Pippa White's death in NSW hospital was preventable and ‘system failed her', medical experts tell inquest
The septic shock death of a two-year-old girl in a regional New South Wales hospital was preventable, senior medical experts told an inquest.
Pippa Mae White died on 13 June 2022, two months before her third birthday, after doctors at the hospitals in Cowra and Orange wrongly assumed she had an acute viral illness rather than the serious bacterial infection that killed her.
Giving evidence on Wednesday at the coronial inquest into her death, a 'conclave of experts' who weren't involved in Pippa's treatment said she should have been checked and treated for potential sepsis much earlier than she was.
The NSW deputy state coroner Joan Baptie is examining whether Pippa's death was preventable and whether she received appropriate care in Cowra and Orange, and from the Newborn and Paediatric Emergency Transport Service team.
The inquest previously heard that Pippa presented to Cowra hospital about 2pm on 12 June 2022 with a fever, vomiting, and a heart rate of 171 beats per minute, considered in the 'red zone' for sepsis.
She did not have a blood test until nearly 4am on 13 June, after she was transferred to Orange, which revealed she had a serious infection.
She was administered antibiotics and given a chest X-ray, which showed she had pneumonia that had caused a 'complete whiteout' of her left lung. She suffered two cardiac arrests and died just after 1pm.
Five of the seven medical experts who submitted a joint report to the inquest gave oral evidence on Wednesday: Prof Simon Craig, Prof John Raftos, Prof Warwick Butt, Prof Adam Irwin and Associate Prof Phillip Braslins, along with GP Robert Morton.
While there was some disagreement on when the paediatric sepsis pathway should have been activated for Pippa, all the doctors agreed investigations into possible sepsis – including blood tests – should have been started much sooner than they were.
The experts agreed medical staff became 'anchored' on the wrong diagnosis of a viral illness. They stressed the importance making 'serial observations' of vital signs heart rate and oxygen saturation more frequently than was done in Pippa's case.
The inquest was previously shown a video of Pippa in the Cowra emergency department making a 'grunting' noise while breathing, which the doctors on Wednesday said would have been identifiable with a stethoscope.
Raftos said Pippa was already a 'very sick' and 'lethargic' child when she was taken to Cowra and she needed a rapid response.
He said if medical staff in Cowra didn't have the capacity to treat Pippa right away, as the inquest previously heard, they should have arranged for an ambulance to take her to Orange, or for her mother, Annah, to drive her there.
Raftos said the alternative was 'doing nothing, which is what they did'.
Craig said the 'make or break' point when 'things went absolutely wrong' was at 1am on 13 June when there were 'delays in escalation' at Orange hospital despite Pippa having become 'critically ill'.
The junior doctor in charge of looking after Pippa in Orange, Dr Christopher Morris, last year cried in the witness box as he gave evidence to the inquest and said he wished he had called a rapid response earlier in the night.
The experts on Wednesday said the senior paediatrician on-call the night Pippa was admitted, Prof Adam Buckmaster, should have assessed her that evening. The inquest previously heard he didn't attend the hospital until the morning of 13 June.
Most of the experts agreed Pippa should have had her blood tested and been administered antibiotics around 9pm on 12 June after arriving at the hospital.
'She should have been on the [sepsis pathway], she should have had an IV [intravenous drip] inserted, she should have had bloods done, and she should have had antibiotics given. I think it's very clear,' Butt said.
'I believe the death was preventable, and that means the system failed her,' Butt said.
The inquest continues, with a final block of hearings expected later this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
21 hours ago
- The Guardian
Psychiatrist body holds firm on 25% pay bid but NSW Health says shortages are ‘more nuanced'
Closing submissions have been heard in the long-running dispute between psychiatrists – who are pushing for a 25% pay increase – and the New South Wales department of health, bringing to a close a landmark legal action brought by the psychiatrists, who argue psychiatric care in NSW is facing 'collapse' because of poor pay and conditions. Over two days this week, the Industrial Relations Commission court in Sydney heard closing submissions from lawyers, before the full bench retired to consider their decision. At the heart of the dispute is the proposition from the psychiatrists, represented by the Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation (Asmof), that NSW staff specialist psychiatrists are significantly underpaid compared with their interstate counterparts. This, they argued, has led to an exodus of qualified psychiatrists to other jurisdictions or the private sector, leading to drastic and dangerous understaffing of psychiatric units and overwork and moral injury of staff. Asmof is arguing for a special levy to increase their pay by 25% to stem the flow of specialist doctors leaving the state's public system. In January, 206 psychiatrists in NSW threatened to resign; 62 have resigned, while others await the commission's decision. In closing submissions Thomas Dixon, the barrister for Asmof, pointed the commission to evidence it had heard about the 'proliferation' of mental health patient presentations in the public health system in recent years, at the same time there has been a reduction in the number of public psychiatric specialists. Dixon said that in the five years from July 2019, the number of staff psychiatric specialist vacancies in NSW increased from 35 full-time equivalent (FTE) roles to 131, a near 400% increase. 'Why is this occurring?' he asked the full bench. 'The reasons are many, including pay … stress, overwork and concern for patient outcomes. All of these factors were caused or exacerbated by staff shortages. 'Staff shortages are having a negative impact on the quality of patient care and integrity of the health system.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email According to Asmof, psychiatrists are paid significantly more in states other than NSW. Salaries were up to 51% higher in Western Australia, 44% higher in the Northern Territory, 38% higher in South Australia, 28% in Queensland and 25% in Tasmania. They are 2% higher in Victoria, but Asmof said that in Victoria, as most psychiatrists do not work full-time, they are paid an hourly rate which amounts to 31% more than in NSW. Dixon reminded the court of evidence it had heard that giving a pay rise to psychiatrists would actually end up costing the government less than its current policy, which was to fill gaps in staffing with locums or visiting medical officers (VMOs). Dixon said that a full-time staff psychiatrist cost the same as a VMO working at 0.6FTE. Ian Neil SC, the barrister representing the secretary of health and the NSW department of health, argued that there was no evidence that increasing the pay of psychiatrists with a special levy would have any impact on the attraction and retention of staff, except for stopping those who had threatened resignation pending the outcome of the arbitration, which he urged the court not to consider. 'Asmof loaded up the gun and pointed it at our heads,' Neil said of the mass resignation threat. 'That ought not to be taken into account.' Neil told the court that increasing the pay for psychiatrists by 25% in an interim 12-month order was problematic in that it meant the commission would have to keep that pay uplift in other award negotiations going forward, and that it would not address the issue that Asmof hoped it would remedy. 'Wage fixing is not an appropriate mechanism to address the problem of attraction and retention, of itself,' he said. 'The problem of workplace shortages … are a much more nuanced problem that requires a nuanced response.' Neil was pushed by the justices to give an account of what the health secretary contended the solution was for the problem of attraction and retention, if not a pay increase, to which he said: 'There is no simple answer to that question because it's not a simple issue. It would be a simple issue if funds were infinite, it would be a simple issue if the source of trained staff specialist psychiatrists were infinite, but none of those propositions are true or realistic.' The full bench has adjourned to consider its judgment.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
The mystery behind a sign 'error' at one of Sydney's busiest stations is revealed
Transport for New South Wales has revealed the truth behind the quirky mystery of why the sign at one of its busiest stations appears to have a spelling error. At Sydney 's Central Station, commuters and visitors have noticed something about the sign reading 'Central' between platforms 20 and 21. The letter 'C' is noticeably smaller and appears in a different font compared to the rest of the word. This seemingly minor detail has sparked confusion, with many passengers assuming it was a design error or modern oversight. But an eagle-eyed Australian recently reignited the discussion by sharing a photo of the sign on Reddit, asking why the first letter looked so out of place. Now, for the first time, the transport department has revealed the reason behind the signage quirk, and it turns out to be entirely intentional. A spokesperson for Transport for NSW (TfNSW) told Daily Mail Australia on Friday that the sign is a heritage feature, which has remained in place for decades. 'The small 'C' visible in the suspended signs on platforms 16 to 23 at Central Station is a design feature of the heritage signs that have been in use since the 1960s.' The spokesperson explained there were two fonts used on original signs when they were installed, one of which was slightly larger. Rather than update or replace the signage, TfNSW made a conscious decision to preserve it in its original form. 'The Central Station signs were rolled out during one of the periodic upgrades of this huge and busy station in the middle of the last century and were handmade,' the spokesperson said. 'Our conservation work on Central is intended to take as light a touch as possible. 'Little things like this speak to the heritage of the country's second oldest train station.' Central Station officially opened in 1906, built on top of the Devonshire Street Cemetery. It is estimated that more than 250,000 people pass through the station daily, with it linked to all train lines, Sydney Metro and the Light Rail. In a recent online post, debate was sparked as to why the sign was different from the others. 'This has driven me mental for so many years! It's been like this for so long,' one frustrated Sydneysider said on the Reddit thread. 'This is frustrating to become aware of,' another wrote. A third said: 'I noticed this a few years ago. It upsets me to no end.'
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
NSW political staffers could be arrested after failing to appear at Dural caravan inquiry
A parliamentary committee is seeking warrants for the arrest of five New South Wales government staffers who failed to appear and give evidence to an inquiry examining the Sydney caravan 'fake terrorism plot'. The staffers – three from the office of the premier, Chris Minns, and two who work for the police minister, Yasmin Catley – were summoned to appear before the inquiry on Friday. But they did not show up. The staffers claimed – in a letter to the upper house committee chair, independent MP Rod Roberts – that they had the 'reasonable excuse or just cause' required by law to not appear. The staff members argued they were 'proxies' because Minns and Catley could not, as members of the lower house, be compelled to appear as witnesses. The inquiry – launched with the support of the Coalition, the Greens and crossbench MLCs – is examining the handling of information about the caravan plot amid concerns about whether parliament was 'misled' before controversial laws aimed at curbing antisemitism were rushed through parliament. In January, after it was announced that the caravan had been found in Dural laden with explosives, Minns said it had the potential to be a 'mass casualty event'. But in March, the Australian federal police revealed they believed it was a 'con job' by organised crime figures seeking to divert police resources and influence prosecutions. Minns has said he was briefed early on that the caravan plot 'could be something other than terrorism as it's classically defined and that no line of inquiry was being ruled out by NSW police'. The premier and the police minister refused to appear at the inquiry before the committee sought the appearance of their staffers. Friday's extraordinary decision to seek the arrest warrants could lead to the staffers being apprehended and brought before the committee to give evidence. But several steps have to be completed first. Roberts, the chair, will meet with the president of the Legislative Council, Nationals MP Ben Franklin, on Friday afternoon to submit the committee's case. Under the Parliamentary Evidence Act, if the president is satisfied that the five staffers failed to appear without just cause or reasonable excuse, the matter would be referred to a judge of the supreme court. If the judge agrees, then warrants would be issued and the staffers arrested and brought before the committee to give evidence. 'This decision follows numerous attempts by the committee over several weeks to secure the attendance of these staff by invitation and ultimately by summons,' Roberts said in a statement. The staffers summoned to appear included Minns' chief of staff, James Cullen, and two of his deputy chiefs of staff, Edward Ovadia and Sarah Michael. The police minister's chief of staff, Ross Neilson, was also summoned, along with Catley's deputy chief of staff, Tilly South. The staffers' letter to Roberts, released by the committee, stated: 'Our attendance before the select committee to give evidence would be at odds with the principles of ministerial accountability and comity between the houses of parliament.' Sign up to Afternoon Update Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion They pointed to an outstanding inquiry on parliamentary privilege and ethics, stating they suspected in light 'of recent events' it would consider whether compelling ministerial staff to give evidence infringed parliamentary privilege or 'offends principles' of Australia's Westminster system of government. 'In these circumstances, and particularly while the standing committee's inquiries are ongoing, we consider that there is a reasonable excuse or just cause for us to not attend the hearing, and we propose not to do so,' they wrote on Thursday. 'Given your [Roberts'] comments on breakfast radio yesterday as to the motivation for issuing the summonses, which make it clear we are 'proxies' because our respective ministers cannot be compelled as witnesses to the select committee, we also consider that they have not been properly issued.' The letter noted Ovadia had informed the committee he was on leave during the relevant period. Minns told reporters on Thursday that his staff would not appear. On Friday morning, Roberts conducted a roll call twice to empty chairs set out for the staffers before closing the hearing. Earlier in the week, the premier told 2GB radio he believed the inquiry was based on a 'giant conspiracy' led by his political opponents. Minns said summoning staffers to appear was a 'bid for some kind of relevance' by opponents. Asked if his staffers were prepared to be arrested, Minns said: 'Well, I hope it doesn't get to that. I mean, I think that would be a giant overreach. It's never happened before.' The NSW Liberal leader, Mark Speakman, was asked by reporters on Friday if the move was drastic. 'It is drastic and it's easily avoidable if they do the right thing, obey the law and appear,' he said. Minns and Catley were contacted for comment.
