The US has plenty of rare earths but not for long
HYPOCRISY, it's said, is the tribute that vice pays to virtue.
The US government's meltdown about rare earths similarly shows how an administration determined to halt the energy transition knows it's already lost the argument.
Rare earth magnets are the super-strong pellets that help stick a charging cable to your laptop, smartwatch or headphones.
They're also an essential component in a swath of high-tech applications. About 90% are produced in China.
That gives powerful leverage. Export curbs imposed by Beijing in April have been a key sticking point in discussions over unwinding tit-for-tat tariffs between the United States and China.
A call between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping to get talks back on track was 'having to do mostly with rare earth magnets and some other things,' according to Trump.
Automakers have warned of factory shutdowns in a matter of weeks if the restrictions aren't lifted.
To hear the administration talk, this is all about national security.
Rare earths and other critical minerals are 'key building blocks of our defence industrial base,' the White House said in April.
The magnets are used in plenty of advanced weaponry, thanks to their ability to power ultra-efficient, lightweight motors.
The F-35 Lightning aircraft contains 408kg of rare earths, while a Virginia class submarine has 10 times that amount.
Smaller amounts crop up in Tomahawk cruise missiles, Predator drones, and JDAM smart bombs.
The US military doesn't account for a very significant slice of demand, however.
The exact amount is a secret, but it's unlikely to be much more (and may well be much less) than 3,000 tonnes a year – fewer than 1% of global consumption.
The vast majority goes instead to clean power, where the magnets help run electric vehicles (EVs) which use them in their motors and wind farms which need them for their gearboxes.
If the Pentagon wants an onshore supply chain to meet its rare earths needs, it's going to have to piggy-back off the far larger civilian market being fueled by the energy transition.
For all it has been derided since the 2024 election, former President Joe Biden's signature climate law recognised this.
The Inflation Reduction Act or IRA, contained billions of funding to establish factories producing everything from EVs, to batteries, to critical components and raw materials usable in both commercial and military settings.
At this very moment, US$439mil of loans and grants to rare earths projects from the Department of Defence since the start of 2020 are starting to bear fruit.
The Mountain Pass rare earths mine southwest of Las Vegas, owned by MP Materials Corp, now refines about half of the 45,000 tonnes it produces each year on-site, rather than in China.
An MP-owned facility due to open in Fort Worth within months will use these compounds to produce 1,000 tonnes per year of rare earth magnets – the first such mine-to-magnets supply chain ever built entirely in the United States.
In Sumter, North Carolina, e-VAC, owned by Houston-based private equity fund Ara Partners, is building a separate plant to make another 1,600 tonnes a year of non-China magnets, with production due to start in the fall.
On their own, these two factories could probably supply the US military's needs. More are under way elsewhere.
The trading arm of South Korean steelmaker Posco Holdings Inc struck a deal in March to provide rare earths mined in Utah to a planned US factory making as much as 5,000 tonnes from as soon as 2026.
In Estonia and Germany, European companies are looking to build another 9,000 tonnes.
Most of this activity depends on manufacturers switching to clean energy, who are in turn counting on low-cost finance provided by the United States and other governments.
Main customer
General Motors Co is the main customer of both MP Materials and e-VAC. Arafura Rare Earths Ltd, which is developing a mine in the Australian outback, has signed agreements with wind turbine manufacturers Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy SA and GE Vernova Inc.
Support for this was once a bipartisan matter. The initial spark was a law signed by Trump himself in 2018, ordering the military to remove all Chinese-sourced magnets from its supply chains by 2027.
The United States should now be on the brink of hitting that target.
There's just one snag. While Trump is pleading with Xi to give the United States access to more rare earths, his allies in Congress are doing their best to eviscerate the IRA, cancelling billions of funding for clean energy to support his tax cut plans.
The outcome of that may push much of this nascent supply chain into bankruptcy, once again leaving GE and Detroit dependent on the whims of a trade official in Beijing.
Myopic mismanagement
It's a blatant act of economic and geopolitical self-harm to match Washington's myopic mismanagement of the country's solar sector a decade ago.
By pretending a clean energy revolution isn't underway and scouring the globe for the materials it needs, Trump is ensuring that critical minerals supply chains become even more concentrated in the secure investment environment offered by China.
The IRA's attempt to bring production of clean tech onshore was an insurance policy against a more chaotic and contested geopolitical environment.
In smothering that industry in the cradle, Trump is ensuring that in future trade disputes with Beijing, America will find itself in the role not of equal, but supplicant. — Bloomberg
David Fickling is Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering climate change and energy. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
10 hours ago
- The Sun
Hundreds of US citizens exit Iran amid war, some detained
WASHINGTON: Hundreds of American citizens have departed Iran using land routes over the past week since an aerial war between the Islamic Republic and Israel broke out, according to an internal State Department cable seen by Reuters on Friday. While many left without problem, 'numerous' citizens had faced 'delays and harassment' while trying to exit, the cable said. It said, without giving further details, that one unidentified family had reported that two U.S. citizens attempting to leave Iran had been detained. The internal cable dated June 20 underscores the challenge Washington is facing in trying to protect and assist its citizens in a country with which it has no diplomatic relations and in a war in which the United States may soon get involved. President Donald Trump and the White House said on Thursday he will decide in the next two weeks whether the U.S. will get involved in the Israel-Iran war. Trump has kept the world guessing on his plans, veering from proposing a swift diplomatic solution to suggesting Washington might join the fighting on Israel's side. The air war began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran and has alarmed a region that has been on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. Israel is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons, and said it struck Iran to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear program is peaceful, has retaliated with its own strikes on Israel. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. 'Due to the limitations of U.S. consular support in Iran, U.S. citizens seeking departure should take advantage of existing means to leave Iran,' a State Department spokesperson said in comments emailed late on Friday, when asked about the cable, which was first reported by The Washington Post. POTENTIAL EVACUATION The U.S. State Department in a travel alert earlier on Friday urged its citizens wishing to depart Iran to use land routes via Azerbaijan, Armenia or Turkey. Iranian airspace is closed. The U.S. Embassy in the Turkmenistan capital of Ashgabat has requested entry for over 100 American citizens, but the Turkmenistan government has yet to give its approval, the cable said. The Islamic Republic treats Iranian-U.S. dual citizens solely as nationals of Iran, the State Department emphasized. 'U.S. nationals are at significant risk of questioning, arrest and detention in Iran,' the alert said. Washington is looking at ways to potentially evacuate its citizens from Israel, but it has almost no way of assisting Americans inside Iran. The two countries have had no diplomatic ties since the Iranian Revolution in 1979. U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on Thursday said the administration was looking at different ways to get U.S. citizens out. 'We're working to get military, commercial, charter flights and cruise ships for evac,' he said in an X post, urging U.S. citizens and green card holders to complete an online form. As of Friday, more than 6,400 U.S. citizens filled out that form for Israel, a separate internal department email seen by Reuters said. The form allows the agency to predict an approximate figure for potential evacuations. 'Approximately 300-500 U.S. citizens per day would potentially require departure assistance,' said the internal email, also dated June 20 and marked 'sensitive'. The State Department does not have official figures but thousands of U.S. citizens are thought to be residing in Iran and hundreds of thousands in Israel. Israel's strikes over the last week have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency. Israel says Iranian attacks have killed 24 civilians in Israel. 'The U.S. Department of State received no reports of U.S. citizen casualties in Israel or Iran,' the second email said.
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
Hundreds of US citizens left Iran in last week, State Dept cable says
WASHINGTON: Hundreds of American citizens have departed Iran using land routes over the past week since an aerial war between the Islamic Republic and Israel broke out, according to an internal State Department cable seen by Reuters on Friday. While many left without problem, 'numerous' citizens had faced 'delays and harassment' while trying to exit, the cable said. It said, without giving further details, that one unidentified family had reported that two U.S. citizens attempting to leave Iran had been detained. The internal cable dated June 20 underscores the challenge Washington is facing in trying to protect and assist its citizens in a country with which it has no diplomatic relations and in a war in which the United States may soon get involved. President Donald Trump and the White House said on Thursday he will decide in the next two weeks whether the U.S. will get involved in the Israel-Iran war. Trump has kept the world guessing on his plans, veering from proposing a swift diplomatic solution to suggesting Washington might join the fighting on Israel's side. The air war began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran and has alarmed a region that has been on edge since the start of Israel's war in Gaza in October 2023. Israel is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons, and said it struck Iran to prevent Tehran from developing its own nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear program is peaceful, has retaliated with its own strikes on Israel. Iran is a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, while Israel is not. 'Due to the limitations of U.S. consular support in Iran, U.S. citizens seeking departure should take advantage of existing means to leave Iran,' a State Department spokesperson said in comments emailed late on Friday, when asked about the cable, which was first reported by The Washington Post. POTENTIAL EVACUATION The U.S. State Department in a travel alert earlier on Friday urged its citizens wishing to depart Iran to use land routes via Azerbaijan, Armenia or Turkey. Iranian airspace is closed. The U.S. Embassy in the Turkmenistan capital of Ashgabat has requested entry for over 100 American citizens, but the Turkmenistan government has yet to give its approval, the cable said. The Islamic Republic treats Iranian-U.S. dual citizens solely as nationals of Iran, the State Department emphasized. 'U.S. nationals are at significant risk of questioning, arrest and detention in Iran,' the alert said. Washington is looking at ways to potentially evacuate its citizens from Israel, but it has almost no way of assisting Americans inside Iran. The two countries have had no diplomatic ties since the Iranian Revolution in 1979. U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee on Thursday said the administration was looking at different ways to get U.S. citizens out. 'We're working to get military, commercial, charter flights and cruise ships for evac,' he said in an X post, urging U.S. citizens and green card holders to complete an online form. As of Friday, more than 6,400 U.S. citizens filled out that form for Israel, a separate internal department email seen by Reuters said. The form allows the agency to predict an approximate figure for potential evacuations. 'Approximately 300-500 U.S. citizens per day would potentially require departure assistance,' said the internal email, also dated June 20 and marked 'sensitive'. The State Department does not have official figures but thousands of U.S. citizens are thought to be residing in Iran and hundreds of thousands in Israel. Israel's strikes over the last week have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency. Israel says Iranian attacks have killed 24 civilians in Israel.
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
China offers to be peacemaker in Iran-Israel war, but is unlikely to intervene
BEIJING (The Straits Times/ANN): As the conflict between Israel and Iran stretches beyond a week, China has found itself sidelined in developments that could yet have far-reaching consequences for its interests in the Middle East. While Beijing has offered itself as a peacemaker, it is unlikely to wade into the conflict directly, or to supply arms to Iran, say analysts. This is because it wants to avoid confronting the United States, for which military intervention against Iran remains a real possibility. Chinese President Xi Jinping, in a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on June 19, said China is willing to continue to strengthen communication with all parties and 'play a constructive role in restoring peace in the Middle East'. Hours later, US President Donald Trump effectively gave Iran two weeks to return to the negotiating table to discuss the future of its nuclear programme, by saying he would decide whether the US would attack Iran in that timeframe. With Iran seriously weakened by the latest hostilities – its top military commanders have been killed, and key nuclear facilities damaged – observers believe the initiative remains with Israel and the US. At stake for China is energy imports. China is the largest buyer of Iranian oil. Iran has also threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, which lies between Iran and Oman and is a major route for oil and gas shipments from the Gulf states to China, including from Saudi Arabia, China's biggest supplier of crude after Russia. Even so, beyond issuing diplomatic statements, China is unlikely to intervene, said analysts. While some have touted China's growing influence in the Middle East, particularly after it brokered a landmark normalisation deal between archrivals Saudi Arabia and Iran in 2023, it has little appetite to be embroiled in the region's conflicts. Associate Professor Jonathan Fulton, an expert in China's relations with the Middle East, said China's interests in the Middle East are primarily economic, noting also that it buys much more oil from countries such as Saudi Arabia and Oman than Iran. 'When China looks at Iran, I think they see a partner of limited economic value,' he said. 'They also see a country that, through its proxies or its own aggressive behaviour, has destabilised a lot of the Middle East.' Another major reason for China's inaction is that it does not want to antagonise the US, said Prof Fulton, who is non-resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a US think-tank. 'Much like the logic with Ukraine – if China gives weapons to Russia and Russia uses them to attack Ukraine, this is going to provoke Nato and make China an enemy in the eyes of countries that it wants to have good economic and political relations with,' he added. Chinese officials have repeatedly called for a ceasefire since Israel began a major offensive against Iran on June 12 to cripple Tehran's ability to develop nuclear weapons, seen by Israel as a threat to its security. Since that first salvo, there have been tit-for-tat air strikes between the two countries, an ongoing conflict that could yet lead to the overthrow of the leaders of the Islamic republic. China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi has suggested through phone calls to his counterparts in the Middle East – Iran and Israel, as well as Egypt and Oman which are involved in mediation efforts – that China is willing to coordinate with regional countries for peace. Dr Clemens Chay, a research fellow from the Middle East Institute at the National University of Singapore, said: 'Beyond the perfunctory statements and calls by Chinese officials, it is unlikely Beijing will stick its hand in – certainly not militarily – in the ongoing tit-for-tat strikes between Iran and Israel.' Given that China has energy interests in the region, including in Iranian oil, the logical approach for it would be to call for de-escalation, he said. 'But to deploy its forces will be too much of an ask.' Dr Andrea Ghiselli, a lecturer in international politics at the University of Exeter who focuses on Chinese foreign policy in the Middle East, said Mr Wang's phone calls should be read as a way for China to get a better read of the situation. China is probably seeking to understand how regional powers and countries like Russia are preparing for a possible collapse of the regime in Iran and the consequent emergence of Israel as a regional hegemon, said Dr Ghiselli, who also heads research at the ChinaMed Project of the Torino World Affairs Institute, an Italian think-tank. A possible regime change in Iran – which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said could happen, even if his government does not aim to bring it about – would also not likely be welcomed by China, not least because the next leadership may be less predictable. Dr Gedaliah Afterman of Reichman University in Israel said a quick collapse of the regime or power vacuum would threaten China's investments, infrastructure and strategic access across the region. 'Beijing prefers continuity and predictability, particularly given Iran's current economic dependence on China,' he added. He said the best-case scenario for China is a swift de-escalation that avoids direct US-Iran confrontation, preserves the existing regional order in which Beijing feels increasingly comfortable, and enables it to continue balancing relations with Iran, the Gulf and Israel. 'China may also seek to present itself as playing a role in any renewed nuclear agreement, even if only symbolically, especially if this comes at the expense of US influence in the region,' said Dr Afterman. - The Straits Times/Asia News Network
