logo
Judge dismisses charges for 98 migrants who crossed into New Mexico military zone

Judge dismisses charges for 98 migrants who crossed into New Mexico military zone

Yahoo16-05-2025

Trespassing charges for dozens who crossed into a new military zone in New Mexico have been dismissed by a federal judge.
Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory Wormuth began filing dismissals late Wednesday into Thursday, reported Reuters, citing court documents. Wormuth ruled that migrants did not know they were entering the New Mexico military zone and therefore could not be charged.
A total of 98 people had the trespassing charges dropped, according to ABC News.
The migrants still face charges for crossing the border illegally, reported Reuters.
Dozens have received 'Title 50' charges for crossing into military defense property, a 170-square-mile strip along the base of New Mexico, also known as the Roosevelt Reservation, according to a news release by the United States Attorney for the District of New Mexico.
The corridor was recently transferred from the Department of the Interior to the Department of Defense and is now being treated as an extension of U.S. Army Garrison Fort Huachuca, the news release said.
The land is subject to military patrols and surveillance, with "U.S. troops authorized to temporarily detain and transfer individuals to federal law enforcement for prosecution."
According to Reuters, Wormuth pushed back against the trespassing charges and ordered New Mexico U.S. Attorney Ryan Ellison, who filed the first trespassing charges, to show proof that migrants arrested in the New Mexico zone knew they had entered a restricted area.
Defense attorneys argued that warning signs in the area were inadequate to inform migrants they were committing a crime, a position Wormuth agreed with, Reuters reported.
A second military zone has also been created in the El Paso area, which will be part of the Fort Bliss Army base. The area stretches about 53 miles east to the border community of Fort Hancock.
Natassia Paloma may be reached at npaloma@gannett.com, @NatassiaPaloma on Twitter; natassia_paloma on Instagram, and Natassia Paloma Thompson on Facebook.
More: Amnesty International report finds disregard for human rights in El Paso ICE facility
This article originally appeared on El Paso Times: Charges dismissed for migrants who crossed into military zone

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US leaders warn Iran against retaliation after strikes on nuclear facilities

timean hour ago

US leaders warn Iran against retaliation after strikes on nuclear facilities

In the hours after its military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, U.S. officials suggested Iran ought to embrace a diplomatic off-ramp rather than choosing to retaliate. "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace," President Donald Trump said late Saturday in an address to the nation, flanked by Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. "This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days," Trump said. U.S. officials on Sunday morning doubled down on the president's message, calling for a diplomatic process and threatening Iran with additional military action should it choose to retailiate for the U.S. attack. Vance suggested the U.S. was not interested in a broader war or a conflict beyond its strikes on the Iranian nuclear program. 'We're not at war with Iran; we're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' Vance said on ABC News' "This Week." At a Pentagon news conference, Hegseth said the nuclear program was 'the line the president set' and that the 'overwhelming' military action should invite peace. 'Iran, in that sense, has a choice,' Hegseth said. 'But we've made it very clear to them -- this is nuclear sites, this is nuclear capabilities. This is the line that the president set, and we set that back.' 'Now is the time to come forward for peace,' he said. The defense secretary did not clarify any potential parameters for negotiations but said the U.S. was sending messages directly to Iran and 'giving them every opportunity to come to the table.' 'They understand precisely what the American position is, precisely what steps they can take to allow for peace, and we hope they do so,' he said. Hegseth said the scope of the U.S. attack -- which struck three nuclear sites including the uranium enrichment facility located deep underground in Fordo -- was 'intentionally limited" and not aimed at "regime change." Trump ordered that the offensive "is most certainly not open-ended,' Hegseth said, calling the attack 'a focused, powerful and clear mission on the destruction of Iranian nuclear capabilities.' 'Those were the targets. That's what was struck. That was overwhelming,' the defense secretary said. Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters at the Pentagon on Sunday that the U.S. was prepared for a potential response from Iran. Caine said 'any Iranian retaliation or proxy attacks…would be an incredibly poor choice,' and Hegseth noted U.S. and allies' assets near Iran. The secretary said the strikes -- which included 14 massive ordnances flown by seven stealth bombers -- "devastated" their targets and left Tehran's nuclear ambitions "obliterated." Caine said a damage assessment was " way too early" to report, but said the operation had 'severely damaged' the targeted facilities. The president suggested Saturday that Iranian retaliation would amount to an escalation and would warrant U.S. attacks which would be 'far worse' than the strikes on nuclear sites. Instead, Trump, Vance, Rubio and Hegseth are signaling to Iran that it should return to the negotiating table to discuss Iran's nuclear program. The U.S. and Iran held five rounds of diplomatic talks -- with a sixth round scheduled -- before Israel attacked Iran last week and the U.S. joined with strikes of its own on Saturday. 'I think it is irrelevant to ask Iran to return to diplomacy because we were in the middle of diplomacy,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Sunday. 'We were in the middle of talks with the United States when [the] Israelis blew it up. And again, we were in the middle of talks and negotiation with Europeans, [which] happened only two days ago in Geneva, when this time Americans decided to blow it up,' he said,– referencing his hastily arranged meetings with European leaders on Friday. 'So we were in diplomacy. But we were attacked,' he added. Rubio, America's top diplomat, characterized those talks as delaying tactics by Tehran. 'They play too many games,' he said Sunday on Fox News. 'They use diplomacy to hide behind and obfuscate and think they can buy themselves time. They think they're cute, they're not cute, and they're not going to get away with this stuff, not under President Trump.' Rubio said repeatedly that regime change was not the objective of the attacks, but he suggested a renewed Iranian nuclear buildup would change Washington's calculus. 'If Iran is committed to becoming a nuclear-weapons power, I do think it puts the regime at risk. I think it would be the end of the regime if they tried to do that,' he said.

Cotton: Trump took ‘decisive action' to ensure Iran does obtain nuclear weapon
Cotton: Trump took ‘decisive action' to ensure Iran does obtain nuclear weapon

The Hill

time2 hours ago

  • The Hill

Cotton: Trump took ‘decisive action' to ensure Iran does obtain nuclear weapon

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) on Sunday touted President Trump's 'decisive action' in directing U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities this weekend. In an interview on ABC News's 'This Week,' Cotton was asked whether he thinks the strikes destroyed the nuclear program or simply set it back. 'Well, I think we heard from General Caine, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that obviously, we have a few days left of battle damage assessment,' Cotton said. 'But there's no doubt that, because of the president's decisive action, we have severely damaged Iran's critical nuclear infrastructure, which is what the president has said he would do for 10 years if we thought Iran was getting close to a nuclear weapon,' Cotton added. Cotton said Americans have been 'terrorized' by Iran for nearly 50 years, and for more than half that time, 'American presidents have worried about them getting a nuclear weapon, have said that they'd never be allowed to.' 'Finally, President Trump has taken decisive action to ensure that they're not going to get nuclear weapons on his watch,' Cotton added. Trump announced Saturday the United States had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites and called on Iran to make peace quickly or face more attacks. 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' Trump said Saturday night in an address to the nation from the East Room of the White House. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chair Dan Caine briefed reporters Sunday morning on U.S. strikes that hit three Iranian nuclear facilities. The bombs targeted three nuclear sites in Natanz, Esfahan and Fordow, located inside a mountain. Six 'bunker buster' bombs were reportedly dropped on Fordow, while more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles were launched at the other two sites. The bombings put the U.S. directly in Iran's crosshairs for retaliation and made it an active participant in the Mideast war, which Israel launched with airstrikes against Iran on June 13.

Homeland Security warns of possible terrorist attacks in US following strike on Iran
Homeland Security warns of possible terrorist attacks in US following strike on Iran

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Homeland Security warns of possible terrorist attacks in US following strike on Iran

The Department of Homeland Security issued a terrorism alert on Sunday — warning of possible Iranian attacks against the US following the American airstrikes against Tehran's nuclear program. DHS warned officials to be on the lookout for Iranian-led attacks over the next three months by terror cells inspired to retaliate following Saturday night's strike. 'The likelihood of violent extremists in the Homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland,' DHS said in a statement. Advertisement Iranians at a rally in Tehran after the US airstrikes on three of the countries nuclear facilities on June 22, 2025. via REUTERS Along with the possibility of extremist attacks on US soil, officials warned that the chances of both cyberattacks and antisemitic acts are likely to increase. The advisory comes after the NYPD put out its own alert last night, with Gov. Hochul upping security at the MTA and Port Authority.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store