Tested at Fort Bragg, new military troop vehicle in production in North Carolina
RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — An evolved version of the iconic U.S. military's Jeep was tested in North Carolina at Fort Bragg and is now in production in North Carolina near Charlotte.
The 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg helped test and provide feedback as the vehicle was developed.
The item has a name that's much longer than 'Jeep' — the Infantry Squad Vehicle, which has now been in the field for a couple of years.
It's designed to quickly move up to nine soldiers and their gear over rough terrain — but not as a fighting vehicle because it has no armor, like a Jeep.
The U.S. Army says the ISV, officially the M1301, is transported easily by helicopters or other aircraft during air assault and airborne assault missions.
The first unit equipped with the ISV was the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg.
The ISV is made from the road-legal Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 midsize truck but has a doorless design, steel and aluminum body panels, and a rollover bar.
Initially, the U.S. Army awarded $214 million for just under 650 vehicles to GM Defense/Ricardo Defense in June 2020.
One key aspect of the vehicle is that 90 percent of the parts are commercial off-the-shelf items, which experts say cuts down on costs, stocking spare parts and time needed to fabricate parts.
The overall Amy requirement is for 2,593 ISVs, which are built in Mooresville by Hendrick Motorsports and then delivered to the military from a GM center about 20 miles away in Cabarrus County. The GM center, located in Concord, is a 75,000-square-foot facility that was built just for ISV production.
Of the total contract, 649 are planned for delivery by this year to 11 infantry brigade combat teams.
So far, foreign governments have shown an interest in the ISV, with Canada planning to buy 90 and possibly another 240, according to GM.
While the ISV is not armored, troops said its 5,000-pound light weight, low profile and speed are assets.
'When expecting an ambush, we used speed to blow through and return fire,' Pfc. Caden Wilhelm told military officials about testing at Fort Bragg.
The 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions used the ISV to help Hurricane Helene victims in western North Carolina last year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 Insightful Analyst Questions From General Motors's Q1 Earnings Call
General Motors delivered first quarter results that surpassed Wall Street's revenue and adjusted earnings expectations, but the market responded negatively due to concerns about margin pressure and evolving U.S. trade policy. Management attributed the modest sales growth to strong U.S. demand, especially for redesigned SUVs and pickups, while highlighting that cost pressures and scheduled plant downtime dampened profitability. CEO Mary Barra acknowledged, 'We are scrutinizing our discretionary spending everywhere and taking steps to ensure that we stay aligned with strong consumer demand for our ICE vehicles and the evolving regulatory environment.' Is now the time to buy GM? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $44.02 billion vs analyst estimates of $42.85 billion (2.3% year-on-year growth, 2.7% beat) Adjusted EPS: $2.78 vs analyst estimates of $2.66 (4.3% beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $5.21 billion vs analyst estimates of $6.07 billion (11.8% margin, 14.2% miss) Operating Margin: 7.6%, down from 8.7% in the same quarter last year Sales Volumes rose 1.8% year on year (3.7% in the same quarter last year) Market Capitalization: $46.34 billion While we enjoy listening to the management's commentary, our favorite part of earnings calls are the analyst questions. Those are unscripted and can often highlight topics that management teams would rather avoid or topics where the answer is complicated. Here is what has caught our attention. Itay Michaeli (TD Cowen) asked about the timeline for mitigating tariff impacts and whether similar relief could apply to imported vehicles. CFO Paul Jacobson replied that mitigation would take time, focusing on pricing, cost reductions, and supply chain adjustments, with ongoing evaluation of further policy changes. Joe Spak (UBS) questioned the composition of the 30% self-help offset and whether pricing assumptions were embedded. Jacobson clarified that pricing is assumed to remain flat, and offsets will come from internal cost actions, supply chain localization, and productivity gains. Dan Levy (Barclays) inquired about U.S. sales assumptions and the impact of shifting production for affordable vehicles currently assembled abroad. Jacobson noted that the company is prepared to adjust its manufacturing footprint as needed, leveraging existing U.S. capacity. Daniel Roska (Bernstein) asked about supplier pricing power under new tariffs. CEO Mary Barra emphasized GM's collaborative approach with suppliers to prevent opportunistic price increases and ensure greater efficiency instead of margin expansion. Adam Jonas (Morgan Stanley) sought updates on Super Cruise adoption and the role of automation and AI in GM's manufacturing strategy. Barra highlighted ongoing expansion of Super Cruise-equipped vehicles and the company's investment in AI and robotics to drive efficiency and product quality. Our analyst team is monitoring (1) the pace and effectiveness of GM's supply chain localization and tariff mitigation strategies, (2) progress in aligning EV production with consumer demand and improving EV profitability, and (3) continued market share gains in the U.S. driven by new ICE and EV models. The ability to maintain pricing discipline amid cost pressures and evolving trade dynamics will also be scrutinized. General Motors currently trades at $48.24, up from $47.19 just before the earnings. In the wake of this quarter, is it a buy or sell? The answer lies in our full research report (it's free). Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth. While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 5 Growth Stocks for this month. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+782% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New CEO of Jeep owner Stellantis starts with leadership shake-up
Antonio Filosa began his tenure as chief executive of US-European auto giant Stellantis on Monday with a leadership shake-up, as he seeks to jump-start performance at the struggling maker of Jeep, Peugeot and Fiat vehicles. The company veteran, an Italian who led Stellantis in North and South America, was named last month to succeed Portuguese CEO Carlos Tavares, who was sacked in December. Filosa, who turns 52 this week, is at the top of a 13-person leadership team with six members from France, four from Italy and three from the United States. "The team I'm announcing today draws on all that is best in Stellantis," Filosa said in a statement. Filosa will retain oversight of the North American region, the region that accounts for most company profits whose struggles last year precipitated the fall of Tavares. Doug Ostermann, an American who was chief financial officer, will oversee mergers and acquisitions while Monica Genovese replaces Maxime Picat as head of purchasing. Picat, who was once seen as a potential successor of Tavares, has been mentioned as a possible replacement for Renault's departing chief executive Luca de Meo. tsz-fmp/lth/cw Sign in to access your portfolio
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Hands-free face-off: BlueCruise vs. Super Cruise vs. Autopilot
'Hands-free' appeals to many drivers. Yet test data shows how each system handles the real world very differently. Here's what you need to know to choose wisely. How They Rank Ford's BlueCruise tops Consumer Reports' latest active driving assistance tests with 84 points; GM's Super Cruise follows at 75; Tesla's Autopilot lands at 61. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety assigns BlueCruise the strongest safeguard ratings, Super Cruise middling marks, and Autopilot a lower tier (IIHS, 2023). Meanwhile, NHTSA's EA22-002 report links several Autopilot overrides to incidents when drivers regained control under glare or faded lane lines. Testers describe a common highway stretch at dusk where lane markings blur. BlueCruise's eye-tracking camera warns early, then ends hands-free when maps lack recent updates. Super Cruise uses precise HD maps plus LIDAR-derived data to prompt a takeover smoothly as fading lines approach. Autopilot's vision-only stack hesitates under glare, requiring manual steering with less warning. Sensor and Software Breakdown ▪ BlueCruise relies on forward cameras plus infrared driver-monitoring. It restricts hands-free to designated 'Blue Zones' (Ford publishes region maps). Eye-tracking ensures the driver watches the road. ▪ Super Cruise combines high-definition LIDAR-scanned maps with radar and camera data. An infrared sensor checks head position; hands off feels secure until map data detects new construction or unclear markings. ▪ Autopilot (FSD Beta) uses a vision-only neural-net stack. It operates beyond geofenced highways but lacks the predictive map layer. Updates arrive over-the-air frequently, altering the cars behavior unpredictably. Transition tactics Each system alerts drivers differently: steering-wheel vibrations, audible chimes, dashboard prompts. BlueCruise's prompt can feel abrupt when exit ramps aren't in its database. Super Cruise often issues a gentle vibration before displaying 'Take Control' messages. Autopilot may allow slight steering inputs before disengaging, but reports note some drivers found the warning delay risky. Hands-free safety: Crash counts and fatalities compared GM's Super Cruise boasts over 160 million accident-free miles with no publicly documented fatal crashes under its engagement. Ford's BlueCruise has been implicated in approximately 32 reported crashes under NHTSA review, including two fatal collisions in Mustang Mach-E vehicles resulting in three deaths (NHTSA ODI, 2024). Tesla's Autopilot has been involved in 956 reported crashes reviewed by NHTSA and is linked to 51 reported fatalities to date (NHTSA EA22-002, 2024). Enthusiasts should note that reporting criteria vary, and ongoing probes may uncover further data, underscoring the importance of vigilance and understanding each system's limitations. Coverage and update cadence BlueCruise restricts hands-free to mapped stretches in the U.S., Canada, and select regions; Ford updates zone maps periodically. Super Cruise covers over 750,000 miles of roads in North America, with map updates via dealer visits or over-the-air in newer models. Autopilot's software changes often, but without map anchoring, performance can vary by region and conditions. Practical recommendations Match System to Drive Profile: If you log long interstate miles in mapped areas, Super Cruise offers predictability. For regional highway runs within Ford's Blue Zones, BlueCruise excels with strict gaze monitoring. If you enjoy frequent software tweaks and can stay vigilant for false positives, Autopilot may appeal-but treat it as a beta experiment. Test under Known Conditions: On a clear day, engage hands-free on a familiar highway. Note how each handles faded lines, curves, or light rain. Observe takeover warnings: Is the vibration firm? Is the chime clear? Does the prompt arrive early enough? Stay Alert at All Times: Hands-free does not mean eyes-free. Keep your gaze on the road even if systems allow relaxed hands. Note that NHTSA data demonstrate that incidents often occur within seconds of takeover. Check Map and Feature Coverage: Before relying on hands-free in a new region, verify if your route lies within BlueCruise or Super Cruise zones. Understand that Autopilot may operate but might misread unfamiliar markings. Plan for Updates and Maintenance: Factor in how frequently each system updates. Ford's BlueCruise zone updates may lag behind new roads. Super Cruise map refreshes often require dealer or connected-car service. Tesla's Autopilot updates automatically but can alter performance without warning. Essential metrics at a glance BlueCruise: CR score 84; top IIHS safeguards; strict eye-tracking; 32 crashes and 3 fatalities, limited to Blue Zones (Consumer Reports, 2025; IIHS, 2023). Super Cruise: CR score 75; broad HD-map network; LIDAR+radar support; smooth prompts; zero crashes and zero fatalities (160 million accident-free miles), map updates via OTA/dealer (Consumer Reports, 2025; GM, 2024). Autopilot: CR score 61; vision-only stack; wide availability; frequent software shifts; 956 crashes and 51 fatalities (Consumer Reports, 2025; NHTSA, 2022). Hands-free systems free your hands but not your responsibility. Choose BlueCruise for strict monitoring in mapped corridors. Opt for Super Cruise if you need broad coverage, map-driven predictability, and a perfect safety record. Treat Autopilot as NSFW; an evolving tool that demands constant vigilance. Test each under clear conditions, track updates, and always keep eyes forward. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
