logo
Governor Stitt quietly signs several Education bills

Governor Stitt quietly signs several Education bills

Yahoo13-06-2025

OKLAHOMA CITY (KFOR) – There are now a handful of bills still on the governor's desk this week, after he quietly signed several that brought funding to Oklahoma education.
The state has one of the highest teacher turnover rates in the nation. While many lawmakers argue that rhetoric at the top needs to get better, it's funding that needs to get better as well.
Tulsa World found earlier this year in their reporting that Oklahoma has one of the lowest per-pupil spending rates in the nation.
This last session saw some of the biggest funding for education the state has seen in a while, like expanding teacher pay opportunities or putting money into math proficiency screening for students.
'These bills are great and all, but what do we do now? I mean, you can still look regional, we are lagging in teacher pay overall? I mean, we're last. So, in the region, if you look at that, it's kind of an arms race that we're losing,' said Representative Jacob Rosecrants (D-OKC).
21 bills still waiting on decision by Gov. Stitt
Two major bills that many educators have had their eyes on include House Bill 1087, which would extend teacher pay raises by 10 years, and House Bill 1727, which expands Oklahoma's Promise, a program that gives scholarship opportunities to educators.
'We want young teachers to come into the system, but we don't want to have such a turnover rate like the one we have now,' said Representative Dick Lowe (R-Chickasha).
Rep. Lowe authored HB 1087 and said it came with a catch. As of right now, teachers' pay raises go until 25 years of service, but now that 1087 is signed, they will receive it until 35 years of service.
'The second part of this bill came from the Senate, and it was a compromise where we had one more day of class for every school in the state of Oklahoma of instructional time,' said Rep. Lowe.
HB 1727 was praised by many educators, and ones we spoke with were hoping the governor would sign it. Others had questions about it.
There is a website that answers most of them here.
'It's great for teacher retention, absolutely, but this doesn't include all teachers and not even all school employees,' said Rep. Rosecrants.
Other education bills that have been signed include SB 140, which ensures students in grades 2-5 are screened for math proficiency three times a year and identifies students in need of intervention.
Then there is House Bill 1287, which creates a high-dosage tutoring pilot program through the State Regents for Higher Education, aimed at boosting student learning with targeted interventions. The initiative is a research-backed program that uses strategic funding to help students close learning gaps to better prepare them for the future.
As of Thursday afternoon, there was a total of three bills left for action to be taken on.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican senators' proposed Medicaid cuts threaten to send red states ‘backwards'
Republican senators' proposed Medicaid cuts threaten to send red states ‘backwards'

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republican senators' proposed Medicaid cuts threaten to send red states ‘backwards'

Advocates are urging Senate Republicans to reject a proposal to cut billions from American healthcare to extend tax breaks that primarily benefit the wealthy and corporations. The proposal would make historic cuts to Medicaid, the public health insurance program for low-income and disabled people that covers 71 million Americans, and is the Senate version of the 'big beautiful bill' act, which contains most of Donald Trump's legislative agenda. 'With the text released earlier this week, somehow the Senate made the House's 'big, bad budget bill' worse in many ways,' said Anthony Wright, the executive director of Families USA, a consumer healthcare advocacy group, in a press call. The Senate's version makes deeper cuts to Medicaid and so-called Obamacare (Affordable Care Act) plans, 'both by expanding paperwork requirements and making it harder for states to fund Medicaid coverage for their residents', said Wright. Related: Democratic senators call on private firm to reveal how it will profit from Trump's Medicaid cuts If passed, the House-passed bill would have already made the biggest cuts to Medicaid since the program's enactment in 1965. With red tape and an expiration of additional healthcare subsidies to Obamacare, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the House version would leave 16 million people without health insurance by 2034. CBO has not yet released estimates, or 'scored', the impact of the Senate proposal, but advocates and experts said the cuts are more draconian, 'punish' states that expanded Medicaid, and attack Medicaid by going after its byzantine financing structures. 'If we look at the big picture of our healthcare system that's where the inefficiencies are – not in Medicaid – but in all the groups profiting off the system,' said David Machledt, a senior policy analyst at the National Health Law Program, referring to Republicans' assertions that they are targeting 'waste, fraud and abuse' with cuts. 'What these cuts are going to do is look at the most cost-efficient program and squeeze it further, and take us backwards, and put us back at a system where the people at the low end are literally dying to fund these tax cuts for rich people and businesses.' A recent study found that expanding Medicaid, as was done during the Obama administration, probably saved an additional 27,400 lives over a 12-year period, and did so cheaper than other insurance programs. The same study found that about a quarter of the difference in life expectancy between low- and high-income Americans is due to lack of health insurance. Republicans, such as Senator John Thune of South Dakota, argue that their bill 'protects' Medicaid by 'removing people who should not be on the rolls', including working-age adults, legal and undocumented immigrants; by adding work requirements and by going after a tax maneuver states use to bring in more federal Medicaid funding. Related: 'Fiscally irresponsible': Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' benefits the rich at the expense of the poor 'Removing these individuals is just basic, good governance,' said Thune. But experts and advocates argue the cuts will not only remove the targeted individuals, including many who are working but struggle to get through red tape, but will also place states in impossible situations with potentially multibillion-dollar shortfalls in their budgets. Both versions contain so-called work requirements, which analyses show will cause people to lose coverage even if they are eligible, experts said. Instead, the largest difference between the Senate and House versions of the bill is the Senate's attack on Medicaid's complex financing arrangements. Medicaid is jointly financed by states and the federal government, making it simultaneously one of states' largest expenditures and sources of revenue. The Senate's version specifically attacks two ways states finance Medicaid, through provider taxes and state-directed payments. With a provider tax, states bring in additional federal revenue by increasing payments to providers. Because the federal portion of Medicaid is based on a percentage rate, increasing payments to providers in turn increases the amount that federal officials pay the state. States then tax those same providers, such as hospitals, to bring the funding back to the state. Although this maneuver has been criticized, it has also now been used for decades. It's in place in every state except for Alaska, is legal and openly discussed. The Senate bill caps this manuever by cutting the tax rate by about half, from 6% to 3.5%, according to Machledt. [Cuts will] put us back at a system where the people at the low end are literally dying to fund these tax cuts for rich people and businesses David Machledt, National Health Law Program In a 2024 analysis, the Congressional Research Service estimated that lowering the provider tax cap to 2.5% would effectively cut $241bn from Medicaid payments to states. Although the exact impacts of the Senate tax cap are not yet known, Machledt expects it would be in the billions, which states would then be under pressure to make up. 'We took great pains to close a $1.1bn shortfall caused by rising healthcare costs,' said the Colorado state treasurer, Dave Young, in a press call. 'To protect healthcare and education, we had to cut transportation projects, maternal health programs and even $1m in aid to food banks.' Because of taxing provisions in Colorado's state constitution, Young said: 'It will be nearly impossible to raise taxes or borrow money to make up the difference.' Similarly, the Senate bill goes after 'state-directed payments'. To understand state-directed payments, it's helpful to understand a big picture, and often hidden, aspect of American healthcare – health insurance pays providers different rates for the same service. Providers are almost universally paid the worst for treating patients who have Medicaid. Medicare pays roughly the cost of providing care, although many doctors and hospitals complain it is still too little. Commercial insurance pays doctors and hospitals most handsomely. To encourage more providers to accept Medicaid, lawmakers in some states have chosen to pay providers treating Medicaid patients additional funds. In West Virginia, a federally approved plan allows the state to pay providers more for certain populations. In North Carolina, state-directed payments allow the state to pay hospitals rates equal to the average commercial insurance rate, if they agree to medical debt forgiveness provisions. The first state-directed payment plan was approved in 2018, under the first Trump administration. These kinds of payments were criticized by the Government Accountability Office during the Biden administration. Related: Trump's 'big, beautiful' spending bill, from tax cuts to mass deportations However, the Senate bill goes after these rates by tying them to Medicaid expansion – a central tenet of Obamacare – and gives stricter limits to the 41 states that expanded the program. Doing this will effectively be 'punishing them', Machledt said, referring to states that participated in this key provision of Obamacare, 'by limiting the way they can finance'. Advocates also warned of unintended knock-on effects from such enormous disruption. Medical debt financing companies are already readying new pitches to hospitals. Even people who don't lose their insurance and are not insured through Medicaid could see prices increase. When Medicaid is cut, hospital emergency rooms are still obliged to provide stabilizing care to patients, even if they can't pay. Hospitals must then make up that shortfall somewhere, and the only payers they can negotiate with are commercial: for example, the private health insurance most people in the US rely on. 'Folks who do not lose their health insurance will see increased costs,' said Leslie Frane, the executive vice-president of SEIU, a union that represents about 2 million members, including in healthcare. 'Your copays are going to go up, your deductibles are going to go up, your bills are going to go up.' Republicans hope to pass the bill by 4 July.

Mass. Dems make unlikely allies
Mass. Dems make unlikely allies

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Mass. Dems make unlikely allies

'THIS IS INSANE' — President Donald Trump's unexpected announcement Saturday night that the United States had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites has some members of Massachusetts' all-Democratic congressional delegation doing something you don't see every day: calling for the passage of a Republican-backed resolution. 'This is insane,' Rep. Jim McGovern posted on X in the wake of the attacks. 'Trump just bombed Iran without Congressional approval, illegally dragging us into war in the Middle East. Have we not learned our lesson!?!?' he wrote, before urging his colleagues to 'return to Washington at once' to pass a measure proposed by Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky that would block President Donald Trump from engaging in 'unauthorized hostilities' with Iran. McGovern and Rep. Ayanna Pressley were among the Democrats who threw their support behind the resolution early last week. And on Sunday, Rep. Stephen Lynch said he had joined the coalition supporting the bipartisan measure. It's unclear if there's enough support to approve the resolution. Massie was a rare Republican voice pushing back on Trump's decision to move forward with the strike over the weekend — and he's already earning threats of a primary challenge from Trump and his advisors for it. Other members from Massachusetts were also quick to decry the strikes as unconstitutional — including Sens. Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren, who both joined on a bill last week to try to head off U.S. involvement in the fighting without congressional approval, and Democratic Whip Katherine Clark. 'Only Congress can declare war — and the Senate must vote immediately to prevent another endless war,' Warren said. 'This is a horrific war of choice.' Rep. Jake Auchincloss struck a slightly subtler tone, calling for Iran to surrender its nuclear program and urging Congress to engage in a 'thorough debate on war-making.' Massachusetts is clear of threats related to the attack at the moment. Gov. Maura Healey said she was briefed by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem 'about the heightened threat environment due to the ongoing conflict in Iran,' but details beyond that were scarce. 'While there are no specific threats to Massachusetts at this time, we are continuing to coordinate with state, local and federal partners to closely monitor the situation,' she said in a statement Sunday night. GOOD MONDAY MORNING, MASSACHUSETTS. Stay cool out there today! TODAY — Gov. Maura Healey and Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll meet with legislative leaders at 2 p.m. at the State House. Reps. Katherine Clark, Lori Trahan and Ayanna Pressley and Sen. Elizabeth Warren host a press conference with the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund of Massachusetts ahead of the third anniversary of the Dobbs decision at 9 a.m. Pressley speaks on a panel about the consequences of abortion restrictions and promotes the EACH Act ahead of a screening of the film 'Red, White, and Blue' at 6 p.m. in D.C. Attorney General Andrea Campbell testifies before the Joint Congressional Judiciary Committee alongside other Democratic attorneys general about how they're countering the Trump administration at 2 p.m. in D.C. Boston Mayor Michelle Wu hosts a press conference on the city's new late-night food truck program at 10 a.m. downtown. Have a tip, story, suggestion, birthday, anniversary, new job, or any other nugget for the Playbook? Drop me a line: kgarrity@ FROM THE DELEGATION IT'S THE AFFORDABILITY, STUPID — One word you can expect to hear from Democrats again and again over the next 16 months leading up to the midterms: affordability. That's the message that Democratic Whip Katherine Clark expects will help her party, still smarting from last year's electoral drubbing, win back control of the House. 'We have learned that it is the cost of living — that we have to be the fighters for the tools of putting the American dream within reach,' Clark said during an interview on WBZ that aired Sunday, when asked what Democrats had learned from their struggles in 2024. Congressional Democrats have little power to sway the economic forces hitting Americans' pocketbooks — tariffs, or the inflation rate, for example. They also likely won't have the numbers to block the sweeping domestic policy package the president is hoping to push through Congress in the coming weeks that's packed with spending and tax policies. Clark, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, threw a few punches at the megabill Sunday, panning potential cuts to Medicaid as 'horrendous' and 'cruel.' And tariffs are bumping the prices on lumber and steel, she warned, 'causing housing costs and insurance of existing housing to go up even more.' Voters 'told us clearly in 2024 they don't think the system is working for them, and they'll vote for someone who says they'll change it,' she said. 'And what they're now seeing is a betrayal of what they were told by the Republicans they would do, and what they're actually doing.' — Sen. Elizabeth Warren defends Medicaid, takes aim at Trump tax cuts at Colonial Theatre town hall event by Maryjane Williams, The Berkshire Eagle. DATELINE BEACON HILL — House Speaker Ron Mariano, 78, plans to seek another term by Emma Platoff and Matt Stout, The Boston Globe: 'Massachusetts House Speaker Ronald Mariano intends to seek reelection next fall and another term as the chamber's leader, an aide to the 78-year-old Democrat said Friday, potentially cementing the House's hierarchy through 2028. Mariano's office disclosed his plans in response to a Globe inquiry about a potential succession in the House. Ana Vivas, a Mariano spokesperson, said he is 'proud to be leading the House during this time of incredible uncertainty at the federal level.' 'He looks forward to serving as Speaker for the remainder of this term, and intends to run for re-election,' Vivas said in a statement. She later clarified that if reelected in 2026, Mariano, of Quincy, would also run again for speaker, which the House votes on at the beginning of each term. Mariano has not faced a serious challenge to his leadership role during his two-plus terms.' — Secretary of State William Galvin has concerns about upcoming census by Matthew Medsgar and Chris Van Buskirk, Boston Herald: 'Massachusetts' secretary of state said he has some grave concerns about the accuracy of the next census thanks to mass retirements of officials and current immigration policies — something that could make or break congressional representation and federal funding. Though the next national population count isn't set to take place until 2030, Secretary William Galvin told the state Senate Census Committee that he's 'very concerned about the quality of those records' and the downstream consequences of getting that wrong.' — Lawmakers seek tougher penalties for 'upskirting' by Christian M. Wade, The Eagle-Tribune: 'Lawmakers want to toughen criminal penalties for a nearly decade-old law to punish suspects who are caught 'upskirting' or secretly recording people's private parts. A proposal being considered by a legislative committee would amend the state's 'upskirting' law to criminalize any secret recordings of a person's sexual or private parts, regardless of whether the victim is clothed or where the recording took place.' — Mass. considers scrapping religious exemptions for vaccinations by Angela Mathew, The Boston Globe. FROM THE 413 — State education department halts trustee appointments at Pioneer Valley Chinese Immersion Charter School by Scott Merzbach, Daily Hampshire Gazette: 'A May 2 vote by trustees for the Pioneer Valley Chinese Immersion Charter School to add two new members is being temporarily nullified by the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Citing that one of the conditions set in February for allowing expansion of the school has not been met, Patrick Tutwiler, then interim commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education, on May 21 informed trustees that he would not be acting on the request for appointments.' THE LOCAL ANGLE — Methuen balks at $5.8M for tech school funding by Teddy Tauscher, The Eagle-Tribune: 'Greater Lawrence Technical School Superintendent John Lavoie faced an aggressive and outraged City Council recently, as he gave a presentation on his proposed budget that will be supported by $5.8 million from the city. While Methuen's contribution to the vocational school based in Andover is rising by roughly $700,000 next fiscal year or 13%, Lavoie told the council he had no hand in the increase as it was a result of a state formula. He added even if the council voted down his budget, the city would still be chipping in the same since it was the minimum required contribution set by the state.' — What's in Weymouth's budget? by Jessica Trufant, The Patriot Ledger: 'The Weymouth Town Council has approved Mayor Robert Hedlund's proposed fiscal 2026 operating budget of $218.8 million, an increase of about 4% from this fiscal year's budget of $210 million. The new fiscal year starts July 1. Town Council President Michael Molisse praised Hedlund's administration on its work on the 'creative, solid budget.'' — Council approves FY 2026 budget after marathon meeting by Dave Rogers, The Newburyport Daily News. WHAT ELSE YOU SHOULD BE READING — As federal cuts loom, rental housing vouchers across Mass. are being put on hold by Andrew Brinker, The Boston Globe: 'In Massachusetts' brutal housing market, the wait for housing vouchers that help hundreds of thousands afford the state's sky-high rents can stretch as long as 15 years. Now, that wait may grow even longer. Most housing authorities in Massachusetts, including the state's housing office, have recently stopped issuing new Section 8 vouchers when tenants give them up. Some are closing waitlists — which can stretch tens of thousands of people long — to new applicants.' — As questions linger, family and school grieve for Boston 5-year-old killed in April bus crash by John Hilliard, The Boston Globe. HEARD 'ROUND THE BUBBLAH HAPPY BIRTHDAY — to Samuel O. Thier and Naomi Alson. Happy belated to Kaitlyn Solares of Attorney General Andrea Campbell's office, who celebrated Sunday.

Philippines VP Sara Duterte Asks Senate to Dismiss Impeachment Case
Philippines VP Sara Duterte Asks Senate to Dismiss Impeachment Case

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Philippines VP Sara Duterte Asks Senate to Dismiss Impeachment Case

Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte has asked the Senate to dismiss the impeachment case against her as it violated the one-year ban set under the constitution. In a copy of Duterte's response to the articles of impeachment against her, she said the complaint was void from the start because under the 1987 Constitution, only one impeachment proceeding may be initiated against the same official within a year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store