Liberal win expected to save millions in federal housing funding for Winnipeg from chopping block
Social Sharing
A different outcome in Monday's federal election could have put hundreds of millions in federal housing dollars for the City of Winnipeg on the chopping block.
But with a minority Liberal government now projected, "it certainly looks like the money is going to be there," said St. Vital Coun. Brian Mayes.
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre promised to axe many Liberal spending programs, like the multibillion-dollar housing accelerator fund, introduced by the Liberals under former prime minister Justin Trudeau.
The City of Winnipeg agreed to make sweeping changes to its zoning rules in exchange for $122.4 million from the federal fund, which is intended to speed up housing construction.
With polls a few months ago suggesting the Conservatives were on the path to forming government, some, like St. Vital's Mayes, questioned whether the city should go ahead with the changes, which allow fourplexes and up to four storeys near frequent transit without the need for a public hearing.
Mayes says he still has concerns about those changes, but the Liberal win means at least the city can rest assured it will get its money.
"If you're only doing this to get federal money and then you're not sure if you're going to get the money — I think we've resolved that," Mayes said in an interview Tuesday.
The city has already received two instalments of $30.6 million from the housing accelerator fund, but two more instalments are expected in 2025 and 2026.
The housing accelerator fund isn't the only long-term municipal funding program that could have been eliminated by a Conservative government.
The city made two applications to the Canada housing infrastructure fund — one for the southwest sewer interceptor crossing for $31.3 million, and one for the biosolids facility at the North End Sewage Treatment Plant for $184.1 million.
The federal government has also promised the city annual payments of $11.6 million for 10 years, starting in the 2026-27 fiscal year, as part of the Canada public transit fund.
Mayes has criticized aspects of the programs, such as the requirement for cities to change policies in order to access funding.
A hearing on the proposed zoning changes is scheduled for June. Mayes says city staff have made some positive changes to their proposals, but he worries that the city's proposed 60-foot (18-metre) minimum lot width for fourplexes without back lanes is too narrow.
"It does look like we'll have the week-long hearing that we have scheduled. I still have an open mind about the details, but I think we're going to have to go forward and have the hearing [and] certainly see what that produces," Mayes said.
Mayor Scott Gillingham says he's glad the city has held up its end of the funding agreements, including planning the hearing on the proposed zoning changes.
"It was very important that we maintain our course, continue to act in good faith in accordance with the terms of the housing accelerator fund agreement that we, as the City of Winnipeg, signed," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
3 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Braid: With Bill C-5, some politicians say federal power is a great thing after all
Is that the House of Commons I'm watching, or a hacked broadcast from some other country? Post election realignment in the chamber is a spectacular display of mutating principles. Article content Article content Conservatives back the Liberals on Bill C-5, which gives the federal cabinet more power. Article content They spent the whole Justin Trudeau era complaining about every Liberal power grab. Now they support a significant centralization, because it promises a result they want. Article content Article content The New Democrats and Greens, great lovers of central power, suddenly don't want it at all. Article content Article content The bill is an 'abomination,' said Green Leader Elizabeth May, who once said Ottawa should have full wartime powers to fight climate change. Article content Bill C-5 itself is a vital tool for breaking down the many barriers to development created by Trudeau and his gang of zealots. Article content The Conservatives grit their teeth to support the bill. It's not easy seeing another government implement your policies. Article content For many years, every resource project that came before the Liberals was an environmental problem rather than an economic opportunity. Trudeau set Canada's economy back a full decade Article content The bill gives the federal cabinet extraordinary power to approve and speed up new projects. Prime Minister Mark Carney wants it slammed through before the national will for a new economy begins to fade. Article content Article content Fall could bring an entirely different mood in Canada, especially if he gets a good result on trade from U.S. President Donald Trump. Article content To that end, quick passage of the bill is supported by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, and Premier Scott Moe in Saskatchewan. Article content Article content Smith brought in the Sovereignty Act. She fought the feds in court at every turn. Moe refused to collect federal tax on home heating fuel — an act branded criminal by Trudeau's crowd. Article content Now, the premiers are ready for more federal power, with some trepidation, because someday it might be used by a federal government even more hostile than Trudeau's.
Toronto Sun
3 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Liberals, Conservatives pass major projects legislation in House of Commons
Published Jun 20, 2025 • Last updated 0 minutes ago • 1 minute read Prime Minister Mark Carney rises during a vote for Bill C-5 in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Friday, June 20, 2025. Photo by Justin Tang / THE CANADIAN PRESS OTTAWA — Liberal and Conservative members of Parliament voted to pass the government's major projects legislation this evening. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account After the second of two votes, Prime Minister Mark Carney crossed the floor to shake hands with Opposition House leader Andrew Scheer and Conservative deputy leader Melissa Lantsman. Two votes were held instead of one after the House Speaker ruled that the legislation had two distinct parts without a clear common element. That allowed the Bloc Quebecois and NDP members to vote in favour of the first part of the bill — which looks to tackle internal trade barriers — and against the more controversial second part dealing with major projects. The major projects bill grants the government sweeping powers to quickly approve projects that are deemed to be in the national interest. The bill is now headed to the Senate, which is scheduled to sit until June 27. World Toronto & GTA Columnists MMA World
National Observer
4 hours ago
- National Observer
Bill C-5 passes the House of Commons vote after accelerated process
The federal government's controversial Bill C-5 is off to the Senate next week for a truncated study. Opposition parties amended the proposed legislation to ensure the government cannot override certain laws (including the Indian Act, Canada Labour Code and Criminal Code) but most environmental law and regulations can still be circumvented if a project is deemed 'in the national interest.' The bill would grant cabinet the power to override laws and regulations to get major projects built. In a marathon committee meeting Wednesday evening, the Bloc Québécois and Conservatives worked together to increase transparency and reporting requirements in the bill and prevent the government from overriding more than a dozen laws. But the government can still override important environmental statutes including the Fisheries Act, Species at Risk Act, Canadian Navigable Waters Act, Canadian Environmental Protection Act, Migratory Birds Convention Act and Impact Assessment Act. The same goes for regulations including Wildlife Area Regulations, Marine Mammal Regulations, two migratory birds regulations as well as port and mining effluent regulations. MPs had their last chance to amend the bill Friday afternoon in the House of Commons. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May tried to add the Species at Risk Act to the list of laws cabinet cannot override. The Liberals and Conservatives defeated May's motion, with Liberal MP Nate Erskine-Smith breaking rank and voting with the Bloc Québécois, Green Party and NDP. Erskine-Smith has been critical of Bill C-5 and previously voted against his own government's order to limit debate on the bill, which would also remove some federal barriers to internal trade. The Liberals and Conservatives voted together not just on the bill itself, but also on a motion to ensure the bill cleared the House of Commons before MPs leave Ottawa for the summer. Parliament will resume sitting in mid-September. MPs ended up voting on the bill in two parts, as originally requested by the Bloc Québécois. NDP MP Jenny Kwan made the request again today, and the Speaker of the House decided to split the bill into two different votes — one on the internal trade components and one on national interest projects — both of which passed. 'This legislation is an abomination' The Bloc Québécois, NDP and Green Party say the major projects bill is undemocratic because of the unprecedented powers it grants cabinet and lack of respect for Indigenous rights. The Chiefs of Ontario and many Indigenous leaders mobilized on Wednesday for a rally on Parliament Hill calling on Carney's government to drop bill C-5 and do it right this time. On June 16, Sen. Paul Prosper said he plans on putting forward an amendment to slow C-5 down if and when it gets to the Senate in 'hopes that more rational minds prevail in terms of consulting with Indigenous groups.' Elizabeth May, in the bill's final moments before the House of Commons, reiterated what many have said since it was introduced: that the speed of the bill and the vagueness of its application means much now rests on what exactly the government decides to do with it. 'There are many great projects … I'd love to see move ahead: east-west-north-south electricity grid, a passenger rail and bus interlinked system,' she said. 'There are many projects in the national interest, but we don't know what they will be and the factors in the bill are not requirements. We could have a great project that we all want to see go ahead — or we could have a nightmare." In the end, May — the sole MP to vote against both parts of the bill — did not mince words. 'This legislation is an abomination and one that will be a stain on the reputation of this government and of our Prime Minister.'
