Caution by BoJ likely to keep Japanese capital overseas
Japan still has plenty of financial muscle with a net US$3.5 trillion in overseas stocks and bonds. — Reuters
The Bank of Japan (BoJ) is taking a more cautious approach to reducing its balance sheet, meaning Japanese capital invested overseas is less likely to be coming home anytime soon.
In the face of heightened economic uncertainty and recent volatility at the long end of the Japanese Government Bond (JGB) curve, the BoJ announced on Tuesday that it will halve the rate of its balance sheet rundown in fiscal year 2026 to 200 billion yen or about US$1.4bil a quarter.
The central bank began gradually shrinking its bloated balance sheet 18 months ago and last August began an even more gradual interest rate-raising cycle, representing a historic shift after years of maintaining ultra-low and even negative nominal rates.
All else being equal, this modest tightening would be expected to narrow the yield gap between Japanese and foreign bonds, making JGBs more attractive to domestic and foreign investors while also strengthening the yen. So why hasn't the Japanese capital been coming home?
In part, because Japan's real interest rates and bond yields remain deeply negative, and the latest BoJ move suggests this is likely to remain the case for the foreseeable future.
The prospect of Japanese real returns staying deeply negative is enhanced by current inflation dynamics.
Price pressures
Inflation in Japan is the highest in two years by some measures and may prove sticky if Middle East tensions continue to put upward pressure on oil prices.
Japan imports around 90% of its energy and almost all of its oil.
Japan's yield curve could also potentially flatten from its recent historically steep levels if the BoJ's decision caps or lowers long-end yields.
And the curve will flatten further if the BoJ continues to 'normalise' interest rates – something BoJ governor Kazuo Ueda insists is still on the table, although markets think the central bank is on hold until next year.
Either way, a flatter yield curve won't be particularly appealing to Japanese investors who may be considering pulling money out of the United States or European markets.
And there is a lot of money to repatriate, meaning even marginal shifts in Japanese investors' positioning could be meaningful.
Assets abroad
While Japan is no longer the world's largest creditor nation, having recently lost the crown to Germany after holding it for more than three decades, it still has plenty of financial muscle with a net US$3.5 trillion in overseas stocks and bonds, the highest total ever.
Analysts at Deutsche Bank estimate that Japanese life insurers and pension funds hold more than US$2 trillion in foreign assets, around 30% of their total assets.
What would prompt Japanese investors to repatriate?
In a deep dive on the topic last month, JP Morgan analysts said several stars would have to align, namely a sustainable rise in long-term Japanese interest rates, an improvement in the country's public finances, and steady yen appreciation against the US dollar.
That's a tall order. But if this were to materialise, and banks and other depository institutions reverted to pre-'Abenomics' asset allocation ratios of 82% domestic bonds and 13% foreign securities, repatriation flows from these institutions alone could amount to as much as 70 trillion yen. That's just under US$500bil at current exchange rates.
That's not JP Morgan's base case though, certainly not in the near term. But over the long term, they think some reversal of the flow of capital from JGBs into US bonds over the last decade or more is 'plausible'.
The BoJ's decision on Tuesday probably makes the prospect of any significant capital shift less plausible, though, at least for now. — Reuters
Jamie McGeever is a columnist for Reuters. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
43 minutes ago
- The Star
Thai PM faces call to step down to avert coalition revolt
FILE PHOTO: Thailand's Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra arrives ahead of a no-confidence vote at the parliament in Bangkok, Thailand, March 26, 2025. REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha/File Photo BANGKOK (Reuters) -Thailand's embattled Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was facing the prospect of losing her government's majority on Friday as a vital coalition partner looked set to demand her resignation after just 10 months in power. Paetongtarn, the politically inexperienced daughter of divisive tycoon and former premier Thaksin Shinawatra, is fighting fires on multiple fronts, struggling to breathe life into a stagnant economy facing steep U.S. tariffs and under pressure to take a tougher stand on a territorial row with Cambodia that has seen their troops mobilise at the border. The United Thai Nation party, the second-largest partner in her alliance, will demand Paetongtarn, 38, step downas a condition for it to remain in the Pheu Thai Party-led coalition, two UTN sources told Reuters, requesting anonymity because they were not authorised to speak to media. "If she doesn't resign, the party would leave the government," one source said. "We want the party leader to tell the PM as a courtesy." Though Paetongtarn received a boost on Friday with another coalition partner, the Democrat Party, pledging its support, Thailand's youngest premier is still in an untenable position, with her majority hinging on UTN staying in the alliance following Wednesday's exit by the larger Bhumjaithai Party. UTN has not said when it will announce its about its decision, UTN spokesperson Akaradej Wongpitakroj declined to provide details. "We have to wait for the party leader to inform the prime minister first," he said. Reflecting concerns in financial markets, the Thai baht THB=TH weakened for a fifth consecutive session on Friday and was on course to log its worst week since late February. TUMULTUOUS PAST Paetongtarn's battle to stay in power demonstrates the declining strength of Pheu Thai, the populist juggernaut of the billionaire Shinawatra family that has dominated Thai elections since 2001, enduring military coups and court rulings that have toppled multiple governments and prime ministers. But Paetongtarn is facing domestic anger and the prospect of an internal revolt over Wednesday's embarrassing leak of a phone call between her and Cambodia's influential former leader Hun Sen - once seen as a Shinawatra family ally - which her critics say posed a threat to Thailand's sovereignty and integrity. During the conversation, Paetongtarn called for a peaceful resolution of the border dispute and disparaged an outspoken Thai army general who she said "just wants to look cool", a red line in a country where the military has a high profile and significant political clout. Political activists met on Friday to schedule a major protest in Bangkok starting on June 28 to demand Paetongtarn resignand coalition partners leave the government. Those included groups with a history of crippling rallies against Shinawatra administrations. Paetongtarn has not commented on the turmoil in her government and has tried to present a united front on the Cambodia issue, appearing on Thursday alongside military chiefs and vowing to defend sovereignty. The premier will make a morale-boosting visit to military units at the Cambodia border on Friday, where she is due to meet Lieutenant General Boonsin Padklang, the regional commander whom she criticised in the leaked call. Paetongtarn's options for staying in power are limited unless her allies can succeed in behind-the-scenes horse-trading to keep her alliance from crumbling. A snap election could damage Pheu Thai at a time of dwindling popularity and play into the hands of the progressive opposition People's Party, the largest force in parliament. Two Pheu Thai sources told Reuters the party is confident Paetongtarn can avoid resigning or dissolving parliament and her government is considering a major cabinet reshuffle to fill vacant positions. (Reporting by Panarat Thepgumpanat and Panu Wongcha-um; Writing by Martin Petty; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Australian trial says tech for social media teen ban can work
A filepic of school students posing with their mobiles showing social media applications in Melbourne, Australia. There has been widespread concern over children's use of online platforms as evidence shows that social media can have negative effects on children's mental and physical health. — Reuters SYDNEY: Australia's world-leading ban on under-16s joining social media sites cleared a big hurdle on June 20 as a trial found digital age checks can work "robustly and effectively". Sites such as Facebook, Instagram, Tiktok and X could face fines of up to A$50mil (RM 138.19mil or US$32mil) for failing to comply with the legislation, which was passed in November. They have described the law – which is due to come into effect by the end of this year – as vague, rushed and "problematic". There has been widespread concern over children's use of online platforms as evidence shows that social media can have negative effects on children's mental and physical health. Digital age verification systems – which would be critical to the ban – can work, said the interim findings of an independent Age Assurance Technology Trial, conducted for the government. "These preliminary findings indicate that age assurance can be done in Australia privately, robustly and effectively," it said. There are "no significant technological barriers" to deploying age checking systems in Australia, said the trial's project director, Tony Allen. "These solutions are technically feasible, can be integrated flexibly into existing services and can support the safety and rights of children online," he said in a statement. In a separate interview with Australia's Nine Network, Allen said preventing children circumventing age verification tools was a "big challenge", however. "I don't think anything is completely foolproof," he said. There are a "plethora" of approaches to age verification but no single solution to suit all cases, said the trial report, in which 53 organisations took part. Australia's legislation is being closely monitored by other countries, with many weighing whether to implement similar bans. Greece spearheaded a proposal this month for the European Union to limit children's use of online platforms by setting an age of digital adulthood – barring children from social media without parental consent. – AFP
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
EU bars Chinese firms from most medical device tenders
BRUSSELS: The European Union will bar Chinese companies from participating in EU public tenders for medical devices worth €60 billion or more (US$68.90 billion) per year after concluding that EU companies are not given fair access in China. The measure announced by the European Commission on Friday is the first under the EU's International Procurement Instrument, which entered into force in 2022 and is designed to ensure reciprocal market access. The new restrictions are likely to increase tensions with Beijing, already inflamed by EU tariffs on China-built electric vehicles, Chinese measures against EU brandy, and curbs on exports of rare earths that the EU wants resolved by an EU-China summit in July. The Commission said on Friday that it would exclude Chinese companies from EU government purchases above €5 million. An EU official said, guided by figures from Medtech Europe, the EU medical technology market was worth some €150 billion in 2023, with public procurement accounting for a 70 per cent share. Contracts of over €5 million were only four per cent of tenders, but made up some 60 per cent by value, the official said. Successful bids will have to ensure they include no more than 50 per cent of medical devices from China. If there are no alternative suppliers, the exclusion will not apply. EU members backed the plan earlier this month. The Commission has previously said it found "clear evidence" that China favoured Chinese devices for hospitals and that its tender conditions led to abnormally low bids that profit-oriented companies could not offer. A Commission official said the ban would cover medical equipment including imaging equipment, artificial body parts and medical clothing. China's commerce ministry has previously described the proposed EU measures as "protectionist", urging the EU to be fair and transparent and for both sides to resolve differences through cooperation and dialogue. The Commission said China had not proposed any corrective action to remedy the situation, but an agreement was still possible.
