Why companies implementing agentic AI before putting proper governance in place will end up behind, not ahead of, the curve
Agentic AI is the buzzword of 2025. Although technically an 'emerging technology,' it feels like companies of all sizes are quickly developing and acquiring AI agents to stay ahead of the curve and competition. Just last week, OpenAI launched a research preview of Codex, the company's cloud-based software engineering agent or its 'most capable AI coding agent yet.' And it's fair that people are interested and excited.
Transforming industries
From customer service to supply chain management and the legal profession, AI agents are set to transform industries across the board and are already showing us that they can be pervasive across both consumer and enterprise environments, bringing AI fully into the mainstream. Unlike chatbots and image generators, which provide answers, but require prompts, AI agents execute multistep tasks on behalf of users. In 2025, these autonomous software programs will dramatically change how people interact with technology and how businesses operate.
This aligns with Forrester's latest findings, which had agentic AI at the top of its recent Top 10 Emerging Technologies for 2025, highlighting the power and potential of this emerging trend. However, as the report also points out, the rewards come with big risks and challenges. Let's dive into these as well as why companies must prioritize governance before development and implementation in order to stay ahead of, not behind, the curve and their competition.
A Governance-First Approach
In just three years, at least 15% of day-to-day work decisions will be made autonomously by AI agents—up from virtually 0% in 2024. This prediction by Gartner, while promising, sits alongside another key stat: 25% of enterprise breaches will be linked to AI agent abuse. As mentioned above, the rapid and widespread adoption of AI agents, while exciting, comes with complex challenges, such as shadow AI, which is why companies must prioritize a governance-first approach here.
So what is it about AI agents that makes them particularly challenging to control?
Short answer: their ability to operate autonomously. Long answer: this technology makes it difficult for organizations to have visibility over four things:
Who owns which agent
What department oversees them
What data they have access to
What actions the agent can take
How do you effectively govern them
A comprehensive approach
This is where unified governance can step in. With a comprehensive governance framework, companies can ensure that AI agents operate responsibly and are aligned with organizational standards and policies. The alternative: a lack of governance framework for AI agents can mishandle sensitive data, violate compliance regulations, and make decisions misaligned with business objectives.
Let's use a real-world example: you are a CEO for a major organization. Your company builds and introduces an AI-powered assistant to help automate workflows and save you time. Now imagine that the assistant gains access to your confidential files. Without guidance or governance, the assistant summarizes sensitive financial projections and closed-door board discussions and shares them with third-party vendors or unauthorized employees. This is definitely a worst-case scenario, but it highlights the importance for a solid governance framework.
Here's a helpful governance checklist:
Establish guidelines that clearly define acceptable use and assign accountability.
Carry out regular reviews to help identify and mitigate potential risks and threats.
Appoint the right stakeholder to foster transparency and build trust in how AI agents are used internally and externally.
Blurred lines
According to Sunil Soares, Founder of YDC, Agentic AI will drive the need for new governance approaches. As more applications include embedded AI and AI agents, the line between applications and AI use cases will become increasingly blurred. I couldn't agree more.
Whether you develop AI agents internally or partner with a third-party vendor, this technology will unlock significant value. But the challenges are not one-size-fits-all and will not go away. And while the human element remains important, manual oversight on its own is not sufficient or realistic when it comes to scale and size.
Therefore, when you build out your governance framework, ensure that you have automated monitoring tools in place that detect and correct violations of policies, record decisions for greater transparency, and escalate the complex cases that require additional oversight, such as a human-in-the-loop. A centralized governance framework ensures accountability, risk assessment, and ethical compliance. Like everything else in life, you need to create and establish boundaries.
And don't worry—implementing a governance framework first won't slow innovation down. When you find the right balance between innovation and risk management, you stay ahead of the curve and competition, leaving room for more cutting-edge AI agents and fewer headaches. For a perfect pill, deploy a unified governance platform for data and AI, as it will be the key to managing and ensuring AI agents don't become the next shadow IT.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
SoftBank Plots $1 Trillion AI Hub With TSMC, Trump
SoftBank (SFTBY) is plotting a $1 trillion AI hub in Arizona alongside TSMC (NYSE:TSM) and the Trump administration to onshore advanced manufacturing, Bloomberg reported. The proposaldubbed Project Crystal Landwould mirror Shenzhen's industrial park model by hosting AI-powered robot assembly lines and high-tech chip fabrication facilities. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with COIN. Son has held talks with Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo on tax incentives for companies that set up shop there, and has quietly approached Samsung and Vision Fund portfolio firms about establishing factories within the complex. SoftBank's own Vision Fund led a $40 billion funding round in OpenAI earlier this year, signaling its appetite for deepening U.S. AI ties, and SFTBY shares are up 3.4% year-to-date, reflecting investor enthusiasm for the vision. Despite the fanfare, TSMC's exact role remains unconfirmed, and much hinges on federal sign-off under President Trump's industrial revival agenda and support from Arizona's state government. Son's pitch aligns with Washington's push to reduce reliance on overseas supply chains, but critics caution that building a trillion-dollar ecosystem from scratch could face hurdles from local regulators, labor shortages and capital intensity. Still, if SoftBank secures carve-outs on corporate taxes and streamlined permitting, Project Crystal Land could set a new benchmark for tech reshoring. Why it matters: Investors should watch for government backing and corporate commitments that will drive SoftBank's capital allocation and influence SFTBY's growth trajectory in the U.S. AI market. Closing: Market participants will be looking for formal announcements on tax-break packages and partnering agreements as Son's plan moves from pitch to planning. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale on Israel-Iran conflict, AI tech wars and future of DOGE
Joe Lonsdale, Palantir co-founder and 8VC founding partner, joins 'Squawk Box' to discuss the latest in the Israel-Iran conflict, what the role of America should be, impact of the 'bunker buster' bomb, AI tech wars, state of OpenAI-Microsoft relationship, future of DOGE, and more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
CEOs and CMOs Are Drifting Further Apart, McKinsey Warns
The chief executive officer (CEO) and chief marketing officer (CMO) relationship has never been without its challenges, and friction between the pair is increasing, per a report from consulting firm McKinsey & Company. The firm found that CEO-CMO misalignment increased 20% between 2023 and 2025 due to factors including a lack of clarity regarding the CMO's remit and marketing's disconnect from company growth metrics. In partnership with the Association of National Advertisers (ANA), McKinsey asked more than 100 C-suite executives -including 75 CEOs and CMOs - from Fortune 1000 companies about growth and relationship dynamics. Responses were gathered across Asia, Europe, Latin America, and the U.S. The research builds upon a similar 2023 report. For the first time, the research includes responses from chief financial officers (CFOs). "It's really about recognizing that the role of the CMO can be so much more than chasing the latest trends and using data science and analytics," said Shelley Stewart III, senior partner with McKinsey's growth, marketing, and sales practice. "That is important, but how does the CMO's role fit more into the core of business day-to-day?" At some companies, the lack of understanding from C-suite peers regarding their remit has resulted in CMOs being excluded from the top table. According to research firm Forrester, only 63% of Fortune 500 companies have a marketing leader who sits on the leadership team and reports to the CEO. McKinsey's report echoed frustrations around a lack of understanding of the CMO role. The data showed the number of CEOs who believe that marketing's role is clearly defined and understood by the C-suite has decreased by 20% (from 90% to 70%). It also found only half of the CMOs surveyed think that marketing executives are involved in the strategic planning process. "The CMO can't be relegated to a very tactical role, it's gotta be much more strategic at the core," said Stewart III, adding that the top marketer should work alongside the strategy and finance chiefs to integrate marketing into its growth drivers. This lack of clarity means marketing departments are underfunded, with 80% of CEO respondents and 77% of CMOs stating their budgets aren't big enough. The trend is also reflected in global ad spend, which Gartner said dropped from 9.1% of revenue to 7.7% in 2024. "It's critical to align marketing with financial objectives to build trust and credibility," said Norm De Greve, svp and CMO of General Motors in the report. "I don't think people spend enough time aligning on the right metrics. I am proactive about sharing what we are doing and how we are driving ROI." A CMO's ability to translate performance metrics such as brand awareness and web traffic into financial metrics like sales and market share is critical. 70% of CEO respondents said they measure marketing's impact based on year-over-year revenue growth and margin. However, only 35% of CMOs surveyed track that as a top metric. This also creates a gap between the CMO and CFO, with one CFO from a global gaming company telling McKinsey: "Once we as a C-suite-including the CMO agree on company goals, strategies, and business metrics we're trying to achieve, I expect the CMO to tie marketing metrics and connect marketing activities to that big picture. I don't want to hear about brand awareness if that's not what we agreed upon as a company goal.' CMOs are increasingly struggling to understand their impact on growth. 79% of respondents say marketing KPIs were aligned with overall growth KPIs, a 9% decrease from last year. Only 30% believe there is "a clearly defined view" on what constitutes marketing ROI. "If you want to create value for your investors, you need growth, and CMOs can and should be at the center of how you think about [that]," said Stewart III. "Customer centricity, no matter what industry you're in, is at the very core of growing a successful business. CMOs should sit at the heart of [that] because they are the ones that actually own and understand the customer journey." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
