Death wish or stress test?
Listen to article
In the past three years, humanity has seemed to teeter on the brink of extinction. When the war in Ukraine began, many of us struggled to visualise the full scope of the threat we faced. Any miscalculation could have brought the war to Europe, where two nuclear powers sit. Further escalation could have led to an extinction-level event — once the nightmare of the Cold War — by dragging the US directly into war with Russia.
Last month, we witnessed another episode of extreme brinkmanship, where — compelled by the desire to maintain its muscular image — a populist government afflicted with a shrinking mandate risked full-blown war with its neighbour. India's policy decisions these days seem to have little to do with rationality. It often convinces itself that it can offset the consequences of its actions through a mix of diplomacy, espionage, propaganda and wealth. Since few have dared to challenge the incumbents in New Delhi, their incremental brinkmanship (2016, 2019, 2025) did not come into sharp relief — until now. But the fact is that had President Trump not intervened, or had Pakistan's conventional defences not held, we could have been trying to survive in a nuclear wasteland.
Now, yet another gift that keeps giving: Israel's incremental belligerence. First Gaza, then Lebanon, Syria, Yemen — and now Iran. In Iran, it seeks to destroy its nuclear programme and, if possible, overthrow the state. Israel now claims to have destroyed most of the nuclear infrastructure above ground, but lacks the bunker-busting munitions to destroy the underground facility at Fordow. That is why it urges the US to enter the fray.
This is a curious development, because until recently, Israel had no shortage of bunker busters. Consider the indigenously developed Spice systems and Rafael's Rocks family of weapons. For instance, the MPR-500 is a smart bomb designed to wreak havoc underground. In Gaza, while claiming to destroy Hamas's fortified underground network of tunnels, Israel regularly used 5,000-lb GBU-28 laser-guided bunker-busting bombs — originally deployed during Operation Desert Storm.
A Jerusalem Post report dated 28 September 2024, titled 'Inside Israel's Operation: Step-by-Step Breakdown of How Nasrallah Was Eliminated' by Amir Bohbot stated: Netanyahu gave the go-ahead for the targeted assassination that would shake the Middle East and the Arab world. The Air Force command gave the green light to arm aircraft with bunker-busting bombs.
You're telling me that after invading a potentially nuclear-capable country, Bibi Netanyahu suddenly realised, "Oops, we didn't check the depleted inventory"? That would be like Elon Musk taking you to Mars and suddenly realising he forgot to arrange water or oxygen for the colony. What is going on? Bibi can be accused of many things, but such debilitating oversight is not one of them.
When you listen to Israeli hawks in the media, you realise they're talking about altogether different weaponry. They want the US to use low-yield nuclear weapons. You may rightly ask: Israel is a nuclear state — why would it need another country's help when it could act alone? Because it has long maintained a façade of deliberate nuclear ambiguity. In fact, the Israeli nuclear programme is the Middle East's worst best-kept secret.
Even so, since when has Israel cared about international law or diplomatic niceties? The objective is clear: to drag the US into a murder-suicide pact — at least diplomatically. Once it becomes America's war, Israel cannot be held solely accountable for starting such a large-scale conflict.
But revisit the unofficial ask: low-yield nukes are still nukes. Use them to destroy a nuclear facility, and imagine the ramifications — not only for the country being attacked, but for the international order. A nuclear incident could trigger a chain of events that draws other nuclear-capable great powers into the fight. That is the very definition of a world war.
It is as if the human race has suddenly developed a death wish. Why else would anyone risk nuclear war if they and their people want to live?
Given that the triggers for such wars are usually a mix of national anxiety and rage over human loss (Pahalgam, 7 October), where leaders ostensibly vow to avenge such deaths and ensure nothing like it happens again — how can they not see that the consequences of their actions could lead to far wider devastation, killing far more people and destabilising global security?
How many millions would have died if India and Pakistan had turned nuclear? Do these missile exchanges between Israel and Iran not kill people on both sides? Imagine the fear and anxiety among civilians across the region. I'm not preaching. I'm asking legitimate questions. Do these leaders not mind the annihilation of the human race? If they don't — why?
It is easy to explain this fatalism within the Abrahamic faiths. All three major monotheistic religions share a similar eschatology. While the timing of the end is still a matter of debate in Islam, Christianity and Judaism, many believe that the three millennia allotted to human existence are over, and therefore the end is nigh. Despite considerable wiggle room, Muslims face a different dilemma: since no specific date is given, many feel free to see the end whenever they want. After every few centuries, they find themselves in a bind and start thinking the end is near — ergo, Al-Qaeda and ISIS's end-times wars.
This may explain the tragedy of monotheists. But why are people of polytheistic or pantheistic orientation — like many Indians — not afraid to risk it all?
That's when you realise that religious fanaticism might be one factor driving brinkmanship, but eschatology is not the sole reason. We don't know what is in Bibi or Modi's hearts, but we know that they excel at exploiting religiosity and the fanaticism of division to stay in power. To do so, they also promise their people a resurrection of golden past glories in a modern setting.
But in Bibi's case, it is clear that even that promise is a means, not an end. As I've mentioned before, he faces many criminal charges — some so petty that mentioning them alongside a prime minister's title seems insulting. In India's case, it is apparent that its ruling elite wants China and America to start a war that will weaken both, allowing India to silently claim the superpower crown.
If I weren't Popperian in outlook, I would have thought that history either seeks the destruction of humankind or intends to subject it to a stress test. But even so, my paranoid mind — shaped by science fiction and conspiracy thrillers — keeps pushing me in that direction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
41 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan goes one up
EDITORIAL: The Indians made quite a show of their delegation's meeting with US Vice President JD Vance earlier this month, wasting no time in framing it as a strategic snub to Pakistan. That narrative didn't age well. Field Marshal Asim Munir's lunch at the White House with President Donald Trump — not only listed on the official schedule but also held without any civilian counterpart — has shifted the optics entirely. In diplomatic terms, this is not just a working lunch; it was a reset. This is the first time a Pakistani army chief has been hosted alone at the White House. No prime minister. No foreign minister. The COAS accompanied by the Director General of ISI, who is also the National Security Advisor, and the President with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his special representative for Middle East affairs Steve Witkoff discussed everything from regional security and rare earths to trade and even crypto currencies. Coming at a time when US-Pakistan ties had been tepid at best for the last several years, this engagement marks a sharp and unexpected upturn. Islamabad has every reason to call this a diplomatic win. What makes it even more significant is President Trump's own emphasis on why this meeting happened. He made it clear that he invited Field Marshal Munir to thank him for choosing de-escalation during the most recent Pakistan-India standoff. He went on to credit both Pakistan and India for avoiding what he described as a potential nuclear war, but he was also unambiguous in singling out Munir's influence on the Pakistani side. 'This man was extremely influential in stopping it,' he said, speaking to reporters on the White House. That level of praise from an American president — especially one not known for scripted diplomacy — matters. It's not difficult to read between the lines here. Rawalpindi's ability to secure this meeting, and to frame it as a counterpoint to India's engagement with the US Vice President, speaks to the quiet but real influence that still runs through the channels of military diplomacy. It also reinforces the Pakistan army's centrality in matters of foreign and regional policy, especially during a time of political flux at home and uncertainty abroad. Whatever was said behind closed doors, there was no public articulation of what is a deeply felt consensus in Pakistan — that Israeli actions are unlawful, disproportionate, and a violation of international norms. Trump noted that Pakistan 'knows Iran better than most' and is 'not happy about anything.' Even though that this is a vague characterisation, there were signs of movement on the economic front. Trump mentioned progress in trade negotiations with both India and Pakistan, signalling a rare willingness to rebalance engagement. If this leads to a serious trade deal that provides Pakistan improved market access or technology cooperation, it will be another important gain. For a country struggling with an overstretched balance of payments and dwindling export competitiveness, any structural shift in trade terms with the US would be a meaningful breakthrough. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
42 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Wall Street mixed with Trump's ME decision in focus
NEW YORK: Wall Street's main indexes were mixed in choppy trading on Friday, as inflation concerns and uncertainty around US involvement in the Iran-Israel war offset relief over President Donald Trump holding back from any immediate action. Trump will take a call in the next two weeks on whether to involve the US military in the conflict, the White House said on Thursday, as hostilities between the two Middle Eastern countries approached their second week. Markets have been on edge as Trump has kept the world guessing on his plans - veering from proposing a swift diplomatic solution to suggesting the US might join the fight as Israel aims to suppress Tehran's ability to build nuclear weapons. A senior Iranian official told Reuters Tehran was ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment. Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi has arrived in Geneva to meet European counterparts who are hoping to establish a path back to diplomacy. 'Markets are looking for the next bullish catalyst ... until then, investors are still in wait-and-see mode,' said Adam Sarhan, chief executive of 50 Park Investments in New York. Concerns about price pressures in the US were also in focus after Federal Reserve policymakers on Wednesday warned inflation could pick up pace over the summer as the economic effects of Trump's steep import tariffs kick in. They kept interest rates unchanged. On Friday, Fed governor Chris Waller said the central bank should consider cutting rates at its next meeting given recent tame inflation data and because any price shock from tariffs will be short-lived. At 11:39 a.m. ET, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 154.39 points, or 0.37%, to 42,323.97, the S&P 500 gained 3.14 points, or 0.05%, to 5,984.01 and the Nasdaq Composite lost 49.32 points, or 0.25%, to 19,496.95. Six of the 11 major S&P 500 sub-sectors rose.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump extends date of TikTok sale for third time
President Donald Trump announced Thursday he had given social media platform TikTok another 90 days to find a non-Chinese buyer or be banned in the United States, reported AFP. "I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025)," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, putting off the ban for the third time. A federal law requiring TikTok's sale or ban on national security grounds was due to take effect the day before Trump's January inauguration. The Republican, whose 2024 election campaign relied heavily on social media, has previously said he is fond of the video-sharing app. "I have a little warm spot in my heart for TikTok," Trump said in an NBC News interview in early May. "If it needs an extension, I would be willing to give it an extension." TikTok on Thursday welcomed Trump's decision. "We are grateful for President Trump's leadership and support in ensuring that TikTok continues to be available for more than 170 million American users," the platform said in a statement. Digital Cold War? Motivated by a belief in Washington that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese government, the ban took effect on January 19, one day before Trump's inauguration, with ByteDance having made no attempt to find a suitor. TikTok "has become a symbol of the US-China tech rivalry; a flashpoint in the new Cold War for digital control," said Shweta Singh, an assistant professor of information systems at Warwick Business School in Britain. Trump had long supported a ban or divestment, but reversed his position and vowed to defend the platform -- which boasts almost two billion global users -- after coming to believe it helped him win young voters' support in the November election. The president announced an initial 75-day delay of the ban upon taking office. A second extension pushed the deadline to June 19. He said in May that a group of purchasers was ready to pay TikTok owner ByteDance "a lot of money" for the video-clip-sharing sensation's US operations. Trump knows that TikTok is "wildly popular" in the United States, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Thursday, when asked about the latest extension. "He also wants to protect Americans' data and privacy concerns on this app, and he believes we can do both things at the same time." The president is "just not motivated to do anything about TikTok," said independent analyst Rob Enderle. "Unless they get on his bad side, TikTok is probably going to be in pretty good shape." Tariff turmoil Trump said in April that China would have agreed to a deal on the sale of TikTok if it were not for a dispute over his tariffs on Beijing. ByteDance has confirmed talks with the US government, saying key matters needed to be resolved and that any deal would be "subject to approval under Chinese law." Possible solutions reportedly include seeing existing US investors in ByteDance roll over their stakes into a new independent global TikTok company. Additional US investors, including Oracle and private equity firm Blackstone, would be brought on to reduce ByteDance's share in the new TikTok. Much of TikTok's US activity is already housed on Oracle servers, and the company's chairman, Larry Ellison, is a longtime Trump ally. Uncertainty remains, particularly over what would happen to TikTok's valuable algorithm. "TikTok without its algorithm is like Harry Potter without his wand - it's simply not as powerful," said Kelsey Chickering, principal analyst at Forrester. Despite the turmoil, TikTok has been continuing with business as usual. The platform on Monday introduced a new "Symphony" suite of generative artificial intelligence tools for advertisers to turn words or photos into video snippets for the platform.
