
UAE: Sharjah court convicts school staff in death of 8-year-old Indian student Rashid Habib
CCTV footage showed 8-year-old Rashid Habib was left unescorted from the school bus and collapsed while walking alone to class/ Image: (File)
A Sharjah court has convicted two school staff members of negligence in the death of eight-year-old Indian student Rashid Habib, more than a year after he tragically died following a fall at his school in Muwaileh.
The Sharjah Federal Court of Appeal overturned an earlier acquittal by a lower court and ordered the defendants to pay Dh200,000 in legal blood money to the boy's family. Additionally, each staff member was fined Dh2,000.
The court found that the two staffers had failed in their duty to escort and monitor students from the school bus to their classrooms. CCTV footage reviewed during the investigation showed that Rashid was left unaccompanied at the time of the incident.
The Grade 1 student collapsed while walking alone to his classroom on 11 March 2024, the first day of Ramadan, shortly after arriving at the CBSE-curriculum school.
He was rushed to Al Qassimi Hospital in a state of cardiac arrest but was declared dead despite resuscitation attempts.
A forensic report from Sharjah Police stated that Rashid had sustained a bruise on his face, a fractured cheekbone, internal bleeding under the scalp, and severe brain injuries, including swelling and bleeding.
Surveillance footage confirmed that no school staff were present with the children during the incident. The footage also showed that another child had attempted to hit Rashid moments before he fell. However, the crucial seconds capturing the exact moment of the fall were missing.
The appeal court ruled that the staff's absence amounted to gross negligence, emphasising that the accident could likely have been prevented had the staff been present.
Rashid's father, Habib Yasar, told Khaleej Times: 'Not a day goes by when we don't remember Rashid. Our lives have never been the same. We keep thinking of what could have been if someone had just been there to watch over him. Why was there no CCTV camera? A school is supposed to be like a second home, but it didn't take care of my child. This conviction brings some closure, but the pain remains. We lost a part of ourselves that day.
'
The family had previously claimed Rashid was bullied and attacked during the missing seconds, a charge the school denied.
Due to ongoing legal and administrative proceedings, the name of the school involved is being withheld.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
38 minutes ago
- Mint
Man gets ₹26 lakh for unpaid salary without working for even a day; company loses case in court
An Abu Dhabi court has ordered a company to pay a man Dh110,400 ( ₹ 26 lakh) for unpaid wages. The man was hired but never allowed to start work. He filed a case asking for salary from 11 November 2024 to 7 April 2025. His contract promised a basic salary of Dh7,200 ( ₹ 1.70 lakh) and a total monthly pay of Dh24,000 ( ₹ 5.65 lakh). But, the company kept delaying his joining date without paying him, according to the Khaleej Times. The company's lawyer asked the court to move the case to another department. However, the court found that the delay was the employer's fault, based on salary records and contract documents. The UAE court ruled in favour of the employee, saying wages must be paid on time as per the Labour Law. The law clearly states that a worker's salary is their right and cannot be held back unless the worker has officially agreed to it or the company has legal proof, according to the publication. In this case, the employer claimed the worker didn't report to duty and took leave. However, the court found no proper investigation to support this claim. The employee admitted to taking eight days off, which were deducted. The court ordered a salary payment for four months and 18 days. In an earlier story, a Spanish government worker, Joaquín Garcia, reportedly skipped work for at least six years, maybe even 14 years, while still receiving his salary. The truth came out in 2010, when he was about to get an award for long and faithful service to the city of Cadiz. The 69-year-old engineer had worked for the local government since 1990. In 1996, he was sent to the city's water department to oversee a sewage treatment plant. But, according to reports, he had not shown up to work for years.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
NEET 2025: Student pays 17k to get tampered marks sheet to impress parents
With an intention to show his parents that he had secured good marks in NEET 2025, an 18-year-old boy from Udupi paid ₹17,000 to get a tampered mark sheet. In the complaint to Udupi Cyber Economic and Narcotic Crime Station, the father of the boy stated that during the NEET preparation period in April, his son saw videos posted on Youtube channel Editing Mater (@ Editingmaster-d6r) showing how results of NEET, CBSE and JEE can be digitally altered. Two mobile phone numbers were given in the videos asking people to call if they need fake marks card. He claimed the boy turned 18 on May 10. The boy dialled the numbers through Whatsapp. The receiver identified himself as Vishnu Kumar. The boy transferred a total of ₹17,000 to Vishnu Kumar. On June 16, Vishnu Kumar allegedly sent the boy, through Whatsapp, a digitally forged NEET scorecard and OMR sheet, which showed boy's rank as AIR 107 with 646 marks. After the boy downloaded the fake scorecard, the sender deleted it, the father said. When the boy showed the forged marks card, the elated father, a government officer, was surprised that none of the newspapers carried news about his son's performance. He sent his son's marks card to a local newspaper, which published the news. The father then checked the results on the NEET website and learnt that his son's actual rank was 17.6 lakh. The boy then confessed to his father about payment of money to get a tampered marks card. Superintendent of Police Hariram Shankar said the boy confided to the police about how he was forced to pay money to get a fake marks card. 'We registered the compliant of the father for offences punishable under Sections 66(c) and 66 (d) of the Information Technology Act, and under Sections 336 (2), 318(4), 335, 336(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. We are search for the perpetrators, who may have cheated other students in the same way,' he said.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Lawrence Bishnoi and Goldy Brar reportedly part ways over Anmol Bishnoi case
CHANDIGARH: A major split appears to have occurred between notorious gangster Lawrence Bishnoi currently lodged in Sabarmati Jail, Gujarat and his long-time aide Goldy Brar, who is believed to be operating from the United States. A purported audio message, now circulating on social media, indicates growing tensions between the two over the handling of a case involving Bishnoi's younger brother, Anmol Bishnoi, in the US. According to sources within Indian intelligence agencies, Bishnoi became upset with both Brar and Azerbaijan-based gangster Rohit Godara for allegedly mishandling Anmol's legal situation. This friction reportedly led to a complete severance of ties between Bishnoi and Brar. The audio message, allegedly featuring Brar and Godara, claims responsibility for a recent attack on Ashish Gupta, a real estate businessman from Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. The speaker believed to be Brar denies any current affiliation with Anmol and justifies the attack on Gupta. 'We no longer have any association with Anmol Bishnoi, and we have made this clear to all our brothers. He was not to be killed, only taught a lesson which is why he was shot in the leg. If he has understood, good. If not, next time he will be shot in the head,' the speaker says.