Musk joins Trump in playing legislative arsonist

For years, congressional Republicans have dealt with a president in Donald Trump who isn't terribly engaged in (or often seemingly aware of) the day-to-day legislative battles – right up until the point he decides to make a splash.
Sometimes, they'll gently suggest he might get involved in the process a little earlier. Often, he waits and then just blows up the whole thing, forcing lawmakers to scramble to address his whims. As far back as 2018, I compared Trump to a legislative 'arsonist.'
It's a tough enough situation for GOP lawmakers as it is.
But now they apparently have two billionaire legislative arsonists leading their movement.
Elon Musk on Tuesday afternoon lit into what Trump's calling his 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' which is largely devoted to extending his tax cuts. The bill has tested the tolerance of both fiscal conservatives who are worried about it ballooning the national debt and Republicans who want to protect Medicaid, which the House GOP's version targets for significant cuts.
And Musk wasn't content to just express his opposition. He went so far as to call it a 'disgusting abomination' that explodes the debt – contrary to GOP leaders' and the White House's claims. He accused Republicans who support it of knowing better. And he even suggested those who run afoul of him could find themselves targeted in the 2026 election.
'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt,' Musk posted on his social media platform X. He also wrote: 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.'
While Musk has gently expressed his concerns about Trump's tariffs, broken with some Trump allies on visas for highly skilled workers, and even said he was 'disappointed' by the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' before, this is something else entirely. It's Musk taking his chainsaw to what is likely to be the GOP's most significant legislative effort of the current Congress – and Trump's agenda – out of nowhere.
Musk, who left his role as a special government employee just days ago, has a lot at stake as a businessman — something House Speaker Mike Johnson suggested could be behind the Tesla CEO's outburst.
'I know that the [electric vehicle] mandate – very important to him. That is going away, because the government should not be subsidizing these things as part of the Green New Deal. And I know that has an effect on his business. And I lament that,' he said.
This is the second time Musk has done something like this.
After Trump's election in November, Musk played perhaps the biggest role in abruptly torpedoing a bipartisan bill to prevent a government shutdown.
The billionaire did this even as Trump had been keeping his powder dry up until that point. It led plenty to wonder who was really in charge. The Trump team claimed it was aligned with Musk, but why had Musk suddenly taken the lead on this?
Musk's missive back then was remarkable for how quickly it marshalled conservative opposition and caused Republican officeholders to respond – often pleadingly. It called to mind the many instances in which Trump suddenly inserted himself into legislative battles at the 11th hour and shook them up.
(Indeed, even on that specific bill, Trump decided very late in the process to demand the package include a debt-ceiling increase – a request that came out of left field and left Republicans wondering why he didn't speak up earlier.)
But this is different than in December. This time, Republicans have pursued their own bill focused on Trump's tax cuts (rather than a must-pass bill to keep the government open) that is aimed at winning the president's approval. And Trump has praised their efforts. Earlier on Tuesday, he saw fit to go hard after one of the bill's chief GOP critics, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, whose concerns align with Musk's.
Trump's push for the bill has created a situation in which there is a much more in-your-face tension between his and Musk's positions than ever before – with no obvious way forward for the MAGA movement.
There is plenty to play out with the bill, and virtually nobody thought the House-passed package that Musk was criticizing Tuesday would be the final result. But his fiery rhetoric suggests modest changes around the edges won't be enough for him.
Musk's opposition comes at a particularly inopportune time, after House Republicans mustered the votes and Senate Republicans were just starting to take up the issue in earnest. And it makes it a whole lot harder for the GOP to argue this is somehow fiscally responsible.
Musk's opposition is also a big deal because it provides a high-profile face to the existing conservative concerns about the cost of the package. A handful of Republicans like Paul, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and House Freedom Caucus members have been making that case, but none of them come close to Musk's heft. It's not difficult to see this awakening some of what remains of the GOP's recent tea party past. Similar to the December showdown, on Tuesday we saw all kinds of Republicans suddenly feel compelled to reckon with Musk's attack. A few critics and skeptics of the bill doubled down.
It remains to be seen how much pull Musk's efforts have with individual senators, given his and DOGE's unpopularity and the fact that he's no longer officially part of the administration. He's also a relative newcomer to conservative politics, and his effort to go at Trump could alienate some of his newfound allies. But polling also shows he retains significant pull within the GOP base; a late-April New York Times/Siena College poll showed 77% of Republicans had a favorable opinion of him, and 44% were 'very favorable.' He has also proven willing to unleash many tens of millions of dollars on political campaigns.
It certainly throws a wrench in the GOP's attempts to unify behind Trump's legislative agenda. Republicans already have narrow majorities, especially in the House. But they seemed to be moving past the gridlock that dogged their side during the Biden administration (see: ousting then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy), thanks to the common causes that are loyalty to Trump and their fear of running afoul of him.
Now, though, they have two rather unwieldy and unpredictable billionaires with relatively little legislative know-how, huge followings and unsteady whims to worry about.
(A case in point: Musk called the package a 'pork-filled Congressional spending bill,' but the reason the bill is expensive isn't earmarks or 'pork,' but rather the tax-cut extension.)
And those two figures' goals increasingly appear to be at cross purposes.
It was always a somewhat uneasy marriage between Trump and Musk. Musk's whole thing is cutting spending and reining in the federal government; he's basically fashioned himself a throwback to the tea party conservatives of the 2010 era. But that's never been much of a priority for Trump, who talks about cutting spending but rarely makes it a priority. (Even while saying goodbye to Musk last week, Trump decided to talk about abolishing the debt ceiling.)
The two seemed to meet in the middle because Musk's efforts to wreck shop with his DOGE cuts overlapped with Trump's efforts to transform the federal government into a more Trump-loyal institution. But DOGE quickly became a liability, and now the two men's relationship is being tested.
Musk hasn't been terribly subtle about the fact that he disagrees with much of what Trump is doing. In a CBS News interview that aired Sunday, he suggested he was holding back on saying too much.
'I'm a little stuck in a bind, where I'm like, well, I don't want to, you know, speak up against the administration,' Musk said, 'but I also don't want to take responsibility for everything this administration's doing.'
In the course of a few days, Musk decided not just to speak up, but to severely complicate the GOP's legislative prospects. And to the extent he plans to keep wielding his influence like this, the party now needs contend with two huge variables that can suddenly change the calculation at any given time.
And it was hard enough with just one.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Boston Globe

39 minutes ago

• Boston Globe

Still marching after all these years

Many of us have had a lot of practice: Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq. We protested every bad government action. Advertisement I learned nonviolent civil disobedience from my parents, growing up in Brooklyn. They were activists even before Vietnam. During the civil rights movement, in 1964, driving through St. Augustine, Fla., they attended a demonstration. When protesters refused to leave a sit-in attempting to integrate the Ponce de Leon Motor Lodge restaurant, some were arrested and jailed. My parents were not arrested, but they were present, in solidarity, as lifelong believers in human rights, in including Black Americans in the American Dream. What we now call DEI was already a good goal. Advertisement And me? Young as I was, my good-girl head was down, finishing my master's thesis on Proust, in graduate school far away. I was merely an educated girl, not political yet, not focused on the common good as they were. Both of them had been radicals in the 1930s, when Jewish leftists and others hoped that a popular front could remake US labor relations, control capitalist greed, and bring America closer to equality for women and people of color. Paul Robeson was one of their idols, along with Eleanor Roosevelt. Later, they opposed the Vietnam War, just as my husband and I did. In 1968, running against feckless Hubert Humphrey, treacherous Richard Nixon promised to end the war, and then prolonged it until more than 50,000 men my age died, as well as countless Vietnamese and Cambodians. In 1972 my father worked to elect Elizabeth Holtzman, also of Brooklyn, to Congress. So she was in the House of Representatives in time to vote to impeach the corrupt Nixon in the summer of 1974. My father, with ALS sapping his body, had followed the investigation and trial avidly from the green couch in the living room. But he missed out on the ending. By August he was in a coma; he died two days short of Nixon's ignominious exit. The night Nixon left, making his awkward, hypocritical peace signs, my mother and I were dining in the dim kitchen with my cousin Sherry, grieving and rejoicing. In that painful, complex mood, we poured some wine and drank to him: 'Marty should have been here to see this day.' 'Daddy should have been here.' Advertisement I know my parents would be out with me on the streets now. They were there, in a sense — at a #HandsOff rally on April 5 in Newton, at an April 19 event to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the beginning of the American Revolution in Waltham, and then at the 'No Kings' rally. The signs were clever and scathing at all these events; drivers going by were honking in approval, shouting, applauding. My laconic father's sign would have said, very big, in block letters, 'NO!' Once when my mother was in her 90s and had lost many memories, I asked her, 'What is wisdom?' She answered unhesitatingly: 'The greatest part of wisdom is kindness.' Her sign, which I saw an older woman hold at the Waltham rally, would have read 'Make America kind again.' 'Nothing is stranger than the position of the dead among the living,' Virginia Woolf wrote in her first, unpublished novel, 'Melymbrosia.' I find it marvelous that my parents can still stand by my side. The rest of our family is in the streets, too: our son and his children in New York City. That solidarity is so welcome to us — just as it must have been to my parents when we opposed the Vietnam War early on, when they felt alone and scorned, when so few Americans had yet come to their senses. Advertisement Intergenerational solidarity is precious. That preciousness includes not only the next generations, but the oldest, too. To all of us lucky enough to have older people in our lives, they comfort us by their presence. Repositories of family lore and legend, they dole out secrets and, for better or worse, guide us by their experiences. And sometimes by the energy of their activism, right now! I see my parents' faces vividly. I summon them and their will to do good, which survives them, in this national emergency. Their memory is a blessing in the here and now and the strife to come.

Yahoo

39 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Meta Platforms (META) Unveils Advanced AI Model Focused on Physical Reasoning

Meta Platforms, Inc. (NASDAQ:META) is one of the best stocks to buy. On June 11, Meta rolled out V-JEPA 2, a refined AI model that strengthens the system's capacity to understand and predict physical gestures. The newly introduced model empowers robots and intelligent agents with stronger situational awareness and predictive skills, crucial for fostering AI systems that "think before they act." By analyzing video footage, the model developed an understanding of real-world patterns, such as human-object contact, kinetic movement, and inter-object interactions. Testing in Meta's research facilities confirmed the model could guide robots in executing actions like reaching for, lifting, and placing items elsewhere. Three new benchmarks have been released by Meta to help measure the effectiveness of current models in interpreting real-world interactions via video. By sharing these benchmarks, Meta hopes to accelerate progress in the AI research community. Meta underlined the importance of physical reasoning as a cornerstone for equipping AI systems to interact effectively with the tangible world and to attain higher levels of artificial intelligence. While we acknowledge the potential of META as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None.

New York Post

an hour ago

• New York Post

Trump and Rubio secure Rwanda-Congo peace treaty amid Pakistan's Nobel Prize nomination

President Donald Trump announced on Friday he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio had secured a 'wonderful' treaty between Rwanda and Congo, as Pakistan formally nominated him for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. 'I am very happy to report that I have arranged, along with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a wonderful Treaty between the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and the Republic of Rwanda, in their War, which was known for violent bloodshed and death, more so even than most other Wars, and has gone on for decades,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social announcement. The president noted representatives from Rwanda and the Congo will be in Washington on Monday to sign documents. He went on to discuss his chances at winning a Nobel Peace Prize, claiming he wouldn't get one, 'no matter what I do.' 'This is a Great Day for Africa and, quite frankly, a Great Day for the World,' Trump wrote in the post. 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for keeping Peace between Egypt and Ethiopia (A massive Ethiopian built dam, stupidly financed by the United States of America, substantially reduces the water flowing into The Nile River), and I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for doing the Abraham Accords in the Middle East which, if all goes well, will be loaded to the brim with additional Countries signing on, and will unify the Middle East for the first time in 'The Ages!' 6 President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio speak with reporters at Morristown Municipal Airport in Morristown, NJ on June 8, 2025. AP 'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me!' On Wednesday, India refuted claims by Trump that he had stopped the war between Pakistan and India. Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri wrote in a news release that 'talks for ceasing military action happened directly between India and Pakistan through existing military channels, and on the insistence of Pakistan,' according to a report from Reuters. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi reiterated India 'has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do,' Misri noted in the statement. 6 Secretary of State Marco Rubio hosts a Declaration of Principles signing ceremony with representatives from the Congo and Rwanda at the State Department on April 25, 2025. AP The mention of a Nobel Peace Prize came nearly two hours after the Government of Pakistan published a lengthy post on X, formally recommending Trump for the honor. 'The Government of Pakistan has decided to formally recommend President Donald J. Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of his decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis,' the post read. 'The international community bore witness to unprovoked and unlawful Indian aggression, which constituted a grave violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity, resulting in the tragic loss of innocent lives, including women, children, and the elderly.' 6 Members of the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda and Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo during a presentation in Goma, DRC on May 10, 2025. AFP via Getty Images 6 President Joe Biden meets with DR Congo President Felix Tshisekedi durign the G20 of World Leaders Summit in Rome, Italy on Oct. 30, 2021. POOL/AFP via Getty Images Pakistani leaders said at a moment of heightened regional turbulence, Trump demonstrated 'great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship' through 'robust diplomatic engagement' with both Islamabad and New Delhi, securing a ceasefire. 'This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker and his commitment to conflict resolution through dialogue,' the post continued. 'The Government of Pakistan also acknowledges and greatly admires President Trump's sincere offers to help resolve the longstanding dispute of Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan—an issue that lies at the heart of regional instability. 'President Trump's leadership during the 2025 Pakistan India crisis manifestly showcases the continuation of his legacy of pragmatic diplomacy and effective peace-building. Pakistan remains hopeful that his earnest efforts will continue to contribute towards regional and global stability, particularly in the context of ongoing crises in the Middle East, including the humanitarian tragedy unfolding in Gaza and the deteriorating escalation involving Iran.' 6 Rwanda President Paul Kagame delivers a speech in Kigali, Rwanda on April 7, 2025. Getty Images 6 The Nobel Peace Prize during the production process in Eskilstuna, Sweden, on Oct. 29, 2019. AFP via Getty Images According to The Nobel Prize's website, to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, a person must be a 'qualified nominator,' which includes national governments, heads of state, previous award winners, and members of specific international organizations. The nomination process is confidential, and entries are due by Jan. 31, hence the 2026 nomination.