 250th anniversary and coinciding with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, at Joint Base Andrews, Md., Thursday, June 12, 2025. (Source: Associated Press)
Then there are the tanks. For fans, 8 minutes and 23 seconds into the procession, the first World War I Renault tank will make its appearance.
Compared with today's tanks, the Renaults are tiny and almost look like a robotic weapon out of The Terminator. But they were groundbreaking for their time, lightweight and enabling movement in that conflict's deadly trench warfare.
The first aircraft will fly over starting 13 minutes and 37 seconds into the parade, including two B-25 Mitchell bombers, four P-51 Mustang fighter aircraft and one C-47 Skytrain. The latter was made famous by the three stripes painted on the wings and body to mark it friendly over US battleships on June 6, 1944, as thousands of Skytrain aircraft dropped more than 13,000 paratroopers into France on D-Day.
ADVERTISEMENT
The procession will move along into the Gulf War, the war on terror and the modern day, showcasing the Army's M1A2 Abrams tanks and other troop carriers, like the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle and Stryker combat vehicle.
There will even be six High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, or HIMARS — the mobile rocket launchers that have been highly valued by Ukraine as it has defended itself against Russia's invasion.
A massive show of Army airpower will begin 48 minutes in, when a long air parade of UH-60 Black Hawk, AH-64 Apache and CH-47 Chinook helicopters fly overhead as the Army's story swings toward its future warfare.
The parade finale
The final sections of marching troops represent the Army's future. The band at the US Military Academy at West Point will lead hundreds of future troops, including members of the Texas A&M Army Corps of Cadets, new enlistees just going through Army initial entry training, and cadets from the Virginia Military Institute and The Citadel in South Carolina.
The last section includes 250 new recruits or soldiers who are reenlisting. As they reach the president, they will turn toward him and raise their right hand, and Trump will swear them into service.
The parade will end with a celebratory jump by the Army's Golden Knights parachute team, which will present Trump with an American flag.
ADVERTISEMENT
After the parade, a 19-minute fireworks show and concert will round out the celebration.
Watching the parade
Crews work on setting up an archway on the National Mall, during preparations for an upcoming military parade commemorating the Army's 250th anniversary and coinciding with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, Thursday, June 12, 2025, in Washington. (Source: Associated Press)
Organisers have estimated that hundreds of thousands of people could be in Washington to see the parade live, but there will be plenty of ways to see it from afar as well.
The Army has said it will be streaming the parade on its social media channels, and some news outlets, including C-SPAN and Fox News Channel, have announced plans to air the entire event live, as well as other special related programming. Others, including NBC News Now, will air the parade via streaming services.
The parade is expected to begin at 6:30pm (10.30am NZ time), and organisers have said it will last 90 minutes.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

RNZ News

27 minutes ago

• RNZ News

Strikes on Iran mark Trump's biggest, and riskiest, foreign policy gamble

By Matt Spetalnick , Reuters US President Donald Trump. Photo: AFP / Brendan Smialowski Analysis - With his unprecedented decision to bomb Iran's nuclear sites , directly joining Israel's air attack on its regional arch foe, US President Donald Trump has done something he had long vowed to avoid - intervene militarily in a major foreign war. The dramatic US strike , including the targeting of Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear installation deep underground, marks the biggest foreign policy gamble of Trump's two presidencies and one fraught with risks and unknowns. Trump, who insisted on Saturday (US Time) that Iran must now make peace or face further attacks, could provoke Tehran into retaliating by closing the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important oil artery, attacking US military bases and allies in the Middle East, stepping up its missile barrage on Israel and activating proxy groups against American and Israeli interests worldwide, analysts said. Such moves could escalate into a broader, more protracted conflict than Trump had envisioned, evoking echoes of the "forever wars" that America fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, which he had derided as "stupid" and promised never to be dragged into. "The Iranians are seriously weakened and degraded in their military capabilities," former Middle East negotiator for Democratic and Republican administrations Aaron David Miller said. "But they have all sorts of asymmetric ways that they can respond... This is not going to end quick." In the lead-up to the bombing that he announced late on Saturday (US Time), Trump had vacillated between threats of military action and appeals for renewed negotiation to persuade Iran to reach a deal to dismantle its nuclear programme. A senior White House official said that once Trump was convinced that Tehran had no interest in reaching a nuclear agreement, he decided the strikes were "the right thing to do". Trump gave the go-ahead once he was assured of a "high probability of success", the official said - a determination reached after more than a week of Israeli air attacks on Iran's nuclear and military facilities paved the way for the US to deliver the potentially crowning blow. This handout satellite picture provided by Maxar Technologies and taken on June 22, 2025, shows damage after US strikes on the Isfahan nuclear enrichment facility in central Iran. Photo: AFP / Satellite Image Maxar Technologies Trump touted the "great success" of the strikes, which he said included the use of massive "bunker-buster bombs" on the main site at Fordow. But some experts suggested that while Iran's nuclear programme may have been set back for many years, the threat may be far from over. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon, and said its programme was for purely peaceful purposes. "In the long term, military action is likely to push Iran to determine nuclear weapons are necessary for deterrence and that Washington is not interested in diplomacy," the Arms Control Association - a non-partisan US-based organisation that advocates for arms control legislation - said in a statement. "Military strikes alone cannot destroy Iran's extensive nuclear knowledge. The strikes will set Iran's programme back, but at the cost of strengthening Tehran's resolve to reconstitute its sensitive nuclear activities," the group said. Assistant professor in the Department of Politics and International Relations at Florida International University, Eric Lob, said Iran's next move remains an open question and suggested that among its forms of retaliation could be to hit "soft targets" of the US and Israel inside and outside the region. But he also said there was a possibility that Iran could return to the negotiating table - "though they would be doing so in an even weaker position" - or seek a diplomatic off-ramp. In the immediate aftermath of the US strikes, however, Iran showed little appetite for concessions. Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation said it would not allow development of its "national industry" to be stopped, and an Iranian state television commentator said every US citizen or military member in the region would now be legitimate targets. Early on Sunday (US Time), Iran's foreign ministry issued a statement warning that Tehran "considers it its right to resist with all its might against US military aggression". Analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Karim Sadjadpour posted on X: "Trump indicated this is now the time for peace. It's unclear and unlikely the Iranians will see it the same way. This is more likely to open a new chapter of the 46-year-old US-Iran war than conclude it." Some analysts suggested that Trump, whose administration has previously disavowed any aim of dislodging the Iranian leadership, could be drawn into seeking "regime change" if Tehran carries out major reprisals or moves to build a nuclear weapon. That, in turn, would bring additional risks. "Beware mission creep, aiming for regime change and democratisation campaigns," Middle East analyst at the Johns Hopkins School for Advanced International Studies in Washington Laura Blumenfeld said. "You'll find the bones of many failed US moral missions buried in Middle East sands." Former US deputy intelligence officer for the Middle East Jonathan Panikoff said Iran's leadership would quickly engage in "disproportionate attacks" if it felt its survival was imperilled. But Tehran would also have to be mindful of the consequences, he said. While actions such as closing the Strait of Hormuz would pose problems for Trump with the resulting higher oil prices and potential US inflationary impact, it would also hurt China, one of Iran's few powerful allies . At the same time, Trump is already facing strong push-back from congressional Democrats against the Iran attack and will also have to contend with opposition from the anti-interventionist wing of his Republican MAGA base. Trump, who faced no major international crisis in his first term, is now embroiled in one just six months into his second. Even if he hopes US military involvement can be limited in time and scope, the history of such conflicts often carries unintended consequences for American presidents. Trump's slogan of "peace through strength" will certainly be tested as never before, especially with his opening of a new military front after failing to meet his campaign promises to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza. "Trump is back in the war business," UN director at the International Crisis Group Richard Gowan said. "I am not sure anyone in Moscow, Tehran or Beijing ever believed his spiel that he is a peacemaker. It always looked more like a campaign phrase than a strategy." - Reuters

RNZ News

2 hours ago

• RNZ News

Live: World awaits Iran's response to US strikes on nuclear sites

The world is awaiting Iran's response after President Donald Trump said the US had "obliterated" Tehran's key nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. With the damage visible from space after 30,000-pound US bunker-buster bombs crashed into the mountain above Iran's Fordow nuclear site, Tehran vowed to defend itself at all costs. It fired another volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and flattened buildings in Tel Aviv. Tehran has so far not followed through on its threats of retaliation against the United States - either by targeting US bases or trying to choke off global oil supplies. Speaking in Istanbul, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran would consider all possible responses. There would be no return to diplomacy until it had retaliated, he said. - Reuters

NZ Herald

3 hours ago

• NZ Herald

‘The enemy gets a vote' - Trump sets off uncertainties, including how Iran will hit back

US B-2 bomber aircraft were involved in the US operation attacking Iran's nuclear programme sites, the New York Times reported. Photo / US Department of Defence, AFP President Donald Trump has claimed a 'spectacular military success' in destroying three sites in Iran; we'll see if that's true. What is clear is that he has pushed America into a war with Iran that he acknowledges may escalate. Beyond doubts about the legal basis for bombing Iran, I