logo
Oakdale explores switch from PG&E to MID. How much might residents save on power?

Oakdale explores switch from PG&E to MID. How much might residents save on power?

Yahoo10-05-2025

Oakdale leaders, alarmed by recent spikes in PG&E power bills, are looking to switch to the Modesto Irrigation District.
The City Council voted 5-0 on Monday, May 5, to recruit a consulting firm to explore the idea in detail. It came over a protest from PG&E, which said rate relief is coming and the system is not for sale in any case.
Interim City Manager Jerry Ramar said homes could save $257 a month on average based on the current rate structures. He cautioned that the transition costs could cancel out the benefits.
Supporters told of residents paying several hundred dollars a month for air-conditioning during heat waves.
'I do live next to people who have to run their fans all summer, and they are actually hot, very hot,' Councilmember Kayleigh Gilbert said.
About 7,000 of Oakdale's homes, the vast majority, have PG&E hookups. Some of the newer subdivisions are in MID because of a circa-2000 effort to bring competition to the California grid.
The switch would need approval from the MID board, the Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission. The process could mean several years of legal wrangling.
As a public agency, MID can charge less for electricity than PG&E because it does not have to earn profits for investors. It also does not serve mountainous areas, where PG&E has incurred huge costs for wildfires sparked by its wires.
Oakdale would have three main obligations before joining MID, said an email from Melissa Williams, the utility's public affairs manager. One is paying for an analysis of how this would affect the overall system. The city also would have to cover the cost of extending MID service and reimburse PG&E for its infrastructure.
Those assets includes poles and wires along city streets and Oakdale's share of PG&E power plants and transmission lines around the West.
Monday's vote was for Ramar to contact firms that could do a feasibility study, which he said might run $50,000 to $75,000 and take a year. The council would have to approve the contract at a future meeting.
MID was founded in 1887 to provide Tuolumne River water to farms, as was the neighboring Turlock Irrigation District. Both began in the 1920s to generate cheap hydropower for sale to local homes and businesses. Population growth prompted them to add other sources, first fossil fuels and later wind and solar.
MID's original service area takes in much of the zone bounded by the Tuolumne, Stanislaus and San Joaquin rivers. Oakdale lies within the Oakdale Irrigation District, which generates Stanislaus hydropower for sale to distant users rather than city residents.
MID gained its Oakdale customers as part of a grid reform that also gave it access to part of the Ripon area and to all of Mountain House. The latter was an entirely new town northwest of Tracy.
MID and TID now have close to a quarter-million electricity customers between them. PG&E also evolved over the past century-plus and today serves about 16 million users of power, gas or both.
Electricity bills have one charge to cover fixed costs, such as salaries, and rates that vary with monthly consumption. Users are penalized for high use.
Ramar said his estimate was based on average MID consumption of 850 kilowatt-hours per home in a month. The district charges 18 cents for each of the first 500 kilowatt-hours and 21 cents for the other 350.
PG&E's rates are 63 cents per kilowatt-hour during peak demand 40 cents at other times, the city manager said.
The speaker from PG&E was Eric Alvarez, government affairs representative for Stanislaus and four other counties. He is a Modesto City Council member but recuses himself from matters involving that city.
Alvarez acknowledged that high summer bills 'cause a hardship for many of our Central Valley customers.' But he said no rate hike is planned this year and 2026 will bring a drop of about 5 cents per kilowatt-hour.
Alvarez also mentioned a $15 billion federal loan guarantee that will help PG&E's upgrade its sources and transmission capacity.
PG&E has paid major settlements following wildfires and also is burying the lines in many vulnerable areas. During winter, it contends with snow and wind in the mountains.
The council said Oakdale residents need help sooner than PG&E offered. Member Jared Pitassi said this could especially aid renters hoping to become owners. He added that his own house is on MID power, never topping $160 per month.
'I think it's fair for us to stand up for the residents,' Pitassi said. '... It really ticks me off how much they have to pay.'
Alvarez warned Oakdale against trying to acquire the system through eminent domain, which happens when governments cannot get owners to sell. And he noted the ongoing attempt by the South San Joaquin Irrigation District to take over PG&E customers within its boundaries.
SSJID generates hydropower on the Stanislaus River in a partnership with OID. It has proposed since 2008 to use it as a cheaper source than PG&E in Manteca, Ripon, Escalon and other towns. Alvarez said this has cost SSJID about $28 million in legal and other costs so far.
He concluded with these words for the Oakdale council: 'We are committed to providing safe, clean, reliable and affordable energy to our customers in Oakdale, and while we understand the focus on affordability, exploring a public takeover that isn't viable and would create additional risk and costs will not benefit residents and customers.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Schools can now directly pay college athletes after landmark $2.8 billion settlement
Schools can now directly pay college athletes after landmark $2.8 billion settlement

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Schools can now directly pay college athletes after landmark $2.8 billion settlement

College athletes will undergo yet another historic change. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken approved the $2.8 billion settlement in the House v. NCAA case on Friday, which allows schools to directly compensate student-athletes. Advertisement Under the new agreement, each participating Division I school can distribute up to $20.5 million annually to athletes, with that cap increasing over the next decade. The NCAA logo at the Division I Men's Golf Championships in 2025. NCAA Photos via Getty Images Moreover, it will provide $2.8 billion in payback to former athletes dating back to 2016, addressing past restrictions on NIL, to some extent. Judge Wilken's approval in court also addressed concerns regarding roster limits that would've likely impacted walk-on athletes. The settlement introduces the 'Designated Student-Athletes' tag, which is intended to allow those impacted by roster changes to return or transfer without worrying about being penalized. Advertisement NCAA President Charlie Baker discussed the settlement in a lengthy open letter. 'Many looked to April's hearing about the House settlement as a culmination of sorts, but the court's final approval of the settlement in fact marks a new beginning for Division I student-athletes and for the NCAA,' Baker wrote. 'For several years, Division I members crafted well-intentioned rules and systems to govern financial benefits from schools and name, image and likeness opportunities, but the NCAA could not easily enforce these for several reasons. 'The result was a sense of chaos: instability for schools, confusion for student-athletes and too often litigation. Sometimes member schools even supported that litigation — some of which spurred hastily imposed court orders upending the rules,' he continued. The NCAA logo is shown on signage before the Division III Men's Ice Hockey Championship held at University Nexus Center on March 30, 2025 in Utica, New York. NCAA Photos via Getty Images Baker additionally acknowledged the challenges ahead involving more change, noting: Advertisement 'Going forward, the defendant conferences will be responsible for implementing several elements of the settlement, including the design and enforcement of the annual 22.5 percent cap (approximately $20.5 million in year one) for financial benefits a Division I school may direct to student-athletes,' he outlined. 'In addition, the court maintains jurisdiction over the implementation of the settlement, and the plaintiffs will continue to track progress.' Baker hailed this as positive, adding, 'The defendant conferences are also responsible for launching and enforcing a series of rules regarding the third-party NIL contracts student-athletes may enter into. With these reforms, along with scholarships and other benefits, student-athletes at many schools will be able to receive nearly 50 percent of all athletics department revenue. That is a tremendously positive change and one that was long overdue.' Baker concluded by pointing out that 'change at this scale is never easy.' Changes are set to take effect beginning on July 1.

Active trading in a Roth IRA: 5 key things to consider first
Active trading in a Roth IRA: 5 key things to consider first

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Active trading in a Roth IRA: 5 key things to consider first

A Roth IRA is considered by many financial experts to be the best retirement plan out there. Workers can invest money on an after-tax basis and then withdraw their funds in retirement (after age 59 1/2) tax-free. They can enjoy decades of compounding growth and never owe the taxman a cent as long as they follow the plan's rules. No wonder it's the experts' favorite plan! Because the Roth IRA eliminates one of the major costs of trading — taxes — some investors may think they can actively trade their way into even greater gains. They might consider day trading with a top broker or even trading every few months after a stock's big price swing rather than focusing on buy-and-hold investing, which is a time-tested strategy. But should you actively trade in a Roth IRA? These are the key things to consider first. Learn more: Planning to retire in 10 years? Do these 6 things first Some investors may be concerned that they can't actively trade in a Roth IRA. But there's no rule from the IRS that says you can't do so. So you won't get in legal trouble if you do. But there may be some extra fees if you trade certain kinds of investments. For example, while brokers won't charge you for trading in and out of stocks and most ETFs on a short-term basis, many mutual fund companies will charge you an early redemption fee if you sell the fund. This fee is usually assessed only if you've owned the fund for fewer than 30 days. The ability to avoid taxes on your investments is an incredible benefit. You'll be able to escape — perfectly legally — taxes on dividends and capital gains. Not surprisingly, this superpower makes the Roth IRA very popular, but to enjoy its benefits, you must abide by a few rules. The Roth IRA limits you to a $7,000 maximum annual contribution for 2025 ($8,000 if age 50 or older), and you won't be able to withdraw earnings tax-free from the account until retirement age (59 1/2) or later and after owning the account for at least five years. However, you can withdraw your contributions to the account without being taxed at any time, but you won't be able to replace those contributions later. The Roth IRA offers a number of other benefits, and retirement savers should look into it. Many traders use margin in their accounts. With a margin loan, the broker extends your capital to invest beyond what you actually own. It's a useful tool, especially if you're trading frequently. Unfortunately, margin loans are not available in IRA accounts. For frequent traders, the ability to trade on margin is not just about magnifying your returns. It's also about having the ability to sell a position and immediately buy another. In a cash account (like a Roth IRA), you have to wait for a transaction to settle, and that typically takes a day. In the meantime, you may be unable to trade with that money even though it's credited to your account. A margin account allows you to buy and then trade immediately, as long as you have enough equity in the account. And that can be an advantage in fast-moving markets. So you can trade actively in a Roth IRA, but should you? Research consistently shows that passive investing beats active investing, whether you're an individual investor or a professional. And it's the advice that top financial advisors routinely offer their clients. For example, a 2024 study from S&P Dow Jones Indices shows that about 57 percent of fund managers investing in large companies underperformed their benchmark in the previous year. This deficit increased over time, and in a 20-year period, roughly 90 percent of pros failed to beat their benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis. These are pros with analysts and high-powered tools trained to beat the market. Instead, you can beat most pros by sticking to a passive approach, and you'll earn the market's returns. One approach is to buy a fund based on the S&P 500 Index, a collection of hundreds of the largest publicly traded companies. The index has returned about 10 percent annually over long periods, but you'll need to hold the fund over time to enjoy its returns. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals If you're trading in a taxable brokerage account, you'll get a tax write-off if you make a losing investment. Some investors even make sure they're getting the largest write-off they can using a process called tax-loss harvesting. They scoop up that benefit and then even repurchase the stock or fund later (after 30 days) if they think it's poised to rise in the future. But if you're trading in a Roth IRA, you won't get the ability to write off losses. Changes to the tax code in 2017 eliminated the ability to claim any benefit from losses in an IRA account. An IRA is meant to fund your retirement, not to speculate on investments. You need that money to be there later and you can't afford to lose it. So the best IRA strategy for most investors is to use a traditional investing strategy — long-term buy-and-hold investing with low-cost index funds. Index funds invest passively, meaning they track a target index, such as the S&P 500, the Russell 2000, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the Nasdaq 100 or some other. These funds don't make active trading decisions and simply hold whatever the index holds. This strategy means the funds don't cost a lot to manage, and they end up passing the cost savings on to investors in the form of lower expense ratios, the annual cost to own the fund. The best ETFs will cost you just a few dollars per year for every $10,000 you have invested. MORE: How to turn $1,000 into $1 million, according to a top wealth advisor One popular investment strategy is to buy three index funds — one based on the largest companies, one for medium-sized firms and one for the smallest companies. Then add to your investments regularly each year — perhaps through the process of dollar-cost averaging. But the key part of this strategy is to continue to hold over time, to let your investments keep compounding. You also won't need to spend a lot of time following the market, as an active investor likely would — and most importantly, you're more likely to end up with better results. Those who are thinking about actively trading in their Roth IRA (or traditional IRA, for that matter) should carefully consider the costs and potential benefits. It's tough to beat the market and you must spend huge amounts of time to do so, when you're more likely to outperform most investors with a few basic index funds and a simple buy-and-hold strategy. Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

IndyCar Announces New Car For  2028 Season With Testing In Early 2026
IndyCar Announces New Car For  2028 Season With Testing In Early 2026

Forbes

time43 minutes ago

  • Forbes

IndyCar Announces New Car For 2028 Season With Testing In Early 2026

Will Power, Team Penske Chevrolet prior to the NTT IndyCar Series XPEL Grand Prix at Road America on ... More June 21, 2025 in Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin. (Photo by Michael L. Levitt/Lumen via Getty Images) IndyCar announced on Saturday, June 21 that a new car will be introduced to the series in 2028 and it will be ready for testing in early 2026. The information was also shared with team owners Saturday at Road America, site of Sunday's XPEL Grand Prix at Road America. Extensive planning and collaborative design work continues for the new chassis, with thorough on-track testing scheduled for early 2026. Dallara Continues As Chassis Builder Dallara will produce the chassis, which will feature a look designed to appeal to a new generation of fans while keeping styling cues recognized by all as an IndyCar Series car. Dallara has produced chassis for the series since 1997 and has been the series' exclusive chassis supplier since 2008. 'The time has come for a new NTT IndyCar Series chassis," IndyCar President J. Douglas Boles said. 'The DW12 served the series so well, as it provided a combination of phenomenal, wheel-to-wheel racing and critical enhancements to safety. But recent significant updates to the car – from the aeroscreen to the hybrid power unit – have helped advance the need for a completely new car. 'We are pleased by what our engineers and Dallara have collaboratively designed and believe it will appeal to the fans and paddock while also upholding our standards of safety and enhancing IndyCar's on-track competition well into the future.' Three areas – competition, powertrain development and safety – are pillars of the engineering, design and development of the new car. The new car will enhance the ultra-competitive nature of the NTT IndyCar Series by being even better suited for racing on all four types of circuits the series visits – superspeedways, short ovals, street circuits and permanent road courses. Evolution of the new chassis has included work by Dallara and recently developed simulation technology, aimed at enhancing overall raceability. Working in tandem with Dallara and other component suppliers, the overall car design includes a projected weight reduction of 85-100 pounds compared to the current IndyCar Series chassis. Plans also include a move to a 2.4-liter twin-turbocharged V-6 internal combustion engine, which is expected to provide more torque and power over the current engine formula. Xtrac, an exclusive supplier for IndyCar since 2000, will continue to provide transmissions for the new chassis. Development for 2028 includes a gearbox that will shed 25 pounds from the currently used unit and one that will share components with a future INDY NXT by Firestone gearbox – streamlining components for teams also involved in IndyCar's development series. Low-voltage hybrid engine technology, introduced to series competition with a successful launch in July 2024, will continue to evolve in the new car with longer deployment, more horsepower gain and overall improved performance. Performance Friction Corporation (PFC) once again will be the exclusive supplier of brake system components for the series, as it has since 2017. Safety also will continue to be a focus of Dallara's design, in close collaboration with IndyCar technical and medical response officials. The new car will bolster safety to new benchmarks with an ergonomic driver cockpit to improve seating position, an integrated aeroscreen and a new roll hoop. The existing chassis was retrofitted with the aeroscreen upon that revolutionary safety device's introduction in 2020. Renderings and more information about the new car, along with additional partners, will be announced at a later date. This new car update and plan continues the upward trajectory of North America's premier open-wheel series. Recent milestones include FOX viewership results of a 27 percent year-over-year gain while averaging 2 million viewers for the 2025 season, a partnership renewal with longtime tire supplier Firestone, the announcement of the IndyCar Grand Prix of Arlington in partnership with the Dallas Cowboys, Texas Rangers and city of Arlington, Texas, starting in 2026 and the acquisition of the Acura Grand Prix of Long Beach by Penske Entertainment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store