MP Jagadish Shettar expresses concern over delay in sewage treatment plant

Belagavi: The construction of a sewage treatment plant on the borders of Halaga village in Belagavi taluk has been stalled since 2023. Belagavi MP
Jagadish Shettar
expressed displeasure that the work has not resumed even after three years.
He said that a letter was written to chief minister Siddaramaiah and urban development minister Byrati Suresh, requesting them to take up the work and complete it soon.
In a release to the media, Shettar said that the lands for the proposed sewage treatment plant work were acquired on Feb 28, 2013. However, since the new Land Acquisition Act came into effect a few days later, the landowners did not receive the maximum compensation they could receive under the new Land Acquisition Act 2013.
He recalled that the deputy commissioner already sent a proposal to the secretary of the urban development department regarding the provision of a higher compensation amount or ex gratia/compensation money for acquired lands, keeping in mind the interests of the farmers.
"Belagavi is a fast-growing city, but the work of setting up a sewage water treatment plant here is being delayed. In several areas of Belagavi city, sewage water is flowing on the road," he said, expressing concern that the stench emanating from this is very difficult to bear for lakhs of residents.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Glicemia acima de 100? Tente esse truque antes de dormir
Saúde Nacional
Undo
This sewage treatment plant project, which is being implemented at an estimated cost of Rs 162.7 crore under the central govt's Amrut scheme and was stalled for many years, needs to be implemented. A higher compensation amount or ex-gratia special compensation money for acquired lands should be given to the farmers. He requested the state govt to take immediate action in this regard and complete the stalled work as soon as possible.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

27 minutes ago

• Business Standard

Rs 20,000 cr spent so far on PM Modi's rallies in Bihar, claims Tejashwi

RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav on Saturday continued with his "pickpocket" jibe, claiming that a staggering Rs 20,000 crore has been spent on rallies addressed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Bihar so far. The BJP also sharpened its counter-attack, with posters being put up across the state capital bearing the slogan "Mera baap chaara chor, mujhe vote do" (my father stole fodder meant for cattle, vote for me), belittling the leader of the opposition who leads the INDIA bloc in the upcoming assembly polls. The young leader, who had a day ago raised the hackles of the ruling NDA by alleging that exorbitant ticket fares of Vande Bharat made Modi look like a "pocketmaar" (pickpocket), used the expression again in a stinging social media post. He alleged that rallies of Modi in Bihar, since 2014, have cost "Rs 100 crore each" and there have been "200 such public meetings" so far. "So the total amount splurged during the period, which has also seen five elections (three Lok Sabha and two Vidhan Sabha), is Rs 20,000 such meetings have been organised by the government even though the objective has been, clearly, electoral," the former Bihar deputy CM claimed. Notably, Modi was in Siwan district on Friday, which was his fifth visit to the state this year, the second in less than a month, and said to be "51st" since taking over as the prime minister. Yadav, who seemed to be in no mood to give up his tirade, alleged, "What should we call a person who cleverly uses public money on his own pretends to be a man of integrity?... Of course, pocketmaar, not madadgaar (a helper of the people)." The BJP, which takes on the RJD in the assembly elections due in just a few months, retaliated with full force. A day after BJP's former state unit president and Deputy CM Samrat Choudhary had sought to berate Yadav by using the famous line from the blockbuster 'Deewaar' - Mera baap chor Hai (my father is a thief) - in an obvious dig at RJD supremo Lalu Prasad's corruption taint, the party engaged in a "poster war". In the posters, which the party has not officially owned, the colourful slogan is inscribed next to a caricature that shows the father-son duo riding a buffalo, an obvious reference to the fodder scam. The conviction in the fodder scam has left Prasad, a former chief minister and an ex-Union minister, disqualified from contesting the elections. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Time of India

36 minutes ago

• Time of India

South Korea: President Lee unveils $22.1 billion stimulus package to revive economy; slashes revenue outlook, ramps up spending

File photo: South Korean President Lee Jae Myung (Picture credit: AP) South Korean President Lee Jae Myung has introduced a 30.5 trillion won (USD 22.1 billion) supplementary budget plan aimed at revitalising the country's weakening economy and supporting struggling citizens, reported news agency ANI, citing The Korea Herald. The proposal, which received Cabinet approval on Thursday, includes 20.2 trillion won in new spending and a downward revision of 10.3 trillion won in revenue projections, South Korea's first such adjustment in five years. 'Fiscal soundness and adherence to balanced budgeting are important, but the current downturn is too severe for the government to stand by,' Lee said at a Cabinet meeting, according to The Korea Herald. 'It is time to put public finances to use.' President Lee emphasised two key priorities: stimulating economic growth and ensuring equitable distribution of benefits. Central to the stimulus is a universal cash handout scheme worth 10.3 trillion won, disbursed via spending coupons. All citizens will initially receive a minimum of 150,000 won, while lower-income households will get more. A second round of payments will exclude the top 10 per cent of earners, with the remaining 90 per cent receiving an additional 100,000 won. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Seniors Born 1941-1979 Receive 55 Benefits This Month if They Ask WalletJump Learn More Undo As per news agency Reuters, this marks the second supplementary budget of the year, coming just weeks after Lee's June 3 election victory. His expansionary fiscal approach aims to counter sluggish domestic demand, compounded by external shocks including US President Donald Trump's tariff hikes and internal political turmoil. The budget includes 2.7 trillion won for the beleaguered construction sector, which has seen four consecutive quarters of contraction. An additional 1.2 trillion won is earmarked for future-oriented industries, such as AI and renewable energy, while 5 trillion won is set aside for livelihood support. This includes 1.4 trillion won for distressed borrower debt relief and 1.6 trillion won to boost job-seeking aid and delayed wage support for vulnerable workers. The revenue forecast has been cut to 642.4 trillion won, down from 651.6 trillion won. Total government expenditure for 2025 has been revised upwards from 673.3 trillion won to 702 trillion won. The resulting integrated fiscal deficit is expected to widen to 110.4 trillion won, or 4.2 per cent of GDP, up from last year's 3.3 per cent, with national debt forecast to exceed 1,300 trillion won, pushing the debt-to-GDP ratio to 49 per cent. The government plans to fund the package with 19.8 trillion won in treasury bond issuances and an additional 10 trillion won from budget restructuring and reserves. Despite the expanding deficit, the finance ministry said Korea's fiscal stance remains sustainable by global standards. The supplementary budget is projected to boost GDP growth by 0.1 to 0.2 percentage points. The Bank of Korea currently projects 0.8 per cent growth, while the IMF expects a 1 per cent rise. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Time of India

38 minutes ago

• Time of India

Trump's Tulsi problem: Wanted a minion, picked a maverick

After Elon Musk, Tulsi Gabbard has found that US President Donald Trump may pick a maverick when he actually wants a minion. When Gabbard was named Director of National Intelligence by Trump in November 2024, it symbolized one of the most dramatic ideological journeys in recent American politics. A former Democrat who once vocally opposed Trump's foreign policy, Gabbard's trajectory from progressive dissident to a Republican-aligned intelligence chief highlighted not only her political adaptability but also Trump's penchant for tapping unconventional allies. Yet less than a year into her tenure, the alliance appears to be fraying. Trump's public rebuke of Gabbard on Friday, accusing her of being "wrong" about Iran's nuclear ambitions, has cast doubt on her future in the administration and underscored the volatile dynamics within Trump's camp as he navigates his comeback bid. What first riled Trump was a video Gabbard posted on X on June 10 in which she warned that "political elite and warmongers" are "carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers," putting the world "on the brink of nuclear annihilation." A person close to the president told Politico that he viewed the video as Gabbard warning him not to greenlight Israel attacking Iran. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 발톱무좀 고민이신분! 제발 이 글 필독하세요! 홈시네라이프 더 알아보기 Undo Also Read: Nuclear war! US intel chief warns world is on the edge of annihilation From DNC pariah to MAGA ally Live Events You Might Also Like: Trump vs Tulsi Gabbard: Is US President planning to fire US spy chief over provocative anti-war video? Gabbard's departure from the Democratic Party in October 2022 did not come as a shock. Her criticism of the party's 'warmongering elite' and her staunch opposition to interventionist foreign policy had long made her an outsider. Yet few anticipated how quickly she would pivot toward Trump's orbit. By mid-2023, Gabbard was appearing frequently on conservative media, praising Trump-era foreign policy and criticizing President Biden's approach to Ukraine and Iran. Her endorsement of Trump in August 2024 was a significant political moment—particularly as it came while Trump was consolidating his position in the Republican primary. Gabbard's appeal to Trump was multi-dimensional: her military service lent credibility to Trump's America First messaging; her defection from the Democrats reinforced his narrative of a party in disarray; and her rising profile in conservative circles offered a fresh face to appeal to independent voters. Trump's decision to nominate her as DNI in November 2024 surprised many but aligned with his history of installing loyalists in key positions, often outside traditional establishment picks. Trump values loyalty but is also attracted to figures who carry an aura of independence, so long as it doesn't directly challenge his authority. Gabbard was useful to Trump because she legitimized his anti-establishment credentials while also appealing to veterans and libertarian-leaning conservatives. Her appointment as DNI was also tactical: Trump sought to shake up the intelligence community, which he has long viewed with suspicion. She, as an outsider with military gravitas and a maverick reputation, fit the bill. Her initial cooperation and alignment with Trump's broad foreign policy themes -- anti-interventionism, skepticism of the intelligence "deep state," and a focus on China -- made her a valuable asset. But Trump's pattern of burning bridges with appointees who assert independence has a long precedent, and Gabbard may now be next in line. You Might Also Like: Trump says Tulsi Gabbard was 'wrong' about Iran, Israeli strikes could be 'very hard to stop' Is Trump preparing to fire Gabbard? Earlier, a Politico report had said that Trump had increasingly mused about nixing Gabbard's office completely. Trump thought Gabbard did not add anything to "any conversation", the report said citing insiders. A few days ago, reports claimed that he is relying on a high-profile group of Cabinet picks and not those who are supposed to be advising him by the virtue of their posts: Gabbard and Defense secretary Pete Hegseth. The rupture had begun with Gabbard's testimony to Congress in March 2025. She stated that the U.S. intelligence community 'continued to assess that Tehran is not currently pursuing a nuclear weapon,' echoing long-standing assessments from both the Biden and previous Trump-era intelligence reports. Trump, however, has taken a harder line in recent months, arguing that Iran is 'weeks away' from acquiring a nuclear bomb -- statements likely influenced by his desire to project strength in the lead-up to the 2026 midterms and potentially 2028. When Gabbard's testimony was raised in a press gaggle on Monday evening, Trump dismissed her comments, saying, 'I don't care what she says.' By Friday, the rebuke was more explicit. Trump's public rebuke of Gabbard suggests a brewing frustration with her unwillingness to bend the intelligence narrative to align with his political messaging, a pattern seen in past Trump appointments, from James Comey to John Bolton. The public criticism, particularly over an issue as significant as Iran's nuclear program, is a red flag. For Trump, public disagreements with his appointees often precede dismissal. Gabbard's claim that her March testimony was 'taken out of context' suggests she is attempting damage control, but it may not be enough. Behind the scenes, Trump loyalists have reportedly grown uneasy with Gabbard's growing media presence and her continued framing of intelligence assessments in ways that don't always align with Trump's messaging. If Trump believes Gabbard is undermining his narrative, especially on a high-profile national security issue, her tenure may be on borrowed time. A dismissal, however, could come with risks. Firing Gabbard could alienate independent voters and veterans who see her as a voice of reason within the Trump movement. It may also reignite debates over Trump's handling of intelligence during his prior presidency. If removed, Gabbard has a number of options. Her reputation as a principled non-interventionist still holds sway with a segment of the right—and even some independents. She could pivot to a media career, possibly on platforms like Fox News, Newsmax, or a new independent outlet. Politically, she could mount a Senate run or become a prominent surrogate for another faction within the GOP, possibly even challenging Trumpism from within if his grip on the party begins to loosen. Alternatively, she may bide her time, reemerging post-Trump with renewed relevance in a reshaped Republican landscape. The Trump-Gabbard saga encapsulates the volatility of MAGA politics. Their alliance was one of strategic convenience more than ideological cohesion. Trump elevated Gabbard because she was useful; now, as she asserts independence on sensitive intelligence matters, she risks becoming expendable.