Did RJ Mahvash go undercover to meet Yuzvendra Chahal amid dating rumours? Watch viral video

RJ Mahvash and Yuzvendra Chahal's rumoured romance continues to gain attention once again. This time, a video of Mahvash visiting his hotel on Thursday has surfaced online.
In the viral video, RJ Mahvash is seen hiding her face behind a hoodie and face mask to keep her appearance low-key. As she failed to conceal her identity, a photographer caught her quickly running towards the elevator.
However, the location of the hotel is not revealed yet.
As per a report of ETimes, she was in the hotel to meet her rumoured beau, Yuzvendra.
Chahal currently clashing with Virat Kohli's Royal Challengers Bengaluru at Qualifier 1 of the IPL. It is taking place at Chandigarh stadium. Tonight's winning team will straight head to the finals of IPL 2025.
RCB bowled out Punjab Kings for 101 in the match. Rajat Patidar opted to bowl against PBKS.
Meanwhile, RJ Mahvash is also cheering for Chahal tonight.
She has been travelling with Chahal almost throughout the IPL season and was spotted multiple times in the stands.
She even penned an appreciation note for Chahal after his first Punjab Kings vs CSK match, which took place on April 8. Sharing a picture with the cricketer, she shared on Instagram, "One for supporting your people through thick and thin and standing behind them like a rock! We are all here for you (sic)."
Recently, she was seen handing out with Punjab Kings co-owner Preity Zinta at the Rambagh Palace, Jaipur. She posted pictures with the Bollywood star on Instagram. In them, Mahvash wore a pink sharara set, while Preity stunned in a yellow attire.
Referring to Preity's iconic character from her hit film with Shah Rukh Khan, Veer Zaara, she wrote in the caption of the post: 'Isn't Zaara the most gorgeous? @realpz."
Yuzvendra and RJ Mahvash's dating rumours have been doing rounds on the internet for quite some time now.
He was previously married to dancer, and choreographer Dhanashree Verma. After they finalised their divorce, reports about RJ Mahvash and Yuzvendra's romance grew stronger.
Yuzvendra Chahal married Dhanashree in December 2020. They filed for divorce by mutual consent in a Mumbai court on February 5, 2025. He was ordered to pay Dhanashree ₹ 4.75 crore as alimony.
RJ Mahvash was last seen in Pyaar Paisa Profit.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Indian Express

an hour ago

• Indian Express

Kesari 2 isn't an ‘untold story', it's historical fiction that minimises Sankaran Nair's real-life contributions to the freedom struggle

Kesari Chapter 2, the film starring Akshay Kumar, directed by Karan Singh Tyagi, which released in theatres just a couple of months ago, centered its promotions on this being the 'untold story' of Jallianwala Bagh that had stayed hidden for over 100 years. The makers declared that the film was based on the events that happened after the massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, where thousands of innocent Indians died after Hitler-like General Reginald Dyer ordered his troops to fire at them without any warning. The events at Jallianwala Bagh were undeniably brutal and over 100 years later, Britain is yet to apologise for them. Kesari Chapter 2 reminds the audience that this apology is due but it does something else as well, it tries to rewrite the story of Sankaran Nair and in the process, it diminishes his actual contribution to the Indian freedom struggle. Nair was a hero, and he did fight against the British but there was never a case against General Dyer in any court in Amritsar. Kesari Chapter 2 claims to be the 'untold story of Jallianwala Bagh' but the fact is, that this courtroom battle never took place. Kesari Chapter 2 claims to be based on the book written by Sankaran Nair's third generation, Raghu Palat and Pushpa Palat, titled 'The Case That Shook the Empire' but upon examining this book, and the autobiography of Nair, it is evident that the acclaimed barrister was never in a trial against General Dyer but Kesari Chapter 2 tries to rewrite history as its actors and director go around claiming that history books aren't doing a good enough job. The disclaimer that Kesari 2 is essentially a work of fiction doesn't go far enough given the publicity material has tagged the film as 'the untold story'. Sankaran Nair was a member of the Viceroy's Council, and saw himself as an ally to the then-Viceroy of India, Lord Chelmsford. But soon after the massacre at Jallianwala Bagh, which was not appropriately reported by the press because of the severe press censorship implemented in Amritsar, Nair was shocked to find out the barbaric acts carried out by Dyer and his men. 'If to govern the country, it is necessary that innocent persons should be slaughtered at Jallianwala Bagh and that any Civilian Officer may, at any time, call in the military and the two together may butcher the people as at Jallianwala Bagh, the country is not worth living in,' he wrote in his autobiography. ALSO READ | Kesari Chapter 2: Akshay Kumar's courtroom drama accidentally exposes Bollywood's handling of sexual misconduct Nair expected Lord Chelmsford to criticise this episode but when he saw that no one in the British administration was willing to speak against the brutal massacre, he resigned from his position in the Viceroy's Council. His resignation shocked the British administration as prior to this, they saw Nair as a loyal ally. After his resignation, Lieutenant Governor of Punjab, Michael O'Dwyer, immediately revoked orders for press censorship in the state and martial law was called off. It was Nair's resignation that led to the formation of the Hunter Commission, which looked into the barbaric acts at the Jallianwala Bagh. The Hunter Commission was a seven-member committee composed of four British and three Indians that conducted interviews all over India, met with eyewitnesses of the massacre and also interviewed General Dyer. As per The Case That Shook the Empire, Dyer accepted that he 'planned the shooting at Jallianwala Bagh in advance' and he had no intentions of scattering the crowd because they were violating the curfew. 'More damning was his admission that he would have used machine guns and armoured cars if it had been possible,' it read. Dyer also confessed that he made the conscious choice to leave the wounded to die. This was the only time when Dyer was made to appear in front of a body that was investigating the massacre, and here, he shamelessly admitted his dastardly acts. Kesari Chapter 2 would have you believe that Dyer was made to stand in court while a former ally to the crown, Nair, badgered him with questions, but this never happened. Hunter Commission submitted its findings and declared that Dyer's actions were a 'grave error.' The crown did not wish to punish Dyer as it was seen that he had 'averted another mutiny' and so, he wasn't court-martialled or dismissed. But, they could not have him in India due to the growing resistance against him, and so, he was shipped off to England in April 1920. ALSO READ | Even as Akshay Kumar's Kesari Chapter 2 shows an imagined past, it ends up confronting the present While Reginald Dyer was the man on ground in Jallianwala Bagh, his superior was Michael O'Dwyer, who was the Lieutenant Governor of Punjab at the time. It was O'Dwyer who gave Dyer enough power that he could implement whatever laws he saw fit. At one point, Dyer ordered people to crawl through the streets of Amritsar, and he was empowered to do so by O'Dwyer. The events at Jallianwala Bagh shocked those Indians who, until then, enjoyed British aristocracy and had received knighthood from them. Rabindranth Tagore gave up his knighthood and Nair left his job with the crown and started working as the Diwan of Indore, which was a princely state then. It was here, in 1922, that he wrote a book titled Gandhi and Anarchy. Nair 'did not believe that non-violence, non-cooperation and civil disobedience was the way for India to achieve Home Rule' and he expressed the same in his book. Here, Nair also implied that Michael O'Dwyer was just as responsible as Reginald Dyer for the massacre in Punjab. 'Nair implied the Punjab atrocities were committed with O'Dwyer's full knowledge and approval,' the book read. When O'Dwyer got his hands on this book in England, he decided to sue Nair for defamation, as he had claimed innocence for the atrocities in Punjab. Sardar Udham Singh eventually assassinated Michael O'Dwyer in 1940. But in Kesari Chapter 2, O'Dwyer is reduced to a supporting character who can be seen making backroom deals but is nowhere on Nair's radar. ALSO READ | FIR lodged against film Kesari Chapter 2 for 'distorting historical facts' after police complaint in Bengal The real-life case was no less than a movie, even though the filmmakers chose not to make a movie on this. O'Dwyer claimed innocence and was 'offended' with Nair's accusations. He demanded that Nair withdraw his book, offer him an apology and damages worth £1,000. Nair, obviously, refused to bow down and was ready to go to trial. He weighed his pros and cons before making this decision. The biggest pro here was that the trial would be held in London, and the press would be covering it. With this, Nair had the opportunity of talking about the massacre at Jallianwala Bagh in front of the English press, and this was the only way the higher-ups in the British government and the locals of the country would get to know how Britain was treating its subjects in India. But, there were some major cons as well. The trial would be presided by an English judge and the judgment would be made by an English jury, and chances were, that they would support O'Dwyer because he was one of them. Nair also did not have the opportunity of presenting his witnesses in person, and would only get a chance to read out their testimony, that could be misinterpreted by foreigners. All of his disadvantages would be advantageous for O'Dwyer but he decided to fight this battle anyway. Even though the trial was was held in England, Dyer did not attend a day in court on account of his ill health so Nair never really confronted him in any court, which is the base of Kesari Chapter 2. ALSO READ | Dharma's creative head responds to Kesari 2 director's comments on film blending fact, fiction: 'Masterclass for Philistines' Nair went through many troubles while preparing for this trial. The first barrister he hired to represent him was promoted to Attorney General, so he quit. The second barrister he hired quit just a day prior. And so, in desperate times, he had to hire Sir Walter Schwabe, a former Chief Justice of the Madras High Court. Schwabe was a learned man but wasn't a trial lawyer, and thus, wasn't cut out for such court battles. In the book written by his grandson, it is questioned why Nair didn't represent himself, but there is no explanation provided for the same. 'It is unclear as to why Nair did not choose to defend himself when Simon withdrew. He would have certainly acquitted himself better than Schwabe who was not as experienced, strong or as knowledgeable about the case,' it read. Nair vs O'Dwyer began in April 30, 1924, almost five years after Jallianwala Bagh massacre and the case went on for nearly five and a half weeks, presided by Justice Henry McCardie. Nair's case was about O'Dwyer being aware of Dyer's actions in Amritsar but after the opening remarks, McCardie, who had blind faith in the British Empire and considered himself to be superior, turned it into an evaluation of Dyer's actions, as he repeatedly insisted that Dyer had to shoot at people to avoid a mutiny. The case was no longer about O'Dwyer's involvement but about justifying the barbaric acts of Dyer in the name of saving the Empire. McCardie was supposed to be an impartial judge, but he acted like he was a lawyer for O'Dwyer. Together, they painted a picture where they made the jury believe that Amritsar was in a volatile state when the events at Jallianwala Bagh happened only to avoid a mutiny. All the facts presented by Nair's lawyer fell on deaf ears and they couldn't convince the jury of the truth. But, even at the end, there was a chance that there could be a mistrial as the jury could not come to a unanimous verdict. McCardie did not want this case to go for another trial so he asked both parties if they would be comfortable with a majority vote, which means that the side getting the most votes from the jury would win the case. By this time, Nair was tired. His grandson said in his book, 'Nair was tired. The case had originally been filed in the middle of 1922. Two years had passed and, during this time, the case had entirely consumed him. He wanted it to end and to get on with his life. For Nair, it had never been about the money. He had fought this case because he had been asked to give a public apology for a claim he had made in his book – a claim he believed to be true. He had refused to apologise then and instead had chosen to fight the case in an English court. Now that an apology had not been demanded, he felt vindicated.' The terms of the case were now modified as it was mutually decided that the one who won would get £500 plus legal fees. Nair demanded that if O'Dwyer lost, he would apologise to those he wronged in Punjab, and he agreed. However, Nair lost the case, 11-1. He was now held guilty for defaming O'Dwyer. He was asked that if he gave an apology now, the monetary compensation would be ignored but Nair was ready to pay, and firmly refused to issue an apology. Nair, who had spent years working with the British, was disillusioned by the British justice system after this case. He refused to go to trial again, as he was certain that the British would not let their own people down. While Nair was a vocal critic of Mahatma Gandhi, he wrote about Nair's trial in Young India on June 12, 1924, 'By accepting Sir Michael O'Dwyer's challenge, Sir Sankaran Nair has put the British constitution and the British people on trial. They have been tried and found wanting. Even in this simple matter, a man of Sir Sankaran Nair's proved loyalty could not get justice,' the Mahatma wrote. Sankaran Nair is a man whose story deserves to be known by Indians all over the world for he truly fought an impossible fight and even though he wasn't victorious, he was an important part of India's awakening against the British. Most real-life stories are slightly modified when they are adapted in movies, but if one changes the central conflict and the verdict, then it's not even a real story anymore. Kesari Chapter 2 is historical fiction in the garb of an 'untold story'. Sampada Sharma has been the Copy Editor in the entertainment section at Indian Express Online since 2017. ... Read More

First Post

an hour ago

• First Post

'He makes his own plans': India coach opens up on Rishabh Pant's unique century

Rishabh Pant scored a measured century on Day 2 of the 1st Test against England at Headingley. After the close of play, Indian coach spoke about Pant's approach and lauded his skills. Despite India's strong showing with the bat, England managed to bounce back by causing a mini-collapse towards the end. read more India's batting coach Sitanshu Kotak praised Rishabh Pant for his brilliant century on Day 2 of the first Test against England at Headingley. Kotak said that Pant's knock was a bit different from his usual explosive style but lauded the wicketkeeper-batter for helping India post a strong total. Pant smashed 134 off 178 balls , hitting 12 fours and six sixes, and looked in complete control for most of his innings. He joined Shubman Gill (147) and Yashasvi Jaiswal (101) as the third Indian centurion in the innings. Kotak acknowledged that Pant is someone who makes his plans when it comes to batting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Rishabh Pant is someone who makes his own plans. He decides how to play and then he goes for it,' Kotak said at the press conference after stumps. 'This innings was a little different than what you normally see from him. But that's his plan. Just because he plays aggressive cricket doesn't mean he cannot play defensive.' India had started the day strongly, with Gill and Pant helping the side go past 400 . However, things fell apart quickly after both set batters were dismissed in quick succession. After that, India lost seven wickets for just 41 runs. Kotak spoke about the collapse and said that the team could have done better towards the end. 'It was a bit of a collapse, I would say, because batsmen were also there. From 430 for three to 471 all out, batsmen also got out in it, isn't it? So, it wasn't only the last five; it was a bit of a collapse. We were expecting better than that, but it can happen,' he said. Kotak lauds Shubman Gill Kotak said a busy calendar in the last few months did not give him a lot of time to work with skipper Shubman Gill, who he thought has worked on certain areas since the end of Australia tour. 'After Australia (tour) he has thought (about) certain things which he implemented,' Kotak said. 'Because after (the) Australia (tour) and England series (followed by) Champions Trophy and then we had IPL, I wouldn't say that I had a lot of time to do things (with Gill).' 'But obviously, he worked on certain things and as soon as I saw him in the nets, I did speak to him that 'you made certain changes' and he said yes. A lot of credit to him for analysing what he needs to do and I think he did it really well,' Kotak said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Kotak dismissed complacency in India's approach given that they ended the first day's play in a commanding position at 359 for three. 'I don't think I saw complacency. But I think after 350 for three, you expect to get a big score because that time you are sitting in a comfortable position. I don't think people were satisfied at all,' he said. 'It is just (how) they (England) bowled well and (there were also a) couple of soft dismissals. 'After losing the toss the way we batted it was very good because at Headingley, normally on Day One, a lot of wickets get taken by the bowling side and results also show the same so we batted well on the first day,' he added. Kotak on Bumrah's wicket off a no-ball In the final minutes of the second day's play, Jasprit Bumrah (3/48) overstepped on a delivery which he had Harry Brook caught at midwicket. 'Normally, it doesn't happen, but it was a bit unfortunate. But I think, as a group of support staff or as a team also, it is one of those things which happen,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We have been bowling well, apart from little patches where we (gave away) a few runs. All in all, it was very good and the wicket is also looking good; something (is) happening off the wicket,' he said. (With agency inputs)

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

‘Kuberaa' box office collections day 2: Dhanush's thriller holds strong; mints Rs 30.75 cr

Dhanush's latest thriller 'Kuberaa' is enjoying a healthy run at the box office, showing strong momentum on its second day. According to early estimates from Sacnilk, the film collected Rs 16 crore (India net) on Day 2 (Saturday, June 21), taking its two-day total to Rs 30.75 crore across all languages. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A steady growth Reportedly, 'Kuberaa' had opened on a solid note with a Rs 14.75 crore India net collection on Day 1. This was led by strong numbers in the Telugu (Rs 10 Cr) and Tamil (Rs 4.5 Cr) markets. The film saw a positive jump on Saturday. It earned an additional Rs 16 crore. The film was largely driven by increased occupancy in Telugu-speaking regions. Occupancy rates The film registered impressive occupancy rates in major languages on Saturday. Telugu occupancy stood at an overall 66.19%, with night shows peaking at 83.67%. Tamil version saw moderate traction. 'Kuberaa' clocked 35.89% overall occupancy, which picked up during evening and night shows. Hindi version saw a gradual rise from morning (4.68%) to night (19.91%) shows, and it reported a modest 10.87% occupancy. Kuberaa Review: Dhanush & Nagarjuna Deliver Fireworks | Rashmika's Surprise Act | Fans React What's next for the Dhanush starrer? Etimes gave the film a rating of 3.5 stars and our review reads," Kuberaa is not your usual commercial potboiler—and that's precisely what makes it worth a watch." 'Kuberaa' features Dhanush, Nagarjuna Akkineni, Rashmika Mandanna, Jim Sarbh, and Dalip Tahil. The film is directed by Sekhar Kammula. 'Kuberaa' is set for a strong first weekend. If it maintains this momentum, the film could emerge as one of the biggest South Indian hits of 2025's second half. On the other hand, Dhanush was last seen in the action drama movie 'Raayan' which received good reviews from the audiences.