By robots, for robots: The new soundtrack to our lives is giving me nightmares
The song Echoes of Tomorrow is a laid-back, catchy tune that might happily slot into a summer playlist on Spotify or Apple Music. Only the lyrics, which make curious references to 'algorithms,' reveal its non-human creator: Artificial intelligence.
The track's mimicry of flesh-and-blood pop is pretty unsettling. Yet what's really disturbing is the sheer quantity of similar AI tunes sloshing around online. Tools like Udio and Suno, trained on millions of songs crafted by human artists, are now churning out millions of their own tunes at the click of a button. Deezer, a rival of Spotify, estimates 20,000 AI tracks are uploaded to its platform daily, 18 per cent of the total. While they only account for 0.5 per cent of total listens, real royalties are being earned and often fraudulently so, judging by the spread of bots to amplify listens. This may not be a Napster-scale issue yet – but the $20 billion music market is clearly vulnerable.
Which is why Deezer is now trying a little more sunlight to disinfect its platform. It's going to start labelling AI-generated content, based on proprietary software. On a recent visit to the firm's Paris headquarters, I watched on a laptop as the detection tool quickly spotted the telltale signs of a computer-composed song – in this case, Echoes of Tomorrow – with what it says is 100 per cent accuracy. It turns out that while human ears can be fooled, AI-generated music can be detected from statistical patterns used in its creation. That's helped the fight against fraud behind the scenes; now it's going to empower listeners.
Deezer deserves two cheers for this – and maybe one nervous gulp. Increased transparency about the provenance of music is one way to ensure a fairer playing field in a market whose pay-per-stream model already felt unequal for artists lower down the food chain. It's also a good way to indirectly put pressure on the bigger platforms like Spotify to follow suit and show users what they're paying for. Much of Spotify's $145 billion market cap is built on expectations of price hikes and premium subscription tiers – these would be harder to justify if built on AI content masquerading as the real thing.
Yet what remains worrying is the extent to which AI music is overwhelmingly cannibalising, not feeding, the human artists on which it was trained without compensation. As Deezer's own experience attests, the utopian view of AI empowering creators by taking care of low-value tasks isn't what's happening: Instead, royalty-collecting society the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers estimates AI music's growth through 2028 will come largely at the expense of humans, generating an estimated €10 billion ($18 billion) of revenue by substituting artists' work. And while streaming platforms have a role to play here, so do governments and regulators if AI firms are to also improve transparency on the sources of their training data.
Loading
'We're seeing AI music shrink the royalty pool for human artists,' says Ed Newton-Rex, an AI music specialist and founder of nonprofit lobby group Fairly Trained. 'There are real economic consequences to this technology.'
Detecting and flagging AI music at the point of distribution is just the start. What's also needed is a model that protects artists who are threatened at the point of generation – such as paid licensing deals between copyright holders and tech platforms like Suno, which are currently in discussion. Newton-Rex says that detection tools like Deezer's could be used by streaming platforms for sanctioning AI tools that don't respect musicians' rights by removing their uploaded content. He has a point. If human creativity really is going to get a boost from new tech tools, Echoes of Tomorrow has to be yesterday's news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
4 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Ten tries news on Spotify, YouTube in hopes of breaking losing streak
Network Ten has long been the third horse in the race for free-to-air news ratings, but its new evening news and current affairs bulletin has opted to do something different: be everywhere, all the time. The company said it had inked what it believes is a world-first deal with audio streaming platform Spotify to broadcast its 10 News+ show as an hour-long podcast and video each day, to be available within minutes of it ending on TV. It will also broadcast live on YouTube.
Sydney Morning Herald
5 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
By robots, for robots: The new soundtrack to our lives is giving me nightmares
The song Echoes of Tomorrow is a laid-back, catchy tune that might happily slot into a summer playlist on Spotify or Apple Music. Only the lyrics, which make curious references to 'algorithms,' reveal its non-human creator: Artificial intelligence. The track's mimicry of flesh-and-blood pop is pretty unsettling. Yet what's really disturbing is the sheer quantity of similar AI tunes sloshing around online. Tools like Udio and Suno, trained on millions of songs crafted by human artists, are now churning out millions of their own tunes at the click of a button. Deezer, a rival of Spotify, estimates 20,000 AI tracks are uploaded to its platform daily, 18 per cent of the total. While they only account for 0.5 per cent of total listens, real royalties are being earned and often fraudulently so, judging by the spread of bots to amplify listens. This may not be a Napster-scale issue yet – but the $20 billion music market is clearly vulnerable. Which is why Deezer is now trying a little more sunlight to disinfect its platform. It's going to start labelling AI-generated content, based on proprietary software. On a recent visit to the firm's Paris headquarters, I watched on a laptop as the detection tool quickly spotted the telltale signs of a computer-composed song – in this case, Echoes of Tomorrow – with what it says is 100 per cent accuracy. It turns out that while human ears can be fooled, AI-generated music can be detected from statistical patterns used in its creation. That's helped the fight against fraud behind the scenes; now it's going to empower listeners. Deezer deserves two cheers for this – and maybe one nervous gulp. Increased transparency about the provenance of music is one way to ensure a fairer playing field in a market whose pay-per-stream model already felt unequal for artists lower down the food chain. It's also a good way to indirectly put pressure on the bigger platforms like Spotify to follow suit and show users what they're paying for. Much of Spotify's $145 billion market cap is built on expectations of price hikes and premium subscription tiers – these would be harder to justify if built on AI content masquerading as the real thing. Yet what remains worrying is the extent to which AI music is overwhelmingly cannibalising, not feeding, the human artists on which it was trained without compensation. As Deezer's own experience attests, the utopian view of AI empowering creators by taking care of low-value tasks isn't what's happening: Instead, royalty-collecting society the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers estimates AI music's growth through 2028 will come largely at the expense of humans, generating an estimated €10 billion ($18 billion) of revenue by substituting artists' work. And while streaming platforms have a role to play here, so do governments and regulators if AI firms are to also improve transparency on the sources of their training data. Loading 'We're seeing AI music shrink the royalty pool for human artists,' says Ed Newton-Rex, an AI music specialist and founder of nonprofit lobby group Fairly Trained. 'There are real economic consequences to this technology.' Detecting and flagging AI music at the point of distribution is just the start. What's also needed is a model that protects artists who are threatened at the point of generation – such as paid licensing deals between copyright holders and tech platforms like Suno, which are currently in discussion. Newton-Rex says that detection tools like Deezer's could be used by streaming platforms for sanctioning AI tools that don't respect musicians' rights by removing their uploaded content. He has a point. If human creativity really is going to get a boost from new tech tools, Echoes of Tomorrow has to be yesterday's news.
The Age
5 hours ago
- The Age
By robots, for robots: The new soundtrack to our lives is giving me nightmares
The song Echoes of Tomorrow is a laid-back, catchy tune that might happily slot into a summer playlist on Spotify or Apple Music. Only the lyrics, which make curious references to 'algorithms,' reveal its non-human creator: Artificial intelligence. The track's mimicry of flesh-and-blood pop is pretty unsettling. Yet what's really disturbing is the sheer quantity of similar AI tunes sloshing around online. Tools like Udio and Suno, trained on millions of songs crafted by human artists, are now churning out millions of their own tunes at the click of a button. Deezer, a rival of Spotify, estimates 20,000 AI tracks are uploaded to its platform daily, 18 per cent of the total. While they only account for 0.5 per cent of total listens, real royalties are being earned and often fraudulently so, judging by the spread of bots to amplify listens. This may not be a Napster-scale issue yet – but the $20 billion music market is clearly vulnerable. Which is why Deezer is now trying a little more sunlight to disinfect its platform. It's going to start labelling AI-generated content, based on proprietary software. On a recent visit to the firm's Paris headquarters, I watched on a laptop as the detection tool quickly spotted the telltale signs of a computer-composed song – in this case, Echoes of Tomorrow – with what it says is 100 per cent accuracy. It turns out that while human ears can be fooled, AI-generated music can be detected from statistical patterns used in its creation. That's helped the fight against fraud behind the scenes; now it's going to empower listeners. Deezer deserves two cheers for this – and maybe one nervous gulp. Increased transparency about the provenance of music is one way to ensure a fairer playing field in a market whose pay-per-stream model already felt unequal for artists lower down the food chain. It's also a good way to indirectly put pressure on the bigger platforms like Spotify to follow suit and show users what they're paying for. Much of Spotify's $145 billion market cap is built on expectations of price hikes and premium subscription tiers – these would be harder to justify if built on AI content masquerading as the real thing. Yet what remains worrying is the extent to which AI music is overwhelmingly cannibalising, not feeding, the human artists on which it was trained without compensation. As Deezer's own experience attests, the utopian view of AI empowering creators by taking care of low-value tasks isn't what's happening: Instead, royalty-collecting society the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers estimates AI music's growth through 2028 will come largely at the expense of humans, generating an estimated €10 billion ($18 billion) of revenue by substituting artists' work. And while streaming platforms have a role to play here, so do governments and regulators if AI firms are to also improve transparency on the sources of their training data. Loading 'We're seeing AI music shrink the royalty pool for human artists,' says Ed Newton-Rex, an AI music specialist and founder of nonprofit lobby group Fairly Trained. 'There are real economic consequences to this technology.' Detecting and flagging AI music at the point of distribution is just the start. What's also needed is a model that protects artists who are threatened at the point of generation – such as paid licensing deals between copyright holders and tech platforms like Suno, which are currently in discussion. Newton-Rex says that detection tools like Deezer's could be used by streaming platforms for sanctioning AI tools that don't respect musicians' rights by removing their uploaded content. He has a point. If human creativity really is going to get a boost from new tech tools, Echoes of Tomorrow has to be yesterday's news.
