Political leaders demand stricter laws for whistle-blower safety
There is a need for laws that protect whistle-blowers.
Image: Meta AI
World Whistle-blowers Day on June 23 is dedicated to raising awareness about the crucial role that whistleblowers play in exposing wrongdoing and promoting transparency.
THERE have been heightened calls for the Government of National Unity (GNU) to provide better protection to whistle-blowers.
During a recent mini-plenary session, members of parliament (MP) from various political parties debated the need for strengthening whistle-blower protection by enacting robust laws that guarantee anonymity, job security, and legal support for individuals who reported corruption.
Visvin Reddy, an uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party member of parliament, said they tackled corruption head on.
'We don't silence whistle-blowers. We protect them because in a country drowning in lies, the person who tells the truth is the bravest one of all. I will say this loud and clear, if Babita Deokaran had spoken out under an MK government, she would still be alive today. She would be protected, not hunted; celebrated not assassinated; and the people stealing from our people, they would be behind bars, and not behind desks.'
Reddy said those who spoke the truth, faced losing their jobs or lives.
'Take Babita for example, she worked in the Gauteng health department. She saw money meant for hospitals and nurses being looted through dodgy PPE tenders. She did the right thing and what did she get? She was killed in front of her home. The big fish behind it, where are they? They are still free.
'There are officials in licensing departments who are watching bribes being taken daily. There are municipal officials who see tenders given to cronies while people go without water. They stay silent because they know the risk. Over 10 years, the AG (Auditor General) has flagged billions in corruption. That's why the MK Party says enough is enough. We are not here to protect the corrupt. We are here to protect the brave souls who speak up,' he said.
Reddy said there was a need for laws that protected whistle-blowers, guarantee anonymity and job safety, provide legal support and emergency relocation if needed.
'We propose a whistle-blower protection act, an independent whistleblower agency, a national whistle-blower heroes fund and jail time for leaking a whistle-blower's identity. All whistle-blower reports need to be automatically investigated by a corruption unit free from political interference. Let us honour Babita and let us protect the next brave voice. This is not about politics; this is about the soul of our nation,' he said.
Dereleen James, an ActionSA MP said: 'If the GNU even cared one iota about protecting whistle-blowers they would have done it by now. If they were remotely serious about strengthening protections for the brave South Africans who risk everything to expose corruption then the Zondo Commission's recommendations would not be gathering dust three years later. Untouched, unimplemented and just forgotten.'
She said the GNU was not a unity of purpose.
'It's a coalition of coverups and the so-called progressive. The GNU does not want to protect whistle-blowers because they are protecting themselves. They drag their feet on funding the NPA because they are terrified of being prosecuted. They do not want to fight corruption because they are corrupt. The GNU does not want justice, they want silence. Silence from Babita Deokaran, silence from every South African who dares speak the truth.
'Well not on our watch. This is why ActionSA will be introducing a Zero Tolerance Corruption Bill to take on public enemy number one which is corruption. The bill is a warning shot to every crooked politician who thinks they will be shuffled from one coy cozy position to the next. We are coming for you. To every official who thinks that looting the State can be followed by a quiet retirement or diplomatic posting, your time is up. The bill will ensure that anyone convicted of corruption will never hold public office again. Once you break the bond of public trust, you are out forever.
'We will be introducing whistle-blowers rewards based on international best practice. If the State won't protect whistle-blowers, then let us do so. We will give whistle-blowers the means, the safety and the legal support they need to come forward and take down the syndicates that have embedded themselves at the heart of government. The truth is, the GNU is not a solution to our crisis, it is the crisis. The so-called progressive caucus is not a solution. They are the wolves eyeing the sheep and ActionSA will not sit quietly while South Africans are expected to accept corruption that goes unpunished,' she said.
Glynnis Breytenbach, a Democratic Alliance MP said: 'In this country are at a crossroads in democracy. One where the integrity of our institutions, the trust of our citizens and the sanctity of our constitutional values are under immense strain.'
She said the matter of whistle-blower protection in South Africa was an issue not only of legal and administrative reform, but of moral imperative.
'Whistle-blowers play an important role in our society. They are not saboteurs, they are not enemies of the state, they are brave men and women who often at great personal cost shine a light on corruption, maladministration, abuse of power and gross human rights violations. They are guardians of public interest, uncompensated sentinels of our democracy.
'Whistle-blowers act in the spirit of Section 195 of our Constitution which enshrines principles of transparency, accountability and good governance. They ensure that State power is exercised lawfully, ethically and in the service of the people. When they step forward to expose wrongdoing they are often met not with gratitude or protection but with intimidation, harassment, unemployment isolation and in far too many cases, death,' she said.
Breytenbach said that the current state of whistle-blower protection in South Africa was inadequate and incoherent.
'The main legislative instrument, the Protected Disclosures Act (PDA) was a progressive step forward at the time of its enactment. But over two decades later it has not evolved sufficiently to address the sophisticated threats whistle-blowers face today. The act applies primarily to employees in the workplace context. It does not extend adequately to contractors, consultants, volunteers or community members who may witness corruption or wrongdoing.
'The PDA offers no proactive physical protection or financial support. It only provides post-op remedies which are often difficult, expensive and time consuming to pursue. No independent whistle-blower protection authority exists. Oversight is fragmented across the public protector the SAPS, the Hawks and other bodies, none of which are solely or effectively tasked with whistle-blower protection. As a result many whistleblowers have had their identities leaked often by those entrusted with their safety.
'One of the proposals is a private bill which is being prepared by the DA to be introduced in the near future. We must always remember the words of Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who said, 'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor'. I urge this parliament to act boldly, decisively and immediately. Let us institutionalise the values of our constitution. We should not wait for another name to be added to the tragic lists of those betrayed by the very system they try to save,' she said.
Marlon Daniels, a Patriotic Alliance MP, said whistle-blowers, who had the courage to expose corruption often at great personal risk are not just informants.
'They are patriots. They are defenders of justice and deserve our full protection. If the information they provide us is factual, if it exposes the fraud or abuse of power then we must stand with them without any hesitation.'
Daniels said whistle-blowers also played a critical role in holding the powerful accountable.
'Without whistle-blowers, State capture would have remained hidden. Billions of taxpayers money would still be looted with impunity and public trust in government would be completely eroded. Yet, what happens to those who speak out? They face intimidation, job losses and even threats to their lives. This is unacceptable. If we are serious about fighting corruption we must ensure that those who expose it are protected and not persecuted.
'We demand robust whistle-blower protection laws that guarantee anonymity. Whistle-blowers must be able to report corruption without fear of exposure. No individual should also lose their livelihood for doing the right thing and as far as legal support goes, the State must provide legal defense to whistle-blowers against frivolous lawsuits or retaliation.
'South Africa is at a crossroads. We can either side with those who steal from the poor or we can stand with the brave men and women who risk everything to expose the truth. The Patriotic Alliance chooses the side of justice. If South Africa is to be saved from corruption we must empower the whistle-blower. Let us pass these laws and defend the brave. Let us rebuild this nation,' he said.
THE POST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa believes democratic order in SA still in 'good health' despite various challenges
Babalo Ndenze 23 June 2025 | 9:56 Cyril Ramaphosa Constitutional Court Democracy President Cyril Ramaphosa delivered the keynote address at the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the Constitutional Court on 20 June 2025. Picture: @OCJ_RSA/X CAPE TOWN - President Cyril Ramaphosa believes the democratic order is still in "good health" in the country despite various challenges being faced. Ramaphosa said this year marks a bold new chapter in the country's journey from apartheid to a democracy, as it's been 30 years since the Constitutional Court convened for the first time. READ: Ramaphosa: The Constitution is a guardian watching over SA's legal health He was writing in his weekly newsletter, where he said the apex court's "humanistic" approach to law over the last three decades should be a source of pride. Ramaphosa emphasised the importance of the establishment of a specialised Constitutional Court, describing it as a key facet of the multiparty negotiations which preceded the country's transition to a fully-fledged democracy. He said that whilst some believed that existing structures, such as the Supreme Court, could perform this task, the African National Congress (ANC) advocated for a new court that was "untainted by the past". In the letter, he wrote that in March 2025, the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council reflected on how the world was facing "a moment of profound instability", characterised by "conflict, democratic backsliding, right-wing populism with judicial independence being undermined". The council stressed the need for countries to strengthen democratic institutions "charged with safeguarding fundamental rights and freedoms". Ramaphosa said South Africans can be proud that they continue to strive to live up to this obligation.
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
ActionSA launches campaign for 2026 local govt elections in Alex, aims to boost financial support for municipalities
JOHANNESBURG - ActionSA has kicked off its campaign for next year's local government elections, with a key focus on boosting financial support for municipalities. While the party acknowledged the issues facing local government, it said that increased funding was essential for municipalities to function effectively. ActionSA's leadership launched the campaign on Monday morning in Alexandra. Along London Road in Johannesburg's Alexandra township, several homes were surrounded by sewage flowing down the street. Potholes were hard to see as they're filled with sewage water, and in some cases, filled with sand to cover them up. A strong and overpowering stench also filled the air. ActionSA national chairperson, Michael Beaumont, said these issues were precisely what the party aimed to tackle if elected to govern. "It is so appropriate that ActionSA is here today [on Monday] to launch this campaign in Alexandra, in a community where you can see service delivery issues of many kinds have not been attended to for many years." Next year will be the second time that ActionSA runs for municipal elections. The party said it was born to address failures in local government. ALSO READ: Most South Africans favour coalition politics ahead of 2026 local elections - survey
TimesLIVE
an hour ago
- TimesLIVE
'Corporate Newsman' by Kaizer Nyatsumba
ABOUT THE BOOK From a humble upbringing on a farm in White River in Mpumalanga via an Ivy League education to influential newsrooms and boardrooms, Corporate Newsman: A Life of Integrity chronicles the extraordinary journey of Dr Kaizer Nyatsumba. As South Africa's first black editor of a mainstream newspaper, Nyatsumba rose above poverty, brushes with death, personal losses and political turmoil to leave his mark as a journalist and business executive. In this book, Nyatsumba shares his story of rising from junior reporter to editor, rubbing shoulders with the political elite during South Africa's transition, and on to the boardrooms of Anglo American, Coca-Cola, Sasol and PetroSA. An inspiring personal story that traverses politics, business and personal triumphs, Corporate Newsman reveals the complex layers of a man who dared to dream. Extract: Madiba's criticism Now two years into office, President Mandela was still popular. However, something strange happened around this period: Mandela appeared to be more popular among white South Africans than he was among black South Africans. This had much to do with his philosophy of reconciliation, which he preached at every opportunity. Though many applauded his visit to apartheid architect Dr Hendrik Verwoerd's widow Betsie, in the 'whites-only' Orania settlement in the Northern Cape, some in the black community were critical of it. Such grand gestures meant little or nothing to me. I was not concerned or emotionally exercised about them. What concerned me, instead, was what I perceived to be a worrisome trend: Mandela was becoming ultra-sensitive to criticism, especially when it came from black journalists. I continued to write independently and fearlessly, praising and criticising the government as I deemed it appropriate, but that criticism did not sit well with the president. In his travels around the country, Madiba started having a go at me, Jon Qwelane and Khulu Sibiya because of criticism that we had directed at him or his government. Without mentioning us by name, repeatedly he railed at 'three senior black journalists' who were allegedly doing their masters' bidding. I had a syndicated weekly column in The Star and its sister publications, Jon wrote a syndicated column for Saturday Star and its sister titles, while Khulu had responsibility for the editorial opinions of his newspaper, City Press. Though Madiba did not name us, it was obvious to many who followed news and political developments that he was referring to us. He had been particularly stung by my criticism of him in a column that began: 'The truth, at last, is out: the emperor has no clothes on'. It was a column devoted to an analysis of the president's sensitivity to criticism from black writers. It triggered angry responses from people in government, including from some of Mandela's cabinet ministers. I was comfortable then and am comfortable now that the criticism was justified. However, President Mandela did not see it that way. He embarked on a campaign to hit back at Qwelane, Sibiya and me. As a rule, I did not mind criticism. I believed that it was only fair that journalists and political commentators who liberally criticised others in the course of duty were also fair game for criticism when they got things wrong or went overboard with their criticism. However, the president's criticism of us was getting more frequent and its tone angrier. That worried me greatly. I feared not only that it had the potential to damage relations between us and the presidency, but that, without being intended to accomplish that goal, it might incite some of the ANC's ardent supporters to cause us physical harm. I felt strongly that the situation had to be brought under control before things got out of hand. Something had to be done. I called Mpumalanga premier Mathews Phosa and asked him to arrange a meeting for me with the president. I also spoke to my friend, Phakamile 'Parks' Mankahlana, who was the spokesman for the presidency, and made a similar request. Both men shared my concern and undertook to speak to Madiba as a matter of urgency. Phosa came back to me on the same day to say that the president had agreed to my request for a meeting. However, to avoid the impression of a meeting between himself and the three of us (Qwelane, Sibiya and me), the president also wanted other senior black journalists and editors to be invited. Phosa said that the ANC head office would contact me about the details. I was grateful to him for his assistance, and just as thankful to Parks. In the run-up to the meeting, Parks's boss, Joel Netshitenzhe, who was the person with overall responsibility for government communications, made an appointment to see me at home. A member of the ANC's National Executive Committee, Netshitenzhe wanted to establish my approach to the meeting. He was as concerned about the potential for it to get out of hand as I was. I assured him, as I had done Phosa, that I wanted to put an end to the spat with the presidency. I wanted an opportunity for us to talk calmly about the fact that there would be occasions when we in the media saw things differently from the presidency and to ensure that there would be an acceptance of our right to differ. Netshitenzhe appreciated my approach and confirmed that it was aligned to his. He, too, wanted the meeting to have a successful outcome. The meeting with President Mandela took place two days later in a boardroom at Shell House, the ANC's head office on Plein Street. With Mandela were his Minister of Communications Pallo Jordan, one of the most level-headed men around, and Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) General Secretary Sam Mbhazima Shilowa, among others. As he entered the boardroom, Shilowa told me that he had no quarrel with journalists; instead, his labour federation had concerns of its own with the governing party, with which COSATU was in alliance. President Mandela was his usual charismatic self. He greeted all of us in his typical friendly manner, shaking hands and flashing a smile as he moved around. During the meeting itself, he did not say much. Instead, that was left to members of his delegation. Since most of the senior black journalists and editors who were there — True Love editor Khanyi Dhlomo-Mkhize was among them — were not involved in the conflict with the president and were not familiar with the issues, they sat quietly throughout the meeting. Instead, Qwelane, Sibiya and I defended our right to hold and express different views, without fearing that we would be seen or described as enemies of the government. That argument won the day. For their part, the government and the ANC insisted on the need for criticism to be fair and informed and on their right to respond to it, and the three of us conceded that point. At the end of the meeting, we shook hands, with both sides undertaking to respect the spirit and content of the accord. That evening, Minister Jordan and I featured in the SABC's discussion programme, during which we confirmed the essence of our agreement. I was pleased to have put that dispute behind us. To this day, I am happy that it was the only fight — if 'fight' is the right word — that I ever had with President Mandela. In the weeks, months and years to come, our relationship improved considerably. In the early months of 1997, I received a call from somebody close to Winnie Madikizela-Mandela. The message was simple: the 'Mother of the Nation' wanted to see me at the home of her daughter, Zindzi Mandela-Hlongwane, in Belgravia, a suburb lodged between Bellevue and Hillbrow. I was given the address and directions to the house. It was a Saturday afternoon, so I took Gugu along. The house had a big, electronically operated steel entrance gate and a large garden. Sitting on chairs outside were Madikizela-Mandela and Zindzi. There were also some young people present, but they were asked to leave as soon as Gugu and I arrived. We were offered juice to drink. It was then that I was told, by both mother and daughter, about President Mandela's alleged indiscretion. Did I know, they asked conspiratorially, that the president and Mrs Graça Machel were more than just friends? I was told that Mrs Machel spent a lot of time at the Mandela residence in Houghton, a mere kilometre or two away from the Hlongwane residence, and that she and Mandela were in a romantic relationship. The news was shared with me in the hope that I would write a story about it or get one of the political reporters to do so. I thanked Winnie and Zindzi for the information. As we were getting ready to leave, I was encouraged to phone any time if there was anything else that I wanted to confirm regarding the story. I did not write the story about President Mandela and Mrs Graça Machel, nor did I get a reporter to do so. In fact, I did not tell a soul about it. I thought that if what they had told me was true, then President Mandela was entitled to his privacy. The matter had nothing to do with his position as the president of the Republic of South Africa.
