Explainer-NBA-Breaking down the Buss family's sale of LA Lakers at $10-billion valuation
Jeanie Buss, President of the Los Angeles Lakers speaks during the permanent placement of late Kobe Bryant's handprints and footprints in the forecourt of the TCL Chinese Theatre in Hollywood, Los Angeles, California, U.S., March 15, 2023. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo
(Reuters) -The Buss family, architects of 11 NBA championships, is poised to relinquish their four-decade reign over the LA Lakers, with ESPN reporting they are entering an agreement to sell a majority stake in basketball's most glamorous franchise.
The following is the breakdown of the deal:
WHAT IS AT STAKE?
Lakers minority owner Mark Walter is set to take majority ownership in a deal valuing the Lakers at about $10 billion, making it the most expensive U.S. sports team valuation in history.
The deal will end family control of the Lakers.
The Buss family will retain a minority share of just over 15% for a period of time after the deal, ESPN reported, bringing to a close its stewardship of a franchise that became synonymous with Hollywood allure and championship excellence.
Reuters could not immediately ascertain what Walter's new stake in the team would be. He purchased a minority stake in the Lakers with Todd Boehly in 2021.
The previous record for biggest sports deal was held by the Boston Celtics, who agreed in March to be sold for $6.1 billion.
WHO ARE THE LAKERS?
The Lakers are one of the most storied franchises in National Basketball Association history. The team was valued at $7.1 billion by Forbes last year, behind only the Golden State Warriors and New York Knicks in the NBA.
They are the second-most successful NBA team with 17 championships. The Celtics have 18.
Jerry Buss, who bought the Lakers for $67.5 million in 1979, transformed them into one of the most well-known franchises in professional sports. The team won five championships during the celebrated "Showtime" era of the 1980s.
The Lakers have LeBron James, arguably the league's biggest star, on their roster. They also snapped up Slovenian Luka Doncic in a high-profile trade with the Dallas Mavericks in February.
WHO IS MARK WALTER?
Walter is a 65-year-old American billionaire businessman who is CEO and chairman of holding company TWG Global. He is also CEO of investment firm Guggenheim Partners.
Walter, whose net worth is listed as $6.1 billion by Forbes, has owned the LA Dodgers baseball team since 2012.
He is adding the Lakers to a sporting portfolio that includes stakes in the Cadillac Formula One team, the WNBA's Los Angeles Sparks and English Premier League soccer club Chelsea.
WHO ARE THE BUSS FAMILY?
Jerry Buss's 66% stake in the Lakers was passed on to his six children via a family trust after his death in 2013. Buss died at the age of 80 due to kidney failure.
His daughter, Jeanie, took over as principal owner after his death and is set to continue as team governor, maintaining a family connection to the purple-and-gold empire her father built.
WHICH ARE SOME OTHER NOTABLE SPORTS DEALS?
The Celtics set the previous benchmark in NBA sale valuations after agreeing to a $6.1-billion sale to a group headed by private equity firm Symphony Technology Group co-founder William Chisholm in March.
The NFL's Washington Commanders sold for $6.05 billion in July 2023, in a deal that, at the time, was the biggest for a North American sports franchise.
Also in 2023, British billionaire Jim Ratcliffe finalised a deal to acquire a minority stake in Manchester United that valued the English soccer club at $6.3 billion.
In 2022, former owner Roman Abramovich sold English soccer club Chelsea to a consortium led by Boehly that included Walter, for about $3.2 billion.
WHEN IS THE LEAGUE EXPECTED TO APPROVE AND FINALISE THE LAKERS SALE?
Final approval of the sale could take several months. The Celtics' sale has yet to receive final approval from the NBA Board of Governors.
The Board is scheduled to meet in July in Las Vegas, though that session is expected to focus primarily on potential league expansion plans.
(Reporting by Pearl Josephine Nazare in Bengaluru;Editing by Rod Nickel)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Gold steady as Israel-Iran conflict escalates, US involvement uncertain
KUALA LUMPUR: Gold held steady on Friday, with geopolitical tensions escalating in the Middle East as Israel and Iran continued their air war, while investors remained wary of possible US involvement. Spot gold was steady at US$3,367.60 an ounce, as of 0020 GMT. Bullion was down 1.90 per cent so far this week. US gold futures were also stable at US$3,384.20. The conflict in the Middle East intensified on Thursday when Israel bombed Iran's nuclear sites, while Iran fired missile and drone strikes on Israel, including an overnight attack on an Israeli hospital. Neither side has signalled an exit strategy. US President Donald Trump will decide in the next two weeks whether the US will get involved in the Israel-Iran air war, the White House said on Thursday, raising pressure on Tehran to come to the negotiating table. Meanwhile, US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi have spoken by phone several times since Israel began its strikes on Iran last week, in a bid to find a diplomatic end to the crisis, three diplomats told Reuters. Trump reiterated his calls for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, saying the rates should be 2.5 percentage points lower. The Fed held rates steady on Wednesday, and policymakers retained projections for two quarter-point rate cuts this year. European officials are increasingly resigned to a 10 per cent rate on "reciprocal" tariffs being the baseline in any trade deal between the US and the European Union, five sources familiar with the negotiations said. The US dollar index fell 0.20 per cent, making greenback-priced bullion more affordable for overseas buyers. Elsewhere, spot silver was steady at US$36.36 per ounce, platinum fell 0.70 per cent to US$1,297.89, while palladium was down 0.40 per cent to US$1,046.71. All three metals were headed for weekly gains.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Malaysia's timber exports may gain edge due to higher US tariffs on competitors
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia's timber exports may gain a competitive edge in the American market due to higher tariffs imposed on regional rivals such as Vietnam and Indonesia. Vietnam, once a leading furniture exporter in the region, now faces tariffs as high as 46 per cent compared with Malaysia's import levy of 24 per cent, Director of Forest Products Division, Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) Wan Tarmeze Wan Ariffin said. "US President Donald Trump imposed higher tariffs on Vietnam probably because they're afraid China might use Vietnam as a manufacturing hub" to bypass American trade restrictions," he told Bernama. The US is the largest buyer of Malaysian furniture, accounting for over half of furniture exports. However, the tariffs announced on April 2 have been paused for 90 days till early July to allow America's trading partners to negotiate for lower tariffs. "If they don't impose high tariffs on Vietnam, China could exploit that route. So, on paper, the advantage actually lies with us (Malaysia)," he said. In 2022, Malaysia exported timber and timber products worth RM7.73 billion to the US. This was a steady increase from RM3.76 billion in 2018. Malaysia's timber exports worldwide include furniture, logs, veneer, plywood and medium-density fibreboard. Asked on the challenges faced by the timber industry, Wan Tarmeze said Malaysia's furniture sector primarily relies on processed wood rather than solid timber, with wood-based materials accounting for up to 85 per cent of inputs in the making of the furniture. Geopolitical tensions may create opportunities He said the ongoing Iran-Israel military conflict was not expected to have a direct impact on Malaysia's timber exports. Nevertheless, post-conflict reconstruction could open up new market opportunities and raise demand for Malaysian timber. "Wars often lead to widespread destruction, but once the situation stabilises, there's usually a surge in demand for rebuilding – including homes and infrastructure," he said. Calls for shift from OEM to OBM in timber exports When asked how Malaysia can position itself as a high-value timber exporter rather than a volume-based player, he said the shift ultimately depends on the industry players themselves. "This has been a long-standing conversation as Malaysia is still heavily reliant on the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) model, manufacturing timber products for others without having its own strong, internationally recognised brands. "Take IKEA for example, which is a Swedish brand while Italy has its own well-known brand names, but Malaysia has yet to produce a brand that stands out globally," he said. OEM refers to manufacturing products for other brands, whereas original brand manufacturers (OBM) involves developing and marketing products under one's own brand name. Wan Tarmeze said that despite the government's repeated calls for the industry to move from being OEMs to OBMs, the shift has yet to happen. "The issue is not about identity but branding, and without branding we can't build value. "The truth is Malaysia tends to shy away from copying, but we should be more open to learning from others, even "stealing" ideas in the sense of adapting best practices and making them our own," he said.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Caution by BoJ likely to keep Japanese capital overseas
Japan still has plenty of financial muscle with a net US$3.5 trillion in overseas stocks and bonds. — Reuters The Bank of Japan (BoJ) is taking a more cautious approach to reducing its balance sheet, meaning Japanese capital invested overseas is less likely to be coming home anytime soon. In the face of heightened economic uncertainty and recent volatility at the long end of the Japanese Government Bond (JGB) curve, the BoJ announced on Tuesday that it will halve the rate of its balance sheet rundown in fiscal year 2026 to 200 billion yen or about US$1.4bil a quarter. The central bank began gradually shrinking its bloated balance sheet 18 months ago and last August began an even more gradual interest rate-raising cycle, representing a historic shift after years of maintaining ultra-low and even negative nominal rates. All else being equal, this modest tightening would be expected to narrow the yield gap between Japanese and foreign bonds, making JGBs more attractive to domestic and foreign investors while also strengthening the yen. So why hasn't the Japanese capital been coming home? In part, because Japan's real interest rates and bond yields remain deeply negative, and the latest BoJ move suggests this is likely to remain the case for the foreseeable future. The prospect of Japanese real returns staying deeply negative is enhanced by current inflation dynamics. Price pressures Inflation in Japan is the highest in two years by some measures and may prove sticky if Middle East tensions continue to put upward pressure on oil prices. Japan imports around 90% of its energy and almost all of its oil. Japan's yield curve could also potentially flatten from its recent historically steep levels if the BoJ's decision caps or lowers long-end yields. And the curve will flatten further if the BoJ continues to 'normalise' interest rates – something BoJ governor Kazuo Ueda insists is still on the table, although markets think the central bank is on hold until next year. Either way, a flatter yield curve won't be particularly appealing to Japanese investors who may be considering pulling money out of the United States or European markets. And there is a lot of money to repatriate, meaning even marginal shifts in Japanese investors' positioning could be meaningful. Assets abroad While Japan is no longer the world's largest creditor nation, having recently lost the crown to Germany after holding it for more than three decades, it still has plenty of financial muscle with a net US$3.5 trillion in overseas stocks and bonds, the highest total ever. Analysts at Deutsche Bank estimate that Japanese life insurers and pension funds hold more than US$2 trillion in foreign assets, around 30% of their total assets. What would prompt Japanese investors to repatriate? In a deep dive on the topic last month, JP Morgan analysts said several stars would have to align, namely a sustainable rise in long-term Japanese interest rates, an improvement in the country's public finances, and steady yen appreciation against the US dollar. That's a tall order. But if this were to materialise, and banks and other depository institutions reverted to pre-'Abenomics' asset allocation ratios of 82% domestic bonds and 13% foreign securities, repatriation flows from these institutions alone could amount to as much as 70 trillion yen. That's just under US$500bil at current exchange rates. That's not JP Morgan's base case though, certainly not in the near term. But over the long term, they think some reversal of the flow of capital from JGBs into US bonds over the last decade or more is 'plausible'. The BoJ's decision on Tuesday probably makes the prospect of any significant capital shift less plausible, though, at least for now. — Reuters Jamie McGeever is a columnist for Reuters. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
