Oil prices eye $100 mark amid intensifying Israel-Iran conflict
Oil soared towards $80 a barrel yesterday as industry experts warned conflict in the Middle East could send it above $100. Brent – the global benchmark – reached a five-month high above $78 a barrel as Israel and Iran exchanged missile attacks.
And if passage through the Strait of Hormuz – a shipping route in the Persian Gulf for 20 per cent of the world's oil – is cut off, the price could rocket higher. The Bank of England sounded the alarm yesterday over surging oil prices, which threaten to drive inflation higher, in its interest rates decision.
But average rises are still less than a penny for petrol and diesel, the motoring association said. 'A spike in the oil price looks daunting but it is taking its time to filter through to drivers,' AA spokesman Luke Bosdet said.
Analysts at Goldman Sachs predict Brent could reach $90 a barrel and Barclays claimed, in the 'worst-case scenario' of a wider war, it could pass $100. Shares in BP and Shell rose 1.7 per cent and 1.2 per cent respectively on hopes that higher oil prices will boost profits.
Former BP chief executive Lord Browne (pictured) said the trajectory for prices 'depends [on] what happens in the Strait of Hormuz, but if we really do shut down global supply then the price will go up a lot'. 'A lot of the price is controlled by fear, fear that Iran will do something different... I think there'll be a lot of volatility short-term,' he told LBC.
And Shell chief executive Wael Sawan (pictured) said: 'The escalation in tensions has added to what has already been significant uncertainty in the region. We're being very careful with, for example, our shipping in the region, just to make sure that we do not take any unnecessary risks.' At an industry conference in Tokyo, he said 'the Strait of Hormuz is the artery through which the world's energy flows and if that artery is blocked, for whatever reason, it'll have a huge impact on global trade.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Fed's Waller: Rate cuts should be considered by July given inflation data
WASHINGTON, June 20 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve should consider cutting interest rates at its next meeting given recent tame inflation data and the fact that any price shock from import tariffs will be short lived, Fed governor Chris Waller said on Friday. "Any tariff inflation ... I don't think is going to be that big and we should just look through it in terms of setting policy," Waller said on CNBC's Squawk Box. "The data the last few months has been showing that trend inflation is looking pretty good ... We could do this as early as July." His dovish comments follow a Fed meeting where the central bank held rates steady and indicated they would remain on hold for now.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Qatar met with energy majors to discuss risks of Israel-Iran war, sources say
DOHA/LONDON June 20 (Reuters) - Qatar held this week crisis talks with energy majors after Israeli strikes on Iran's huge gas field, which it shares with Qatar, an industry source and a diplomat in the region told Reuters. Doha was asking firms to raise U.S., UK and European governments' awareness of increasing risks to global gas supply, they said. QatarEnergy did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Nigerian communities set to have oil pollution High Court claims tried in 2027
Members of the Bille and Ogale communities in the Niger Delta, which have a combined population of around 50,000, are suing Shell plc and a Nigerian-based subsidiary of the company, the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria, which is now the Renaissance Africa Energy Company. The two communities began legal action in 2015, claiming they have suffered systemic and ongoing oil pollution for years due to the companies' operations in the African country, including pollution of drinking water. They are seeking compensation and asking for the companies to clean up the damage caused by the spills. The companies are defending the claims, saying that the majority of spills are caused by criminal acts of third parties or illegal oil refining, for which they are not liable. On Friday, Mrs Justice May ruled on more than 20 preliminary issues in the claims, following a hearing held in London over four weeks in February and March. She said that 'some 85 spills have, so far, been identified', but added that the case was 'still at a very early stage'. Her findings included that Shell could be sued for damage from pipeline spills caused by third parties, such as vandals, in efforts to steal oil, a process known as bunkering. She also said that while there was a five-year limitation period on bringing legal claims, a 'new cause of action will arise each day that oil remains' on land affected by the spills. The cases are due to be tried over four months, starting in March 2027. Reacting to the ruling, the leader of the Ogale community, King Bebe Okpabi, said: 'It has been 10 years now since we started this case, we hope that now Shell will stop these shenanigans and sit down with us to sort this out. 'People in Ogale are dying; Shell need to bring a remedy. 'We thank the judicial system of the UK for this judgment.' Matthew Renishaw, international development partner at law firm Leigh Day, which represents the claimants, said: 'This outcome opens the door to Shell being held responsible for their legacy pollution as well as their negligence in failing to take reasonable steps to prevent pollution from oil theft or local refining.' He continued: 'Our clients reiterate, as they have repeatedly for 10 years, that they simply want Shell to clean up their pollution and compensate them for their loss of livelihood. 'It is high time that Shell stop their legal filibuster and do the right thing.' A Shell spokesperson said that the company welcomed the judgment. They said: 'For many years, the vast majority of spills in the Niger Delta have been caused by third parties acting unlawfully, such as oil thieves who drill holes in pipelines, or saboteurs. 'This criminality is the cause of the majority of spills in the Bille and Ogale claims, and we maintain that Shell is not liable for the criminal acts of third parties or illegal refining. 'These challenges are managed by a joint venture which Shell's former subsidiary operated, using its expertise in spill response and clean-up. 'The spills referenced in this litigation were cleaned up by the joint venture regardless of the cause, as required by Nigerian law, working closely with government-owned partner NNPC Ltd, Nigerian government agencies and local communities. 'Clean-up certificates were issued by the Nigerian regulator NOSDRA.' The High Court and the Court of Appeal ruled in 2017 and 2018, respectively, that there was no arguable case that Shell owed the claimants a duty of care, but the Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that there was a 'real issue to be tried'.
