Cost of emissions from five major Australian resource companies more than $900bn, study finds
Five of Australia's biggest fossil fuel producers could be on the hook for hundreds of billions of dollars in damages after a US research team developed a method to link individual companies to specific climate harms and put a dollar figure to the impact.
This is the result of a new peer-review study published in the journal Nature that sought to establish a method that would allow courts to quantify the economic loss caused by fossil fuel producers for one kind of climate impact – extreme heat.
Looking at the period 1991 to 2020, the researchers, Christopher Callahan at Stanford University in California and Justin Mankin at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire, used historical emissions data for the world's five biggest oil producers: BP, Gazprom, Saudi Aramco, ExxonMobil and Chevron.
They then sought to understand how the emissions from these companies contributed to extreme heat. This was defined as the temperature of the hottest five days in a year.
The team developed a replicable method to quantify the damage linked to a single company, with the figure running into the trillions for the world's largest fossil fuel producers.
It suggested state-owned oil companies Saudi Aramco and Gazprom were responsible for US$2.05tr and $2tr in damages respectively. Chevron, ExxonMobil and BP were each found to be responsible for $1.98tr, $1.91tr and $1.45tr in losses respectively.
In a separate analysis of emissions data for five major Australian resource companies – BHP, Rio Tinto, Santos, Whitehaven Coal and Woodside Energy – Callahan assessed the total damages from their collective emissions at more than US$600bn, or A$929.47bn.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
'Our analysis is very explicitly thinking about emissions that are already occurred and the sort of historical changes in extreme heat, and attributing those to emissions that have been already detected and attributed to specific actors,' Callahan said.
'Even just from that we get numbers in the trillions, when you aggregate globally over the last 30 years in terms of the losses associated with any individual company, but GDP growth losses from extreme heat are a very small fraction of the total cost of climate change.'
The difficulty in establishing causation and calculating a single company's contribution to climate harms has made courts in many jurisdictions, particularly in Australia, reluctant to hold individual fossil fuel producers to account for the climate impact of their projects.
When seeking approval to build and operate its $5.6bn Barossa gasfield in a remote area off the far north Australian coast, Australian oil company Santos was asked by the Australian Conservation Foundation whether it had considered potential climate harms.
Santos responded by arguing 'there are limitations to linking emissions from the activity to any specific climate change impacts'.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'Santos invited ACF to provide further information regarding how it is able to undertake an analysis that links climate change impacts from the activity to specific environments or ecosystems,' the company said.
Callahan said the work provides a foundation for future research to link the activities of specific oil, gas and coal producers to additional climate harms such as drought, flooding and sea level rise, though he added there was still 'a long way to go' before a tobacco or asbestos-style lawsuit succeeds.
'Until two weeks ago, it was unclear whether it was scientifically supported to say an individual emitter can be linked to the impact that you're suing over or that you are trying to recoup costs for. That scientific connection can absolutely be made,' he said.
'It is no longer scientifically supported for actors to argue that there is plausible deniability, that it is impossible to link any of an individual actor to any impact of climate change.
'That statement, that there is a sort of uncrossable gap between where you emit and some other impact down the road, we've shown that to be fallacious.'
Several significant law suits have been brought against major US oil companies, including Municipalities of Puerto Rico v Exxon Mobil Corp and other cases brought by individual US state governments.
On Friday, Hawaii became the 10th US state to take fossil fuel producers to court over alleged climate deception, prompting a counter-suit by the Trump administration in an attempt to block the filing.
Next to the United States, Australia is the second most active jurisdiction in the world for climate litigation, according to Melbourne Law School's Climate Change litigation database which currently tracks 627 cases.
Many of these cases include smaller decisions involving council planning, regulations or access to information as the database uses a broader definition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Serbia's NIS oil company seeks fourth sanctions waiver from US
June 20 (Reuters) - Russian-owned Serbian oil company NIS ( opens new tab has asked the United States for a fourth waiver from sanctions which could cut its crude supply, it said on Friday. NIS, which is majority-owned by Russia's Gazprom Neft ( opens new tab and Gazprom ( opens new tab, operates Serbia's only oil refinery. The facility has an annual capacity of 4.8 million tons and covers most of the Balkan country's needs. The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) initially placed sanctions on Russia's oil sector on January 10, and gave Gazprom Neft 45 days to exit ownership of NIS. NIS has so far secured three waivers, with the third one set to expire on June 27. On March 14, NIS submitted a request to the U.S. Treasury Department for its removal from the sanctions list, it said. "Despite the complex environment in which the company operates, NIS continues with regular supply of the domestic market with all kinds of oil derivatives, and remains devoted to maintaining social stability of its employees," the company said in a statement on its website. On February 26, Gazprom Neft transferred a stake of around 5.15% in NIS to Gazprom in an attempt to ward off sanctions. Gazprom Neft owns 44.85% of NIS, while Gazprom has 11.3%. The Serbian government owns 29.87%, with small shareholders accounting for the rest. NIS imports about 80% of its oil needs through Croatia's pipeline operator Janaf. The remainder is covered by its own crude oil production in Serbia.
Edinburgh Live
7 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Eager Edinburgh customers in huge queue stretching up road as new cafe opens
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Hundreds of Edinburgh customers were spotted in a huge queue on a busy street to celebrate the opening of a new bubble tea shop. The team at HeyTea previously announced the opening of their new location in the capital and they officially welcomed customers in on Friday morning. Based at South Bridge, fans of the chain flocked to the new venue to make the most of the 'buy one get one free offer' and hoped to get their hands on the Edinburgh themed magnets - prompting a huge queue. A video taken opposite the road shows the line stretching up South Bridge as customers couldn't wait to get their hands on a drink. A post on Instagram reads: "A fresh sense of taste, awakened by the history tucked in the alleyways. Brew a pot of tea, adding a bit of depth, a bit of layers. "Feel it, gather it, and wait, for another renaissance to unfold. "Grand opening on 20th June. Buy one get one free on our exclusive opening menu. Limited-edition Edinburgh fridge magnets available." An application for HeyTea branded signage was submitted to Edinburgh Council in February of this year and approved in late March. The shop will occupy the premises formerly occupied by another bubble tea shop, HI TEA, now closed. HeyTea is a popular bubble tea brand originating in China. They brand themselves as starting the "new tea style", which innovates traditional tea by adding ingredients like milk, fruit, and various toppings. They sell fruit tea and milk teas, experimenting with unusual ingredients like cheese foam. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sentstraight to your messages. Their website reads: "As the originator of the New Style Tea, we hav ebeen infusing our teas with eccentric inspiration, giving traditional tea a new life. We want to create a tea brand for young minds who are tired of mediocracy and who dare to drink differently." This will be the franchise's second Scotland store after their first opened in Glasgow. The brand also operates a number of cafes in London and Manchester. They also operate stores across the world in Australian, America, Canada, and Asia.
Daily Mail
13 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Oil prices eye $100 mark amid intensifying Israel-Iran conflict
Oil soared towards $80 a barrel yesterday as industry experts warned conflict in the Middle East could send it above $100. Brent – the global benchmark – reached a five-month high above $78 a barrel as Israel and Iran exchanged missile attacks. And if passage through the Strait of Hormuz – a shipping route in the Persian Gulf for 20 per cent of the world's oil – is cut off, the price could rocket higher. The Bank of England sounded the alarm yesterday over surging oil prices, which threaten to drive inflation higher, in its interest rates decision. But average rises are still less than a penny for petrol and diesel, the motoring association said. 'A spike in the oil price looks daunting but it is taking its time to filter through to drivers,' AA spokesman Luke Bosdet said. Analysts at Goldman Sachs predict Brent could reach $90 a barrel and Barclays claimed, in the 'worst-case scenario' of a wider war, it could pass $100. Shares in BP and Shell rose 1.7 per cent and 1.2 per cent respectively on hopes that higher oil prices will boost profits. Former BP chief executive Lord Browne (pictured) said the trajectory for prices 'depends [on] what happens in the Strait of Hormuz, but if we really do shut down global supply then the price will go up a lot'. 'A lot of the price is controlled by fear, fear that Iran will do something different... I think there'll be a lot of volatility short-term,' he told LBC. And Shell chief executive Wael Sawan (pictured) said: 'The escalation in tensions has added to what has already been significant uncertainty in the region. We're being very careful with, for example, our shipping in the region, just to make sure that we do not take any unnecessary risks.' At an industry conference in Tokyo, he said 'the Strait of Hormuz is the artery through which the world's energy flows and if that artery is blocked, for whatever reason, it'll have a huge impact on global trade.'
