Senators schedule public forums on medical cannabis and pending Nebraska legislation
Crista Eggers of Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana, center, leads a news conference urging legislative support for bills to help implement a safe, fully regulated medical cannabis system. March 3, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner)
LINCOLN — State lawmakers scheduled three eastern Nebraska public forums this weekend to allow the public to weigh in on medical cannabis and proposed state legislation.
State Sens. John Cavanaugh of Omaha, Rick Holdcroft of Bellevue and Ben Hansen of Blair plan to host the series this Saturday in La Vista, Sunday in Omaha and Monday in Lincoln. Attendants will be able to hear updates on the status of medical cannabis legislation, namely Hansen's Legislative Bill 677, and 'share their thoughts.'
The schedule is as follows:
Saturday, May 3, from 1-3 p.m. at the Carpenters Union Hall in La Vista (10761 Virginia Plaza, La Vista).
Sunday, May 4, from 1-3 p.m., at the University of Nebraska at Omaha Thompson Alumni Center (8800 Dodge St., Omaha).
Monday, May 5, from 5-7 p.m., at Southeast Community College (8800 O St., Lincoln).
The hosts plan to accommodate everyone who wishes to speak during the two-hour events.
In November, about 71% of Nebraskans legalized medical cannabis with a physician's recommendation, and 67% of Nebraskans voted for a regulatory scheme.
'Since the legislature has failed to act at this point, I want to give the citizens an opportunity to have their voices heard by their elected representatives,' Cavanaugh told the Nebraska Examiner.
Hansen's LB 677 seeks to help the ballot measures build better guardrails, with help from supporters who put the measures on the ballot.
His bill would delay full implementation of the regulatory law to give the new Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission time to craft regulations that, without funding, officials have said is near impossible to get done by the voter-set July 1 deadline or begin licensing by Oct. 1.
LB 677 has stalled in the Legislature's General Affairs Committee that Holdcroft chairs. Cavanaugh is the vice chair.
Holdcroft, who has said he would support a narrowed LB 677, said he is looking for 'back and forth' at the public forums, such as whether to allow smoking or how many dispensaries should be permitted.
At an April 17 meeting of committee members, the committee considered a narrower committee amendment that sought to create a list of qualifying conditions, restrict who can recommend medical cannabis, exclude smoking as permissible for medical cannabis and prohibit sales of natural cannabis flower or bud.
None of the eight committee members tried to attach the amendment to LB 677. Advancing the bill as-is failed along ideological lines, 3-5.
Five days later, Hansen filed an amendment to add post-traumatic stress disorder as a qualifying condition and allow sales of flower and bud, the latter of which is a line in the sand for Hansen. Hansen also filed what is known as a 'pull motion' that would advance LB 677, with at least 25 votes in the full 49-member legislative body and start the three-round debate.
The latest Hansen amendment would not allow smoking.
Holdcroft and Hansen continue to discuss whether a path forward in the committee exists. Speaker John Arch of La Vista, who sets the daily legislative agenda, declined to say if he would schedule the pull motion as those discussions continue.
Crista Eggers, executive director of Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana, said her team is 'very appreciative' of lawmakers' efforts to give voters a chance to voice their feelings on the issue.
'While we find it disheartening that Nebraskans are being asked to 'clarify their vote,' we hope this final effort makes it clear: Nebraskans support medical cannabis. They knew what they were voting for,' Eggers said. 'They now are demanding lawmakers to uphold the voice of the people.'
LB 677 faces a tight timeline and fiscal situation in the waning days of the 2025 legislative session. Debate on the state's budget bills — with a major hole to still fill — is set to begin May 6. The final budget must pass by May 15.
Lawmakers are set to adjourn for the year on June 9.
Also co-hosting the public forums are State Sens. Ashlei Spivey of Omaha, John Fredrickson of Omaha, Jane Raybould of Lincoln, Victor Rountree of Bellevue, Margo Juarez of Omaha, Machaela Cavanaugh of Omaha, Megan Hunt of Omaha, Myron Dorn of Adams, Merv Riepe of Ralston, Wendy DeBoer of Omaha, Tom Brandt of Plymouth, George Dungan of Lincoln and Danielle Conrad of Lincoln.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
Nebraska AG Sues Temu Over Alleged Consumer Protection Violations
Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers announced Thursday that his office had filed a lawsuit against low-priced e-commerce platform Temu. The complaint alleges a host of consumer protection violations, including misrepresentation of goods, greenwashing, embedding illegal malware into consumers' personal devices and sharing Nebraskans' data with the Chinese Communist Party. More from Sourcing Journal France Moves to Curb 'Ultra-fast' Fashion With Bill Targeting Shein and Temu Federal Appeals Court Grants Trump Temporary Relief on Tariff Ruling Labor Department, Which 'Ridiculed Supporting Worker Rights Abroad,' Responds to ILAB Lawsuit The crux of the complaint is centered around consumers' data. Hilgers alleges in the complaint that Temu has illegally 'siphoned' personal information about Nebraskan consumers, leaving them at risk. Hilgers said Temu's famously low-cost products 'come with a one-two punch to Americans.' 'Temu's app operates as malware; its code is designed to exfiltrate an enormous amount of sensitive information, from access to a user's microphone, pictures and messages, to information sufficient to track their movements,' Hilgers alleged in the complaint. 'This sensitive information that is unlawfully exfiltrated to Temu naturally flows to its powerful patron—the Chinese Communist Party. In the United States's great power competition with China, Temu presents yet another way in which China can extract and exploit information about Americans for its own purposes.' Temu was founded in China and is a subsidiary of PDD Holdings, but its headquarters are now located in Boston. A spokesperson for Temu said the claims made in the complaint are untrue. 'The allegations in the Nebraska Attorney General's lawsuit are without merit and appear to be a rehash of misinformation circulated online, much of it originating from a short-seller. We categorically deny the allegations and will vigorously defend ourselves against them,' the spokesperson told Sourcing Journal via email. This isn't the first time Temu has come under fire for the way it handles consumer data; in June 2024, Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin announced that the state had filed a lawsuit against Temu, calling it 'a data-theft business that sells goods online as a means to an end.' Last year, Republican members of Congress asked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to pursue further information about Temu and its business practices. Throughout the rest of the complaint, Hilgers goes on to allege that the means by which Temu entices Nebraskan consumers are also unlawful. He alleges that the company uses greenwashing to mislead consumers and that it deceives consumers with its local warehousing business model, leading them to believe that they are purchasing from local businesses. 'Temu misleadingly uses the 'local' tag for products shipped from warehouses located in the United States,' Hilgers contended. 'These products could originate from foreign countries, such as China, but Temu passes them off as local goods because the products are temporarily stored for distribution in the United States.' In this section of the complaint, Hilgers is referring to the fact that Temu has been making a push for what it refers to as 'local warehouses.' These warehouses, located in markets of interest, like the U.S. and the EU, make it possible for the company to get products to consumers' doorsteps faster than sending them directly from China. While it has looked to onboard U.S. sellers, many of the sellers who use these local warehouses are based in China. Hilgers further said that the platform is 'awash in products infringing copyrights and other intellectual property.' In the complaint, the attorney general states that Nebraska believes Temu is in violation of multiple state laws, including its Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act and its Consumer Protection Act. Hilgers asks the judge overseeing the case to enjoin Temu from 'continuing to engage in such unlawful acts and practices' and to award affected Nebraskan consumers compensation. Hilgers said the lawsuit is intended to shield the state's residents from unlawful company conduct. 'Temu is putting Nebraskans' privacy at risk and running a platform rife with deceptive listings, unlawful promotional practices, and products that rip off Nebraska brands and creations,' he said in a statement. 'Our office will hold Temu accountable for its exploitation of Nebraska consumers, brands and creators and fight hard for honesty and safety in the online marketplace.'
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
Patty Pansing Brooks announces 2026 bid to return to Nebraska Legislature
Former State Sen. Patty Pansing Brooks of Lincoln. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska News Service) LINCOLN — Former State Sen. Patty Pansing Brooks announced her 2026 candidacy Friday to return to the Nebraska Legislature, a day after the current officeholder said she would not seek reelection. State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln announced her decision not to run again Thursday, leaving the central Lincoln seat open, as first reported by the Nebraska Examiner. Just 24 hours later, Pansing Brooks 'enthusiastically' threw her hat in the ring with Raybould's support, one of more than 70 current and former officials to endorse Pansing Brooks. 'People keep calling me saying, 'What should I do?'' Pansing Brooks told the Examiner. 'And I keep thinking, 'Well, what should I do to help this country right now?' The main thing that I know that I can do is run for office.' Pansing Brooks, 66, said she hopes to be an example for others to run for office and get involved in these 'very strident times.' During her first two terms in office, 2015 to 2023, Pansing Brooks said she worked to be a voice to bring people together, elevate conversations and help people see other sides to issues. If elected back to Legislative District 28, Pansing Brooks said she would continue uplifting juvenile justice reform, combatting human trafficking, defending workers' rights, protecting public education, supporting small businesses, expanding correctional programming for successful reentry and ensuring access to and equity in health care, 'right where I left off in 2022.' Among Pansing Brooks' previous successes: protecting survivors of human trafficking from prostitution charges, mandating new juvenile room confinement standards and reports and shielding survivors of sexual assault and sex trafficking before criminal charges are filed. 'There's still work to do,' she said. Pansing Brooks has a history of working with conservative colleagues, such as with former State Sen. Lou Ann Linehan on dyslexia. The pair toured schools and passed laws to increase interventions for students with dyslexia and require teachers to be educated about the disability. Pansing Brooks also worked closely with former State Sen. Tom Brewer, a member of the Oglala Lakota Tribe and the Legislature's first Native member, notably to help pressure the closing of four beer stores in the village of Whiteclay in Brewer's north-central Nebraska district. For decades, the stores helped fuel alcoholism for the neighboring Pine Ridge Reservation, home to the Oglala Lakota. The duo also worked to add 'Indigenous Peoples' Day' to state law alongside Columbus Day. Brewer is one of many former conservative colleagues of Pansing Brooks to have already endorsed her 2026 campaign. Pansing Brooks, if elected, would join a handful of lawmakers to return after being term-limited. She said she knows there will be 'horrible days,' as there were before and that it might be tough. However, Pansing Brooks said, 'There's goodness and kindness to share, important laws to make and ways to support our fabulous Nebraskans.' Since 2023, the one-house Legislature has been increasingly divided on partisan lines. Pansing Brooks would return as lawmakers have a heightened focus on the LGBTQ community that she advocated for during her time in office. She had proposed legislation attempting to outlaw discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation, which other senators picked up after her absence. 'I care about the rights of people to live and to be who they are, to not have prejudice against them, no matter what group they're in,' Pansing Brooks said. 'But I'm also going to be there to learn and listen and try to figure out if there's new steps where I'm needed or new issues where I'm needed, then that's what I'll do.' Another lawmaker who returned after being term-limited, former State Sen. Steve Lathrop of Omaha, declined to seek reelection in 2022, in part because of how much the institution had changed in the four years he was gone. Lathrop endorsed Pansing Brooks, with whom he served. Just one lawmaker has been term-limited twice since the voter-approved restrictions took full effect after 2006: former State Sen. Ernie Chambers of Omaha. Pansing Brooks said that, if elected, she would not return with any assumptions that she would be treated differently than other 'newbie' lawmakers. She said she knows she would need to make new friendships and gain trust, which she's ready to do, and that Nebraska could be a model for Congress on working together. In 2022, Pansing Brooks was the Democratic candidate for Nebraska's 1st Congressional District, falling short to U.S. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb. Flood, a former colleague, repeatedly sought to tie Pansing Brooks to national Democratic policies and party leaders. Pansing Brooks in that 2022 congressional race won her legislative district by a slightly greater percentage of votes than Raybould did that year. It is Lincoln's most progressive legislative district. A bipartisan group of former senators endorsed Pansing Brooks, including State Sens. Kathy Campbell, Bob Krist, John McCollister, DiAnna Schimek, John Stinner, Tony Vargas and Lynne Walz. She is endorsed by current State Sens. Machaela Cavanaugh, John Cavanaugh, Danielle Conrad, Wendy DeBoer, George Dungan, John Fredrickson, Dunixi Guereca, Megan Hunt, Margo Juarez, Terrell McKinney, Dan Quick, Raybould, Victor Rountree and Ashlei Spivey. All but Hunt, a nonpartisan progressive, are Democrats in the officially nonpartisan Legislature. Other early endorsements include Bob Kerrey and Ben Nelson (former governors and former U.S. senators), former Nebraska Lt. Govs. Kim Robak and Maxine Moul and Lincoln Mayor Leirion Gaylor Baird. Pansing Brooks, who had been a Republican for much of her life until the 2000s, including a stint as Lancaster County GOP chair, said she's honored by conservative friends she made in the Legislature who have now endorsed her. 'It makes me realize that this is possible. We don't all have to be divided and in circular firing squads, just firing away at each other,' Pansing Brooks said. Pansing Brooks added that the Legislature is special and that she hopes lawmakers can continue to find common ground. 'We've done that in the past,' Pansing Brooks said. 'We can continue to do it.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
NU Regents to consider 5% tuition increase, next UNK chancellor June 19
Advocates for the University of Nebraska system join at the Nebraska State Capitol for the annual "I Love NU Day." In the front row, from left, is NU President Jeffrey Gold, State Sen. Jason Prokop of Lincoln and Student Regent Ishani Adidam (University of Nebraska at Omaha), Student Regent Pranita Devaraju (University of Nebraska Medical Center), Student Regent Elizabeth Herbin (University of Nebraska-Lincoln), Student Regent Sam Schroeder (University of Nebraska at Kearney), State Sen. Teresa Ibach, Chancellor Joanne Li (UNO), interim Chancellor H. Dele Davies (UNMC) and interim Chancellor Charlie Bicak (UNK). April 2, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — The University of Nebraska Board of Regents will consider a roughly 5% tuition increase at its meeting next week after state appropriations fell well short of NU's request. Nebraska lawmakers in May approved a 0.625% increase in state dollars for the next fiscal year ($4.35 million) at NU. But regents last August asked for a 3.5% increase, mostly to cover inflationary costs. NU President Jeffrey Gold said that while the Legislature must balance its budget, 'the other side of the coin' is that NU faces similar inflationary pressures to the rest of state government. Gov. Jim Pillen, a former regent for 10 years, initially suggested a 2% cut of state funding to NU, but federal funding cuts and freezes helped ignite new negotiations. 'While we're not a supermarket or a car dealership, we still have to buy the same dozen eggs, the same tomatoes to feed our students,' Gold told the Nebraska Examiner this week. Lawmakers, Gold and Pillen landed at a new 'compromise' to increase state funding by 0.625% next year and 0.625% over that new baseline in the following fiscal year, both short of the annual 3.5% increase regents asked for. The state runs on a two-year budget cycle, but NU passes an annual budget. Gold said NU leaders studied tuition at peer institutions, as well as within specific colleges and programs so NU maintained competitive tuition rates. Most are within the lowest quartile or decile, he said, or the lowest compared to other universities and colleges. As a first-generation college student, Gold said he always has concerns that tuition increases could hurt enrollment, and he's focused on trying to keep college as affordable as possible. 'Not to say that it's not a significant change in tuition and that it is essentially asking families and students to pay more for their education out of pocket,' Gold said. 'It is still a very conservative approach, with our focus on remaining affordable long term into the future.' Under the proposal, NU's $1.1 billion 'state-aided budget' would increase by $19.07 million, the result of new state dollars and increased tuition, minus $2.5 million in declining investments. It's an overall spending increase of about 1.8%. Operational expenses would increase by $37.44 million, but Gold is seeking $18.37 million in cuts to balance new expenses and revenues. The increased costs are: $22.31 million for general operations. $12.73 million for faculty salaries (faculty at the University of Nebraska at Omaha and the University of Nebraska at Kearney are unionized.) $7.78 million for health insurance (assuming a 7.25% increase in premiums). $1.64 million for utilities. $793,507 for employee benefits. The budget also seeks to expand the 'Nebraska Promise' — free tuition for any Nebraska student whose family makes $65,000 or less — by about $1 million and invest $2 million in deferred maintenance. Another $1.5 million will go to maintain the 'Presidential Scholars Program' to waive tuition and pay students with top scores on the ACT to attend NU, for a 50-student annual cohort. Regents had asked for matching state fund, which did not come. Gold said campuses are proposing planned reductions that will be ready by the end of the month. He said administrators are committed to closing any budget gap while also turning attention to a growing set of legislatively mandated tuition remissions, waiving tuition for law enforcement, public safety workers, firefighters, first responders, veterans and more. While Gold said it's good to offer higher education to those individuals and often their families, the roughly $10 million cost next year means sustaining those programs get more difficult. NU continues working with Pillen and lawmakers to find a solution. While there is a net increase in faculty expenses, the NU budget shows a $12.34 million decrease in nonfaculty expenses, meaning the status quo for staff also won't be maintained. Jordan Gonzales, president of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Staff Senate, said in May he was 'deeply disappointed' after Gold announced the budget would include no allocation for general salary increases or across-the-board raises. Gonzales told UNL staff that investing in them 'is not just a matter of fairness, but a strategic imperative for the long-term health and success of the University of Nebraska.' He predicted 'significant, negative consequences,' including diminished morale and productivity, declines in recruitment, increased staff turnover and higher workloads passed on to remaining staff. 'Investing in our people is also critical if we truly aspire an odyssey to the extraordinary, especially if we want to create and maintain an extraordinary culture and environment,' Gonzales wrote, citing Gold's long-term strategic plan. Gold had said campuses can pay for promotions, often needed for recruitment and retention, but that those costs would need to be made up on individual campuses. Outside of the general state-aided budget, the total $3.57 billion NU budget (including cash funds, auxiliary funds, federal funds and trust funds) estimates that NU will receive about $11.85 million less in federal funds. NU is estimated to receive about $740.7 million in restricted federal funds. Gold said federal cuts would predominantly be dealt with on a campus-by-campus and college-by-college level, such as if a research grant is canceled or indirect cost recovery rates are dropped. He noted that the current congressional tax-focused bill — dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — calls to significantly reduce federal research funding. It could be harder to compete for federal research grants, Gold said, and if a research program is terminated, NU would try to repurpose those researchers. If not, they could lose their jobs. 'These are very, very significant changes, and there's no easy solution to this across the country,' Gold said. 'But we're going to do everything we can to protect our faculty and our staff who are involved in these research-intensive programs.' Regents are also set to officially confirm Neal Schnoor as the next UNK chancellor. Gold said he is excited for the 'right person at the right time,' someone who knows Nebraska, Kearney and UNK 'extremely well' as a former faculty member and administrator. Gold said the public vetting process has been 'astoundingly positive' and that Schnoor understands how to focus on enrollment, leadership development and make hard decisions. Schnoor is currently the president of Northern State University in South Dakota. 'It will be with a great sense of pride that I will recommend Neal Schnoor to be the next chancellor of UNK,' Gold said. If confirmed, Schnoor would start July 1 with a $355,000 salary. He would succeed former UNK Chancellor Doug Kristensen, who retired May 2024 after 22 years. The regents will meet at 9 a.m. June 19 in NU's Varner Hall in Lincoln. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
