Remembering Shubha Singh: Foreign Affairs Journalist and Unlikely Admirer of Prince Charles
Published : May 29, 2025 15:43 IST - 5 MINS READ
In the mid-1990s, the only person in the world who thought highly of Prince Charles (now King Charles III) was Shubha Singh, my colleague at The Pioneer. Charles's then-wife, Princess Diana, was globally beloved, and this was even before her fatal car crash in Paris in 1997. Prince Charles was much reviled: on seeing Camilla on TV, various acquaintances would seethe about the 'horsey-faced woman'.
Shubha, however, had a different view, and part of the reason was that she was our Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) correspondent. Besides dealing with India's mandarins in South Block and networking with the embassies in New Delhi, she was invited to state banquets for visiting dignitaries, including princes.
A perk of the MEA beat was that it was almost daily that one embassy or another held a reception. Our art writer Juliet Reynolds, an English expatriate with a caustic style, once whispered that a senior editor from the paper (and wife) did not miss a single embassy cocktail party, 'gobbling up all the food'.
Also Read | Daniel Ellsberg (1931-2023): 'Pentagon Papers' whistle-blower leaves a legacy of courage
Shubha, however, was not a glutton for hors d'oeuvres. She was tall and thin, among the seniormost of our political bureau. The bureau was headed by the late Padmanand Jha (Paddy), and we had been hired by the legendary Vinod Mehta when he launched a New Delhi edition of The Pioneer in 1991, the old Lucknow paper started by the English in the 19th century, famously counting Rudyard Kipling among its sub-editors.
It had fallen on hard times, however, and now looked drab and small-town. Industrialist Lalit Mohan Thapar bought it, and Vinod produced a beautifully designed newspaper with interesting stories that was the rage in Delhi for the three years he led it.
Shubha was full of grace. She never talked of her pedigree to her rag-tag bunch of colleagues. Her brother Ajay did a stint as Minister of State for Railways in V. P. Singh's short-lived (but momentous) government. I was unaware of this connection until our deputy bureau chief and resident quipster, KV Ramesh, referred to Ajay as the 'jeans-clad Jat'. Even Shubha laughed, though she never wore jeans; her daily wear was a nondescript salwar kameez and Rajasthani Bundi waistcoat.
Woman of vast knowledge
Shubha spoke often about the Pacific Island nation of Fiji, and her depth of knowledge about it puzzled me until she revealed that she had lived and taught at a school there. Her father, Captain Bhagwan Singh, was posted as High Commissioner (1971-1976) soon after Fiji's independence. He had served in the King's army during the Second World War and was India's first Jat IAS officer. He was also the grandson of an indentured worker, Ram Chander, taken from their ancestral village in Agra to Fiji in 1917. (Ajay represented Agra in the Lok Sabha, 1989-1991, and followed his father's footsteps as high commissioner to Fiji in 2005.)
Shubha was 38 when she joined The Pioneer from the Telegraph (I was 27). She was thin-faced, wore glasses that hid her shrewd eyes, and had thinning hair that she kept short. Her smile revealed full upper teeth, but when she was tickled her upper gums showed.
In a newspaper newsroom, activity is concentrated in the evening. The Pioneer bureau was a zany place, though we were steps from Vinod's door (and he had a habit of quietly strolling up from behind). Two of our colleagues in their mid-30s, Prakash Patra and the late GK Singh, would finish their copy first (our department had three computers) and then spend the evening with Patra ragging GK. Shubha would laugh the loudest.
She never spoke in anger. In KV's words, she had a 'sardonic sense of humour' and not 'a bad bone in her body'. She generously passed news tips to those of us on other beats. She broke the news of India's recognition of Israel (under then Prime Minister PV Narsimha Rao). Like the rest of us, she was politically left-of-centre. She was part of the gang that started the Indian Women's Press Corps in 1994.
Shubha was unflappable, even when one of our political correspondents, Faraz Ahmed, habitually made the filthiest of remarks that cannot be reproduced here. However, she did raise an eyebrow at KV's occasional double entendre, and this kept the quipster in check.
She and I chatted as I was the Home Ministry correspondent and used to regularly report from Kashmir (for which I am eternally grateful to Paddy and Vinod). Her network of foreign diplomats was, during those turbulent and violent years, always keen to hear the latest from Kashmir; so, she and I routinely exchanged notes.
One day, our conversation drifted to Prince Charles, who in the 1990s visited India more than once. I casually. disdained his neglect of the beautiful Diana. 'She's nothing but a melodramatic bimbo,' Shubha hissed, much to my surprise because she rarely used such strong words.
Also Read | Veteran journalist M.S. Prabhakara passes away
'What!' I exclaimed. 'Charles is no better.' Shubha countered by revealing that Charles was a deep and sensitive man. 'How do you know this?' I asked, incredulously.
She had sat next to him during a Rashtrapati Bhawan banquet that she was invited to as the MEA correspondent, and she had conversed with him throughout.
So what, I said.
She looked me in the eye. 'When you sit and talk to someone for a length of time, you get to know the person,' she said, with a mix of seriousness and passion. I could offer no reply.
Shubha passed away on May 25, weeks after turning 72. She had spent two years in agony, due to doctors' negligence at a corporate hospital. In 2023, after a routine gum cancer procedure, a tracheostomy mishap sent fire from her mouth down her airway. She was in and out of hospital since. Hopefully death was a merciful release.
Though many of my former colleagues have passed away over the years, this one hit me hard, even though we hadn't spoken in decades. Possibly that's because of recent bereavements. I wish I had kept in touch.
Aditya Sinha is a writer living on the outskirts of Delhi.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
UK family visa rules spark outcry as families face forced separation
British citizens are calling on the government to change family visa rules that risk separating them from their partners and children. The demand for reform follows new findings from charities Reunite Families UK and Coram, which show that current visa income requirements are forcing some British families to live apart, as per a report by The Independent. The UK's Minimum Income Requirement (MIR) was raised from £18,600 to £29,000 in 2024 and remains one of the highest among developed countries, according to the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC). The committee has advised against raising the threshold further to £38,700, the level currently required for skilled workers, warning that it would have a serious impact on family reunification. David Todd, a 33-year-old British citizen living in Germany, shared how visa restrictions could force him to return to the UK without his American wife, Claire, and their soon-to-be-born child. The couple cannot meet the financial threshold required under current family visa rules, which expect the British partner to earn at least £29,000 per year or show savings above £88,500. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Todd said to PA News agency, 'It's like we're second-class citizens because we married someone who fell in love with someone who wasn't British.' He urged the government to either scrap or reduce the Minimum Income Requirement (MIR), which is now under review. Todd and his wife, both classical musicians, had hoped to return to the UK to raise their child near family. However, because his wife's income, though sufficient and earned remotely, does not count toward the visa requirement, they remain stuck. (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) The report by Reunite Families UK and Coram concluded that the current rules are financially and emotionally damaging. Families often face long-term separation, and children may suffer psychological harm. The report also noted that the MIR disproportionately affects British women, working-class individuals, and ethnic minorities who are more likely to earn below the threshold. Live Events MORE STORIES FOR YOU ✕ UK may ease family visa income rule after 'Tax on Love' criticism Lowering UK family visa income bar may raise net migration; says advisory panel « Back to recommendation stories I don't want to see these stories because They are not relevant to me They disrupt the reading flow Others SUBMIT According to the Independent news report, Caroline Coombs, Executive Director of Reunite Families UK, said: 'Simple and practical changes from the Home Office could make significant differences to families, starting with scrapping the MIR and simplifying the rules and application process.' She added, 'These rules have become the tax on love. People are suffering and want to be heard.' The Home Office has not yet responded to the findings or public calls for reform.
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran's warning to ‘gambler' Trump: ‘You may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it'
Iran's Military Central Command issued a fiery warning to US President Donald Trump on Monday, declaring that the US attacks on Iranian soil had expanded the battlefield and that powerful retaliatory operations are imminent. The warning came in a video message delivered by the Command's spokesperson, who also directly addressed Trump. 'Mr. Trump, the gambler, you may start this war-- but we will be the ones to end it,' the spokesperson said in English, in a defiant statement aimed at the American leadership. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo The remarks followed a series of US bomb attacks on Iran's three key nuclear installations, which Washington claimed 'obliterated' Tehran's nuclear weapons building programme. The Iranian military, however, described the strikes as an act of aggression that has only intensified the conflict. Live Events The entry of the United States into this conflict has officially expanded the scope of legitimate targets for the Iranian armed forces, the spokesperson said. "US entering conflict expands the scope of legitimate targets for the Iranian armed forces," Iran's Military Central Command spokesperson was quoted as saying by Reuters. He added that 'powerful operations with heavy consequences' for the US are to be expected. The statement signals a sharp escalation in rhetoric and posture from Tehran, as tensions between the two countries-- already inflamed by the Israel-Iran conflict--rise. US bombs deepen Israel-Iran conflict, draw global concern The unprecedented escalation comes after the US carried out coordinated airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan early Sunday morning. President Trump later declared that the sites had been 'totally obliterated.' Experts say this has pushed the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict into a 'decisive phase.' Former diplomat and strategic analyst Rajiv Dogra criticised the US move as reckless, warning of long-term consequences. 'Only time will tell whether there has been a radiation leak or if that has been contained in one way or the other,' Dogra said. He stressed that strikes on nuclear sites violate international norms and carry the risk of cross-border radioactive contamination. 'All bets are off once nuclear facilities are attacked.' The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), meanwhile, confirmed in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that 'no increase in off-site radiation levels has been reported' so far. The agency said further assessments are underway. Fears rise over Strait of Hormuz closure, global oil shock Strategic affairs experts also warned that Tehran may retaliate economically by shutting down the Strait of Hormuz—a critical oil shipping corridor connecting the Persian Gulf with the Arabian Sea. Former diplomats Rajiv Dogra and Dilip Sinha both said such a move would severely affect global oil supplies and prices, particularly hurting India, which imports most of its crude through that route. 'Iran naturally will look at all options that are available to it,' Dogra said. 'Closing the Strait of Hormuz or attacking shipping going through it are the options that seem it (Iran) might exercise.' Sinha echoed the concern: 'If the critical corridor is closed, not just the supply will be impacted but oil prices will also go up.' He said the situation was already deteriorating due to Israel's Operation Rising Lion, launched on June 13 to destroy Iran's nuclear and missile infrastructure. Lt Gen K.J.S. Dhillon (retd) added that Iran's military capacity had been significantly degraded due to Israel's precision strikes. 'Attrition on Iran's side is higher than on the Israeli side,' he said, warning that Iran may not be able to sustain a prolonged conflict. He also noted that while closure of the Strait may not immediately disrupt oil delivery chains, 'it would shake global stock markets within days.'
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Has Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian resigned? Fact-checking viral letter
The image of a letter purportedly revealing Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian's resignation has surfaced on social media. The post is being widely shared by X users with the claim that Pezeshkian has resigned amid the Israel-Iran conflict and the United States' bombing of Iran. Has Iranian president Masoud Pezeshkian resigned? Fact-checking viral letter (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS PICTURE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY(via REUTERS) What does the letter say? An X user translated the letter in English. It reads, 'Having completed my service as President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and after fully adhering to the law and fulfilling my obligations, I hereby submit my resignation in your esteemed presence. During my tenure, the Islamic Republic of Iran faced severe attacks from the international system, especially the United States, which imposed cruel sanctions and unprecedented pressure on the country. With the guidance of your esteemed leadership, the support of the honorable people, and the sincere efforts of the officials, the Iranian nation was able to resist and persevere. I hope my service has met your approval.' Pezeshkian's purported letter adds, according to the translation, 'Based on my duty, I have performed my responsibilities in order to serve the interests of the country and the people. Now, after completing this responsibility and with your permission, I am handing over the affairs to the next administration, in accordance with the constitution, so that new officials may, with God's help, continue to advance the goals of the Islamic Republic of Iran. I ask God, the Almighty, for the continued success and pride of the dear people of Iran and the honor and health of your blessed existence.' Is the letter true? The letter has been dismissed as a 'fake document' by Shayan Sardaizadeh, a senior journalist at BBC Verify. Sardaizadeh wrote on X, 'Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has not resigned and this is a completely fake document claiming to show his resignation letter to the supreme leader.' Grok, a conversational AI chatbot developed by xAI, also claimed that the letter is not true. 'The letter claiming Masoud Pezeshkian's resignation lacks authenticity,' it noted. 'No credible news outlets, such as Reuters or The Guardian, confirm his resignation, and recent reports show him actively serving as Iran's president, including a call with India's PM on June 22, 2025. The Iranian government and Pezeshkian himself have denied resignation rumors. The letter's signatures, including one from Mustafa Al-Kadhimi, raise doubts, as no official sources validate it. It appears to be misinformation, possibly spread to undermine his administration.'
