Government would struggle to cope with severe animal disease outbreak
Animal diseases such as bird flu, bluetongue and African swine fever can pose serious threats to England's farming sector, food security, human health and wildlife, and costs associated with an outbreak can spiral into the billions of pounds, a report from the National Audit Office (NAO) has said.
The 2001 outbreak of foot and mouth cost an estimated £13.8 billion in today's prices, with farming businesses devastated, thousands of animals slaughtered and the countryside shut to recreation and tourism.
And 7.2 million birds have been culled in avian flu outbreaks since 2020, which have also devasted wild seabird colonies across the UK.
But while the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) has worked hard to tackle recent outbreaks, the NAO said it is likely the public bodies would struggle with a more severe outbreak or concurrent serious outbreaks.
A report from the NAO warned that long-term resilience to disease in livestock was being undermined by officials having to focus on increasingly frequent outbreaks – and there was no long-term strategy for improving the situation.
There are significant gaps in contingency plans for outbreaks, and plans for specific diseases have not been updated with the latest findings, with its strategy for coping with foot and mouth disease not updated since 2011.
Just 5% of live animal imports are undergoing physical checks, all taking place at the final customer destination, against a target of 100% checks at border control, raising the risk of 'exotic' diseases arriving from abroad.
A fifth of vet roles are vacant at the APHA, and there is a 'very high' risk of site failure at the Government's key animal science lab at Weybridge, the report said.
The report said that while a £2.8 billion redevelopment programme at Weybridge was now on track, the main new laboratory facilities will not be delivered for another 10 years.
The report found Defra thought there was a 'very high' risk of an outbreak to which it would be unable to respond effectively, but it lacks a long-term strategy and action plan for improving resilience to animal disease, and many of its activities are reactive rather than part of a coherent plan.
A comprehensive livestock movement tracing system – crucial once infection is detected – is lacking, with the costs of an upgraded scheme now estimated at £563 million amid concerns over delivering it in the face of rising costs and funding constraints, while there are also issues with vaccine supplies.
Gareth Davies, head of the NAO, said: 'Defra has assessed that the risk of an outbreak to which it would be unable to respond effectively is above the level it considers tolerable, but it has not determined a way to reduce this risk.
'A long-term strategy and action plan are urgently needed, to protect national economic resilience as well as food security, human health and rural communities.'
Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the parliamentary Committee of Public Accounts, said: 'Despite some good work to identify new threats, Government's preparations for a future major outbreak are being hampered by a lack of capacity, skills and long-term strategy.
'Government's failure to carry out checks on animal imports is also threatening biosecurity at the border.
'Resilience to a severe outbreak has not been tested in recent years, but the threat remains ever increasing as our livestock become more susceptible to disease.
'Without changes to the current operating system, there is a very real risk that Government would not be able to respond effectively.'
Biosecurity Minister Baroness Hayman said: 'This Government's commitment to maintaining the country's biosecurity in the face of the mounting risks of disease is unwavering – we will do whatever it takes to protect our farmers and economy.
'We took immediate action to ban personal imports of meat and dairy from Europe after a wave of foot and mouth cases on the continent and, after years of underinvestment, we are investing £200 million into a new National Biosecurity Centre.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
New bluetongue rules 'impossible burden' on farmers
The new rules for bluetongue would place an 'impossible cost burden' on farmers according to a Powys MP. MP for Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr, Steve Witherden, said that he is concerned about the potential spread of the disease but that it could not be at the cost of farmers who cross the Wales-England border. The new rules would require sheep crossing into Wales to be tested for the blue tongue virus, regardless of whether they are vaccinated, which can cost anywhere from £40-£70 per animal. This could lead to huge bills with one farmer telling the County Times that it would cost him as much as £25,000 to move his flock. According to NFU Cymru, over 550 farms lie in both England and Wales, with many of them being in Powys, whose eastern edge makes up about half of the 160-mile border between the two countries. 'I am deeply concerned about the potential spread of bluetongue and believe we need a workable solution to contain its spread, and protect livestock and farmers,' said Mr Witherden. 'I realise that there are a great many aspects of the management of this disease to consider by DEFRA and Welsh Government, but the rules they collectively impose must not make farming life impossible for farmers with cross border farms. 'Is it really sensible that a farmer has to test an animal because it moves from one field to another on their farm, when that field border is the Welsh/English border?' Help support trusted local news Sign up for a digital subscription now: As a digital subscriber you will get Unlimited access to the Oswestry Advertizer website Advert-light access Reader rewards Mr Witherden said he would be 'strongly encouraging Welsh Government and DEFRA to reach a sensible and workable solution for both cross border farms and for transporting animals where the road passes from Wales'. He added: 'I am continuing to stay in regular contact with the FUW, NFU Cymru and NFU in London. I will be listening to concerns and pressing for sensible and affordable solutions to help farmers deal with the practical reality of cross border farms and the costs and rules associated with testing. 'We also need fast access to inoculation for livestock. 'It is paramount that we have a practical set of clear and well communicated rules and that we take all the precautions necessary to ensure that this disease does not spread.'
Telegraph
19 hours ago
- Telegraph
Farming budget faces ‘death knell' if Thames Water is rescued
Sir Keir Starmer has been warned that buying out Thames Water could signal a 'death knell for farming as we know it'. The Government could be forced to step in to rescue the ailing water company, which is teetering on the edge of bankruptcy despite a £3 billion bailout in February. Independent estimates suggest that public ownership of the firm, which supplies 16 million customers, could cost the taxpayer up to £2.75 billion a year. Whitehall officials are discussing which Government department would pay for the Special Administration Regime (SAR) if ministers are forced to step in. It has been suggested that Defra, which is responsible for water policy, should pay for any public ownership out of its own budget. But a £2.75 billion cost would amount to 37 per cent of the department's budget, as allocated in last week's spending review, and would be likely to lead to cuts to farming support. The Government would also have to bear the cost of hundreds of millions of pounds in fines with which Thames Water has been hit for breaching rules on waste water management and dividend payments. The cost of nationalising the company would be equivalent to the entire farming support budget, of £2.7 billion a year, and almost double the annual flood defences budget of £1.4 billion.] 'It's taxpayers who will pay the price' A City source close to the process told The Telegraph: 'With no money set aside, Defra would be forced to raid its own budgets to bail out London's ailing water company and divert funds away from farmers. 'It is no exaggeration to say that special administration for Thames Water could signal the death knell for farming as we know it in this country. Meanwhile, the Government would have to pay itself nearly a billion pounds in fines for breaking its own rules. Ultimately, it's taxpayers who will pay the price.' It comes after the Government was accused of betraying farmers by making family farms subject to inheritance tax in last year's Budget. The move sparked mass protests by farmers on tractors outside the Treasury. If the cost of bringing Thames Water into public ownership was borne by the Treasury, it would create an additional black hole for Rachel Reeves ahead of this year's Budget, at which she is expected to raise taxes. Economists estimate that there is a shortfall of around £20 billion in the public finances, which must be filled by spending cuts or tax rises because of the Government's rules, which restrict borrowing. Steve Reed, the Environment Secretary, told MPs on Thursday that Thames Water remained 'financially stable' and suggested that a public bailout was not imminent. But he added: 'We have stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities... including a special administration regime, if that were to become necessary.' If Thames Water were to go bust without a public bailout, it would be likely to cause disruption to customers across London. Ministers are understood to have drawn up contingency plans on an SAR and are ready to intervene if the company looks on the brink of failure. The last significant public bailout came in November 2021, when the Government was forced to temporarily nationalise Bulb Energy. Taxpayers ultimately made a profit on selling the company to Octopus Energy, a rival firm, the following year. A Government spokesman said: 'The company remains stable and the government is closely monitoring the situation. It would be inappropriate to comment in detail on the financial matters of a private company.'
Daily Mail
21 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Will British holidaymakers have to pay more than £120 for a passport? Officials say the cost of renewing travel documents should RISE
British holidaymakers could see a major rise in the cost of renewing their passports under plans put forward by government officials. The National Audit Office says that the current £94.50 cost of a new travel document should increase because the Passport Office is losing so much money. The department, which has been credited with reversing a huge backlog of delays in issuing new passports, has racked up a deficit of almost a billion pounds over the past five years, including £223million last year alone. The NAO argued that without increasing the one-off payment made every 10 years taxpayers more generally would have to cover the shortfall. It did not give a figure for the rise but the Telegraph suggested it would have to rise £32 to £126.50 to recoup the lost money. A Home Office spokesperson said there were no 'immediate plans' to increase fees and any changes would almost certainly not come into effect this year. But it would be an additional financial burden for Britons at a time when the cost of living remains high. Gareth Davies, head of the National Audit Office said: 'Government bodies provide important services for the public and businesses, including issuing passports and driving licences, and filing company information. 'But many are not consistently recovering their costs - posing risks to the financial resilience of these services and fairness between users. 'HM Treasury should strengthen how it oversees cost recovery processes and provide more comprehensive guidance to charging bodies.' The cost of renewing passports has already risen significantly in recent years. The department drastically hiked prices for adult passports in February 2023 - from £75.50 to £82.50. Fees then rose again by 7 per cent last year - before an inflation-busting increase of 6.7 per cent in April to the current level for digital renewals. Renewing an adult passport using a paper form already costs £107, while fast track services will get you your passport in a week for £178 or a day for £222. The Home Office previously said the new fees were necessary to ensure the cost of passport operations is met without relying on taxpayer funding. It added that fees help cover passport processing, consular services for lost or stolen passports, and border operations. Nearly seven million new passports were issued last year. Adult passports are valid for ten years, while passports for children are valid for just five. The call for higher passport renewal fees came in a wider report by the National Audit Office into government services. A total £340million shortfall was found across all the services looked at - including UK Visas and Immigration, the Court and Tribunals Service and the Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency. The National Audit Office's report concluded: 'Many government departments rely on charging fees to recover the costs of providing services to people and businesses. 'But none of the services we looked at recovered costs consistently, and the charges for the services may not accurately reflect the costs.' 'The government is missing opportunities to deliver efficiencies and share good practice,' it added. 'This poses risks to the financial resilience of public services, the costs of which are likely to be borne by future fee payers.'
