Arizona State Football Preview 2025: Who's Having More Fun Than Kenny Dillingham and the Sun Devils?
Everything about Arizona State last year was fun.Running back Cam Skattebo was fun. Quarterback Sam Leavitt was fun. Winning the Big 12 Championship was fun, and almost pulling out a thriller over Texas in the College Football Playoff was super-fun, even in a loss.And no one had more fun than head coach Kenny Dillingham, with an infectious excitement and style that showed in every play in every game.
X CFN, Fiu | CFN Facebook | Bluesky Fiu, CFN Arizona State Offense BreakdownArizona State Defense BreakdownSeason Prediction, Win Total, Keys to Season
Skattebo might be a New York Giant, but now that the Sun Devils are the hunted, the good times aren't going to stop.The Big 12 is much better from top to bottom, being the hunted won't be easy, and there will likely be more than the two regular season losses the team suffered last year. And none of that should be a problem, because this team won't quit.
Arizona State started 2-7 in Dillingham's first season in 2023, but there was still intensity and toughness over the final three weeks, even when they were way overmatched in blowout losses to Oregon and Arizona over the last two games.That all carried over into 2024, and now is when it's on Dillingham to keep the party going.
He's just 35, and Arizona State is his school - this isn't just some job for him - and it should once again show after proving that his style works.This year's team is among the most experienced in the country, and it still landed a few icing-on-cake transfers to come in to help patch what few holes there are.Fun team, fun coach, and all at one of the most fun schools in the country. Arizona State is on the national radar now as a must-watch team every week.Keep it all going with another strong season, and 2024 should be just the beginning.
Arizona State Offense BreakdownArizona State Defense BreakdownSeason Prediction, Win Total, Keys to Season
© 2025 The Arena Group Holdings, Inc. All rights reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
What are the odds Iowa football goes undefeated in 2025?
What are the odds Iowa football goes undefeated in 2025? Could the 2025 season have some magic in store for the Iowa Hawkeyes? Is it possible that they could run the table and go undefeated given their slate? It isn't necessarily the most likely, but based on the odds, crazier things have happened. The Hawkeyes are the beneficiaries of getting seven of their 12 games at home inside Kinnick Stadium, two of which appear to be their most difficult games on paper. At home this year, in order, Iowa gets UAlbany, UMass, Indiana, Penn State, Minnesota, Oregon, and Michigan State. The matchups against Penn State and Oregon, two teams that made the 2024 College Football Playoff, are their toughest tests. While the slate has just five road trips, the Week 2 trip takes Iowa to Iowa State for an early-season battle. The road slate, in order, takes Iowa to Iowa State, Rutgers, Wisconsin, USC, and Nebraska. So, can Iowa run the table and go undefeated? According to FanDuel Sportsbook, the Hawkeyes have the eighth-best odds to go undefeated, with odds of +6500. At the top of the odds are the usual players in the Big Ten and national championship landscape. Ohio State (+400), Oregon (+440), and Penn State (+490) are the most likely to run the table with their regular-season slates. Michigan sits with +1100 odds, and the upstart Illinois Fighting Illini, who many view as a sleeper, have +2800 odds to go undefeated. Rounding out the list before Iowa is Nebraska with +4000 odds and USC at +4800. Contact/Follow us @HawkeyesWire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Iowa news, notes and opinions. Follow Riley on X: @rileydonald7
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
SEC propaganda blitz for College Football Playoff speaks to need for more Big Ten games
If you're explaining, you're losing. I thought about that old Ronald Reagan quote last week at the SEC spring meetings while the conference launched a days-long propaganda campaign explaining why it deserved more respect from the College Football Playoff committee. Advertisement The SEC's best programs lost too often the past few years. Alabama's four losses last season marked its most since 2007. Georgia lost just twice in three seasons from 2021-23 before losing three times last year. LSU hasn't lost fewer than three times in a season since 2019. That 2019 season also marks the last time Florida won more than eight games. The less said the better about Auburn's past five seasons. We can debate whether the playoff committee would have been wiser to select a three-loss SEC team rather than SMU, but there's no arguing this: A Big Ten team won the national championship each of the past two seasons, and the SEC didn't even advance a team to the title game in those years. The SEC's consecutive seasons without a champion mark its longest drought since Florida State and Ohio State won the titles in 2013 and 2014. LSU quarterback Garrett Nussmeier (13) looks to throw during his team's game against Southern California on Sunday, Sept. 1, 2024, at Allegiant Stadium in Paradise, Nev. It's not that the SEC came unglued. It remains a deep league with few weaklings, but the SEC's cream wasn't as sweet as the Big Ten's last season. Advertisement That left the SEC to explain its mightiness with rhetoric and graphs, rather than pointing to the national championship scoreboard. 'This (league) is not like any other,' SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said on the final day of his conference's propaganda blitz in Miramar Beach, Florida. Sankey paired that quote with a packet of paper several pages in length that sought to explain the SEC's greatness. NO CUPCAKES: If SEC wants playoff respect, it needs tougher games BIG DECISION: SEC's Greg Sankey can be hero or villain in playoff debate While several SEC coaches and administrators tried to prop up the league with their words, LSU coach Brian Kelly broke ranks and spoke some plain truth. Advertisement 'Look, the Big Ten right now holds it on the SEC,' Kelly said. 'They won the last two national championships. That's the reality of it.' Here's more reality: Big Ten teams went 6-4 in games against SEC opponents last season, including postseason results. Kelly, a skilled orator, didn't compliment the Big Ten for no reason. He paired his praise by challenging the SEC and Big Ten athletic directors and commissioners to come to agreement on more interconference matchups between these two super leagues. Count Kelly among those who favor a Big Ten-SEC challenge. 'As (SEC) coaches – and I can speak for the room – we want to play Big Ten schools,' Kelly said. 'You've got to get a partner. You've got to get a partner who says, 'We're in for that, too.' We've made our voice clear. Our ADs know that, as well.' Advertisement Kelly exaggerated when he said he spoke for the room of SEC coaches. In truth, some other SEC coaches sounded more squeamish about the idea of an annual game against a Big Ten foe. Kelly is smart to push the envelope, though, because the SEC needs this interconference challenge more than the Big Ten does. The SEC ruled the four-team playoff, but the conference up north scored the early advantage in the expanded playoff, both in number of qualifiers and bracket advancement. The SEC might be deeper in number of robust teams, but a 12- or even 16-team playoff works well for the Big Ten's quest to qualify its top quartet, even if the conference wavers down ballot. This season, SEC newcomers Texas and Oklahoma will play Ohio State and Michigan, respectively. Alabama's game against Wisconsin is the only other Big Ten-SEC matchup. Advertisement 'We want to get challenged (by Big Ten opponents),' Kelly said, in what amounted to chiding a heavyweight belt holder to step into the ring. The SEC's most authoritative path to gobbling up at-large playoff spots would be to repeatedly beat Big Ten teams in non-conference clashes. Consider the SEC's basketball uprising. It dominated the non-conference schedule last season, including a 14-2 record in the ACC-SEC challenge. Come Selection Sunday, an NCAA record 14 SEC teams qualified for March Madness. The SEC didn't need to explain itself, because it owned the scoreboard. Not too many years ago, that was true of SEC football, too. Advertisement This little Big Ten revolution spurred the SEC to double down on talking points. Anyone that spends that much time explaining must be losing a bit too much for comfort. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: SEC needs Big Ten in College Football Playoff propaganda blitz
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
College Football Playoff debate gives SEC's Greg Sankey chance to be hero
MIRAMAR BEACH, Fla. – SEC commissioner Greg Sankey bristles at the idea that he's a college sports villain. So, don't be the villain then. Be the hero the College Football Playoff needs. A man who's hailed as college sports' most powerful figure ought to flex his muscle to land a playoff format that both suits the SEC's needs, while remaining an open-access tournament, rather than stand by and let the playoff morph into a rigged SEC/Big Ten invitational. Advertisement The playoff's undecided format for 2026 and beyond is the subject of much debate here this week at the SEC's spring meetings. The conversation centers on two models featuring 16 teams. One model comes off as a sham. The other seems like a fairer format good for any top team, regardless of conference affiliation. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey talks with the media during SEC Media Days at Grand Bohemian Hotel on Oct. 16, 2024. In the sham corner, there's the 4+4+2+2+1 model loaded with 13 auto bids, plus three at-large selections. Auto bids would be preassigned to conferences before the season kicks off, with four apiece going to the Big Ten and the SEC, two going to the Big 12 and ACC, and one going to the top remaining conference champion. Some risk-averse Big Ten and SEC athletic directors support this structure. Most everyone else sees this model for what it is: a farse that predetermines bids based on a conference's brand and reputation instead of in-season meritocracy. Advertisement In the other corner, there's the open-access 5+11 model that divvies up five auto bids to the top conference champions and leaves 11 at-large bids up for grabs. SEC coaches took a shine to this model during their meetings here on Tuesday, Sankey said. 'At the coaching level, the question is, why wouldn't that be fine? Why wouldn't we do that?' Sankey said of the 5+11 model. Great questions. There's no good reason the SEC shouldn't embrace this model, if only athletic directors could reject the allure of preassigned bids. CRYING EYES: SEC coaches complain as college football burns ADULTS NEEDED: College 'leaders' acting like children in CFP fight SEC coaches prefer playoff model with more at-large bids SEC coaches, Sankey said, trust their teams' ability to earn at-large bids. Advertisement To wit, Ole Miss coach Lane Kiffin rejects the need for auto bids. He prefers a 16-team model designed to select the best teams, regardless of conference. Georgia's Kirby Smart, too, offered support for a playoff in which teams could hunt bids rather than have them preassigned based on affiliation. Would controversy surround at-large bids? Sure, but that's nothing new. Controversy accompanies postseason selections across NCAA sports. Somebody will feel 'snubbed,' but that's preferrable to preassigning bids based on conference clout. More clarity would be needed to determine how strength of schedule is calculated and how much it's weighted during the selection process. There's time to hammer out that strength of schedule piece in the coming months. Advertisement This 5+11 model leaves a mathematical path for the SEC – or any other conference – to claim as many as 12 playoff bids. The auto-bid model, by comparison, would restrict the SEC from accessing nine of the 16 bids. And yet, some SEC athletic directors just can't seem to resist the carrot of the conference being guaranteed four bids, even if that goes against coaches' apparent desire to leave more spots up for grabs to access through performance combined with strength of schedule. The auto-bid model reportedly enjoys strong support within the Big Ten. In fact, the idea seems to have originated from there. The SEC and Big Ten wield the power to shape the playoff's future format. Sankey has forged a warmer relationship with Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti than he had with Petitti's predecessor, but this playoff debate isn't the time for Sankey to cede the floor to his Big Ten buddy. Advertisement This moment calls on Sankey to assert his leadership to craft a playoff format that's good for the SEC, but without being rigged against other conferences with a stacked auto-bid system. May the best teams earn the bids, rather than the most powerful conferences be preassigned the bids. Greg Sankey was once a college sports hero. Can he reprise role? Sankey's been the hero once before. He saved the college football season in 2020, amid the COVID pandemic. That August, the Big Ten and Pac-12 initially opted to cancel their seasons. Sankey decided the SEC would play. The Big Ten and Pac-12 came to heel. Advertisement Sankey's leadership during the pandemic remains his finest hour. In the years since, Sankey moved to strengthen his conference's position, even if those moves challenged what might be good for college sports on the whole. The SEC's additions of Oklahoma and Texas ignited another round of conference realignment that weakened some conferences while the SEC and Big Ten grew in size and strength. Sankey repeatedly suggested March Madness needed reimagined, remarks that aged like milk on the pool deck of a beach resort. He's verbally sparred with fellow commissioners. Sankey took a villainous turn since the pandemic. He's not a lone wolf. Petitti operates behind the curtain for a stacked-deck playoff, but that doesn't mean Sankey and his conference must embrace this auto-bid plan. To hear SEC coaches tell it, they don't even want this crock of a 4+4+2+2+1 auto-bid format. Here's Sankey's chance to denounce this auto-bid sham, resist the elitist invitatinal, and steer an open-access format to the finish line. Advertisement Cast aside the black hat, and be the fair-minded hero this playoff debate needs. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: College Football Playoff debate gives Greg Sankey chance to be hero
