Democrats, major medical groups denounce Supreme Court's gender-affirming care ruling
Democratic leaders and professional medical organizations on Wednesday denounced the Supreme Court's ruling that upheld a 2023 Tennessee law banning gender-affirming care for transgender minors, a decision the high court delivered along ideological lines and one that stands to impact similar laws passed in roughly half the country.
The high court's three Democratic-appointed justices dissented from the conservative majority. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, said Wednesday's decision 'abandons transgender children and their families to political whims.'
'Once again, politicians and judges are inserting themselves in exam rooms,' Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.), the nation's first openly transgender member of Congress, said Wednesday on the social platform X. 'This ruling undermines doctors in delivering care to some of the most vulnerable patients in our country.'
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), whose grandson is transgender, said the court's decision may force families living in Tennessee and other states with restrictions on gender-affirming care for youth to leave their homes to 'ensure their kids can access medically necessary care.'
Including Tennessee, 25 Republican-led states since 2021 have passed laws prohibiting health care professionals from providing puberty blockers, hormone therapy and rare surgeries to transgender youth. Court challenges to those laws have been met with mixed results.
Responses from other Democratic lawmakers were more succinct.
'This is just wrong,' said Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.).
Merkley, a Senate sponsor of the Equality Act, filed an amicus brief late last year asking the Supreme Court to strike Tennessee's law alongside Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Democratic Reps. Mark Pocan (Wis.), Jerrold Nadler (N.Y.) and Frank Pallone (N.J.), who also denounced the court's ruling on Wednesday.
'Today, hate won,' Markey said in a statement.
In 2023, Markey and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), whose adult child is transgender, introduced the Transgender Bill of Rights, a landmark resolution to recognize the federal government's responsibility to protect and codify the rights of trans and nonbinary people nationwide.
From her office in Seattle, Jayapal told reporters Wednesday afternoon that the Supreme Court's ruling puts 'a cruel and politically motivated policy over the lives of people.'
Some of Congress's most vocal critics of gender-affirming care were noticeably quiet on Wednesday's ruling. In a post on X, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) encouraged the federal legislature to pass her Protect Children's Innocence Act, which would make it illegal to provide transition-related care to youth, without mentioning the case directly.
Tennessee's Republican attorney general, Jonathan Skrmetti, celebrated the court's ruling, saying voters' 'common sense' prevailed over 'judicial activism.'
'A bipartisan supermajority of Tennessee's elected representatives carefully considered the evidence and voted to protect kids from irreversible decisions they cannot yet fully understand,' Skrmetti wrote in a statement following the decision.
'This victory transcends politics,' he added. 'It's about real Tennessee kids facing real struggles. Families across our state and our nation deserve solutions based on science, not ideology.'
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), an international nonprofit that develops standards of trans health care, called Wednesday's ruling 'a dangerous setback for transgender health and human rights in the United States.'
'This decision will effectively allow states to ban evidence-based gender-affirming healthcare for thousands of transgender and gender diverse youth and their families. Furthermore, it will make it much more difficult to create an evidence base to support access to healthcare of this kind,' the organization said Wednesday in an emailed statement.
'A ruling like this does not change the fundamental fact that transgender youth exist, their lives are improved when they can access care and are harmed whenever the government comes in between them and the professional experts trained to provide them this care,' WPATH said. 'Let us be clear — healthcare bans of any kind are rooted in stigma, misinformation, and fear and this one comes at the expense of the youth in need of this care.'
WPATH, formerly the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association, has researched transgender health since 1979 but has only recently become a target of the White House and Republicans in Congress, who claim the organization is manipulating its findings to advance a political agenda. In a January executive order aimed at eliminating federal support for gender-affirming care for minors, President Trump said the organization's guidance regarding treatment 'lacks scientific integrity.'
In a concurring opinion Wednesday morning, Justice Clarence Thomas, one of the high court's leading conservatives, said courts should not defer to 'self-described experts' on gender-affirming care, claiming 'prominent medical professionals,' including those affiliated with WPATH, have dismissed 'grave problems' undercutting their assertion that there is a consensus around the efficacy of gender dysphoria treatments for youth.
'They have built their medical recommendations to achieve political ends,' Thomas wrote.
In a joint statement on Wednesday, six other medical groups, led by the Endocrine Society, said they are 'disappointed' by the Supreme Court's ruling, which they claimed would increase 'the likelihood that other states will limit or eliminate families' and patients' ability to access medical care.'
'Decisions about medical care must be based on individualized assessments by qualified professionals in consultation with the patient and their parents or legal guardians and guided by well-designed medical evidence,' wrote the American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, American Psychiatric Association, the Endocrine Society and the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners.
The six organizations, part of an earlier amicus brief in the case against Tennessee's law, said health professionals 'must be able to rely on their training, education, and expertise to provide appropriate care based on the needs and values of each patient and their family, without bans or interference.'
In a separate statement, Susan J. Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, said the court's ruling Wednesday 'will have profound and far-reaching consequences' for the health and well-being of transgender youth nationwide and the doctors who care for them.
'To be clear — regardless of today's legal ruling — the science still supports gender-affirming care, children will still need it,' Kressly said.
Adrian Shanker, who led LGBTQI+ health policy at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under former President Biden's administration, told The Hill in an interview Wednesday that the Supreme Court's ruling on gender-affirming care is part of an 'avalanche of attacks' on trans people and bodily autonomy.
'It really isn't just one isolated incident — it's a shift politically that has made it very difficult for trans people to access the care that their bodies need, and ultimately, that's just going to lead to significant harm for one of the marginalized populations in our society,' Shanker said.
In May, Trump's HHS broke with major medical groups, which have said gender-affirming care for trans youths and adults is medically necessary, in an unsigned report that declared there is a 'lack of robust evidence' to support providing such interventions for minors.
Trump, who campaigned heavily on a promise to ban gender-affirming care for youth, has, in addition to his executive order, called for Congress to pass legislation 'permanently banning and criminalizing sex changes on children and forever ending the lie that any child is trapped in the wrong body.' He has endorsed Greene's bill.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has also instructed states not to use Medicaid funding for transition-related care for minors and recently demanded hospitals providing gender-affirming care to young people to hand over data on their standards of care and finances.
The White House did not immediately return a request for comment on Wednesday's Supreme Court ruling.
Do No Harm, a medical group that advocates against gender-affirming care for youth, applauded the court's decision, which the organization's chair, Stanley Goldfarb, said 'should end the debate over laws like Tennessee's.'
Kristina Rasmussen, the group's executive director, said it plans to advocate for similar bans on transition-related care in other states.
Jamie Reed, a former caseworker at the Washington University Transgender Center who helped jump-start the Missouri Legislature's efforts to ban gender-affirming care for minors, said Wednesday's ruling 'confirms what whistleblowers, parents, and detransitioners have been saying for years.'
'These are not settled, safe, or evidence-based practices,' Reed, now the co-executive director of the LGB Courage Coalition, an organization that opposes transition-related care for youth, said in a statement. 'They are high-risk interventions being pushed on vulnerable children in the name of ideology.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
29 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Still marching after all these years
Many of us have had a lot of practice: Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq. We protested every bad government action. Advertisement I learned nonviolent civil disobedience from my parents, growing up in Brooklyn. They were activists even before Vietnam. During the civil rights movement, in 1964, driving through St. Augustine, Fla., they attended a demonstration. When protesters refused to leave a sit-in attempting to integrate the Ponce de Leon Motor Lodge restaurant, some were arrested and jailed. My parents were not arrested, but they were present, in solidarity, as lifelong believers in human rights, in including Black Americans in the American Dream. What we now call DEI was already a good goal. Advertisement And me? Young as I was, my good-girl head was down, finishing my master's thesis on Proust, in graduate school far away. I was merely an educated girl, not political yet, not focused on the common good as they were. Both of them had been radicals in the 1930s, when Jewish leftists and others hoped that a popular front could remake US labor relations, control capitalist greed, and bring America closer to equality for women and people of color. Paul Robeson was one of their idols, along with Eleanor Roosevelt. Later, they opposed the Vietnam War, just as my husband and I did. In 1968, running against feckless Hubert Humphrey, treacherous Richard Nixon promised to end the war, and then prolonged it until more than 50,000 men my age died, as well as countless Vietnamese and Cambodians. In 1972 my father worked to elect Elizabeth Holtzman, also of Brooklyn, to Congress. So she was in the House of Representatives in time to vote to impeach the corrupt Nixon in the summer of 1974. My father, with ALS sapping his body, had followed the investigation and trial avidly from the green couch in the living room. But he missed out on the ending. By August he was in a coma; he died two days short of Nixon's ignominious exit. The night Nixon left, making his awkward, hypocritical peace signs, my mother and I were dining in the dim kitchen with my cousin Sherry, grieving and rejoicing. In that painful, complex mood, we poured some wine and drank to him: 'Marty should have been here to see this day.' 'Daddy should have been here.' Advertisement I know my parents would be out with me on the streets now. They were there, in a sense — at a #HandsOff rally on April 5 in Newton, at an April 19 event to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the beginning of the American Revolution in Waltham, and then at the 'No Kings' rally. The signs were clever and scathing at all these events; drivers going by were honking in approval, shouting, applauding. My laconic father's sign would have said, very big, in block letters, 'NO!' Once when my mother was in her 90s and had lost many memories, I asked her, 'What is wisdom?' She answered unhesitatingly: 'The greatest part of wisdom is kindness.' Her sign, which I saw an older woman hold at the Waltham rally, would have read 'Make America kind again.' 'Nothing is stranger than the position of the dead among the living,' Virginia Woolf wrote in her first, unpublished novel, 'Melymbrosia.' I find it marvelous that my parents can still stand by my side. The rest of our family is in the streets, too: our son and his children in New York City. That solidarity is so welcome to us — just as it must have been to my parents when we opposed the Vietnam War early on, when they felt alone and scorned, when so few Americans had yet come to their senses. Advertisement Intergenerational solidarity is precious. That preciousness includes not only the next generations, but the oldest, too. To all of us lucky enough to have older people in our lives, they comfort us by their presence. Repositories of family lore and legend, they dole out secrets and, for better or worse, guide us by their experiences. And sometimes by the energy of their activism, right now! I see my parents' faces vividly. I summon them and their will to do good, which survives them, in this national emergency. Their memory is a blessing in the here and now and the strife to come.
an hour ago
As Musk's 'robotaxi' rollout approaches, Democratic lawmakers in Texas try to throw up a roadblock
NEW YORK -- A group of Democratic lawmakers in Texas is asking Elon Musk to delay the planned rollout of driverless 'robotaxis' in the state this weekend to assure that the vehicles are safe. In a letter, seven state legislators asked Tesla to wait until September when a new law takes effect that will require several checks before autonomous vehicles can be deployed without a human in the driver's seat. Tesla is slated to begin testing a dozen of what it calls robotaxis for paying customers on Sunday in a limited area of Austin, Texas. 'We are formally requesting that Tesla delay autonomous robotaxi operations until the new law takes effect on September 1, 2025,' the letter from Wednesday, June 18, reads. 'We believe this is in the best interest of both public safety and building public trust in Tesla's operations.' It's not clear if the letter will have much impact. Republicans have been a dominant majority in the Texas Legislature for more than 20 years. State lawmakers and Republican Gov. Greg Abbott have generally embraced Musk and the jobs and investment he has brought to Texas, from his SpaceX rocket program on the coast, to his Tesla factory in Austin. The company, which is headquartered in Austin, did not responded immediately to a request for comment from The Associated Press. The law will require companies to secure approval from the state motor vehicles department to operate autonomous cars with passengers. That approval, in turn, would depend on sufficient proof that the cars won't pose a high risk to others if the self-driving system breaks down, among other reassurances. Companies would also have to file detailed plans for how first responders should handle the cars if there is a problem, such as an accident. The letter asked Tesla to assure the legislators it has met all the requirements of the law even if it decides to go ahead with the test run this weekend. The letter was earlier reported by Reuters. Musk has made the robotaxi program a priority at Tesla and a failure would likely be highly damaging to the company's stock, which has already tumbled 20% this year. Musk's political views and his affiliation with the Trump administration have drastically reduced sales of Tesla, particularly in Europe, where Musk's endorsement of Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany party in February's election drew broad condemnation. Tesla shares bottomed out in March and have rebounded somewhat in recent months. Much of the rise reflects optimism that robotaxis will not only be deployed without a hitch, but that the service will quickly expand to other cities and eventually dominate the self-driving cab business. Rival Waymo is already picking up passengers in Austin and several other cities, and recently boasted of surpassing 10 million paid rides. In afternoon trading Friday, Tesla shares were largely unchanged at $320.
an hour ago
Police in northeast Ohio arrest man who allegedly menaced GOP US Rep. Max Miller on interstate
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- A northeast Ohio man was arrested Thursday on allegations that he threatened and spewed antisemitic epithets at Republican U.S. Rep. Max Miller while the two were traveling on an interstate highway near Cleveland. Police in Rocky River said Feras S. Hamdan, 36, of Westlake, voluntarily turned himself in with counsel present and is awaiting an appearance in municipal court. A message was left with his lawyer seeking comment. Miller, who is Jewish, called 911 while driving on Interstate 90 on his way to work Thursday. He reported that another driver was cutting him off, making profane hand gestures, showing a Palestinian flag and shouting death threats targeted at him and his 1-year-old daughter. After an interview with police, Miller filed a complaint against Hamdan alleging aggravated menacing and sought a criminal protective order. Local police continue to investigate with assistance from the U.S. Capitol Police, the Ohio State Highway Patrol, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Attorney's office and the Rocky River prosecutor. The Ohio Jewish Caucus praised Rocky River police and extended their thoughts to Miller and his family, noting the incident followed by just days the politically motivated shootings in Minnesota, which left two people dead and two others injured. 'Enough is enough," the all-Democratic legislative alliance said in a statement. "There is no place for this type of violence — whether it be political, antisemitic, or ideological — whatsoever. We believe we can solve our differences with humility, not hatred.'
