Campaigners 'concerned' by Scottish buffer zones 'weakness'
The legislation – which started as a member's bill proposed by Green MSP Gillian Mackay – enforced 200m exclusion zones around 30 sites in Scotland in an attempt to limit intimidating protests held outside of clinics.
Mackay has repeatedly insisted the legislation is in place 24 hours a day, with the law stating that if an offending act has a 'continuing effect', it 'does not matter' whether any patient is attempting to access services in the zone at the time.
But in an email between a police inspector in Glasgow and an MSP, the officer said legal advice from Police Scotland lawyers and the Crown Office concluded the legislation cannot be enforced when clinics are not operating.
READ MORE: More than 100 anti-abortion protesters target Glasgow hospital
The exchange was sparked after the MSP sought clarity about a protest held outside the Sandyford Clinic in Glasgow by the Scottish Family Party on April 12, which was closed due to it being a Saturday, telling police constituents had been 'understandably distressed' by the protest.
Responding, the inspector referenced a similar incident in March at a clinic in Edinburgh, where advice had been sought and officers told the ban could not be enforced and the Crown would not prosecute if the facility was not open.
Lucy Grieve, who started the campaign group Back Off Scotland that pressed for the introduction of buffer zones for several years with co-founder Alice Murray, said she feels frustrated a 'point of weakness' has emerged in the law given they had been reassured throughout the passage of the legislation that it was 'the strongest bill in the land'.
'I think a lot of the groups that are protesting when the clinic is closed are just screaming into the void essentially, but I would say it's very frustrating when so many times we heard this bill was so robust, and that's why it was taking so long, that this has been left as a point of weakness,' she told The National.
(Image: NQ) 'I'd say it's a lesson for drafting stuff in the future. Certainly the Government and Gillian really reassured us it was going to be the strongest bill in the land so the fact this has been a slip-up is concerning and frustrating.'
Grieve (above, left) said given Back Off Scotland had heard a lot of testimony on staff coming across protesters after opening hours when they leave work, she hoped Police Scotland would take this into consideration.
Murray (above, right) added: 'I think the worry is they [protesters] see this as a loophole and this spirals into a bigger issue.'
READ MORE: Police decline to intervene as anti-abortion group ignores buffer zone
Murray also suggested that because the Scottish bill focuses on punishing people based on the impact their actions have on a patient or staff member rather than the specific behaviours of protesters, the law could be 'up for interpretation'.
She said: 'If you're seen to be doing behaviour that could intimidate or harass etc, and because it is written in that way, that does leave room for interpretation because if you're saying it's illegal to intimidate or harass, and a protester then says that's impossible when there's no one inside, then that is up for interpretation.'
Grieve said despite the concern, complaints to Back Off Scotland had dropped since the law came in and the law has been shown to be effective with it resulting an arrest earlier this year.
The law clearly states that a person in a safe access zone is committing an offence if they act with the intention of or are reckless as to whether the act has the effect of:
Influencing the decision of another person to access, provide or facilitate the provision of abortion services
Preventing or impeding another person from accessing, providing or facilitating the provision of abortion services
Causing harassment, alarm or distress to another person in connection with the other person's decision to access, provide or facilitate the provision of abortion services
It goes on to say that if the offending act has a 'continuing effect', it 'does not matter' whether any patient is attempting to access services in the zone at the time.
Mackay said earlier this week she would be seeking a meeting with Police Scotland and the Scottish Government on the issue following the 'surprising and disappointing' intervention from police.
The Green MSP said the Holyrood committee scrutinising the law discussed proposals that would have limited the operating hours of buffer zones but did not support them and they were not moved or included in the legislation.
The Scottish Government has said an act carried out which has an impact within the zone when a clinic is closed, but which could continue to have that impact once services are open, could give rise to an offence.
'However, this will always be a matter for enforcement agencies and will depend on all the facts and circumstances of the case,' a spokesperson went on.
There are calls for a buffer zone at the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital to be extended beyond 200m after more than 100 protesters gathered just outside the zone earlier this month.
Mackay said: "Like most laws, buffer zones were designed to apply all day every day and should be enforced that way.
"The committee scrutinising the act took time to consider proposals that would have limited the operating hours of buffer zones but did not support them. These proposals were not moved or included in the legislation.
"I am very concerned by Police Scotland's comments on this and am even more concerned that their policy will serve as an invitation for more protesters to target health facilities.
"Abortion rights are human rights. I have written to Police Scotland to seek an urgent meeting to discuss the situation and their approach to enforcement."
The Scottish Government and Police Scotland have been contacted for further comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
11 minutes ago
- The National
Keir Starmer accused of 'gaslighting' statement on US bombing of Iran
The Prime Minister posted on social media following news of the attack, with his comments gathering 1.7 million views and thousands of furious comments. Starmer said the US bombing was taken to 'alleviate' the threat of Iran developing a nuclear weapon. 'The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority,' he wrote. READ MORE: 'I spent 16 months in Gaza amid Israel's genocide. Here's what I saw' 'We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis.' Starmer's comments prompted a furious response from politicians and social media users. Former first minister Humza Yousaf said: 'An awful statement from the PM, which ignores our collective responsibility to uphold international law. 'Supporting illegal military action in Iran, and gas-lighting us about an imminent nuclear threat, is hauntingly reminiscent of the lies told in the run up to the Iraq war.' (Image: PA) Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said: 'This is a deplorable response, but all too predictable. 'Israel expanding its war, by attacking Iran when negotiations were imminent, was an outrage. The US is now escalating the conflict. 'Instead of being a voice for de-escalation, the UK is siding with the aggressors.' Green party deputy leader Zack Polanski said: 'I don't think anyone expected him to say anything better. 'But he'd probably have been better maintaining his usual silence. 'Iran were negotiating - when Israel launched a war on them. The US joined in - and now our Prime Minister basically says 'well they were asking for it'.' READ MORE: Laura Kuenssberg slammed live on air for platforming Israeli president SDLP MP Colum Eastwood said simply: 'Utterly pathetic.' Social media users also criticised the PM's comments. One wrote: 'I have never despised a prime minister more. You've drenched every British citizen in blood. The vast majority reject your support for Israel, its genocide, and its constant violations of international law. Shame on you.' Another added: 'Are you dumb? Iran was bombed whilst at the negotiating table. Stop gaslighting your electorate and start telling the truth.' Elsewhere, First Minister John Swinney called for a 'diplomatic solution'. It comes after Cabinet minister Jonathan Reynolds would not say the UK supported the military action nor whether he believed the US strikes were legal. Asked on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg if the US action was a good thing, he said: 'The outcome. It isn't the means by which anyone in the British Government would have wanted to see this occur.' Pushed on whether the US strike was legal, he said: 'It is where we are today.' The US attacked Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz which are linked to Iran's nuclear programme. The Tehran regime has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful but its uranium enrichment process has gone far beyond what is required for power stations. In an address to the nation from the White House, Donald Trump warned there could be further strikes if Iran retaliates: 'There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran.'
The Herald Scotland
17 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
John Swinney calls on UK to insist on diplomacy over Iran
UK minister Douglas Alexander said the Government 'has been putting contingencies in place' as the region braces for any potential retaliation from Iran. US President Donald Trump said three key nuclear sites in Iran were 'completely and fully obliterated' in the military strikes. READ MORE: The US is thought to have used B-2 stealth bombers to drop bunker-busting munitions on the sites – including the deeply-buried Fordo facility – as well as 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from submarines. The US-UK base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean is not thought to have been used in the operation. Posting on X, Mr Swinney said: 'The Middle East conflict has reached an alarmingly greater level of danger after the US attacks on Iran. 'The conflict must be stopped by a diplomatic solution delivered through the international community. And the UK Government must insist on that now.' The Prime Minister had earlier said Iran should 'return to the negotiating table', noting the region remains 'volatile'. He said: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.' Former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf was critical of the Prime Minister's response. He posted on social media: 'An awful statement from the PM, which ignores our collective responsibility to uphold international law. 'Supporting illegal military action in Iran, and gas-lighting us about an imminent nuclear threat, is hauntingly reminiscent of the lies told in the run up to the Iraq war.' During a protest march in London, Mr Yousaf had earlier accused the UK Government of 'abusing' anti-terror laws against the Palestine Action group, which vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Trade policy minister Mr Alexander, who is the MP for Lothian East and a former international development minister, spoke to the BBC's Sunday Show. He said: 'I understand that people have woken up this morning to the news that was breaking overnight with a real sense of concern. 'I want to assure your viewers that the British Government has been putting contingencies in place. 'There have been a whole series of meetings, I and other have been attending Cobra meetings in the course of the week.' He said plans are being put in place to move UK nationals in affected countries to safety, stressing the UK 'took no part in this military action'.
Rhyl Journal
20 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
UK must push for diplomatic solution following US strikes on Iran, says Swinney
The Scottish First Minister's response to the developments in the Middle East came after Sir Keir Starmer urged Iran to return to negotiations. UK minister Douglas Alexander said the Government 'has been putting contingencies in place' as the region braces for any potential retaliation from Iran. US President Donald Trump said three key nuclear sites in Iran were 'completely and fully obliterated' in the military strikes. The US is thought to have used B-2 stealth bombers to drop bunker-busting munitions on the sites – including the deeply-buried Fordo facility – as well as 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from submarines. The US-UK base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean is not thought to have been used in the operation. Posting on X, Mr Swinney said: 'The Middle East conflict has reached an alarmingly greater level of danger after the US attacks on Iran. 'The conflict must be stopped by a diplomatic solution delivered through the international community. And the UK Government must insist on that now.' The Prime Minister had earlier said Iran should 'return to the negotiating table', noting the region remains 'volatile'. The Middle East conflict has reached an alarmingly greater level of danger after the US attacks on Iran. The conflict must be stopped by a diplomatic solution delivered through the international community. And the U.K. Government must insist on that now. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) June 22, 2025 He said: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.' Former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf was critical of the Prime Minister's response. He posted on social media: 'An awful statement from the PM, which ignores our collective responsibility to uphold international law. 'Supporting illegal military action in Iran, and gas-lighting us about an imminent nuclear threat, is hauntingly reminiscent of the lies told in the run up to the Iraq war.' During a protest march in London, Mr Yousaf had earlier accused the UK Government of 'abusing' anti-terror laws against the Palestine Action group, which vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call… — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 22, 2025 Trade policy minister Mr Alexander, who is the MP for Lothian East and a former international development minister, spoke to the BBC's Sunday Show. He said: 'I understand that people have woken up this morning to the news that was breaking overnight with a real sense of concern. 'I want to assure your viewers that the British Government has been putting contingencies in place. 'There have been a whole series of meetings, I and other have been attending Cobra meetings in the course of the week.' He said plans are being put in place to move UK nationals in affected countries to safety, stressing the UK 'took no part in this military action'.
