Leader who killed 6,000,000 of his own honoured in new statue

The face of one of the worst dictators of the 20th century has been put on display in a busy Russian subway station.
Joseph Stalin, who is estimated to have murdered at least 6,000,000 of his people during his brutal reign, is now portrayed in a white statue in Taganskaya station, Moscow.
Stunned commuters were seen staring as they walked by the newly unveiled statue, a replica of an original which was removed six decades ago.
Others were seen smiling and taking photos with Stalin's likeness leering over them in the historic subway station.
One Russian pensioner said she was 'happy our leader got restored' – even though Stalin had taken her father prisoner in the Second World War.
Liliya Medvedeva told the New York Times that Stalin could have sent her father to the gulag, but didn't.
Others weren't fans. A history student called Stalin a 'bloody tyrant' when he saw the statue.
Historian and propaganda analyst Ian Garner told Metro: 'The Russian state has been putting up statues of Stalin as part of a much broader program to rehabilitate Stalin's image.
'People who criticize Stalin or draw attention to crimes committed under Stalin are now threatened with jail, with media attacks.
'The state itself discusses Stalin in school textbooks, books, popular culture, movies as somebody who was a wise leader, who had the brilliant foresight to bring his country into the industrial age and most importantly to win the Second World War.'
But Mr Garner points out, the crimes committed by stalin can't be covered up. They're common knowledge, but Russia's conduct towards Ukraine today shows that there is a true 'embrace' of the 'bad guys' in Russian culture.
'It's almost become good to commit violence, good to be aggressive because violence and aggression, especially when wrapped up with the image of a strong and decisive male leader is what supposedly gets things done.
'That's what supposedly saved Russia in the 1930s and 40s and it's what supposedly is going to save Russia today,' he said.
Beginning in the early 1930s, Stalin executed around a million of his own citizens. He then forced hundreds of thousands of others to work in labour camps and go to prison.
The murders of Kulaks, upper middle class farmers, sparked the famine in Ukraine, also known as the Holodomor.
Between 1932 and 1933, up to five million peasants died of starvation in the Soviet Union thanks to Stalin's actions. More Trending
As Mr Garner said, the Kremlin has been attempting to reintroduce Stalin for a few years now. There are more than 100 statues of Stalin across Russia today.
Putin's reintroduction of Stalin after the removal of many of his statues in the 1960s could be attributed to the fact that he's the second longest serving Russian leader, behind Stalin.
Though he hasn't outrightly praised Stalin, Putin has said that Russia 'shouldn't be ashamed of its history'.
Yet, the new statue in central Moscow has divided modern-day Russians just as much as Stalin divided the country during his bloody reign.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: The bizarre reason Russia wants to ban Shrek and other beloved animations
MORE: Putin threats to 'throttle' US firms like Microsoft and Zoom in words war with Trump
MORE: British missiles could soon be used against Putin deep into his own territory

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New Statesman​

an hour ago

• New Statesman​

Britain wants no part in Israel's war

Photo byPacifism is a dirty word in Britain. The pre-war premier Neville Chamberlain's undoubtedly well-meaning but naive appeasement in the face of Hitler's Germany is rejected by all and sundry in the history books today. Ask Britons whether they'd sooner be a Chamberlain or a Churchill and the overwhelming number would reach for the latter. But how persistent the Chamberlain mindset is! 'How horrible, fantastic, incredible it is that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas masks here because of a quarrel in a far away country between people of whom we know nothing.' This was Chamberlain in 1938. And in 1938 he was a popular premier. And it could almost be forgiven for being the view of the median Britain in 2025. The nation's attitude to war overseas is more often than not best characterised as an aversion to engagement; an unwillingness to expend excess material and wealth for foreigners in far-off places. In the face of Russian aggression in Ukraine, that isolationist approach has been inverted. But the Middle East? Iran? Israel? In the shadow of Iraq? Britons baulk. Here is the state of public opinion about possible action involving Iran. You can see YouGov's wording of the question mentions Israel. It provides much-needed context, but mention of Israel may toxify attitudes somewhat – voters are increasingly unfavourable towards the state because of its actions in Gaza. But it doesn't detract from the main narrative: voters, for the most part, want to give this part of the world as wide a berth as possible. So how did we come to this? Is it all just Iraq? Not quite. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe In the 1990s, voters were against military action in Bosnia. In the shadow of the Vietnam War – 30 years hence, mind you – Britons did not want to risk British lives for a country in which many could not even name its capital. 'Don't risk UK troops' came the Independent's headline, accompanying an NOP poll that found popular support for aid but total aversion to anything that 'would end up like Vietnam'. On the rare occasion that Britons are willing to risk war, it appears to come only with very specific circumstances. It would be wrong to say voters were opposed to intervention in Iraq from the beginning. They weren't. And at one point most Britons did favour intervention to topple Saddam Hussein. Nevertheless, YouGov found there was consistent but tepid support until the middle of 2004, including in the shadow of the well-attended anti-war protests. It's a tale of two nations. On the streets, a country adamantly against any form of intervention. But when it came, voters in their living rooms rallied to the troops. But it was not to last. Not one survey since shows voter appreciation for US-UK intervention in Iraq. But Iraq has not nullified British overseas ambition. In 2015 most voters backed airstrikes to combat Islamic State in Syria. In 2018 those numbers dwindled. In 2022 Britons were quick to rally in favour of Ukraine. And as late as March this year a plurality support sending peacekeepers to the country. With the right conditions, people in the UK can be rallied to support friends in the face of adversity. But emphasis on 'friends', there. On Israel vs Iran, few regard Israel with much favourability. Right now Israel is the least liked it's ever been in Britain and much of western Europe. It's unlikely this country's public could be rallied to Israel's aid any time soon. Without a serious deterioration in regional or global security, Britons would sooner turn their backs on this 'quarrel in a far away country between people of whom we know nothing'. [See more: Let the non-doms leave] Related

Rhyl Journal

an hour ago

• Rhyl Journal

Irish deputy premier to attend EU ministers summit in wake of US attack on Iran

Simon Harris, who is also Ireland's foreign affairs minister, said the attack was an 'extraordinarily dangerous escalation' in an already 'volatile' situation in the Middle East. He is to attend a meeting of EU foreign affairs ministers in Brussels on Monday, where the growing crisis in the Middle East will be discussed among other topics. I can confirm that 15 🇮🇪 citizens and their dependents have been successfully evacuated from 🇮🇱 today. Grateful to 🇦🇹 and our teams in Tel Aviv, Dublin & the region for their tireless work. We remain in close contact with all Irish citizens in the region. — Simon Harris TD (@SimonHarrisTD) June 22, 2025 Tensions in the Middle East boiled over 10 days ago when Israel launched strikes on Tehran, targeting the country's nuclear programme. Israel and Iran have been exchanging strikes with one another since, rekindling fears of a full-scale conflict. On Saturday the US weighed in, sending planes and submarines to attack Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz, which are linked to Iran's nuclear programme. Tehran threatened to retaliate, while US President Donald Trump warned of further action if necessary. Statement by Taoiseach Micheál Martin on Middle East — Micheál Martin (@MichealMartinTD) June 22, 2025 Speaking ahead of the EU meeting on Monday, Mr Harris said there needed to be 'a diplomatic solution' to Iran's nuclear programme. The Tanaiste said that urgent de-escalation and diplomacy are 'crucial', and the EU 'has a role to play in charting a way forward'. He said he would also be calling for 'swift and concrete actions' in response to the EU's review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. 'We must also maintain a strong focus on the situation in Gaza, which remains catastrophic,' he added. 'I call on Israel to lift its blockade on aid into Gaza. The situation in the West Bank also continues to be unacceptable. 'The EU can and must provide leadership on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, on the release of hostages, on preserving the two-State solution, and on efforts to support peace and stability in the Middle East.' We will have a Security College on Wednesday, focused on the escalating situation in the Middle East and its effects on Europe. — Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) June 22, 2025 EU ministers are expected to discuss the latest developments, the situation in Gaza and the West Bank, and the review of Israel's compliance with Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. Among the other topics to be discussed are the Russian invasion of Ukraine, EU engagement with China, and Georgia. Ukrainian foreign minister Andrii Sybiha will also attend the summit and provide an update. The discussion on China is expected to prepare for the upcoming EU-China Strategic Dialogue and EU-China Summit. Mr Harris added: 'I will be underlining the need to demonstrate our unity and collective backing for Ukraine in the face of Russia's ongoing aggression. 'Recent weeks have seen a significant escalation in brutal Russian air attacks on Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities. These are not the action of a country interested in peace.'

Daily Mirror

4 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

UK military bases on 'highest level' red alert after US bombing of Iran

The British armed forces are on the highest level of alert for drone strikes after the US bombing of Iran, the Defence Secretary has confirmed British forces stationed throughout the Middle East have been placed on heightened alert for potential drone strikes after the US airstrikes on Iran, as per Defence Secretary John Healey. Healey has affirmed that protection of UK Armed Forces is now at "highest level" amid escalating concerns that the US action might ignite a broader conflict, as published in The Telegraph. ‌ Since the strikes took place early Sunday morning, security measures at British bases in the Middle East have been significantly intensified, with staff preparing for the possibility of not only drone attacks but conventional rocket and missile assaults too. ‌ The increased state of alert also comes at a time of growing worry over threats to UK bases both domestically and abroad. On Saturday, a British national was apprehended in Cyprus under suspicion of conducting espionage on an RAF base for Iran, closely following an incident where two pro-Palestinian activists infiltrated RAF Brize Norton and caused damage to two planes, reports the Express. In his column for the newspaper on Sunday, Mr Healey penned: "The safety of UK personnel and bases is my top priority. Force protection is at its highest level, and we deployed additional jets this week." Senior defence officials are particularly cautious of the use of drones following an event where Ukrainian drones wreaked havoc on 40 Russian aircrafts –including those capable of carrying nuclear warheads– across Russia. With the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, Russia's employment of Iranian-made Shahed drones has led to widespread power outages and significant destruction of infrastructure. ‌ The Shahed-136's explosive payload, originally designed to demolish buildings, can now also deliver lethal fragmentation or thermobaric blasts. Iran has recently deployed these drones against targets in Israel. Earlier this month, Sir Keir Starmer confirmed that additional RAF jets would be dispatched to the region to enhance security. British bases in the Middle East include RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus, where 14 RAF jets are currently stationed, as well as naval hubs in Bahrain and Oman and shared airbases in Qatar and the UAE. Potential extra security measures could involve increasing armed guards, issuing live ammunition and deploying more radar systems. The US acted independently in its strikes on Iran, and so far Iran's threats of retaliation have been solely directed at America. It is understood that British bases are not yet preparing for any immediate, targeted attack, but the heightened alert reflects the broad range of threats - from rockets to improvised explosive devices - that UK forces could potentially face.