Richmond, B.C., councillor 'dumbfounded' by alleged misuse of city hall gift card program
Social Sharing
A city councillor in Richmond, B.C., is calling for a more fulsome audit of city finances amid a police investigation into alleged misuse of a gift card program.
In a statement on May 15, the City of Richmond said it purchased approximately $446,000 worth of gift cards from 2022 to 2024 as part of an employee recognition program — but found in a recent review that around $295,000 of them were unaccounted for.
Richmond RCMP said their serious crimes section has opened an investigation into the gift card case, which was first reported by Global News.
The city said "an individual's employment with the City has concluded" following a personnel investigation.
It also said it no longer uses gift cards and would be conducting a forensic audit of the past three years of finances.
Richmond Coun. Kash Heed introduced a motion Tuesday to expand the audit to include the past decade, and have the findings presented to council afterwards. The motion was approved unanimously.
He also co-signed an open letter to B.C. Premier David Eby that says the province needs to either reinstate a specific office to oversee municipal spending or expand the auditor general's mandate to cover it.
Heed spoke with CBC's On The Coast host Gloria Macarenko on Tuesday afternoon.
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
So what do we know about these gift cards?
What we don't know is the troubling aspect of this — how we could let almost $300,000 worth of unaccounted transactions take place in the City of Richmond.... So that is very troubling. And we just know this from three years of data.
The gift card program has been in existence for over a decade. As a result of that, I think we have to dig further into this particular problem to identify where this went off the rails, why there is such a discrepancy [in] the accounted-for and the unaccounted amount.
Why does the city hold this much money in gift cards?
I'm dumbfounded. I've never experienced this in [my] career. When I talk to other councillors throughout the Lower Mainland, they don't have a particular program like this.
We have to remember gift cards are actually treated as monetary cash.... So when we have reconciliation, for example, for cash items that are purchased within local government, that is all looked after and it's all caught by the auditors to make sure there's integrity behind it.
These cards were used as part of an employee recognition program. Do you think this is the most appropriate way to offer recognition?
Absolutely not. It's proven itself that it's not the appropriate way. We cannot control it. We can't even account for it.
So this is something that has been halted here in Richmond, but the reason why this went off the rails and the reason why we're unable to reconcile it has to be looked at, has to be explored.
I'm not sure … whether this is a deficiency in our oversight or that there is actual fraudulent activity taking place, and until we do the level of forensic audit that's required to determine what went wrong, we will never know.
We do annual audits outsourced by a particular company, they were unable to pick up on this. We have internal auditors that work within the City of Richmond, they were unable to pick up on this. We've got to delve into this.
What do you make of the decision to stick with KPMG for the forensic audit since they also audited the city's financial statements?
I think, based on whether there's a clear conflict or the possibility or the perception of a conflict, they should have outsourced it to another company that has the ability to do these types of forensic audits.
KPMG is the auditor, they've been the financial auditor for the City of Richmond for decades now. And now we're bringing that same company in to do the forensic audit. It is very telling.
According to media reports, one employee in Richmond has already been fired. What more do you think needs to be done for accountability?
My fear is, do we have a deeper problem within our financial accounting of the taxpayer dollar in Richmond? And I think if we can truly understand what occurred here, maybe we can start looking into other areas to see and ensure the right standard operating procedures and auditing systems are in place.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
43 minutes ago
- CTV News
New tool to challenge greenwashing claims goes live as companies weigh strategy
Greenpeace activists protest BP's Calgary headquarters, alleging that the company's environmental claims contradicted its oilsands investments, on Thursday, April 15, 2010. The company sold its last oilsands holdings in CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh. TORONTO — It's been a year now since a new law took effect that requires companies to back up their environmental claims, but there's still a lot of unknowns about how the anti-greenwashing rules will play out. What is clear so far is that they've already reduced what companies are choosing to say about their environmental record, even as the biggest source of worry for many — an option for the public to initiate claims — is only now kicking in. The pullback started as soon as the law came into effect on June 20 last year, when the Pathways Alliance group of oilsands companies scrubbed all content from its website and social media feeds. Since then there have been other high-profile moves blamed on the law, including RBC dropping its sustainable finance target and several climate metrics, and CPP Investments ditching its net-zero emission by 2050 target, but there have also been numerous other companies that have made quieter adjustments. 'I can say with 100 per cent certainty that many organizations across many industries in Canada are revisiting their disclosure,' said Conor Chell, national leader of ESG law at KPMG in Canada. 'There's a lot of disclosure that was pulled from the public domain.' Companies have raised concerns about the broad, vague wording of the provision in Bill C-59 that requires them to backup environmental claims with 'internationally recognized methodology,' and the threat of penalties of up to three per cent of global revenues if they're found to be in violation of the law. Many companies and groups have called for the additions to be scrapped, while the Alberta Enterprise Group and the Independent Contractors and Businesses Association have launched a constitutional challenge, alleging the law is a breach of freedom of expression protections. The Competition Bureau has tried to address at least the uncertainty of the law by providing guidelines, with a finalized version out just over two weeks ago. Some have said the guidelines are still too vague, while others like the Pathways Alliance say they provide no assurance at all, because the Competition Bureau isn't bound by them, while the Competition Tribunal doesn't have to adhere to them. And it's the Competition Tribunal that many companies are especially worried about. A clause in the law that went into effect Friday allows the public to bypass the bureau, and directly ask the tribunal to hear a case. 'From the perspective of many of our clients, the real risk lies in that private right of action,' said Chell. The clause has raised fears of a flood of cases against companies, tying them up in legal wrangling at the court-like tribunal, possibly for years, and the costs that come along with such disputes. 'We believe the amendments ... should be removed to allow businesses to speak openly and truthfully about what they are doing to improve environmental performance and without fear of meritless litigation by private entities,' said Pathways president Kendall Dilling in a statement. But environmental groups have played down the threat. Ecojustice finance lawyer Tanya Jemec said the narrative that there is going to be a wave of filings is overblown, since bringing a case is time consuming and resource intensive, while they will have to meet a public-interest threshold before being allowed to proceed. 'I think there is a lot of fearmongering going on out there, and efforts, whether intentional or not, to undermine these anti-greenwashing provisions.' Some, including Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, have questioned whether the new greenwashing laws were needed at all, given deceptive marketing practices were already covered by the Competition Act. But Jemec said the existing process takes years, with no updates along the way from the bureau, while being able to take cases to the tribunal will increase transparency and relieve pressure on the bureau. She said the reaction to the new laws, which also set elevated standards and penalties to the existing general protections, shows they were needed. 'The fact that companies are looking at what they are saying and changing course just may be an indication that the provisions are doing their work.' Pushing companies to make sure they can back up their environmental claims improves competition, by making room for those legitimately trying to do better, said Wren Montgomery, associate professor at Western University's Ivey Business School. 'It's often these smaller, newer, really sustainable, pure-play sustainability companies that the innovation is coming from,' she said, noting she's seen in sectors ranging from fashion to wine. 'In my research, we see that greenwash is driving them out, so it's making it really hard for them to get rewarded for bringing that value to the market.' Others, including Calgary-based clean-tech investor Avatar Innovations, have raised concerns that the higher reporting standards could hold back startups, both because of the compliance burden and the lack of established testing standards for emerging technology. Montgomery said there are many established standards, and more being added, to cover environmental claims. 'My larger concern is not that a reporting standard is going to inhibit innovation. It's that greenwashing is going to inhibit innovation, and I think the latter is a much bigger concern for Canada.' It's not just smaller companies affected. Chell at KPMG said that for a while every company was clamouring to get out net-zero targets for the competitive advantage, but that advantage kept fading as more and more did it. He said if the law works as intended, only companies that can actually substantiate claims will be able to do so, especially for those 'big ostentatious claims like net zero, carbon neutrality.' 'So there is actually, I think, a competitive advantage for companies that can make those claims and back them up credibly.' Whether the law is truly effective, or just forcing companies to say less out of caution, is still unclear, but it's certainly brought more focus to the problem, said Chell. 'If the intent was to draw attention to greenwashing as an issue, I would say that that objective has certainly been achieved.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025. Ian Bickis, The Canadian Press
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Bank of Canada hoping for better look at ‘complicated' inflation picture
Bank of Canada Governor Tiff Macklem is seen during a news conference, in Ottawa, Wednesday, June 4, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld OTTAWA — The Bank of Canada will get a fresh look at national inflation figures this week — a picture that's been particularly murky as of late amid tax changes and trade wars. Statistics Canada is expected to publish its consumer price index for May on Tuesday. Financial data shows the consensus among economists is that inflation ticked up to 1.8 per cent year-over-year last month. April figures showed the annual inflation rate slowed sharply to 1.7 per cent, thanks largely to a drop in gasoline prices tied to the end of the consumer carbon price. Benjamin Reitzes, BMO's managing director of Canadian rates and macro strategist, said he expects inflation cooled two ticks to 1.5 per cent in May. He pointed to a slowing in shelter inflation and a smaller jump in gas prices compared with the same time last year for the easing. But it won't be just the headline number the Bank of Canada is parsing as it attempts to set its benchmark interest rate in an increasingly uncertain world. 'The reality is, they don't just look at one number. They look at a number of different inflation metrics to really try and figure out what the underlying trend is,' Reitzes said. Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem called the current inflation picture 'complicated' in a speech to the St. John's Board of Trade in Newfoundland and Labrador on Wednesday. The 'firmness' in underlying inflation lately might be early signs of the trade war with the United States impacting inflation, he said. The central bank has so far been dogged by uncertainty tied to the tariff dispute, holding its policy rate steady at 2.75 per cent twice in a row as it waits for clarity on how the trade restrictions will impact inflation. While the tariffs and counter-tariffs themselves are likely to drive up prices for businesses, it's not yet clear to the bank how quickly companies will pass those costs on to customers. Resulting slowdowns in the economy could also see businesses and consumers rein in spending, keeping inflationary pressures relatively tame. Katherine Judge, senior economist at CIBC Capital Markets, said inflation likely inched higher because of tariffs. 'The acceleration in the monthly pace will be largely tied to food prices that are picking up counter-tariff impacts and core goods prices that could begin to reflect broader tariffs,' she said in a note to clients on Friday. 'We expect rent inflation to decelerate after a surprising jump in April, and in line with industry data, leaning against food price increases.' Judge noted the upcoming inflation reading will reflect adjustments Statistics Canada made to its CPI basket, but said such changes don't usually have a meaningful impact on the headline number. Reitzes said it's been hard to pinpoint the impact of tariffs on the inflation data. 'The Bank of Canada is certainly watching for that, though,' he said. 'The army of economists they have working for them will be kind of teasing through all of that data and looking for any signs of that.' Food inflation has been a bit stronger in recent months, which Reitzes noted is one area where Canada is applying counter-tariffs. But he also said that could be a lagged impact from weakness in the Canadian dollar at the start of the year now filtering into food prices. Another source of noise in the inflation data is tax changes from the federal government in the early part of the year. First, Ottawa's two-month GST holiday skewed price data on a range of groceries, gifts and household staples, and now the end of the consumer carbon tax is driving down headline inflation. But that impact is only going to last for a year and will fall out of the inflation comparison after 12 months. Macklem said the central bank is increasingly putting weight on CPI measures that strip out influences from tax changes to give it some clarity. He noted Wednesday that inflation excluding taxes was 2.3 per cent in April — stronger than the central bank was expecting. Macklem also signalled Wednesday that the Bank of Canada is scrutinizing its own preferred measures of core inflation a little more closely. Those core inflation figures are now running above three per cent, but Macklem also warned there's 'potentially some distortion' that could be 'exaggerating' price pressures. Alternative measures of core inflation are coming in lower, so he said the bank is looking at a range of factors as it gauges where inflation is heading next. 'There is some unusual volatility. So how temporary or persistent this is, I think remains an open question,' Macklem said. The Bank of Canada will get a look at two inflation reports before its next interest rate decision on July 30. If inflation shows signs of remaining well contained in those releases, Reitzes said the Bank of Canada might find a window to lower interest rates to boost the economy in the face of tariffs. 'They'll probably take that opportunity, but inflation needs to provide them with that,' he said. 'And at the moment it is not doing so.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025. Craig Lord, The Canadian Press
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Carney travelling to Europe for security, defence talks with EU, NATO
Prime Minister Mark Carney greets NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alta., on Tuesday, June 17, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney will depart for Europe on Sunday for back-to-back summits where he is expected to make major commitments for Canada on security and defence. Carney will be joined by Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand, Defence Minister David McGuinty and secretary of state for defence procurement Stephen Fuhr at the EU and NATO summits, where military procurement and diversifying supply chains will top the agendas. The international meetings come as Canada looks to reduce its defence procurement reliance on the United States due to strained relations over tariffs and President Donald Trump's repeated talk about Canada becoming a U.S. state. Carney will fly first to Brussels, Belgium, starting the trip with a visit to the Antwerp Schoonselhof Military Cemetery where 348 Canadian soldiers are buried. He will also meet with Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, European Council President António Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. At the EU-Canada summit, Anand and McGuinty are expected to sign a security and defence agreement with the EU in what one European official described Friday as one of the most ambitious deals Europe has ever signed with a third country. The agreement will open the door to Canada's participation in the ReArm Europe initiative, allowing Canada to access a 150-billion-euro loan program for defence procurement, called Security Action for Europe. An EU official briefing reporters on Friday said once the procurement deal is in place, Canada will have to negotiate a bilateral agreement with the European Commission to begin discussions with member states about procurement opportunities. A Canadian official briefing reporters on the summit Saturday said the initial agreement will allow for Canada's participation in some joint procurement projects. However, a second agreement will be needed to allow Canadian companies to bid. At the EU-Canada summit, leaders are also expected to issue a joint statement to underscore a willingness for continued pressure on Russia, including through further sanctions, and call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. After Brussels, Carney heads to The Hague in the Netherlands for the NATO leaders' summit on Tuesday and Wednesday. There, Carney will meet with the King of the Netherlands and later with leaders of Nordic nations to discuss Arctic and transatlantic security. At the NATO summit, Carney will take part in bilateral meetings with other leaders. The summit agenda includes a social dinner hosted by the king and queen of the Netherlands and a two-and-a-half hour meeting of the North Atlantic Council. NATO allies are expected to debate a plan to hike alliance members' defence spending target to five per cent of national GDP. NATO data shows that in 2024, none of its 32 members spent that much. The Canadian government official who briefed reporters on background says the spending target and its timeline are still up for discussion, though some allies have indicated they would prefer a seven-year timeline while others favour a decade. Canada hasn't hit a five- per- cent defence spending threshhold since the 1950s and hasn't reached the two per cent mark since the late 1980s. NATO says that, based on its estimate of which expenditures count toward the target, Canada spent $41 billion in 2024 on defence, or 1.37 per cent of GDP. That's more than twice what it spent in 2014, when the two per cent target was first set; that year, Canada spent $20.1 billion, or 1.01 per cent of GDP, on defence. In 2014, only three NATO members achieved the two per cent target — the U.S., the U.K., and Greece. In 2025, all members are expected to hit it. Any agreement to adopt a new spending benchmark must be ratified by all 32 NATO member states. Former Canadian ambassador to NATO Kerry Buck told The Canadian Press the condensed agenda is likely meant to 'avoid public rifts among allies,' describing Trump as an 'uncertainty engine.' 'The national security environment has really, really shifted,' Buck said, adding allies next door to Russia face the greatest threats. 'There is a high risk that the U.S. would undercut NATO at a time where all allies are increasingly vulnerable.' Trump has suggested the U.S. might abandon its mutual defence commitment to the alliance if member countries don't ramp up defence spending. 'Whatever we can do to get through this NATO summit with few public rifts between the U.S. and other allies on anything, and satisfy a very long-standing U.S. demand to rebalance defence spending, that will be good for Canada because NATO's good for Canada,' Buck said. Carney has already made two trips to Europe this year — the first to London and Paris to meet with European allies and the second to Rome to attend the inaugural mass of Pope Leo XIV. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 22, 2025. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press
