Australia mushroom murder suspect fell sick from same meal: defense
SYDNEY: An Australian woman accused of killing three lunch guests with toxic mushrooms fell sick from the same meal, her defense said Thursday, rejecting claims she faked her symptoms.Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents and aunt in July 2023 by spiking their beef Wellington lunch with death cap mushrooms.She is also accused of attempting to murder a fourth guest – her husband's uncle – who survived the lunch after a long stay in hospital.Patterson has steadfastly maintained her innocence during a seven-week-long trial that has made headlines from New York to New Delhi.As the trial came to its closing stages, defense lawyer Colin Mandy poked holes in the prosecutor's case, saying his client, too, fell ill after consuming the beef-and-pastry dish.Patterson's medical tests at the hospital revealed symptoms 'that can't be faked,' including low potassium and elevated hemoglobin, he said.'She was not as sick as the other lunch guests, nor did she represent she was,' Mandy said.The prosecution maintains Patterson did not consume the fatal fungi and faked her symptoms.Mandy said his client lied in panic in the days after the lunch, trying to 'conceal the fact that foraged mushrooms went into the meal.''If that was found out, she feared she would be held responsible,' her defense said.'She panicked when confronted with the terrible possibility, the terrible realization, that her actions had caused the illness of people she liked.'Mandy said he was not 'making an excuse' for Patterson's behavior after the lunch, but that it did not mean she meant to harm or kill her guests.Patterson originally invited her estranged husband Simon to join the family lunch at her secluded home in the farming village of Leongatha in Victoria state.But he turned down the invitation on the eve of the meal, saying he felt uncomfortable going, the court heard earlier.The pair were long estranged but still legally married.Simon Patterson's parents Don and Gail, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, attended the lunch.All three were dead within days. Heather Wilkinson's husband Ian fell gravely ill but eventually recovered.The trial in Morwell, southeast of Melbourne, is in its final stages.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
a day ago
- Al Arabiya
Investigator and Jurors Speak Out About Karen Read Murder Trial in Aftermath of Not Guilty Verdict
Two jurors and the lead investigator in the murder trial of Karen Read have come forward to comment about the case since a jury returned a not guilty verdict earlier this week. Read, 45, was charged with second-degree murder by authorities who said she intentionally hit Boston police officer John O'Keefe with her car after a night of drinking in the suburbs. The high-profile case culminated in a not guilty verdict on murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene charges Wednesday. The jury found Read guilty of operating a vehicle while under the influence. The trial has centered in part on lead investigator Michael Proctor, who defense attorneys described as biased against Read from the beginning. The State Police Trial Board found Proctor guilty of sending crude and defamatory text messages about Read while leading the investigation into her. He was fired and has drawn ire from Read supporters who believe he played a key role in a cover-up to frame her. Proctor told NBC's Dateline that the idea he is corrupt and framed Read is 'a ridiculous accusation.' He specifically said an accusation that he cracked Read's taillight to make it look like she backed into O'Keefe is 'absolutely not true.' 'I laugh because it's such a ridiculous accusation,' Proctor told the program. 'There's not one piece of evidence or fact to support that because it did not happen.' The judge in the case announced via court papers Wednesday that the jurors' names would be sealed from public view due to safety concerns. But one of the jurors, who identified himself only as Jason in an interview with TMZ, said he did not believe Read collided with O'Keefe. He also said he did not think investigators planted taillight pieces at the scene to frame Read. 'I don't really know if there was a cover-up or not. I know that's the big conspiracy about it, but I don't really know. All I know is there were a lot of holes in their investigation,' the juror said. Another juror, Paula Prado, told local news stations her mind changed about the case over the course of the last three weeks. At first she thought Read was guilty of manslaughter, but her opinion changed as the case progressed. 'As the weeks passed by, I just realized there were too many holes that we couldn't fill. And there's nothing that put her at the scene in our opinion, despite just dropping John O'Keefe off,' Prado told media. Massachusetts State Police said in a statement that it 'extends its sincerest condolences to the loved ones of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe.' The statement said the 'events of the last three years have challenged the department to review its actions and improve accountability and oversight. Under my direction as colonel, the state police has and will continue to improve in these regards. Our focus remains on delivering excellent police services that reflect the value of professionalism and maintain public trust,' Colonel Geoffrey Noble said in the statement. The jurors, state police, and Proctor are not the first to speak out about the verdict. Some of the key witnesses in the trial released a joint statement Wednesday in which they called the not guilty ruling 'a devastating miscarriage of justice.' The joint statement was issued by several people, including Brian Albert, who owned the home where the party took place, and Jennifer McCabe, Albert's sister-in-law, who was with Read and O'Keefe on the night of O'Keefe's death. Norfolk County District Attorney Michael Morrissey said only: 'The jury has spoken.'
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
Australia mushroom murder suspect fell sick from same meal: defense
SYDNEY: An Australian woman accused of killing three lunch guests with toxic mushrooms fell sick from the same meal, her defense said Thursday, rejecting claims she faked her Patterson, 50, is charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents and aunt in July 2023 by spiking their beef Wellington lunch with death cap is also accused of attempting to murder a fourth guest – her husband's uncle – who survived the lunch after a long stay in has steadfastly maintained her innocence during a seven-week-long trial that has made headlines from New York to New the trial came to its closing stages, defense lawyer Colin Mandy poked holes in the prosecutor's case, saying his client, too, fell ill after consuming the beef-and-pastry medical tests at the hospital revealed symptoms 'that can't be faked,' including low potassium and elevated hemoglobin, he said.'She was not as sick as the other lunch guests, nor did she represent she was,' Mandy prosecution maintains Patterson did not consume the fatal fungi and faked her said his client lied in panic in the days after the lunch, trying to 'conceal the fact that foraged mushrooms went into the meal.''If that was found out, she feared she would be held responsible,' her defense said.'She panicked when confronted with the terrible possibility, the terrible realization, that her actions had caused the illness of people she liked.'Mandy said he was not 'making an excuse' for Patterson's behavior after the lunch, but that it did not mean she meant to harm or kill her originally invited her estranged husband Simon to join the family lunch at her secluded home in the farming village of Leongatha in Victoria he turned down the invitation on the eve of the meal, saying he felt uncomfortable going, the court heard pair were long estranged but still legally Patterson's parents Don and Gail, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, attended the three were dead within days. Heather Wilkinson's husband Ian fell gravely ill but eventually trial in Morwell, southeast of Melbourne, is in its final stages.
Al Arabiya
3 days ago
- Al Arabiya
Jury Reaches Verdict in Karen Read Murder Trial Over Death of Boston Police Boyfriend
Jurors in the murder trial of Karen Read reached a verdict Wednesday in a divisive case about the death of a Boston police officer that lawyers have presented as either a tragic love story or a sinister cover-up. Read, 45, is accused of fatally striking her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, 46, with her SUV and leaving him to die in the snow outside a house party where other local police and a federal agent were closing out a night of drinking in 2022. She's charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter, and leaving the scene. If convicted on the most serious charge, she faces life in prison. Jurors began deliberating June 13 after weeks of often heated testimony from both sides. Read's defense said O'Keefe was beaten, bitten by a dog, then left outside a home in the Boston suburb of Canton in a conspiracy orchestrated by the police that included planting evidence. Prosecutors have described Read as a scorned lover who chose to leave O'Keefe dying in the snow after striking him with her SUV outside the house party. It's the state's second attempt to convict Read. The first Read trial ended July 1 in a mistrial due to a hung jury. The state's case was led by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who called fewer witnesses than prosecutor Adam Lally, who ran the first trial against Read. Describing O'Keefe as a good man who helped people, Brennan told jurors during closing arguments that O'Keefe needed help that night, and the only person who could provide it was Read. 'Instead, she drove away in her SUV. She was drunk. She hit him, and she left him to die,' he said. Defense attorney Alan Jackson rejected the idea that there was ever a collision at all. He and the defense called forward expert witnesses who agreed. 'There is no evidence that John was hit by a car. None. This case should be over right now, done, because there was no collision,' Jackson said during closing arguments.
