Britain's MI6 spy agency gets its first female chief

Britain's real-life spies have finally caught up with James Bond. MI6 has appointed its first female chief.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced Sunday that Blaise Metreweli will be the next head of the U.K.'s foreign intelligence agency, and the first woman to hold the post since its founding in 1909. She is currently the MI6 director of technology and innovation — the real-world equivalent of Bond gadget-master Q.
A career intelligence officer, Metreweli, 47, steps from the shadows into the light as the only MI6 employee whose name is made public. She said "I am proud and honored to be asked to lead my Service."
Starmer said the 'historic appointment' comes at a time 'when the work of our intelligence services has never been more vital.
'The United Kingdom is facing threats on an unprecedented scale – be it aggressors who send their spy ships to our waters or hackers whose sophisticated cyber plots seek to disrupt our public services,' he said.
Starmer made the announcement as he arrived in the Canadian province of Alberta for a Group of Seven leaders' summit.
Metreweli takes over at MI6 as the agency faces growing challenges from states including China and Russia, whose use of cyber tools, espionage, and influence operations threatens global stability and British interests, even as it remains on alert against terrorist threats.
Metreweli is the first woman to get the top job, known as C – rather than M, the fictional MI6 chief of the 007 thrillers. M was played onscreen by Judi Dench in seven Bond movies starting in the 1990s.
She will take up her post in the fall, replacing Richard Moore, who has held the job for five years.
Britain's two other main intelligence agencies have already shattered the spy world's glass ceiling. MI5, the domestic security service, was led by Stella Rimington from 1992 to 1996 and Eliza Manningham-Buller between 2002 and 2007. Anne Keast-Butler became head of electronic and cyber-intelligence agency GCHQ in 2023.
Moore, an Oxford-educated former diplomat, fit the 007 mold like a Savile Row suit. But in recent years MI6 has worked to increase diversity, broadening its recruitment process from the traditional 'tap on the shoulder' at an elite university. The agency's website stresses its family-friendly flexible working policy and goal of recruiting 'talented people from all backgrounds.'
Moore suggested he would like his successor to be a woman. He wrote on X in 2023 that he would 'help forge women's equality by working to ensure I'm the last C selected from an all-male shortlist.'
Like many things about MI6, also known as the Secret Intelligence Service, the process of choosing a new chief took place out of public view. It began with the country's top civil servant writing to government departments in March asking them to put forward candidates. The job was open to applicants from other intelligence agencies, the civil service, the diplomatic service, the armed forces or the police.
In the end, MI6 opted for an internal candidate with a 25-year career in espionage, a degree in anthropology from Cambridge University — where she was on the women's rowing team — and expertise in cutting-edge technology.
'At a time of global instability and emerging security threats, where technology is power and our adversaries are working ever closer together, Blaise will ensure the U.K. can tackle these challenges head on to keep Britain safe and secure at home and abroad,' said Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who oversees MI6.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

33 minutes ago

• Telegraph

Don't trust two-tier Keir on Palestine Action. He hasn't turned sound

If a mystic with a crystal ball asked you last week to guess which political leader would try to ban a group with 'Palestine' in the name, you'd have plumped for Donald Trump. Turns out, however, it was Keir Starmer. I speak of Palestine Action, the neo-Corbynite clowns who infiltrated RAF Brize Norton on electric scooters to sabotage strategic aircraft. The Government says it will ban them as terrorists for their trouble. Has the Prime Minster finally gone sound? Has he heck. The petulant hoodlums will complain that unlike Hamas and the other groups on the list, they weren't trying to bomb anybody. That argument will probably prevail; the ban must win the support of both MPs and peers before coming into force, so it may never materialise. No, it's all about the headlines. Nigel Farage demanded that Palestine Action be proscribed in the morning and by the afternoon, Starmer had claimed the oxygen for his own. This created the impression that the Government takes our national security seriously, stands against the irritating Gaza radicals and is determined to crack down on treason. No need to vote Reform then, eh? He's a slippery fish, that prime minister. This is the most unprincipled government in living memory and its playbook is always the same. Wrongfoot and gaslight the public while advancing an agenda that nobody has voted for. Mark my words. After this, Starmer's betrayal of Israel will continue apace. Take the child sex gangs. The inquiry was a controlled explosion of a political landmine with senior Labour figures protected by spin. Meanwhile, this was Death Week, with infanticide and geronticide, neither of which were in Labour's manifesto, forced through the Commons. Thus the Government emerges as the shadowy winner while the country and its despairing people have lost. The same pattern can be seen in everything from the economy to immigration and defence. Starmer talks tough, cracks out a little U-turn, then when the heat has passed, pushes on with his agenda, making superficial modifications to throw us off the scent. Last week, for instance, it emerged that our rising defence budget will also fund Heathrow's third runway, reduce food prices and bolster supply chains. The Prime Minister told us he was serious about defending the realm, but he didn't really mean it. The Palestine Action episode is the same. This government is now the most Israelophobic since the Fifties. It has suspended arms export licences while continuing to provide them to the repressive regimes of Qatar, Turkey and Egypt. It has sanctioned objectionable Israeli ministers while leaving far more chauvinistic regional figures untouched. The Tunisian president, for example, demands 'all the land of Palestine' for the Arabs. No two-state solution there. No British sanctions, either. It has presided over crackdowns on free speech and two-tier policing of the Gaza mobs. Just as sensible voters reach the end of their tether, however, Sir Keir throws sand in their eyes on Palestine Action. Now it is the turn of his Corbynite Left to feel the burn. But this is nothing more than an exercise in damage limitation; as always, the pendulum will swing back the other way, only – crucially – not as far as its original position. Thus public rage is subdued while the Overton Window creeps inexorably leftwards. You can feel it, can't you? You know you're being conned but you can't quite put your finger on it. As the months pass, a browbeaten and confused electorate finds the country drifting away beneath its feet, little by little becoming unrecognisable.

Powys County Times

an hour ago

• Powys County Times

More than 400 migrants arrive in the UK crossing the Channel in small boats

More than 400 further migrants have arrived in the UK having crossed the Channel in small boats despite the French police taking a tougher stance to control the departures. According to Home Office figures, 437 people made the crossing on Friday June 20 in seven boats, bringing the total for the year so far to 17,817. This compares to 12,313 by the same date in 2024 and 10,518 in 2023 while 11,690 had made the crossing by June 20 in 2022. The latest arrivals come after Sir Keir Starmer said the situation was 'deteriorating' and threatened a visa crackdown. The Prime Minister signalled that countries which did not do enough to tackle the irregular migration crisis, for example by taking back failed asylum seekers, could face repercussions in the numbers of visas issued to their citizens. Sir Keir's message came as French police were seen to employ more robust tactics on the beaches this week including using teargas. But they were also seen to stand by and watch once migrants had entered the water to board a dinghy in the hope of crossing the English Channel.

The Sun

an hour ago

• The Sun

Britain's borders are broken – and we can only mend them by bringing in ID cards

FOR most people that I meet , concern about immigration is more about those arriving on small boats than those coming legally to study or work. It is the undocumented arrivals that worry people, not least when they remain here illegally and disappear into the sub-economy organised by criminal gangs. 2 Over 40,000 people arrived on our shores from France last year, and that number is expected to be much higher in 2025. Unknown numbers of those arriving this way are not claiming asylum but are absorbed into the 'black market'. They melt away to work as cash-in-hand labourers or in car washes or barbers' shops in towns and cities across the United Kingdom. It is a cycle of exploitation that leaves everyone poorer. Illegal immigrants are paid a pittance, British workers are undercut, and the state does not get any tax from this illicit economy. We have the tools to confront this abuse - but have failed to use it. The time has come to bring in ID cards. I have spoken over many years about the importance of introducing a comprehensive and robust identity system in the UK. But we have reached a moment of reckoning. The government must grasp the nettle and come up with a proper plan for ID cards, and all the safeguards that must go with it. Identity cards are a simple, cheap and practical way of tackling the illegal immigration crisis and the black market. Everyone with a right to live and work in Britain would have their details on their card. For most of us, the card would be uploaded to our smartphone - like the NHS app or our Covid vaccine passports. If someone does not have a smartphone they could carry a small ID card around in their wallet, just like a driving licence. This simple, pocket-sized card would immediately transform the state's ability to crack down on illegal immigration. At a glance the authorities would be able to tell if someone is in Britain legally or illegally. If migrants needed an ID card to work in Britain, claim benefits or receive NHS treatment, they would be far less likely to come here illegally, something that the Government has already acknowledged in the White Paper in May. By its very existence, the scheme would stem the tide of small boat migrants. Bosses would be required to check that all their workers have a proper ID card. If they didn't then sorry - no job. Dodgy bosses who hire illegal immigrants without the proper ID would be more easily identified by inspectors. Without the ability to earn cash, illegal migrants would be far less likely to come here in the first place. Those who are here would be more easily identified and deported. This would in turn help British workers, whose wages would no longer be undercut by illegal workers. And it would help the British state by ensuring businesses are legitimate and paying their fair share of tax. 2 I know ID cards can work because I tested them when I was Home Secretary. Sadly only 15,000 were rolled out. Back then, in the early 2000s, migrants were being smuggled into the UK hidden in lorries arriving through the Channel Tunnel. We saw that trade slashed by two thirds. People smuggling gangs realised it was not worth trafficking people to the UK if they could not work or claim benefits here. ID cards worked. It made no sense to ditch them. But the Coalition government of 2010 scrapped them. That was a decision that has harmed our borders ever since. I wont pretend ID cards were not controversial. Civil liberties campaigners railed against the scheme raising the spectrum of a knock on the door and a demand to see proof of identity. But this was always a farcical caricature. Most of us have willingly handed over our data when we sign up for a social media account, or get a loyalty card with our favourite supermarket. Big tech companies like Elon Musk's X or Facebook already know nearly all our details and have the capacity to analyse our online activity. Mobile phones track our activity; where we have gone that day and even how many steps we have taken. The introduction of ID cards would not create a police state, but would be a crucial weapon in our armoury to fight illegal immigration. Properly organised, with built in safeguards, an identity system of this kind would safeguard us all.